Nilsi

Jane Remover >>>

This is not to say it’s all relative, though. I think a given piece of music can only be properly understood and evaluated in the context of music (and art more broadly) in its entirety. As you dive into the complexity and richness of our musical legacy, certain things start to click, and a sense of "objectivity" emerges. That doesn’t mean you won’t have individual preferences and „taste“ regardless.

Some of the best and most critically acclaimed music is intentionally poorly made and sung badly. Take the infamous "The Velvet Underground and Nico" record. For what it’s worth, this is probably my favorite record of all time (definitely up there) and perhaps one of the most influential records ever. So, it's more subtle than simply categorizing music as good or bad singing. There are many Aretha Franklin and Whitney Houston records that suck ass, even though the production is very neat and spotless, and both of these women are obviously incredible singers.

Cute girl at a houseparty: *hands OP the aux* "can you put on some good music?" 👉👈 OP: "sure, uh, what kind of music do you guys like?" Cute girl: "anything. just put on something we can have a good time to" 😏 OP: "well, uhm, ok, I guess... let me think... snap... ahh, I guess I got something" The speakers: *Goldbach Variations play*

If this was a freak accident and it ended up killing them, it would be akin to a "Putin was just found dead at his dinner table. The cause of death is believed to be airway obstruction by a foreign body. Kremlin officials state that he apparently choked on an artichoke while having a midnight snack. Investigations are still ongoing" situation. It's actually quite profound to contemplate the idea of such a banality leading to a significant change in the course of world history. I can already hear Netanyahu and his henchmen dm'ing each other with shit like, "Halleluyah, Jehovah listened to our prayers."

This gives me the ick and is the musical equivalent of people praising vegan food for tasting "just like meat."

So you're bumping Mozart's "The Magic Flute" when you get the aux at a house party, is that what you're telling me?

I suppose @Carl-Richard would even agree with you and call that „optimal experience“ or whatever as opposed to the „neuroticism“ i’m advocating for, if i recall his position on this correctly.

Are you saying that to truly understand Beethoven's 9th Symphony is to just assess that it’s made up of woodwinds, percussion, strings, and so on, and that it represents the musical form called a symphony, and that any deeper assessment of this work of art is merely a suboptimal use of your intelligence? I couldn’t come up with a more vulgar conception of intelligence if I tried. "The whole" you are referring to is infinitely complex, and I would define intelligence as precisely the ability to hold as much of that complexity in mind as possible.

Don’t get me wrong, I like being bigger and stronger than the average guy as well, just not excessively so. Brad Pitt in Fight Club is roughly my ideal body type, and I’m reasonably close (apart from abs, which i lack a lot of) I would say. What you bring up about not pushing yourself to your limit is precisely the disagreement, I think, because that’s the whole premise of Mentzer’s high-intensity training, and it’s what I like as well - it gives you that extra workout for your mindset. Anyways, I don’t think there is necessarily a right or wrong approach, as you said. I was just curious about your perspective, since you obviously are way more knowledgeable and experienced in this than I am.

Let’s zoom in on that. Doing heavy compound lifts like squats, deadlifts, bench presses, and such multiple times a week, as you seem to suggest, strikes me as quite a lot. Mentzer recommended one workout per week, or even less frequently. The 3-day split is actually more of a compromise from his point of view, but he gave some guidance on that as well, so that’s what I’m running with. He doesn’t look natural to me at all, lol, and I don’t have any ambitions to get anywhere close to as big. Quite the contrary. I’m rather afraid of getting too big because that’s not what I’m aesthetically aiming for, and it wouldn’t work with my wardrobe and fashion preferences.

I'm on a Mike Mentzer-style HIT training regimen and a 3-day split, and I can reliably increase the intensity of every exercise in every training session. I don't know much about the science of training, and what I do might not be the most efficient way of training, but it feels very satisfying to know that when I show up, focus, and push through my psychological barriers, I can make gains every single time. Also, I usually don't work out for longer than 20 minutes in a given session, so this works quite well with my very busy schedule. Any thoughts on this training style?

Are you able to increase the intensity (weight or reps) of all these exercises every training session?

Also, basics like getting a good night's sleep, being well-hydrated, and eating a healthy, filling meal (preferably lots of vegetables, legumes, some good fats, and some quality animal protein, if that is congruent with your ethical framework) a couple of hours before your test will go a long way.

If you are interested, we can talk about dosages for your specific situation.

Modafinil, Noopept, Sulbutiamine, Vinpocetine, Alpha-GPC and Caffeine would be a basic nootropic stack I would suggest to significantly improve your short-term/working memory on demand.

I also recall Leo in a shirt and vest, elf ear Leo, masked Leo and Santa Leo.

Clubbing is awesome. You just have to find a club where you feel like you belong. There are many different kinds of techno clubs, for example - I would almost guarantee that some of them will strike a chord with you. It depends on where you live, though, of course.

Fair enough, I often get fed up with humans myself, but reflecting on my life, it's been friendship and moments of deep intimacy and belonging that stand out the most, so I would suggest you don't become too cynical on this issue.

Maybe there is some psychological blockade, or you didn't take enough. I distinctly remember from my most profound psychedelic journeys breaking through this lens of perception and experiencing myself as absolutely omnipresent and "decentralized," so to speak.

It's one of the most meaningful aspects of life. I'm sorry that this isn't part of your experience.

We can debate whether criminal activity (which is a highly relativistic notion anyway) is intrinsically immature, but be assured that the true professionals in this game can get much farther than you could ever comprehend without running into any legal consequences.

Also, don't underestimate the appeal of criminals, especially to women. Criminal behavior is highly attractive to many women, as it is a proxy for evolutionarily adaptive traits in men, such as competence and dominance. Many notorious criminals, including terrorists, serial killers, and rapists, receive thousands of love letters in prison from women worldwide. Additionally, women often seek out porn that involves violence and socially transgressive behavior. If it weren't prohibited on surface-web porn sites, i bet you there would be a significant interest in roleplay involving criminal activity.

It's a dangerous game, and I agree with your analysis that this often stems from a sense of superiority over others and an addiction to seeing how much one can get away with. Some psychoanalysts believe that this is an acting out of the Freudian "Death Drive," where criminals secretly wish to be caught and punished, leading to self-sabotaging behavior that fulfills this desire. A more nuanced psychological analysis would probably distinguish such perverts (if you allow) from professionals who are actually in it for the money, power, status, or whatever - these are the people who end up running serious criminal operations, often without ever being caught or even appearing on anyone's radar.

The joke is that in the movie "Oppenheimer" by Christopher Nolan, there's a sex scene between Oppenheimer and some Marxist chick in his bedroom. While they're going at it, the girl suddenly stops, points to his bookshelf, and notices some works by Sigmund Freud, Carl Jung, and the Bhagavad Gita, among others. She then asks him to read her something from the Bhagavad Gita. This caused major backlash in India, with people complaining about the vulgarity of depicting their most sacred book in a sex scene. In response, Zizek remarked that he agrees it is a vulgar scene, but for a different reason: he believes they spoiled the most sacred human experience (sex) with an obscene and dirty book like the Bhagavad Gita.