bambi

It just seems like unnaccasary fear mongering to me to think people can dream devils and hells when they die. Thats not accurately whats happening, What most people class as hells and demons is the by product of a deep disconnect from God along with a powerlessness and hopelessness and deep terror and fear. The closer to God you become the more freedom, hope and power you get, and the less arbitrary and fearful it becomes. The ego doesnt have any real power or hope, and it is the ego what takes you to hell, if your ego dies and you merge into God, this freedom to dream whatever you wanted wouldnt be from a place of randomness , fear or lack of hope, and its incredibly unlikely you would do anything but dream the highest heaven for yourself, anything else wouldnt be a possibitlity as far as Im concerned, or so unlikely it doesnt make sense to consider it

This is one of the big flaws or dangers in your communicaiton style to me. Your speaking to un-enlightened people i.e. egos i.e. devils. They arent dreaming shit after death, theyll be dead and God will dream. All this communication does is reinforce ego-centricity and ego-aggrandisation that it itself is God, when that isnt the case. Thats also the reason for so much of the deep confusion within conversations on forums like this. Most people are ego-identified, and speaking from this perspective, whereas you are mainly speaking from the absolute or God perspective

Do you have optimism your health situation can be healed? I also agree, Ive suffered deeply this past 6 years, while simultaneously being a CEO of small company (25 employees), my capacity to lead them without being a completely impatient condescending asshole is limited. I didnt sleep properly in years. I think someone said the difference between heaven and hell is a good nights sleep lol! I have completely given up on sleeping with girls or having sex again, Ive developed a condition called post orgasm illness syndrome which makes sex/orgasm a non-possibility. This appeared out of the blue 5 years ago Unless a miracle happens I dont see how my life gets back to normalcy

To me psychedelics simply illuminate your mind and subconcious. So a bad trip is simply aspects of your mind/subconcious that are scary, or more simply aspects of yourself you dont want to see. High doses will illuminate this greatly, which can be traumatising. I dont personally end trips as I class them all as part of the healing/purification journey. Some of the darkest trips lead to the most corrective action. For example if you are behaving way out of line psychedelics will correct this at some point, or more accurately show you unequivocally the truth of what is happening, and the seriousness of it - so you can immediately correct it. It's hard to see how someone would continue to behave a certain way after a dark serious psychedelic trip I think we like to believe the material atheistic paradigm that who we are, and how we behave is without any consequences at all, where pscyhedelics cut straight through this delusion in an intense way

The reason why those gimmicks wont work as they totally misunderstand what is happening in the mind and conciousness, and the role of identity , suffering and free will. You cant just shortcut your way to enlightenment, this would totally invalidate Karma. Karma is the pain of your actions from a seperated or egoic state. This pain/suffering will need to be repaid in full. Psychedelcis help expedite this; not as a shrotcut but via highly intense/difficutl experiences

[redacted] (posted in wrong thread)

Will you ever do psychedelics again or is that done for you now?

If I could click my fingers and never care about masturbating again or totally delete the urge/discomfort that comes when I dont do it, that would be a complete blessing to me. So many of us are literally systemetically conditioned to masturbate and have compulsive sexuality, sex as a core coping mechanism, deeply embedded, and very difficult to overcome. YMMV though

What dose?!

Hey you need to find some clubs/societies or groups with friendly welcoming positive role models. There are websites like meetup.com, or chess clubs etc etc Toastmasters is also good. Anywhere you can congregate with other humans in a positive supportive encouraging and welcoming environment can be very good for you. This would be my advice

you missed off two over's

LOL sorry I had forgot about that thread/post and it being you, that was a good one. Sorry if I was confrontational and rude!

I think I just prefer to be more direct then others! BTW when was our Chapter 4: Keryo, the Nonsense Singularity, what thread was this in

LOL! Very apt, the force is strong in you! Im happy my nuwu work wasnt lost on everyone, very good!

Understood, sorry if my frustrations with it where overly direct, confrontational and abrasive, I can be like this in discourse. I will be mindful in the future

Its not your 'style' nor is it your grammar lol, its simply your pattern of subtle introduction of contentious gender dynamics, specifically defending females, that flow out of the conversational intent. So to me your overly defensive in ways that are totally obvious and glaring, and it actually ruins conversational flow for me; thats actually why I highlight it, as I dont enjoy you when the convo gets disrupted with your seemingly subtle feminist idealogical gripes lol!

