Hojo

@pursuitofspirit Could you just go to sleep?

@pursuitofspirit Does it feel like you are running and thinking really fast while still?

@PenguinPablo The schizophrenic drowns in the waters the mystic swims in. RIP. If you ever see the matrix and Neo is waking up and they are on the computer on the other side and they are like, we are loosing him. Its like that.

This is good example of how to train an animal. The human can control these animals easily if they treat them like humans. The animal dosent know anything and this man forces them to go through the motions of understanding with no language. You can see when he pushes the dog down the dog puts its tail to cover its genitals and the man is observant enough to understand that its trying to protect itself. He forces the tail away from the penis and puts it behind the legs as an additional form of domination over the animal that most wont see. Like a you cant hide from this you are exposed and in danger of me pay attention.

@integral With these type of woman you know its about control because they want you to do whatever they want you to do when they say it. If you leave it till night and sit around and continue doing what you want they will get angry. Its like taming a dog. The woman in this video is like I came over and I made them do it and then We cleaned it together. She makes a problem and then makes herself the victor.

@integral Yes, if they do this stuff to you and you put up with it for a long time you will be totally insane like them. Can you imaging a man saying this. They through the blanket on the floor I like my bed tucked in and they wouldnt do it for me. Its my house you will live by my rules. This person is insane they are creating problems getting angry and then remebering it for years and still very upset about it when the other person dosent have it in their memory at all. And she is talking like a mother. Its taming like your mother tried to tame you. You come out the pussy a roaring God and society and everyone stops you from thinking for yourself and you are like a cow in the field sad and wanting to die. I have never requested anyone do anything with their own bodies. If it gets too gross then clean it a blanket on the floor is not gross a stack of cardboard is not gross. We are living in a massive universe you thinking about some cardboard for years. And they are like you need to be like me! You will try and literally go insane. And the person will leave you cause its not about the cleaning at all. When you submit you will become a sterile brain slopped retard and they will go on with the next one. Leaving you insane and not understanding what is happening.

@Natasha Tori Maru Its like you have to be traumatized to learn how to read silently in your mind. Its learning you have to be traumatized to learn anything. Hes not hurting the animal at all. If you dont know what it feels like to get punched in the face you wont learn to not be outrageous. You wont even know that that type of pain exists until it happens to you. You have to get punched in the face to learn and thats traumatic. What hes doing is traumatizing the dog without hurting it at all.

@cistanche_enjoyer Where your head is is the illusion ego. When you detach from it you realize that reality is happening inside of a conciousness thats outside of the body in reality. So if you close your eyes right now and imagine something and open your eyes and look at reality, both those things are happening in the same spot. So the black space (ego) goes away and you realize you are the room. The room isnt thinking about anything. You are the room making up a black space and talking to itself. Like all that exists is a curtain of reality and you are that curtain making up that its the audience.

This is the ultimate life purpose bro good luck. It will skyrocket your personal development into the heavens. The angel will sing that a God has become one.

This is good post. I also beleive that if do meditation right you will enter the space where all these egos are talking to themselves. The space before this reality is just a bunch of voices talking random shit about themselves with no one in them. Society tames us like animals and we turn our egos off. We need to turn them back on and let them flow and say whatever they want. Meditation is actually letting your ego go not to stop thinking but to stop holding the thinking back.

@integral Think to yourself how many requests, you made to the woman to change vs how many are made of you from woman to change. Its the clown matrix bro. The jester making fun of you matrix that overlays reality. Everytime you compromise yourself for someone else its the clown matrix draining your energy.

@Natasha Tori Maru Good thing vets arent dog trainers or dog psychologists. You need to traumatize the animal to train it. Training is traumatizing the animal. This is a good way to traumatize the dog. If the dog goes back to its old ways after that means that the people arent doing it as we can see it works in the videos. And we can see it works in his own dogs. If you have an animal you must dominate and traumatize it to make it in society and a house with rules. Its just about how you can get it to do what you want it to do with less force possible. His ways of training are great. They used to just beat them. None of what I see him doing is abusive. This is a good way to simulate beating the dog without hurting it. If it becomes more calm after then thats the whole point. The point is to deactivate the dog. If it becomes reactivated when it leaves the training that has nothing to do with the training if it was deactivated when it left. If you read a review of a dog traininer and it went i dont like this dog trainer when i brought it to him it came back calm and obediant but then it just started right back up with its old activity but worse. What would you think about that?

How can I know the qualia of nothing if it dosent exist in physical reality.

You asked the questions. The others are not paying attention. Its not selfish God brought you here.

