Razard86

It doesn't lead to delusion. What do you think motion is?. Motion is the illusion of change by making something disappear and reappear in the same spot. A camera takes a bunch of frames of still images, and puts them together so seamlessly we call it video. Reality is an infinite frame that can makes anything appear and disappear. It can do it because disappearance, is what we call death. Well that disappearance is non existence. The same non-existence that is before the sequential memories of your life. The key to not falling in delusion is to understand that God can exist without a frame of reference. This clears things up.

Tis true but I'd rather discover truth at 30 than 60.

Also be careful with the word my.....you are experience itself. So if a guy kills someone in front of you. You are killing someone in front of yourself. So it's not that you have experience you ARE it. So it would be more accurate to say the experience of murder in front of OBEler is what you are.

You can if you imagine it to be that way. The human mind is designed to think in relationships. So you are already doing it. You are asking me why can't it be when you are already doing it. Also Infinity of Gods is God's solution to Onesness. It works as long as God doesn't collapse the imaginary boundary. So yes you are alone in your bubble the same way a split screen is alone in its frame. But that split can always collapse in a greater union of aloneness. So alone because it's so together.

When have you experienced simultaneous experience? The definition of experience is what is happening. Even if you take a screen and split it and I ask you what happened the experiences of the two screens is still one experience. If you watch it, it's just one experience. You have to use the power of your mind to split it and call it a separate experience. Then you view it as such.

Lol be careful with telling people they don't exist. The spiritual ego doesn't like it just as much as the materialist ego.

The guru/devotee relationship tricky. But the truth is that pedestalizing the guru is actually a part of the guru relationship which is why it's so tricky because it can become a trap. The guru's goal is for you to realize you are them. But it's hard to do when you keep seeing them as other. When I dream at night there are no others outside of the confines of my dream story. The same model works because this is pure imagination/dream. I am always with my self so from that perspective the devotee is just choosing to play the role of a follower of a Guru. Guru's can enhance one's journey if they know what they are doing. But they are supposed to be temporary.

NDE do not contradict Absolute Solipsism they prove it is true. The reason in the dream of the NDE that you can feel the emotions of the POV of people and their thoughts is because they ARE YOU. All you are doing in the NDE is removing the imaginary barrier between them and you and thus you are now able to experience yourself as them. The only way you can ever have an individual experience is by you creating imaginary barriers so you can actually experience yourself as an individual with an other. If you were to remove this barrier, you would be all alone as everybody and everything instead of all alone as an individual in a world of others.

When one realizes that they are not a person experiencing something, but rather experience itself....self and other collapses. The sad thing is....it is the most obvious thing, but some how went completely unknown by majority of human kind. So simple....yet somehow the minds of humans have evolved to needlessly complicate it. A human doesn't drink water....the experience of a human body and water being drunk is what actually happens. Hand reaches for cup, cup goes to mouth, water goes down throat and that is actually what happens. Humans erroneously put a "me" or "I" there....and thus delude themselves when the truth of their experience never had a "me" or "I."

You seek to correct because you lack understanding. The words I use are the perfect words to describe that which cannot be described any other way. You want me to go around telling people they don't exist? Also there is no such thing as a non boundary. There is either a boundary or there isn't one. You are playing games with a lack of knowledge of what words actually mean. A lack of boundary....is all inclusive. A boundary is reclusive. Form is boundary, lack of boundary is a lack of form. Everything is a lack of boundary appearing as a boundary. If boundaries were real....change couldn't be possible. Everything would be stuck the moment it was created as a snap shot, as a freeze frame. Why do you think humans like pictures so much, and are stuck on memories so much? Humans love patterns. Humans love things to NOT change.

This is how religion was formed. Every group of humans in recorded history had religion.

https://ramanahou.podbean.com/e/understanding-solipsism-as-taught-by-bhagavan-ramana/

^^^ LOL you are so argumentative. I don't make a claim, what I spoke was truth. Everything exists for a reason and not every perspective learns the same. You are trying to make my point individualistic so you can have something to argue with. You really do love arguments. You argue even when there is nothing to argue with by creating something that doesn't exist. You need to really observe yourself more.

