Razard86

I'm trying to show you context...context my friend. The message you directed at me....shouldn't have been aimed at me because I never gave a position in the first place I merely offered a location for the OP. That's what I am pointing to. You are currently a firefighter who is seeing fires everywhere. Where was the fire? Go back and read my post, then go back and read your post and if you take out your assumptions....you will see clearly what happened. You added to what wasn't there. All I linked was a location. That was it, nothing more and nothing less. Now go back and read your response to that comment. Notice you disagreed with me....and I never offered a perspective to be disagreed with.

Alright now Nilsi I'm starting to think its not me this time. I have figured out what my issue is, its not just me I noticed it now....your responses lack context. My comment is in response to what the OP is asking. So my response is tailored to the Op's request. You are not respecting the sovereignty of others by trying to force your agenda on them. He wants places to be listed where high conscious communities dwell, coming in and preaching to him is akin to ignoring their perspective and pushing your own. I know this is not your intention but you are doing it (I do it too its why I notice it so well) but the reason it is bothering me in this case because you preaching to me as if I agree with what the OP wants. I don't but I can still offer suggestions to support their agenda.

So I wasn't going crazy? Yeah I call B.S. on that, that human body dropping and is going to be buried. The real you leaves the dream while others mourn your death.

Nice yeah it is....

Great Post. Well said!!!

A man in a relationship is expected traditionally to be a leader, emotionally resilient, a provider, a protector. A woman in a relationship is expected traditionally to be a nurturer, emotionally expressive, kind, and a supporter. The problem in relationships is that most individuals are too selfish, too conditional, to ever receive a fulfilling relationship. Ever see a man and a woman who have been together for years and the man catches a terrible ailment and is no longer able to be those things I said above? Yet you will see the wife stick by him, and not leave even though he is unable to fulfill that role. Why did she stay? Love. True love is not conditional, as long as you are so focused on getting your needs met you will never be able to have a meaningful relationship. All conflicts in relationships are due to selfishness. Conflict will never be resolved without commitment and accountability. I am not saying accept a relationship that does not meet your needs where you do all the heavy lifting and they provide none, that would be abusive. But the sad thing is, from a logical standpoint all relationships whether healthy or not will involve some level of exploitation unless you found someone who is VERY selfless. So whoever you choose as a partner you need to be honest with who they are, where they are in their level of selfishness and ask yourself are you willing to take that on. Many want to try to change someone, this is a fool's errand. You can only change yourself, you can influence someone sure which will create small changes but any meaningful long lasting change will come from daily concerted effort which only happens when there is a paradigm shift in perspective. Many of the most selfish people will need to suffer before they see the value in selflessness. Suffering is a form of purification, and sometimes we all need a good dose of that bitter medicine to find the meaning we are searching for. So pick a partner who you are willing to accept as they are, and learn to love the parts you don't. Pick wisely, and grow in love and everything else will work itself out. Eventually you may reach a point, where you and that person love so deeply, that no condition even matters anymore. This is a level few will reach, because it takes a denial of self to reach. Good Luck out there.

Again its my ego, I admit I am getting resistance whenever I feel you are trying to teach or correct me. I'm aware of why this is happening. But I hear ya, thanks for pushing my buttons you brought some things up I needed to see.

Oh my Ego, the gathered opinions of others given to me when small against my will before I had the discernment to know what to take in. Oh my Ego the statements I verbalize or mentally repeat as fact even though it is just an opinion, an interpretation of a past event Oh my Ego even though you are an illusion to me you are real, why can't everyone see the lens through which I see Oh my Ego as long as I believe you I cannot change, you are a cage that both protects me and imprisons me. Oh my Ego I have the key to open the cage but I fear I will die. If I don't have you what am I? Oh my Ego I know you allow me to be ME, without you I have no identity Oh my Ego one day I will have to leave you, our relationship is impermanent, so please release me so I can be free.

You can be a freelance web designer, video editor, coder, in fact coding would probably be the best field maybe go into Machine Learning...

When did I say that Nilsi...you need to stop trying to teach so much, you add what was never there. Nobody implied one-uping, you put that there. I merely informed the person I was commenting to that I have seen awakenings with much more profound experiences. You are seeing what you want to see, maybe you have a unfulfilled desire to teach yourself?

.....That's like asking if you are ageist for like women 5 years younger or older. Your preference is your preference, as long as you don't treat women who aren't in your preference range bad you're good.

Here is someone you can take a look at. https://youtu.be/crV8Z6eOIdw

What happened to me is child's play compared to some other people's awakenings. Watch this video by Leo. https://www.actualized.org/insights/dpt-the-other-god-molecule

Great take. Couldn't agree more.

I understand what you are trying to do, but this is kind of a waste of time. 1. What has Andrew Tate said that hasn't been said in the manosphere? Nothing 2. Andrew Tate is new to the manosphere they were here long before him. He only joined to cash in. 3. His background reveals he is not an honest person. Should you really be giving too much attention to a dishonest person? Not saying you can't glean wisdom from anybody but he is not exactly someone you should be paying too much attention too. What you focus on you become.

This book will explain men in a nutshell to you if you are interested as a woman. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/31178970-finding-the-right-man

I agree with this. When I got in my car accident I blacked out, I wasn't sleepy or nothing and time stopped before it happened. Me surviving the accident and not hitting anybody at all....what would you call that? I had no control over time stopping as a human, no control over blacking out, and no control over not hitting anyone and no control over the human body surviving. So from God's perspective sure free will, but from human perspective I don't think so.

Hard times creates strong men, strong men create weak times, weak times create weak men, weak men create Hard Times, onwards into infinity.

Thanks this helped me integrate my Ego Death I now know exactly what quote on quote Death is. I was with a friend when it happened and she said it was like I was a Robot. I had no memory at all or feeling in my body. I was in this empty void. Before all that happened electricity shot throughout my entire body and I felt like I exploded. This was on 2-3 edibles mind you. So now I get it...that was my awareness expanding outward into the universe and me reaching my true self. Interesting makes sense now. I also experienced time freezing as well so that let me know this dream is illusion. Sounds cool.

That's the answer I was looking for! Thanks man well explained I get it!

Its fine that was just my ego. When you say clinging to some petty memory, you are basically saying that my attachment to my memory is preventing me from being present and truly realizing myself as God. That's what you are saying I take it. Basically I am still in the conceptual puzzle? I don't believe that, but maybe am I....

There was another post in the past where he implied that so I'm just adding that to this here. But its fine I found my answer anyway.

Thats the thing I know physical death isn't real my question was, was he saying the physical body wouldn't fall down when it takes too much damage etc. But I get it now, he was just saying when you are enlightened you wouldn't even notice when the body falls because you had no attachment to it all. So he wasn't saying the body isn't going to fall, you just won't notice. Which is interesting.

Sorry if I sounded aggressive, its just anoyying when people completely ignore what you are asking. These were the main points of the question. As you can see it was asked twice. I already mentioned I know we are infinite and look what the first thing was posted. ^ I literally said I know I can't die and the first statement was this. It's like....sigh..... you didn't even listen. So I'll repeat. I was in a car accident. I experienced my body being inside me and that I was pulling it. When my body healed after two weeks I felt the normal feeling of being inside my body. When I felt like I was outside of my body I was in bliss, and the bliss was intense and consistent. So just from that alone since I was half way to death I already know that 1. I am not my body. 2. Death is Infinite Love. And both were confirmed in my direct experience. So my question was, was Leo saying the physical body won't even fall dead? That was my question. Not will I die because the body is not me, but the avatar (body) was he saying that wouldn't fall dead.