Arthogaan

I just know that their "Soul" animated movie that came out I think 3 years ago is like my top 5 movies ever.

That why God didn't bother with subscriptiom, he just chose to incarnate

Hi, what do you think on this topics: 1. Are women wired to be more social and need social life more? Or is it cultural. I am a loner type and really do not need much social life to feel blisfull and fulfilled. I can romanticize the idea of being a loner sage for the lest of my life. I do not know many girls that would like her future to be like that. Most of them seem to always need a partner in their future or at least very close circle of friends. Do you think that is cultural and eventually more and more woman will realize that they do not need anybody to be happy and will embody that? I see more female creators on youtube just living in a forest or a van alone. Or rather that is something that just is part of feminine energy and it will probably continue to be like that for most? 2. The same question basically but in the context of sex life. Do you think that women will in the future embrace casual sexuality more or rather feminine energy always will tend to want this sexual activities to be only with a really close one/ones? Because when I feel into the feminine energy it is really connected to the body and it's needs. It actually feels more sexual than masculinity but in current society it does not seem to express in that way. For example I heard that in some country (I think Cuba?) there is a whole culture revolving around being sexy, seducing and female sexuality. To me it seems more natural to femininity, but I am not sure. Have a nice day @Leo Gura, @Emerald, @MsNobody, @flowboy, @puporing

Morality be like:

Terence for sure had still a lot of materiality and external world left. As for Watts I genuinely don't know because many teachers seem to kind of water down their message especially around solipsism to not freak out their audiences.

I agree. But we still have to communicate it somehow on the forum. And I believe that this experience of no structures is better described by "others have no pov" rather than "others exists". Because Solipsism requires much less additional structure than the structure of whole other being having their own perception. So its the closest in the game of communication imho.

The same could be said inside a nightly dream. And yet a dream is imaginary.

My favourite post this week.

I think I get you. I also like to romanticize certain ideas. And now for you one time a weeks is much less romantic than the romance of 5-6 times a week gym grind. I would say you just have to be creative to look at your new 1 time a week schedule in a romantic way. Because bro, there certainly is something romantic about it. Discovering more of yourself, healing yourself from overworking, finding joy in other aspects of life so much that you don't want to go to the gym so often BUT you still go once a week to maintain your physique and health benefits. Dude. Thats Badass! Look at the badassness and wisdom of your new approach.

For me it really is similiar to the dream at night in which you become lucid, and therefore you know you are one with all you see, and it is obvious you are the creator. Even if there are some contractions left in my case they are just part of the dream. And notion of infinity, all perspectives at once and so on are also just an idea happening in my dream. Thats how I see it. Nightly dreams really are such a simple analogy that works great.

Ben explains it nicely here why the has to be ONE:

Maybe, maybe not. I don't know. I don't know what God will dream later. All I know is now.

@Loveeee I totally get you brother. When I first got glimpses of Absolute Solipsism I was almost crying out of relief, that the only suffering there ever was...was mine suffering. You naturally grow in compassion more and more on a spiritual journey. And then it is like the best news ever, that there is no suffering, there is only THIS. Such a relief. The bitter sweetness of being Alone is such a low price to pay for no suffering other than the one HERE. Just as Leo said in deleted solipsism video "There is only one being that can suffer, and that is You" or sth like that

Dude. That was brilliant.

That would be a catchy song. Boo hoo.

Bookmarked quote dude.

Actually I would say that unconditional acceptance will make you more subtle and intelligent in giving advice to the partner. Because even when accepting you can still provide advice, but you are not attached. When we have expectations/emotions we often say them to the partner in a way that only makes their toxic behavior worse.

He just told the truth. And he recognizes that its a mean thing. Does not change the fact that it's true. Do you disagree with it?

Haha good question. Well actually it's the same. Learning how to love without expectation, without the need for your partner to be "as evolved as you", without the need to be fully understood by your partner, makes your relationships and love so much easier and deeper. You can mix the love for children vibe with seeing their true essence/higher self in them.

Just see them as sweet, innocent children that sometimes just get mad because they don't know better. Also realize that if you had the same brain as them and the same life experiences you would behave just like them.

Thats an assumption. Maybe you are right, but maybe strong spirituality does not speak about morality? This. You nailed it here imho. When it clicks it removes separation, not creates it. As Leo said "We are alone because we are so together" or sth like that.

@Osaid that was a great way to put it, brother.

I would say lots and lots of meditation. So much that you can meditate throughout whole day while doing regular stuff. Meditative state becomes your default. And everything that @Breakingthewall wrote.

Sending a warm digital hug.

And this more would be turning the knob of Consciousness and Understanding ever higher, right? Or do you mean something else?