Nilsi

Im pretty sure there is some variation of this in all holy books and even Hegel wrote something akin to "I am God and these words are my final will" or whatever. It's just silly to think this has never happened before. It just doesn't feel right to talk like that, although I don't doubt or deny your awakening.

You are not the first one to say these words.

He's just speaking as God, which is fine in itself, but it isn't congruent with talking shit about other mystics - at that point it's just delusions of grandeur.

How would you know who has reached absolute truth and who hasn't? I could speak from the same place and then we would both say "I am the only one." Nobody understands your point anyways, so why be so anal about being the best?

These dynamics have existed long before human culture though; it's much more about survival and specifically about "selfish genes." Skin color is a way more primordial cue than cultural norms, so in my estimation it's fair to talk about "racism" as a biological imperative (on top of which sits culture). You can argue that culture is what's primarily driving discrimination today, but that's kind of arbitrary and doesn't really explain why we want to live among our kind in the first place.

Racism, just like tribalism, is basically your biological imperative. According to Neo-Darwinism (which is still probably the most sophisticated and robust scientific paradigm), you are just your genes way of creating more genes; Your genes survive by way of you reproducing; Your genes also survive by way of your relatives reproducing (the closer you are related, the more genes you have in common). Skin color is just an easy indicator of relatedness. If you are white, it's unlikely you have much genes in common with a black person, so he's a direct competitor for resources and women. That's why you will hear rednecks complaining about immigrants taking their jobs and wives They are literally acting out their most primitive motivations. Of course, the more conscious you are, the more you transcend these knee-jerk survival mechanisms; Spiral Dynamics illustrates this quite well (it's basically the developmental arc from Monkeyhood to Godhood).

A big city is basically a strange attractor/local optimum, that's why they emerged. The value of a network (a city) increases exponentially to the number of it's nodes (citizens). This was an inevitable evolutionary development and only now, with the emergence of the internet, can we leverage those network dynamics without having to live in close proximity to each other.

This was pretty informative, maybe youll get something out of it.

With your lack of contextual sensitivity you should not even be in a position to carry out such jurisdiction. Im not thrilled about defending this Red Pill ideology, but your ignorance forces me to do so and you can go ahead and give me as many points as you want, I dont care.

One of the grooviest and most suave songs I ever heard.

I will not censor myself just because of your personal insecurities.

You are so lame, my God.

How is it a weak worldview? It literally outcompetes every other worldview in terms of reproductive success. This is an intellectual challenge of the highest sort, you are just to lazy to think about these things seriously, so don't be so smug.

I'm not even here to champion that worldview. I was referring to the book as a seminal text to understand the Red Pill worldview. Obviously you should consider the other perspectives as well and then find a synthesis between them, that's all I'm saying. As long as you react against a worldview, you can not transcend it or find higher ground.

You watch your mouth with your bullshit advice.

I think it's a compelling perspective that deserves to be taken serious. If you just strawman that worldview you won't actually get to any higher synthesis and you'll just get outcompeted. PUA/Red Pill is basically a multipolar trap for you as long as you can't find a higher order perspective, so don't be stupid.

Im not going to argue with you what experiences you have or havent had.

Id say the closest thing to how I conceptualize Actualized.org is The Stoa. Part of what they do is also modeling and giving you a catalogue of tools and frameworks to explore and actualize, but a lot of their stuff is rather obscure and weak-sauce.

Just manifest a new one before the excitement wears off lol.

Im kinda parroting Leo here, but I like the analogy - its as if you were talking about Australia and speculating if kangaroos are actually real, instead of just buying a plane ticket to Australia and seeing for yourself. I have no problem with philosophizing about kangaroos, but its kinda lame talking about kangaroos with someone who has never even seen one.

Maybe what you call awakening is not what I call awakening. It's quite literally just you awakening to/realizing yourself as Reality/God/Infinity/Whatever the fuck you wanna call it. That part should be quite obvious and self-evident if you had an awakening experience. Do that and then you can come back here and philosophize about what it all means, if you want

Read "The Rational Male" by Rollo Tomassi, if you want a stealman version of the Red Pill ideology.

I'm not talking about stepping outside it. An awakening experience is precisely you grasping yourself in your entirety, which should be your goal (instead of your armchair philosophy).

Not that I'm aware of. Besides, why would you need even more content? Focus on whatever you dig the most and then actualize that. There should be more than enough material already.

What are you talking about? This will not work if you just go on random tangents. We were on the topic of possibly grasping reality in it's entirety, that's what your mind should be focused on right now. I'll leave this one to Dr. Freud.