bambi

Lol not your hypothetical imposition is pointless and meaningless, how do you not see that? What if his dog bit him as a child and the dog was male and thats informing his views, what if what if what if what if lol

Im sorry but what type of post is this?! 'maybe he' lol Cmon dude

Partially true lol! I am 110% aware of everything that is happening, you mispercieve me. I dont feel myself hammered by others passive aggression I mainly come on here for the psychedelic section, and when I veer out of there for leisure, the deep degree of bullshit that permeates this forum is jarring, and seemingly most of the server is complicit. I enjoy and see it as my responsibility to point out the delusions.. 95% of all conversations are people talking past each other. A poster literally called Emerald a saint, and they weren't being facetious. Modern AI calls her self absorbed and condescending, the irony only seems to be lost on me. Your write up is good. But I'd add in the subjectivity of her assessment, she creates her own subjective ideals and interpretations based on her anecdotes, and imposes them universally. Second even within her own holistic ideal, she has a partial and incomplete understanding. In her world there are no universaly attractive male traits to women or if she sometimes does acknowledge this, she further claims they arent powerful enough to influence womens mating choice, citing this organic irrational unqiue femine process that only she knows about as she is the superior saint. And that men with our stupid logic can never understand this as our whole mating process is simply surface level attraciton. Her whole paradigm is fucked, its pure fiction Her analysis is so poor, its concerning that people even take it seriously

He isnt defining for you what is masculine or feminine, he can't do it in any meaninfull way without reducing to useless propositions like feminine is life and masculine is death lol!, which in of itself is an arbirary construct. Hes trying to create a set of criteria that can apply ubiqitously to male psychology, and it doesnt exist. Jung theory counters this, and Jung was correct. Psychology is informed somewhat by biology, but its complex and emergent. Any set of traits you can arbitrarily define as mascule or feminine, would only be half the picture for a healthy human, independent of gender, so this dichotomy is mostly useless. Its basically archaic and a poor attempt to deal with human and their diversity. Its useful some of the time in some of the places, just like a hammer. The core problems we face in soceity are not borne out of a lack of strong traditional gender roles, its borne out of millenia of pain, shame, oppresion and cruelty. Humans will natually return back to their symbiotic state when their pathologies are removed. This symbitioic state will be diverse dependant upon the individuals unique pyschological preferences and constructs.

LOL I dont know if the chimpanzee studies are proof of essential gender traits in humans. Nor does it debunk that gender is socially contstructed or influence. Reality is gender is informed from biology and society. But its correlative not causative. Putting gender as a causal truth in relation to biology is just inaccurate. The more accuracy you want the less you can actually say about gender, and inverse the more you want to make generalisations about gender, you lose accuracy. Thats why gender heuristics are limited and have a time and a place, but when you have a hammer all you see is nails.

Oh I meant the architectural style lol I was using a metaphor not an adjective I agree. I think there tends to be two camps of people, those who see gender as having a core substrate or essence that has a certain set of immutable characteristics or qualities, and those that see it as a perennial behavioural description or stereotype. Neither realise the entire thing is a construct

All my work is aesthetic, you just dont appreciate brutalism How is the study going, what did you learn so far?

Would you be shocked to know mirroring ego maniacs isnt a full time pursuit of mine Im pretty good consiering this forum is my only practise

LOL I didnt even know people put their birthdays on forums, I wouldnt have figure that out your right. One of my cells must be faulty, shall return to manufacturer Thank you, helps me orientate myself to your posts

How old of you please?