Your comment made me think about what your perspective must be to post that response. When I read your response, it felt like it brought in a broader issue that wasn't directly related to the original post, and to me this happens alot in your style of engaging in this topics, which suggests a subconcious contentious attitude to gender dynamics. For example, I think something like 'Yes, it's beautiful to see women express their confidence' would have been more in line with the context and flow, but you took the oppurtunity to bring up the a subtle issue of respectful men, which doesnt really relate to what the author was saying, which causes a subtle division between you and the author, where there was none in the first place. And to me you do this constantly

Hmm for me, it was truamatizing for me, in the beginning, but be aware I was coming out of the hell realms. I see this white light experiences as incredibly signifcant as they illuminate the totality of your mind, and show you , your whole subconcious. Unless youve been deeply sinning recently I wouldnt stress about it. Im sure in the final hour when your close or in union with the light its pure bliss

Why would you post that exact message to his, its non-sequitor, do you understand? Your smuggling in your idealogical gripes for no reason, you do it constantly but are completely unaware... de nile isnt jsut a river in Egypt my dear friend. But of course you think I have a person vendetta, so let GPT help you: The exchange between Person A and Person B on the forum reflects different perspectives and priorities. Person A's comment, " Love to see women with confidence.," expresses admiration for the woman's confidence. It's a positive statement that aligns with the context of the video—highlighting a quality they find attractive. Person B's response, "Yes, and I love to see respectful men," might come across as insecure or defensive and somewhat non-sequitur for a few reasons: 1. **Shift in Focus**: Person A's comment focused on the woman's confidence, a positive trait. Person B shifts the focus to a different topic—respectful behavior in men. This can seem like an attempt to steer the conversation towards a different issue or agenda, which may not directly relate to the initial context. 2. **Underlying Assumptions**: Person B's comment might imply an underlying assumption that respect from men is not always present or should be highlighted. This could suggest a concern or insecurity about men's behavior, even if it's not directly related to the situation at hand. 3. **Tone and Context**: The original post described a positive and consensual interaction where both parties exchanged numbers. Person B’s emphasis on respectful men might seem unnecessary in this context, as there was no indication of disrespect. This can make their comment appear out of place or as though it is addressing an unrelated issue. 4. **Non-Sequitur Nature**: A non-sequitur is a statement that does not logically follow from the previous discussion. Person B's comment could be seen this way because it introduces a new idea (respectful men) that wasn't part of the original observation (admiration of confidence). Overall, Person B's response might come across as insecure or defensive because it introduces a concern that wasn't evidently present in the original interaction, and it shifts the conversation in a different direction without a clear reason. This can sometimes happen when individuals feel the need to insert broader social issues into a discussion, which may not always be relevant or necessary.

I dont see the big hoo-ha personally. One example of him snapping at his son regarding his behaviours as a child. Hardly the crime of the century. If the analysis is to determine whether Elon was the perfect father, then we can stop and conclude he wasnt. But pulling up any and each anecdote for sensationalism is a waste of time to me

I mean Elon never claimed to be enlightened. As far as most humans go he does a good job. Having a son that ends up on hormone replacement and trans at a young age wouldnt be easy for anyone, at least the worry if its ultimately healthy or the right time for that decision is important. Hopefully they all have loving moms! Elon clearly describes to more traditional family structures, I dont think necasarrily makes him a bad parent Children and family dynamics are complex and tough, no matter how present you are with your children or how you try to raise them doesnt gurauntee any type of outcome. Theres many spiritual teachers who had children and they ended up drug addicts

This is one of your posts that scream the insecurity. Theres no need to respond with this, youve totally misinterpeted the authors intent, and youve responded seemingly defensively, injected a subtle negativity and divide into the convo Just randomly checked this thread! lol

Okay then I apologize, next time if I think its the case, Ill clarify with you Its just usually when people inject the male vs female shaming and judgementalism into a conversation when it wasn't the context, its usually a sign of trauma or frustration around this dynamic, which I acknowledge can be like that for alot of men and women

So the main crux is when Ive highlighted - rightly or wrongly - that you seem to be in insecure in how men percieve you, your sexuality, and womens sexuality? Thats just my impression from some of the posts youve made, I havent seen alot of your posts, so I have no idea your personal story, but its just stood out to me, that this paradigm seemed siginficant to you.

Love you too. Dont mistake my direct or confrontational style to be personal to you, I can be like this with everyone - apologies if Ive been overly direct or confrontational with you. Also I can go through phases of making a concious effort to call people out on their posturing and spiritual bypassing if it seems they arent speaking from experience or simply regurjitating spiritual rhetoric to sound knowledgable - rather then doing the work and getting the insights. Of course you might respond that 'doing the work' is just another idea and illusion, its all just appearences and happenings in this moment or something of the sort, this is a deep spiritual bypass to me, and thats why I challenge it