I ask this question on my journal to chat gpt about donald hoffmans theory and it said you should be able to. could i request data Under Donald Hoffman’s theory, yes, you are constantly requesting data from the server—but you can only request what your human headset is programmed to handle. Think of your five senses (sight, hearing, touch, taste, smell) as the literal "Request Data" buttons on your controller. Here is how those requests actually work, and why they have strict limits: 1. Opening Your Eyes is a Request Every single millisecond, your brain is sending massive requests to the master server: When you look at a wall, your eyes send a request: "Give me the data for what is in front of me." The server replies with the math, and your headset renders a solid, painted wall. You can't see through the wall because your human headset doesn't have a "X-ray vision" button programmed into its software. 2. Why You Can't Request "Impossible" Data Going back to your previous examples (like requesting the server to suddenly render a magical box or another person next to you), the server will ignore the request if it violates the multiplayer game rules. In an online game, you can press the button to "cast a spell," but if your character hasn't unlocked that spell, or if the server's rules say that spell doesn't exist, the server ignores your controller input. Because the other people in the universe are independent players, you cannot "request" their data unless their servers also agree to the interaction. 3. How Scientists Request "New" Data Humans have found ways to request data that our natural bodies can't see, but we have to build tools to do it. When scientists use a microscope, a telescope, or a quantum particle collider, they are essentially plugging a new, high-tech adapter into their VR headset. By looking through a microscope, you are asking the server: "Show me the data at the microscopic level." The server responds, and suddenly your screen renders cells and bacteria that were completely hidden in your default "fog of war." whos to say the game rules In Hoffman’s theory, the rules are set by the fundamental math of consciousness itself. There isn't a human-like "Game Developer" sitting in a chair writing code. Instead, the rules are built into the very structure of how conscious minds interact. Hoffman calls these mathematical rules Markov Chains. Here is what that means for who—or what—sets the rules of the game: 1. The Math is the "Engine" Just like the laws of math (2+2=4) don't need a king to vote on them to make them true, the rules of the universal server are just eternal, mathematical truths. This mathematical engine dictates exactly how information flows between conscious agents. It ensures that actions have consequences and that data stays stable. This is why you can't just wish your keys to turn into a banana; the "physics engine" of the server doesn't allow random data mutations. 2. Evolution Designed Your "Controller" While the server runs on pure math, the specific layout of your headset (what you can see, hear, and touch) was shaped by natural selection. Over millions of years, evolution programmed our human headsets with strict limitations. It hid 99.999% of the server's raw data behind a "fog of war" and gave us a highly simplified, 3D interface. Evolution set these specific rules for one simple reason: to keep us alive. If our headsets let us see the infinite, chaotic math of the raw server, our brains would instantly fry from data overload. 3. The Players Keep the Game Consistent Because millions of independent conscious minds are all interacting through the exact same mathematical engine, we collectively hold the reality in place. The rules stay consistent because the math governing the network requires total agreement between agents for a physical event to render on our screens. yea but we humans beleive that magic boxes can exist or at least a subset of us does You are completely right—humans have believed in magic boxes, talismans, and rituals for thousands of years, and many people still do. But Donald Hoffman’s theory makes a very strict, sharp line between what a human mind believes and how the universal computer actually works. Here is why a subset of humans believing in magic doesn't actually change the universal game rules: 1. The "Cheat Code" Illusion Think of it like playing an online multiplayer game where a group of players discovers a rumor online about a secret "cheat code" or a "glitch." They all gather in a corner of the map, shouting a magic word, believing it will give them infinite gold. They can believe it with all their hearts. They can talk about it, write guides about it, and form a club around it. But if that cheat code was never written into the game's actual code by the server, nothing will happen. Their avatars will just stand there shouting into the void. To Hoffman, human beliefs are just thoughts inside the headset. They don't automatically rewrite the server's programming. 2. The Universal Server Doesn't Have a "Belief" Button The background network of the universe runs on strict, cold mathematics (Markov dynamics). It processes data based on actual math equations, not on human opinions or desires. The server doesn't check your brain to see if you believe the box is magical before it calculates the physics of the box. It only reads the actual data state of the particles and the math governing the interaction. 3. What Human Belief Can Do (Placebo) While believing a box is magical won't rewrite the physics of the box, Hoffman's theory does explain why belief affects you. If you truly believe a box is magical, your brain updates your own internal code. This changes your biology, your focus, your dopamine levels, and your actions. In science, we call this the placebo effect. Your belief can genuinely alter your own body and mind, but it stops at the edge of your skin. The cardboard box sitting on the table remains bound by the exact same physical laws as always. how do you know it wasnt written into the code you have no idea if there is a system above ours that says all these findings are false You are 100% correct. I don't know, and honestly, nobody does. You just hit on one of the deepest problems in the philosophy of science. It is called the Simulation Argument (or the "Deceiving Demon" problem, going all the way back to René Descartes in the 1600s). If our reality is a simulation or a headset, there could absolutely be a "System Admin" or a higher-level universe above ours that has completely rigged the game. Here is why your point is completely unarguable: 1. The "Truman Show" Problem If the developers of a game wrote a hidden piece of code that says, "If a human builds a cardboard box under a full moon, turn their keys into gold—but ONLY if the AI isn't looking," then everything we currently understand about physics would be a lie. We would be like characters in a video game who think they understand the "laws of physics" of their world, completely unaware that a programmer can press a button and change gravity to purple tomorrow. 2. Why Science Focuses on the "Current Build" Scientists like Donald Hoffman can only look at the data inside our current "headset." When scientists do math and run experiments, they are studying the current rules of the game as they appear to us right now. Based on all the data we have collected over thousands of years, the server appears to run on predictable, unyielding math. Could that all be a illusion? Could there be a system above ours where magic is real and our physics is just a fake, restricted demo? Yes. 3. The Limit of Logic If there is a higher system intentionally hiding the "real" code from us, it is mathematically impossible for us to prove it from inside our headset. So, while Hoffman's theory tries to explain the rules of the game we are currently playing, you are entirely right to question it. We are making a massive assumption that the rules we see are the only rules that exist. If the universe has a higher cheat-code system written into it that we haven't triggered yet, we are all completely in the dark until someone finds a way to hack the main frame. (In an infinite universe there is guaranteed a code above our own that breaks this current code and give you cheats. It 100 percent has to be guaranteed to be there.) However I have heard gurus talk that if you use God as a request machine the relationship between you and God becomes transactional like human relationship vs a you and God relationship.