Emerald you are the type of person to sniff their own farts and lie about it, and I cant respect that type of behaviour Is it not clear that all the 'Im trying to help you' condecencsion to you and Princess is my purposeful mirroring of you two How can you think this is my natural personality, its absurd

Not quite, I just see through all ego-posturing games and bullshit you all like to play Notice that you dont respond to AI analysis, does AI have wounds too? The ultimate core of your issue is dunning kruger, you dont have the intelligence to accurately assess your own or others, and its leading to deep errors and conflation. You see Emerald as a saint, and me the wounded devil. This is your deep bias and misapprehension at play. Emerald is an ego manic, and I am the only saint willing to call the bullshit out, yours too lol

No, not quite: Lust is fundamentally a psychological function. It represents a mental projection—an imagined future scenario that is desirable to the individual. Lust also has a physiological aspect, triggering pleasure responses to the fantasy, compelling the individual to bring that fantasy into reality. Lust is broad; at its core, it’s about desiring something that doesn’t currently exist. It has a self-centered focus, rather than an inclusive one. So yes, some sexuality can be lustful, and some lust can be sexual. People who are highly lustful in their sexuality are often using lust as a coping mechanism. Lustful fantasies provide a dopamine hit, and like any addiction, it becomes a cycle that feeds on itself. Human sexuality is often distorted by psychological lust. Lust is inherently imaginary, hijacking natural biological instincts to serve its own ends. It’s frequently used as a coping mechanism for underlying psychological issues, leading to more extreme sexual behaviors, which manifest as kinks or fetishes.

This is a wierd response and gives insights into your pyschology. You are creating a false dichotomy here. Lust and sex drive are not the same thing. And most of your statements are non-sequitor. Lets cut to the shit, are you worried about female sexuality in terms of your own sexual needs?

Then on average accoridng to studies, men will be more lustful. They will think about explicit sex more, masturbate more and watch more pornography, by all available data I have read. This is just averages though, and individual variation will vary greatly. Also their is a complex web of confounding variables for trying to explain this

1) You didnt answer any of my questions and are deflecting 2) Yes of course, a bunch of self-absorbed, self-aggrandizing content we've all become accustomed to

Are you talking in terms of sex or other material things?

Yes becuase feeding her delusion grandeur is healthy lol You genuinely find it profound and insightful that humans dont like their emotions and needs to be dismissed? Seriously? Further you think this is only applying to women? Really? You honestly think of yourself as wise and integrated, yet are completely overblown by the suggestion humans (or ignorantly females) dont like their emotions and needs to ignored diminished or dismissed? This is the true absurdity of this thread

No this is my last life, fortunately for you!

Very relaxing! But come on this is the town square, we came to dance

Sorry I dont follow, how does this relate to the video

Precisely, most of the women here are in the most dysfunctional relationships and as per the AI analysis are totally ego-deluded, Their coping mechanism of dissociation away from their romantic failure is posturing on forums like this lecturing males with their delusions at any chance to fill the void Truly what is Emeralds status and value? What is her past relationship experience, what is her current situation, where does her authority and condescion come from? Where is the data or credentials here?

Wise and integrated lol!!! Ego-centric, condescedning, and self-absorbed, yes, 100%. This was given to you by AI, but Im sure the females skimmed over that objective analysis. Wouldnt want to ruin their ego-image, fragile enough Hey I am just using your own axioms, the women have stated multiple times men are logic driven and female emotional. Now you are saying I shoyldnt be doing this? Got it, which logic exactly, can you be the first women to actually address any of the propositions I made, or gonna hide behind that veneer of pesudo-intellectualism and faux help you guys tend to parrot

I hope most of the guys especially the younger one can clearly see the pointlessness of having female input on these topics, especially the ones on this forum. Its cute and fun to some degree to engage with them, but by their own disclosures none of them have any logic, which makes it impossible for them to analyse or communicate coherently or with any value. I think this is the core issue, without the logic that men have and simply having emotions, they simply cannot even discern or think about topics properly. This renders most of what they say completely useless and nothing more then a quaint attempt to join the discourse. This should be taken for what it is, fun social dynamics, but not literally listening to what they write, that would be like listening to a drunk person I worry about the younger men, so hopefully they are wise enough to see the sense.

What about this was eye opening for you, out of interest?