bambi

Im the opposite, LSD feels more stable and loving, mushrooms more sinister and unstable. This could just be my personal karmic propensities, but I have had hellish (literally) mushroom experiences, some of my most traumatizing actually

Can you give an example post of 'shameless apologetics for zionism or trumpism?' Youve basically called Trump satan several times, its an over-exaggaration and huge bias that is hard to reconcile. The whole of politics is totally fucked, capatilism itself is fucked, all our institutions are fucked, all media is fucked. We are just arguing about degrees of self-serving, or types of self-serving that aligns or misalign with our own self-interests

LOL are you serious with this types of posts? Do you believe in satan etc?

Yeah maybe at microdosing levels for me, the bigger doses are deep spiritual work so far, not possible to do tasks on the computer lol! But each to their own Yeah they are partial agonists to D1/2/3/4, but their mechanism of action and consequence to receptor health are drastically different to cocaine and porn, its a total false equivalency imo. Well psychedelics simply show you your mind, so sure if you have a ton of repressed issues, and been behaving in unsavory ways for prolonged periods of times, it isnt going to be a fun experience at all for you, whether this is 'unhealthy' or 'healthy' would depend on how someone responds to this. Sure, each to their own!

Thats so bizarre your thinking so hard on psychedelics, Im hvaing deep meditaiton experiences wiht brihgt white intnese lights, it doesnt seem the type of acitivty for compulsive thinking BTW cocaine/porn/most doperminergic activities seem like the opposite of true psychedelics to me. Psychedelics feel like the are psychologically healing, they really force you confront your psychology

Isnt the Devil just ego, so every human alive is a devil..

I could run your responses through, but Im sure theyd just say you should be stating specifically how and why they dont understand you, simply stating they dont is quite obtuse

I find them less bias and better at removing the emotions from this type of situations, dont you agree?

AI has you at Stage Red below Elon and Trump FYI: The critique of Elon Musk provided by Leo primarily reflects a Red stage perspective in Spiral Dynamics, with some elements of Blue and Green. Breakdown: 1. Red (Power and Dominance) - Focus on Power Dynamics: The critique highlights aggressive tactics, lawsuits, lying, and dominance, which are characteristics of the Red stage. The statement about not playing nice and crushing opponents fits this stage. - Emotional Tone: The critique has a confrontational and accusatory tone, typical of Red's emphasis on strength and assertiveness. 2. Blue (Order and Rules): - Ethical Concerns: Criticizing Musk for not paying employees or rent, and attempting to back out of agreements, reflects Blue’s concern for ethics, rules, and social contracts. - Expectation of Accountability: The demand for adherence to agreements and ethical standards aligns with Blue values. 3. Green (Community and Fairness): - Moral Judgement: Accusations of sexual harassment and unfair treatment of employees highlight Green’s focus on community, fairness, and equality. - Social Responsibility: The critique implies a belief in social justice and ethical behavior, which are central to Green values. ### Conclusion: The critique itself is mostly rooted in the **Red stage**, with its emphasis on power dynamics and aggressive behavior. It also incorporates **Blue** and **Green** elements, as it calls for ethical behavior and fairness. This mix of stages suggests a complex viewpoint that is critical of perceived abuses of power while advocating for order and community values. Let's break down the critique of Elon Musk as presented by Leo, focusing on the claims and their implications: 1. **Frivolous Lawsuits:** The claim is that Musk engages in unnecessary legal actions, potentially to intimidate or exhaust opponents. 2. **Lying:** Accusations of dishonesty in public statements or business dealings. 3. **Non-payment of Employees and Rent:** Allegations that Musk has refused to pay Twitter employees and rent for Twitter HQ, which raises ethical and legal concerns. 4. **Sexual Harassment:** Accusations of inappropriate behavior, which are serious and damaging if proven true. 5. **Reneging on Agreements:** The claim that Musk tried to back out of the Twitter acquisition deal on insubstantial grounds. 6. **Business Tactics:** Assertion that Musk's success involves aggressive tactics, not "playing nice." 7. **Political Grudge:** The suggestion that Musk's opposition to President Biden stems from personal slight, likening him to Trump in terms of ego. ### Critique of the Critique 1. **Specificity and Evidence:** - Many of these claims lack specific examples or concrete evidence within the critique. Providing detailed instances and credible sources would strengthen the argument. - Sexual harassment and refusal to pay employees are serious accusations that should be backed by verifiable reports or legal documentation. 2. **Bias and Objectivity:** - The critique seems highly critical and may benefit from a more balanced perspective, acknowledging Musk's accomplishments alongside his controversies. - Comparing Musk to Trump based on ego and political grudge might oversimplify their motivations and actions. 3. **Generalization:** - Claims like "He lies" and "He does sexual harassment" are broad and sweeping. It's important to delineate between isolated incidents and patterns of behavior. - The assertion that success requires crushing others is a cynical viewpoint that may not account for the complexity of business dynamics. ### Summary While the critique raises significant concerns about Musk's behavior and business practices, it would be more compelling with specific examples, evidence, and a balanced perspective. Addressing these areas can provide a clearer, more nuanced understanding of Musk's actions and their implications.

