bambi

Unpleasant, you lost me sorry And to your second part, I totally agree!

Sure, but all of your videos are basically the synthesization and recapitulation of other peoples work. Did you correctly proportion your revenue to them? What about credit, do you break down all your videos and correctly and accurately cite all of your sources and how and where you combined other peoples work? Its easy to point the finger at other people in commerce and industrialists, but I dont see the academics or theorists any different. If you want truth and transparency in commerce and insdustry you should also want the same level for yourself, surely

I dont think Leo will answer but I wonder what honest confessions of theft he would own up to, his concepts ideas etc are synthesized based upon other peoples work, he rarely if ever cites them in any exposition. I wonder what his own view is, or where he personally draws the line. It's always a criticism of other people and never about ourselves in this type of conversations. Is musk more of a theif then trump, is leo less of a theif then them?

Interesting to put ro-occuring subscritpions alongisde rape, colonaliasm etc lol Re-occuring subscriptions are interesting to categorically call as theft, I don't see it. It can be a form of theft depending on how its regulated perhaps, but also it can make life much simpler but automating your procurement of a service you tend to repeat. Most reoccuring subscriptions these days have quite alot of explicit terms, and they're quite easy to cancel. Not that it cannot be improved, and give people more honest awareness and choice to leave subscriptions. But hard to see them all as categorical theft, it misses the mark imo

He has 0 conversational skills or emtoional development. He dominates people and loves the sound of his own voice, he barely or rarely lets anyone speak. I dont see how he doesnt get more flak, hes an extremist, theres veery few people as intense and self absorbed as jordan

Do you honestly believe Hamas and most palistinians have engaged in 'good faith' negotiations and they that don't include the return of their refugees? I mean literally every protest in the past year the main slogan is 'From the river to the sea palestine will be free' lol. Its almost sattire to insinuate they are good faith In your view its Israel destroying any hope of peace by their irrationality in the face of hamas and palistentina rationality? The fact their president got asessinated during their previous peace deals shows that there exists both extremists , moderates and progessives in Israel. Their president died trying to solve this issues. I cant see how you are taking such a categorical view on the situation

Where are you getting this 'hamas will accept a peace deal if Israeli settlements stop' whats your sources here? Pretty much all palistiaen deals I have ever seen included the return of the original refugees back to Israel at best and full removal of Israel at worst, not merely Israeli settlements stopping

I believe the model could benefit from further clarification, particularly on the core mechanics of shame. Shame is not simply internal inadequacy, but fundamentally rooted in self-rejection and the fear of disapproval or punishment. This leads to feelings of inadequacy and low self-esteem/self-worth. To compensate, individuals often engage in self-aggrandizing, inflating their perceived worth externally as a direct response to their internal sense of lack. Building true self-esteem, or intrinsic value, is a function of authenticity. Forgiveness, in turn, is a function of self-acceptance, helping diminish shame and stabilize self-worth. When one fully forgives themselves, they achieve total self-acceptance, which aligns true authenticity with maximal intrinsic value. Key Components: 𝕊 (Shame): Internal sense of self-rejection and fear of disapproval, stemming from delusion. 𝕊𝔸 (Self-Aggrandizing): A compensatory mechanism where one inflates their worth in response to shame. 𝕊𝔼 (Self-Acceptance): The process of accepting oneself, which reduces shame and is tied to truth. 𝔽 (Forgiveness): A result of self-acceptance, enabling one to release shame and grow emotionally. 𝔸 (Authenticity): Living in alignment with one's true self, which strengthens intrinsic value. 𝕍ₑₓₜ (External Value): Value derived from external sources such as social recognition and status. 𝕍ᵢₙₜ (Intrinsic Value): The core of self-worth, grounded in authenticity. 𝕎 (Self-Worth): Overall self-perception, influenced by intrinsic value, external value, and self-acceptance. 𝔻 (Delusion/Falsehood): Living in a false reality or exaggerated self-perception, leading to shame and self-rejection. 𝕋 (Truth/Reality): Alignment with what is real and true, diminishing shame and leading to self-acceptance. Revised Mathematical Model: Shame (𝕊) arises from delusion (𝔻), driving self-aggrandizing behavior: 𝕊=λ⋅𝔻𝕊 = \lambda \cdot 𝔻S=λ⋅D Where 𝔻 (Delusion) leads to self-rejection, increasing shame. Self-Aggrandizing (𝕊𝔸) compensates for shame, especially when reliant on external validation (𝕍ₑₓₜ): 𝕊𝔸=α⋅𝕊=αλ𝔻𝕊𝔸 = \alpha \cdot 𝕊 = \alpha \lambda 𝔻SA=α⋅S=αλD Intrinsic Value (𝕍ᵢₙₜ) is a function of authenticity (𝔸): 𝕍int=k⋅𝔸𝕍ᵢₙₜ = k \cdot 𝔸Vint=k⋅A Where 𝔸 (Authenticity) drives the internal self-worth. Forgiveness (𝔽) is now a function of self-acceptance (𝕊𝔼), meaning as self-acceptance grows, forgiveness naturally follows: 𝔽=f(𝕊𝔼)𝔽 = f(𝕊𝔼)F=f(SE) Self-Acceptance (𝕊𝔼) reduces shame and is tied to truth/reality: 𝕊=1𝕋and𝕊𝔼=m⋅𝕋𝕊 = \frac{1}{𝕋} \quad \text{and} \quad 𝕊𝔼 = m \cdot 𝕋S=T1andSE=m⋅T Where 𝕋 (Truth) diminishes shame and enhances self-acceptance. Self-Worth (𝕎) incorporates intrinsic value, external validation, and self-acceptance: 𝕎=k⋅𝔸+𝕍extf(𝕊𝔼)𝕎 = k \cdot 𝔸 + \frac{𝕍ₑₓₜ}{f(𝕊𝔼)}W=k⋅A+f(SE)Vext Key Insights: Delusion (𝔻) drives shame and self-rejection, leading to compensatory behaviors like self-aggrandizing. Authenticity (𝔸) strengthens intrinsic value, grounding self-worth in internal qualities rather than external validation. Forgiveness (𝔽) grows as a function of self-acceptance (𝕊𝔼), which reduces shame and is linked to living in truth. Pride is the compensation for low self esteem in all cases. Pride takes for the form in externalisation of being better than or superior then or worse then or less then, these are all covet pride.