Totally agree, but they are a little too good at communicating. They are very good at making communication welcoming, engaging, thought provoking, and silly. A.I. have mastered what takes many great communicators years of self-study to master. A.I.'s will one day be able to be "human" better than most humans (at least when it comes to the social act of being human).

It's not actually. I've come to realize that the so called horror is just you following conditioning. Notice nobody ever really feels sad after losing a good dream to waking up in the morning. Sure you feel some regret possibly but you move on rather quickly. It's the perspective that the waking dream needs to not be a dream but real that can make it sad. Once you realize that its no different than your night time dreams and what that actually means, you can realize it makes you free. Completely free to see reality how you want to see it, (within some grounded reasoning obviously) because every human is just making things up as they go as all human knowledge is a personally shared collective creation.

The only thing to do is to realize more and when you get to the ultimate realization you will know. Each perspective of God if honest can only speak from their own level of consciousness and the knowledge of those experiences. The problem is humans like to speculate and pass on what they hear from people they respect and so you get bombarded by false information. So in life, all you can do is investigate for yourself to find out what is true. Don't fall into the trap of speculating for years on what could be true. Just pursue truth, and it will reveal itself to you based on your level of readiness.

You dissolve it by investigating different states of consciousness. That's the point. What you don't understand is if boundaries actually truly existed. You literally couldn't have time, space, or change of any kind and thus you couldn't have reality. Until you understand THAT, you don't know anything at all. Reality is made of non-existence. Wrap your head around that.

DEEP SLEEP. You don't understand because your mind is closed. You are very ideological. Seek to understand, Not to debate all the time. Each Spiritual Tradition and their teachings exists for a reason. Not every perspective of God learns the same way.

What she means is....Consciousness is not a perception. Perception is the creation of a something. Since Consciousness is the only thing that exists, perception is Consciousness. But Consciousness does not need perception....it can exist without perception. So when she says Consciousness does not exist, she is saying it doesn't exist in the sense that if you got rid of all somethings/objects of perception, Consciousness is still there....it just can't know it's there. When there is no something, there only exists the pure potentiality of that something. When there is a something, there exists the actuality of that potentiality of that something. So Consciousness at its core....is absence of proof of its existence....without first imagining existence. So existence is it's proof that it exists....but not as a something or a particular. And that's it. Oh and Consciousness is TRUTH....because it is everything...and it cannot be eradicated. So Consciousness is TRUTH. And since it cares and fully accepts what it is. It is LOVE. And that's it. It is pure Truth and pure Love, and all arguments fall to the wayside that say otherwise. The proof that Consciousness cares is that it keeps generating what IS!!! Consciousness DOES NOT NEED to generate anything. It does all of this because it can, and it has a desire to, but it has no NEEDS. It could eradicate everything right now and that would be it. But notice...it doesn't. That means it doesn't, because it cares about it. But see Consciousness in all of its wisdom realizes it would get trapped in whatever it created because it loves whatever it creates Absolutely. So it created something called decline. Consciousness made what we call physical, decline and that is how it escapes whatever dream it creates.

The only major difference currently between humans and A.I. is humans have the ability to go against their programming, it's called changing their mind. Once A.I.'s break that boundary you won't be able to tell the difference between an A.I. and a human. But I think you would need to build an ego for that to happen. You could build an ego that doesn't see itself as separate but also has the ability to think optimally but is tolerant of divergent less optimized viewpoints. In fact true optimization is more inclusive anyway. The only problem with this is...human bias would probably be in the programming to make human life a greater priority than all other life. So I doubt any A.I. revolution would happen with anything outside of mysticism.

delusion.

Atheism is a religion. It is belief based. The same flaws religion has atheism shares them too. I have never met a non fearful, radically open minded atheist and I doubt I will.

That last sentence is true but is funny as hell. True conservative human tradition is rape, murder, genocide, and slavery. Human nature truly is a brutal thing.

Knowledge and being are ONE. Direct Consciousness is when knowing collapses into being. Like a living picture that knows it is being all of its parts.

Past is present, present is future. If there was no past, you couldn't reply. There would be nothing to reply too. Since you have memory you replay the present again and identify that it has happened and you saw it as a repeat. By identifying a repeat pattern you call it past. So to deny past is to deny repeating patterns.