DrugsBunny

If I wanted to plug 5-MeO-DMT would I use the freebase or the HCL? I would much rather try 5-MeO-MALT but I cannot find it anywhere, at least not through a vendor I would trust. So I'll have to try the much harsher seeming 5-MeO-DMT. Does plugging make the come up easier? How long would you be waiting for the come-up if you plugged it?

A moderator exposing his bare ass for all to see. ?? Nothing I said denotes that I believed anything different lol my dude, are you okay? Yeah, no shit they're just doing it for monetary security. What kind of deranged mental gymnastics have you concocted to convince yourself that I said anything different? Are you having a medical emergency? Lmao, a fucking child.

That feeling when you fully know that you have no substantive merit to engage with the actual discussion matter, so you defer to some baseless conservative aphorism in lieu of mustering an actual response to the devastating defeat that your arguments just suffered. EDIT: So first you falsely admonish the left for supposedly forcing Hasbro's hand otherwise they suffer monetary loss, then when it's literally shown that your side is causing that exact phenomenon, you laugh it off as "go woke, go broke lul". This is just unforgivably stupid, embarrassingly inconsistent and outright devoid of any modicum of intellectual integrity. I knew you were never a serious person with any semblance of a respectable thought-process, but this is just pathetic.

@Roy Admittedly knows nothing of the case but already has mind made up that the woke mob forced Hasbro's hand ?. Quite the opposite... Hasbro yielded to conservative backlash and reversed the decision very quickly. It's interesting how self-assured you are in matters which you admittedly know nothing about. Now that we know it was actually the angry mob of inbred conservatives who forced their hand, will you concede that you've misinterpreted the political climate in favor of anti-LGBT sentiment while scapegoating leftists as the cancelation catalysts? There are plenty examples of this shit, I'm sure you're familiar with the Bud Light boycotts or more recently the Target boycotts, and now even the Chick Fil-A boycotts https://www.delish.com/food-news/a44156455/chick-fil-a-boycott/ Chick Fil-A is literally under attack by conservatives just for hiring a VP of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion... Target is under attack for having shirts with rainbows on them, and Bud Light just for having a trans woman do a couple ads. Which side is the ludicrous angry mob again? No matter how thoroughly I expose your perspective as ass-backwards you'll still stick to your convictions with your head in the sand. It's very sad to watch.

Trump literally disbanded the national pandemic response team before covid, persistently dismissed covid's seriousness as a 'liberal hoax', and once the pandemic had ravaged countless lives he took action to diminish covid testing, willing to sacrifice human life to preserve his public perception regarding covid numbers... What kind of gullible mental patient looks past this heinous shit?

This is pure delusion. You've fallen and can't get up. Nobody is talking to kids about gay sex.. ANYWHERE. Conservative propaganda has you foolishly convinced that this fervor is being fueled by the left. When Hasbro rebranded their "Mr. Potato Head" item to "Potato Head" conservatives absolutely lost their shit. How can something so innocuous, so incontestably harmless possibly provoke an entire political group's fervorous call-to-arms as predictably as it did? Notice how my mere response stating it's not a good look to call gay acceptance a "mind virus" has you frothing at the mouth spewing paragraphs of asinine drivel. The truth is, conservatives are the ones adding fuel to the fire, much like yourself here, the pattern persists: bigot says something obnoxious, then a leftist points it out only to be scapegoated as the catalyst of the fervor. Embarrassingly ass-backwards interpretation. ??

Some overweight guy is fed up with inbred homophobes, haha he's fat "is this you bruh?" so juvenile.

@Zedman Heterosexual preferences are already taught to children, which is innately sexual, you've just been trained to see it as normal. According to the conservative narrative, a cartoon of a man and woman kissing is fine and innocent, but if it were two guys then it's lambasted as sexual indoctrination even though the focus is exclusively on the romantic affinity and nothing sexual. Literally nobody is talking to kids about gay sex, this is a complete lie made up by hate-filled inbreeders.

10/10 excellent bait. I like how saying "It's okay to not be heterosexual" is a mind virus in your worldview. My guy @Roy would have been against the 1964 civil rights act if he lived in this period, 100% no doubt about it.

Sickeningly stupid thread.

The idea that American conservatives wouldn't kill queers if the broader aspects of society allowed for it is very naive.

You have more patience than I do. A noble quality, good for you.

"Take an L" is just inadvertent language being used to admit fault in a bad assumption here. Cringing at your own misinterpretation, I cannot fathom a greater cringe. Coming from the "all studies are fake" guy this doesn't hold much weight. I've presented every reason why I hold the positions I do, and you haven't responded to those, you just concocted some vague response towards the overall idea that someone would defend trans people. The fact you can't see your own bullshit is surprising and sadly discrediting. They're too afraid to ban me. This guy wishes he was a mod so bad lol.

@Godhead I was bound to take an L eventually. Sincere apologies; I am very used to being maligned in regards to this topic, and your language, I think you would admit, is a bit difficult to distinguish from an attack as it was worded.

