bambi

We are a community, if people dont want me here or collectively think I should be banned, I would have left long time ago. Last time I was accused (wrongly in my view) of causing personal drama even @Inliytened1 kindly messaged me for support (hope he doesnt mind the mention). I dont agree with the characterisaiton and assumed intent of my posts. I am basically responding to unprovoked condescions with the same condescions. But if people are in good faith so am I

FYI considering this thread is about leadership and integrity. Leo has messaged me telling me I am to be banned for my posts in this thread. He sees my posts in this thread the cause of personal drama, and that its severe enough to be banned. This is the leader of the forum. Who criticizes Trump and other leaders for being authotarian and lacking integrity Whatever your personal gripes or annoyances with me are. If any of you have a modicum of honesty or integrity, I urge you to re-read my posts in this thread and see if you conclude I should be banned, or even if I am the instigator of personal attacks, find the exact post and see precisely who starts the attacks first. This is the conclusion of the leader of the forum. Utterly bizarre Godspeed to you all

Do you honestly see Musk et al, (Peter thiel is partner with Vance in a firm), as being complicit in camps and the level of opression you are depicting? Its this type of convo that leaves me boggled. Ive watched Thiel Musk etc quite alot of the years, and I just dont see how you are deriving to anywhere near to the picutre your painting, its discombobulating

I just want to commend you on your subtle condescencion, its the perfect amount No, I dont see him as a good choice as a leader, but look around the world, theyre all corrupt as fuck lol! Look at the arab nations, Id chose Trump. I understand your concern, Trump has fascist traits, theyre not actually my main issue though, I think you are always going to face some type of extremsit ideology if you want to disrupt any established system, albeit I agree Trump is not a good candidate for true honest systemic change and reform I just dont see what the fascist nomenclature is bringing here, its derailing an honest critique of him

Awesome, thank you. Lets see how it goes and the accuracy of the above

The correct analogy here would be having teachers that admit to being attracted to physically developed 15-16-17-18 year old girls, or behaviours that show that they are. Its an unofrtunate truth of human nature. I dont see Trumps level of fascist traits equal to pedophilia propensities, Im sorry

How do you see the next 4 years going realistically then, what are your core concerns and predictions. I actually think Trumps need for vanity will be beneficial this time round. He will be less polarizing and make more policies inline with the young capilaist elite.

No, you totally missed how this post was in direct and purposeful response to someone elses unprovoked disrespect and condescension towards me. Please recheck properly my friend

Not doing it for Trump, but for a productive discussion. The exagarration or sensationalism makes it harder to be productive in my view. I understand the frustration towards he blinding self-serving corruption, but I believe accurate analysis is the best response. For example I just posted shortly ago Scott Galloways analysis and its balanced and insightful to me

This is utterly poor and bias moderation, all my posts you are qouting are in direct response to unprovoked attacks and condescncion towards me, yet you dont even begin to address it, shame on you

No I get you point: Trump is corrupt, self-serving and selfish, and this has severe consequences to an inclusive, fair and honest society. Its just as AI says its more accurate to say he has fascist qualities under a authoriarian or right wing populist stance, its more accurate.

We all have traits to different degrees of different idealogies. You are clearly deeply biased against him. You see him in the same league as true fascists like Hitler or Mussolini, which is utterly absurd to me, but bias is blinding as they say.

It is baseless, and if you think he posited any semblence of an attempt at argument and dicussion then your blind my friend. I urge you to put his posts through a LLM to educate yourself properly

Its the fact you want to call him a fascist, but this is an oversimplificaiton and incorrect assesment. Neither GPT4o or Claude agreed with the label, yet you did, this is your bias

What are you talking about? You hoenstly think posting long videos is some type of serious good faith discussion? Lets try to see if we can get on a level, we dont have to agree, but surely you can engage in a dicussion, Ill start: While JD Vance is clearly going to benfit commercially from being Trumps VP; he has vested interested in venture capailism, and has many pro-capialsit friends, its clear this will benefit him and those around him. However with that said, hes clearly intellignet and with the boundaries of his own self-itnerests (private markets, unregulated markets), to my view he wants to genuinely help america. To me hes credible and capable intellectually, he isn't like Hariss or Trump (both incompetent). I dont agree with all of Vances view or positions, but he often admits when he doesnt know something and doesnt overstep (Rogan podcasts). What exactly about him to you dislike or disagree with