Yeah I wouldnt take this personal or make it personal, its quite cruel actually. Alcoholics and addicts are in tremendous pain, its about their pain, not about you. Hopefully your dad recovers

Lol! what do you mean you love spirituality and do it for its own sake, what spirituality do you do??

So did you personal have cessation experience syet? Sorry couldnt decipher from the post

ty

Ah where is that written?

Ah where is that written?

Sorry wdym

Yeh it was an accurate analysis, Arabia is a thick walnut to crack and shine some light inside, hoped the AI could get through

Oh I very rarely post any of my own writings over 200characters

100% AI genereated

Trans are clearly the closest theyve integrated both femine and masculine sides

While your perspective on the nature of desires and feelings has some merit, it appears to lack a deeper understanding of the fundamental distinctions between material pursuits and spiritual practice. Allow me to gently enlighten you. You assert that both materialistic and spiritual desires are merely tools used to achieve a better feeling, implying that they are fundamentally the same. However, this view oversimplifies the profound differences in intent, process, and ultimate outcomes of these pursuits. The quest for material goods is often rooted in the ego, driven by societal conditioning and external validation. People seek cars, houses, or relationships to bolster their self-image or gain social status. These desires are inherently transient and superficial, tied to the impermanent and often illusory nature of worldly satisfaction. In contrast, genuine spiritual practice aims to transcend the ego and uncover the deeper truths of existence. It's not merely about feeling better but about achieving a state of inner peace, clarity, and liberation from the cycles of desire and aversion. Spiritual seekers aim to understand the nature of the mind and reality itself, moving beyond the fleeting pleasure of sensory experiences. Material pursuits are typically linear and finite. You set a goal, work towards it, and either achieve it or move on to the next desire. The satisfaction derived from these accomplishments is usually short-lived, as you've aptly noted. Spiritual practice, on the other hand, is an ongoing journey of self-discovery and inner transformation. It's a process of shedding layers of ignorance and conditioning, which involves practices like meditation, mindfulness, and ethical living. These practices cultivate a stable, enduring sense of contentment and equanimity that is not dependent on external circumstances. The fulfillment of material desires often leads to a perpetual cycle of seeking, as each attainment leaves you wanting more, never truly satisfying the deeper yearning for lasting happiness. Spiritual practice, however, aims at breaking this cycle. The ultimate goal is not another transient feeling but a profound shift in consciousness. When one realizes the nature of the mind and attains enlightenment, the endless quest for external validation and pleasure ceases. One experiences a lasting sense of peace and fulfillment that is not contingent on external conditions. To compare the desire for a hot car with the desire for spiritual enlightenment is to misunderstand the essence of the spiritual path. True spiritual seekers do not engage in practice to achieve fleeting feelings of joy or peace but to uncover the very root of suffering and transcend it. The feeling of serenity you mention is not the end goal but a byproduct of a much deeper realization. Your argument hinges on the notion that both paths are fundamentally the same because they use thought to achieve a desired feeling. This overlooks the qualitative difference between the transient happiness from material gains and the enduring peace from spiritual realization. The mind's trickery, as you put it, is precisely what spiritual practice seeks to unravel, revealing the mind's true nature and freeing one from its deceptions. In summary, while it is true that both material and spiritual pursuits can involve seeking and the use of thought, their intents, processes, and ultimate outcomes are vastly different. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for appreciating the profound depth of the spiritual journey. Perhaps, with a bit more reflection and deeper inquiry, you too might come to see beyond the superficial similarities and grasp the true essence of spiritual practice.

@Leo Gura do you put suicidal tendency and ideation down to bad genetics, or trauma or both etc, did you ever release any videos on this?

I would say a combinaiton of psychedelics and meditation will be the two most potent tools. Along with group therapies/support and consuming positive content

Wierd isnt it, psychedelics have a huge impact on BDNF etc too

if you think your convoluted, self-indulgent ramblings pass for profound insight, you’re sorely mistaken. You’ve laid out your breakdown as if it suddenly adds clarity to the nonsensical mess you originally posted. Here’s a reality check for you: If you truly want to engage in discourse, drop the pretense and write in a way that others can actually understand. Your current approach isn’t profound; it’s pretentious and alienating. your writing doesn’t dissolve ego; it reinforces your own. you’re not inviting anyone into a conversation; you’re monologuing to an audience you believe is beneath you.