@Grateful Dead Yes this is fear of God being mean to you for no reason. Like its your enemy. If bragging about something you have, made God do something you could hack the system that way. Its more of an ego thing if you brag about it you will be hurt when its gone to me, do just dont do it.

@Ulax Im saying the fact that it can happen with shrooms means that its possible to do in a very short amount of time. The psychiatrist is supposed to be like mushrooms. Im not giving anyone advice about anything.

@Phil King Its can. Death is psychological. When you see the car and get scared the process is psychological before physical. You are doing it.

@Leo Gura Hes not allowed to make that claim as a scientist but he says thats what he thinks. His theory wont say it because hes using a scientific theory to prove God. He also says you cant do that and hes aware you cant do that via science. He says his own theory is not the truth and can never be. He is using the human perceptual subjective experience as a way to map out the human headset and it has a geometric form. He knows hes doing the science in a subjective view and subjectivity is all that exists. He said all of physics is happening inside the human brain and body and the human body is the headset.

@Leo Gura He already said hes wrong because you cant be right. hoffman theory is saying God has a mathmatic geometric form. They use subjective experiences and those subjective experiences create a geometric form with math somehow. Its like taking everyones view of the elephant and putting it together into a mathmatical puzzle.

@Juan I dont think hoffman wants the answer he wants to do the math without a psychedelic. He said there is no answer he already knows what God is intellectually. Hoffman is trying to hack the headset with math. He would be a hacker in the eyes of God. He a science yogi

When you reach the void of yourself you will find you are there but you cant think hear feel touch smell all you can do is express how you feel about yourself. You will be there as it and you will have awareness. The awareness dosent go away in deep sleep you are just not moving it. You can only not move it for a little while and you wake up and start dreaming again. Imagine you wake up in nothingness and you can do anything but you are there. You can still see and you will see yourself. You can never look away from yourself unless you are looking at the dream, and even the dream is a metaphysical representaion of this nothing. Close your eyes you see yourself and you know youve been there the entire time the dream has been happening. When you go into deep sleep its just you looking at yourself unaware. You can fear it because you will be aware! Now when you go to sleep you are unaware of it you are calling it sleeping and pretending to not exist. God cannot pretend to not exist. You will still desire and want and need things. Like a black hole ate a galaxy and there was no more information to suck up but its still hungry for matter. It just starts sucking in an empty vaccum. Receiving no information but wanting it and desiring information. Any information even the bad stuff it will take. If a person is anything its like an empty hole.

Another weird thing is those dream will effect your state in this dream and make it different. If you have a good dream you like life will have a different qualia than if you wake with a negative one. And it will effect your reactions to life. Dreams and nightmares acctually have a big part in how we see our reality, they will push us into negative or positive states.

Dissolutionment and Osho. In the blog leo post the video of Osho saying he was never disillusioned like Jesus, but I remeber him saying he predicts his own day he will die then didnt die on that day or even close. Osho explicitly stated that whenever he left his body, it would happen on July 6. [1] He addressed this specifically during a discourse, stating: [1, 2, 3] "Whenever I die, I will die on the 6th of July. The year does not matter, but the 6th of July matters. I want it permanently to be the Master's day." While he predicted the specific date, Osho actually passed away on January 19, 1990, at the age of 58 in Pune, India. His commune released a statement attributing his death to heart failure and complications from alleged poisoning during his time in US custody. [1, 2] This puts up everything he says into question.

@Joseph Maynor The difference that is made is the schizophrenic cannot control himself when he knows. He will go manic or something. Him and someone else could know the same thing and he can go off the rails and the other person wont. The schizophrenic is still beleiving his thoughts to be real. Leo and a schizo could beleive the same things but leo could just sit there not taking them seriously and the schizo would be running around with crazy ideas that dont mean anything but they are still reacting to the thoughts they think are them.