My perspective is substantiated with extensive scientific data, a process perhaps beyond your comprehension. Imagine being the last pawn of a human centipede, but in your case it's an intellectual downpour of regurgitated bigotry until it eventually reaches its final vessel, @Godhead who himself cannot even muster a semblance of the original excrement's quality, so he just settles for baseless insults as he has no substance to put forth as an actual counter-argument.

It's existed for over 100 years, multiple generations, and surprise, surprise -- had its most notable opposition under Nazi Germany's oppressive ruling. How long are we supposed to excuse repugnant ignorance, and at what cost? There is a significant elevation in systematic discrimination towards trans people today, and it is NOT a stretch to call it genocidal ideation considering the INSANE anti-trans bills that are being proposed. There is obviously a level of incongruity that is evoked by less 'passable' transgender people, but understand you're admitting that your disgust response plays a role in your political regard towards the demographic as a whole, which is by definition transphobia. You can perhaps make a case that calling people transphobic will not fare well in persuading them, but don't use this as an excuse to dismiss trans advocacy as a whole simply because more accepting people are unsympathetic towards your prejudice. Are you serious? Yeah obviously, it's a serious affliction that can lead to suicide. I don't understand why you would say this.. Of course it warrants concern, that's why I advocate for gender affirming care... This is just -- I'm so disappointed in your logic lately, just wow. -___- has it ever occurred to you that fuck you.. I say that in jest, no ban hammer needed; understand I find it extremely dishonest that you're framing it this way, and it's particularly frustrating coming from the founder of Actualized who everyone here has at least some reverence and respect towards, which lends undue credence to your words when it is not earned in this case. Nobody is encouraging people to undergo the extremely stigmatizing process of sex reassignment surgery on a whim. All I have done is cite studies demonstrating the objective truth that gender affirming care leads to positive mental health outcomes for people suffering from gender dysphoria. I seriously hate that you would frame it this way, it's like, forreal, you seriously have some unchecked biases.

@Israfil First, you incorrectly declare that the article does not compare people not using puberty blockers (implying you read the whole thing, as you claimed to have read the "entire" previous study) then once it's shown that the article does compare both groups, your next reflexive defensive error is highlighting the following quote: All of this still falls under gender affirming care. Nothing has changed. It cannot be confidently declared that puberty blockers are the sole cause of better mental health, I never said it was. But It's undeniable that the overall process of gender affirming care, including the possibility of using puberty blockers, is the explicit cause of these favorable health outcomes. I already addressed this, but predictably you chose not to respond. "Gender affirming care, a scientifically substantiated and highly cautious medical process, is not so embarrassingly reckless that it simply affords any kid with sex reassignment surgery merely because "they say they want to"... ?? There is extensive psychological screening and laborious safety precautions that go into assuring a beneficial decision can be made. " It's as if you actually think that some boy somewhere opts for a pink icing donut over a blue one, and immediately a horde of indoctrinated leftists storms their front door with a rusty meat cleaver to castrate some innocent child and hoist up their dismembered privates as a trophy of trans acceptance... It doesn't work that way, the process is strenuous, and the child is not a final authority on the ultimate decision. Some people, (mostly adult males) do not have the ideal facial/body structure to sufficiently 'pass' as their preferred gender, which obviously makes an earlier transition the more favorable approach. The facts are incontrovertible, gender affirming care is the most feasible solution to addressing gender dysphoria case closed.

So embarrassing. Dude literally said he read the "entire thing".. Such insecurity in your position that you felt the need to lie about such a thing. I wouldn't even necessarily expect you to read all of it. Just get a general grasp on the methodology used then comprehend how the conclusion logically follows, but no, your insecurities forced you to forge an obvious lie. Do not respond to this thread anymore, just see yourself out.

@integral I am being mercilessly bombarded with intentional senselessness. Read the actual shit Leo said to me and tell me this is an intelligent good-faith actor.. Wasn't even worth responding to but it does set the tone for my temperament. Read the onslaught of asinine drivel I actually bothered responding to. Guy literally brought up puberty blockers framing them as a negative, so I cited a contradictory study. Then he forgets that he's the one who brought up puberty blockers and pompously insists that the undeniable correlation between favorable mental health outcomes and usage of puberty blockers doesn't account for people who.. didn't take puberty blockers (?? yeah no shit.. are you kidding me?) all while proudly declaring that I don't know how science works... Words cannot begin to describe the relentless affront towards rational sensibilities that this level of ineptitude serves as. I'm not exaggerating for the sake of performative cruelty, but this unyielding lack of wits is literally evocative of the existentially threatening possibility that other beings have no actual consciousness of their own. I'm not simply lashing out to be mean, I'm using the precise language that accurately reflects the unsettling philosophical conundrum that is evoked by such a comedically absurd commitment to stupidity.

