Arthogaan

But I agree that everyone has that potential in him. Once on dmt I saw how everybody is asleep Nikola Tesla.

Well I could say the same about going for a massage more than 100 times. Still other gender touching you. Yes there are far more consequences from sex but thats why you take more precautions. But sex is nothing more wrong than a massage. We only live in sexually supressed cultre so it seems so. But it is totally perfect, cute, natural, pure activity. @vladorion the same can be said about masturbation for males. Damaging if done out of imbalances and addiction. But it doesnt have to be. We need to learn to be mature from inside. Not just avoid sex.

It can be done responsibly. Sex is nothing wrong.

Thankts for that question. Really made me think and I realized that shit, I would not trade my mortality for anything. Its like giving up infinity. Really made me appreciate death.

In channelled material (The Law of One: Ra material) it is said that Jesus had power even as a kid, and once when playing with his kid friend he got angry at him and he killed him with intention. Jesus was so shocked at this and felt bad that he decided to understand himself. " 17.19 Questioner: How did Jesus learn this during his incarnation? Ra: I am Ra. This entity learned the ability by a natural kind of remembering at a very young age. Unfortunately, this entity first discovered his ability to penetrate intelligent infinity by becoming the distortion you call “angry” at a playmate. This entity was touched by the entity known as Jesus to you and was fatally wounded. Thus the one known as Jesus became aware that there dwelt in him a terrible potential. This entity determined to discover how to use this energy for the good, not for the negative. This entity was extremely positively polarized and remembered more than most Wanderers do. "

I thought it will be a post about Law of Attraction

There can be a woman that has naturally high levels of testosterone and metaphysically a lot of masculinity in her and fascination with sexuality. For her sleeping with 100 dudes actually may be the fastest path to her full potential. I don't like such generalizations.

1. All there is is God. 2. And one and only thing I can be sure of is that I AM. Not I as Arthogaan, but I as awoken Consciousness. Since 1. and 2. is true then -> I AM GOD

Aww, I respect that answer

@Someone here genuine sugestion- If just couple of months ago you were sure Solipsism is true and life is a dream and now you are totally sure that that is "horseshit" then we not become just a little bit more humble in what you write. You may soon discover some totally new paradigm for you so why not a little bit less arogant and openminded?

I think he has totally different function than Leo. It is not so much wisdom, teaching but rather art, inspiration.

From watching I him I think what he has to offer is that he seems to be reaaaly stable in his state. Whether is going throught the street without the shirt, or just cheerfully talking with a friend, he has those empty eyes all the time, and he never waits with his expression, it is instant as if there really is no-one controlling. Actually it is inspiring.

Checked and he is 37 years old. Kinda crazy. I would believe if someone said he is 25.

But a newborn child, with no reference points, no memory, he would perceive just some weird dance of colours. The thing he would experience is more close to being alone with no conception of others, rather than the whole story about humans having their own perspective and thoughts.

Consciousness with no thoughts whatsoever.

How can it be a relative notion if all there is, is direct experience (consciousness/I AM)? (Asking not arguing) What would you say to me trying to make a sneaky workaround about this in the following way : Absolute Solipsism is true, but the moment it is thought about, conceptualized by a mind it is immediatelly bastardized and it is no longer true. So no one can claim it. But it is true.

I understand how importance of it is relative. But it is very important for me at my stage. And Absolute Solipsism just resonates and perfectly explains everything, but on the other hand I just can't be 100% sure. And talking and asking about it constantly, trying to grok this 100% - even if irrelevant - is what gives me fun at the moment.

In direct experience there is only Oneness. There is no multiplicity. There is only imaginations of distinctions within that Oneness. Wouldn't you agree?

That is a really cool way of looking at it. But: 1. Does not change the fact that you are the only one with perspective RIGHT NOW. It is like there are all this slides/photos of each possible frame of each possible POV laying on the floor in an infinite potential room. And they are put onto the projector one by one. Yes all of them "exist" as potential laying on the floor, but there is only one projector - your consciousness. So everyone has a perspective as potentiality but only you as actuality. I know you meant this, just wanted to use my own words for fun. 2. If that is the case and you have all the eternity I do not really see the reason why would God interrupt each "stories" with frames from other stories. He can as well just end Breakingthewall's life and only then start my life. But who knows. Maybe that's what dejavu is - God slips just a little bit and continues a story in a little bit wrong place

@Matthew85 does your intuition and direct experience also tell you that others are obviously real when you dream at night?

He called solipsism "a form of madness" and used it as a argument against it which goes to show that he is scared of that concept of alloneness. And I don't blame him. It is a quantum leap and he does not use pdychedelics to help with that leap.

You wrote long articles about how you realised solipsism is true with similiar arrogant and confident tone as that one. So I think the question is fair.

Because only you exist. Leo is your imagination. Not sure what you mean brother. That is true, but also they have potential to be the deepest ones available in humanity's history. I don't know. Just wanted to clarify what I think Leo's standpoint is. All of what he says about solipsism resonates with me, aligns with my experiences and gives me great joy, but there is still that 1% of uncertainty and suspiciousness that I have to tackle on my path.

I don't see that as limitation at all. It is what it is. It is like saying that Matthew85 shouldn't be himself because that would be limiting. Well actually if you behaved other than your true self that would stem from some limitation.