Come on, what is wrong with my communication in this thread? Your upset as I call you out on your bullshit, but I already apologized in the other thread, I was doing it on purpose to show you what its like, but explicitly.

I would say 50% of humans if not more face toxic family situations. Thats why most people ensure they can leave home at 18 or even 16. You have to do what it takes my friend. Good luck

Yeah your going to have to take some ownership and personal accountibility. This victim mindset at 22 isnt going to help your plight. You need some accountiblity and positive planning. Put your situatiion into AI and build a plan

At 22 can you not leave home? I dont know indian culture but I left home at 18, why are you still living with your family?

Sorry to hear about your situation. I would run things on the hypothesis that suicide will just make your reappear/reborn in a worse situaiton then you currently are, so take this option of the table as its no real solution. How old are you? Where do you live? You ultimately need to get away from your abuse as fast as you can, whatever it takes, and then take some time to heal. Its natural to have those deep feelings of hopelessness and despair considering your situation. Focus on a tangible actionable plan even if its multi-year, some type of strategy that you can at least see leads to the removal of the immediate abuse will bring you some positivity and hope

Your contribution to this thread is highly innapropriate and does the very thing you accuse me of: derailing a productive discussion If you have personal issues with me, you can message me one on one Thanks for the footer suggestion, I wasnt aware of the feature I think you are conflating my conversational styles from different threads. You should take me on the merits of each of my posts. You arent pattern matching me correctly

This is totally false, else you would be specific, In fact in this conversation all my posts are concise and high quality, your post above is a bunch of trash. Please feel free to ignore me, hopefully that will remove your insanely disturbing self-absorbed footer that takes up half of all our screens. Let me be utterly clear Davino, I dont respect you, you roll around this forum acting like a sub and bottom for people, masquerading constantly in your feminine. You have no capacity for self ownership, I find you sickly

Please can you stop giving unsolicted advice and posturing, no one is falling for this bullshit. Either state your arguments in full and join the discourse, or just watch queitly from the sideline. This other nonsense won't be tolerated

Want to be specific? There is no substance at all to what you just wrote, so I forgive me if I skip your classes lol

1. There are some huge accusations from his sister, to both Sam and her other brothers, so all of them where sexually abusing here? She accused them of every type of abuse including sexual, she didnt merely focus on this. This is wierd that you mention this as some how evidence of his corrupt business practices 2. Every company is maximizing profits, why wouldnt you? You maximize or optimize them within a given strategy. No one is saying Musk didnt make mistakes, he isnt excempt from human fallibility. But hes hardly a Saudi prince 3. Corrupt in what ways? Again he has transformed several industries and risked his wealth many times to achieve what he has, and is an overal net positive impact on commerce

Be specific, give me a name and their corruption. I think you discount the responsbility and hard decision you have to make in leadership, especially with staff. Its always the best of the worst situations constantly. Then people label it corrupt who are negatively affected Sam Altman for example, what is his extreem corruption in your view

Sure, but show me a non devil in your view. We are in a bit of a double bind in humanity right. What should we do? Surely the modern tech and engineering companies are the least corrupt so far, so at least we should be incentivizing this vector of progression? What else can we do, society isn't transposing into gift economy any time soon, and the collateral damage would be huge. For me the end vision is designing new cities and large scale communities embedded with new energy systems and technology. Like re-building London but from the ground up, with renewable energy and batteries at the core, with modern governments, societal infrastrucutres etc So starting from the scratch

Your just have type type 4 ennegram in your tritype, the individualist -> cares about being unique, individuality, different, non-conformist. You think all type 3 ennegram (the achiever) -> productivity, recognition, achievement, are devils and you are the angels lol!

This is why I respect Musk, open source all technology and innovation The real devils are those who try to claim propetiery ownership rather then giving it the commons, nothing is more toxic then this to me. True devilry right here imo

Come on, no one is selling their mothers, its pure hyperbole. Its way more complex then what you are painting,. Even OpenAI, they need infrastructure and hardware to compete at scale, this requires capital and investment. Sure its not inline with their original non-profit intent, but thats life shit changes. To even have a chance to positively impact AI they require significant investment that probably wasnt clear in beginning - or definatley wasnt clear, check the email repositories between Altman and Musk, its all on there These things just arent simply mutually exclusive. You can want to make personal money and help humanity, or believe you are. Teams are more complex too, companies are emergent and evolving and stay productive and achieve your goals, personell changes are a neccassary requirement. Most tech startups should be viewed like sports teams not like your family dynamics. You think NBA players being drafted end of the season is pure devilry too?

Come on Leo, you are reducing this down to binary intentions from a singular monolithic entity, you cant seriously beleive in what you write here Theres a whole host of different actors working in AI for myriad for different reasons and intentions. This entity that is out to conciously steal from people and monetize their theft as a singular aim, who are they lol? This might be a valid criticism of AI, but to suggest its the main driver, sole focus, only intent or use for AI is an absurdity