You mean to tell me a study that observes how puberty blockers affect mental health only focuses on people who used puberty blockers? Yeah, no shit... We're discussing puberty blockers ?? Lmfao, you have freed me. I have been disillusioned from the misjudgment that you'd actually pose a halfway worthy response. Literal child's play... This guy is so neurotically invested in preserving his anti-trans delusions that he's managed to convince himself that the final determination of a peer-reviewed study somehow intentionally strays from the logical conclusions of the actual assessments conducted. There is no winning with such a person, a blind ideologue who has sold his soul for trivial recompense, forever dammed to mindlessly play devil's advocate for pitiful dogma. A true argument for solipsism, as surely no actual consciousness resides in such an obviously undiscerning drone.

@Leo Gura Is this a joke? Am I supposed to derive humor from the unacknowledged futility in citing a statistic on false studies which itself sounds made-up on the spot? This is why I'm arrogant, because my claims are substantiated and the opposition is.. stuff like this:

You forgot to read the actual CONCLUSION section of this study. Bruh this is so common, conservatives be citing quotes from studies and conveniently leaving out that the CONCLUSION states precisely what they didn't want to hear. Yes, there is some subjectivity regarding assessement of regret, but even if the regret rate were higher, it would still be relatively low compared to the regret rate of LITERALLY ANY OTHER BODY MODIFYING SURGERY... Let's go over these false assumptions about hormone blockers. Unbiased research will always affirm the pro-trans narrative, despite how uncomfortable this might make you. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7073269/ So right off the bat we know incontestably that puberty blockers are associated with favorable mental health outcomes, which is the whole point of using them, regardless of any unsubstantiated side effects, which even if true, these detriments would be weighed against the positive outcomes associated with puberty blockers and overall this approach still leads to favorable outcomes. You've clearly exaggerated the extent to which side effects are associated with puberty blockers, but let's just say the side effects are considerable. Cancer treatment certainly has more egregious side effects than puberty blockers, but you wouldn't deny someone treatment for this reason. This situation is similar except you don't lend as much concern to gender dysphoria because your unfamiliarity makes you unable to gauge the severity of the mental discomfort the affliction can cause. Obviously the decision between an afflicted kid, their family and their healthcare provider would take these factors into account before signing off on sex transitioning. It's unreal that I even have to explain this honestly. Lol this is one of my favorite conservative dismissal tactics, just dismiss the conclusions of any unfavorable study because they're insatiably incredulous of the assessment's methodology. As if it's that complicated to ask people if the surgery has made them more comfortable or not. Some people, mostly adult males transitioning to female, simply don't have the ideal facial or body structure to pull off a passable transition (which is why earlier transitioning is obviously nececssary), so their "regret" would only be based on the incongurity between their physical likeness and their preference which is, uhh, oh yeah -- what they already suffer from.. My guy, the surveys are from 2021... People here are so deeply invested in preserving their preconceived beliefs, it's insane... What kind of counterarguement is that?! __________________________________________________________________ All the anti-trans nonsense has been thoroughly debunked and eviscerated to oblivion in the assessments made above, but notice how nobody will budge even an inch despite having their arguments torn limb from limb. If these arguments had a physical body they would be licking their festering wounds and praying for the sweet release of death after such an unyielding defeat, but somehow they just won't die...

Yes, @Danioover9000 obviously cited the shooting first, otherwise there would be no reason for me to present the refutation. He has denied this twice even though it was visibly verifiable. This is simply a case of untreated mental illness and I'm surprised moderation is so careless that they allow an unstable psychoneurosis victim to fester in chronic delusions via their unrestricted use of this forum. It's not healthy for him or the community. @Roy Studies show conservatives are happier and studies show left-leaning people are more intelligent. Ignorance is bliss, nothing new here. I do find it funny that you chose to defer to this vacuous speculation in lieu of addressing my response to your absurd accusation that I am disrespecting victims of Nazism. I'll repeat myself, there's a reason why we distinguish the original Nazis from modern day "neo-nazis" which is the term I used. Are you willing to sheepishly deny that ideological tenets of original Nazism have survived to this day? Is your position that anyone who merely refers to these ideological successors is a "sucked in idiot" as you put it? ?? Nobody is disrespecting original victims of Nazis by acknowledging that modern day neo-nazis exist. Such drivel.

You are lost. Another hapless victim led astray by modern anti-trans fervor. Gender affirming care, a scientifically substantiated and highly cautious medical process, is not so embarrassingly reckless that it simply affords any kid with sex reassignment surgery merely because "they say they want to"... ?? There is extensive psychological screening and laborious safety precautions that go into assuring a beneficial decision can be made. Here's an idea, one I'm sure you're too ideologically stubborn to consider: Why not actually research the regret rates for sex reassignment surgery?

@Leo Gura I live in Vegas. This is my humble requests for some spots in Las Vegas for both day and night game. Kinda hoping Leo just says "Get you own list, you lazy degenerate" and forces me to dedicate more effort to the cause, but if such a strict scolding isn't warranted I'll gladly accept the easier approach of just copying any spots Leo doesn't mind sharing.