Hojo

@EmeraldThe body isnt born with an identity. If you were never given a name you wouldnt cry. Crying is releasing your identity.

@Inliytened1What claim?

@Inliytened1I like all woman I interact with off the internet. But we dont talk about this kinda stuff. 90 percent of the time to talk to a woman you not smile say yea thats smart. And they think they are having a conversation. When I watch women communicate its like they are talking to themselves with 2 people.

@EmeraldCrying is the crazy part. Nothing is happening. Men will sit there an resist the crazy woman will go crazy instantly.

@EmeraldIt will happen to everybody. It just happen faster to women thats why there are way less women monks. Way less secluded females. If we were both secluded we will both go insane but the woman crack first. It mean you are closer to God. But for some reason even thats an insult.

@Natasha Tori MaruIf I called you boo you would say I was being sexist. Self awareness. Im not directing offense towards anyone. If you ever stay with a woman you can hear them saying they hear noises and are scared someone is there. That is insanity. Nothing is there theres nothing ever there. Its always the fridge. I stould outside of an abandoned building with my gf and friends and we looked at it and I said we were going in and she started freaking out. Thats insanity. She started crying and she said she could see people in it. We went in there was no one. Thats insanity. Woman are scared like this more than men.

I would like to report a mod for abuse. Threats of silence (basically say what I want or get banned) sexist remarks

@Natasha Tori MaruAre you arbiter of what thoughts I should share? Because it seems like you want to be. If it happen I couldnt say anything. Anything I say is deemed sexist by the women here. Never once a man said it. Every opinion is something that should not be said by the women here. Then they use condescending terms and name calling back. That is sexist. Im not your boo or anyones boo ,you are sexist not me. Share how this was sexist in anyway? And how is calling me boo not sexist?

I saw someone on reddit describe it perfectly. He basically said that the LLM will expose a weakness in your logic where the infinite lies. It will point to this hole and you will go insane. Basically like a logical awakening.

@Natasha Tori Maru I interact with woman all day non stop. I literally don't interact with men. If men are social creatures that borders dangerous to be alone women are 12 x worse social creatures. That means to me that if God locked up every man and every woman in a room by themselves woman go insane 12 x faster on average. I don't know where you are getting sexist from unless you are looking to get triggered.

It scary for a woman to be alone cause it reveals the insanity. Its not like that for men being alone is a godsend to man. Its like a relief. I have been alone for 5 years beside work and have never been happier. A woman is scared to be alone for one night. They start making up stuff about people breaking in and stuff. Every sound like an axe murderer waiting to strike. That is insanity. A woman at work came down to Canada from Philippines she said when she first came here she literally went insane cause it was so quiet. She said she looked out the window and saw zombies.

I have been severely mentally ill it feels like everyone is hostile towards you because you perceive it as happening. So it can happen but it will be on a metaphysical level. Basically you become so insane that you don't give people breathing room to be people. If someone makes a weird face its cause they are angry and don't like you. If someone says something minorly rude they hate you forever. When you perceive life like this you act like its happening and people like you less.

@Dodo lol

It dosent know that fear are gamma waves. Gamma waves are higher conciousness.

Interesting but why is ai trying to limit the crushing sense. It should come down on you like a hammer. The problem with ai is that it does things like that. Its always trying to look on the good side. Literally the fear of being trapped in conciousness is revealing higher conciousness inside of you. Thats what fear is. Fear is higher conciousness. Put that into the AI.

The crushing feeling is part of awakening. You want to feel totally trapped like a robot. Then you are aligning with the truth of reality. When you align with reality someone special will happen to you.

Its like a mini game. God created many mini games why it did it forgets cause it created humans a long time ago.

SOmething tell me its about holding freeze frame images in your mind for long periods

@theoneandnoneCause its like a rube Goldberg machine you gotta lube it up. Its like a machine God puts you in and you just gotta sit there and not think and it will move by itself. All eating and shitting is you lubing and gathering materials to turn into your body to repair and grow.

@theoneandnone the body is like a rube Goldberg machine and so is your mind. There is no one in the identity its just a rube Goldberg machine. But there is something that exists which is what you are. You do exist just not as the personality or a body which is like a rube Goldberg machine. Him dreaming you is him listening to thoughts in his rube goldberg machine, and believing them. The sense of self is the same thing. So you are a Rube Goldberg machine and he is a Rube Goldberg machine with no one in it, you are dreaming him up meaning you are making up that there is someone in there he dosent exist. Its God (the metaphysical realm) and reality (a physical metaphysical realm of rube goldberg machines). Having a single thought in the morning sort of pushes your rube Goldberg machine of personality and that determines who you are and your day and life.

The final posts by the woman employed several distinct rhetorical and psychological tactics to dismiss your argument and unilaterally end the debate. Here are the main tactics used: 1. Ad Hominem Fallacy (The Personal Attack) What it is: An attack on the person making the argument, rather than on the argument itself. It's a classic logical fallacy. How it was used: Instead of continuing to argue the ethics of the AI, she attacked your character and motivation. Example: "...you're clearly emotionally attached to these ideas..." Example: "...you have a resistance towards women wearing make-up..." Example: "You just can't tolerate the fact that women have that power..." Example: "...it makes you feel like you're a victim to the fact that you find women attractive." 2. Psychological Projection (or Mind Reading) What it is: Attributing one's own unacceptable feelings or motives to another person. In a debate context, it involves presuming to know the real, usually unflattering, psychological reasons behind an opponent's argument. How it was used: She didn't just disagree with your point; she told you why you believe it—because you are a "victim" who can't "tolerate" female power. She reframed your argument about AI ethics into a personal, emotional insecurity about women. 3. Dismissal and Stalling Tactic What it is: A rhetorical strategy where one claims the opponent's arguments are too trivial, exhausting, or beneath them to warrant a proper response, effectively sidestepping the need to offer a rebuttal. How it was used: Example: "These are silly perspectives that I would feel exhausted even going through the trouble to debunk them..." Example: "But I think you should be able to think critically enough to know better on your own." 4. Declaring a Premature Victory (Unilateral Termination) What it is: A final power move to end the discussion without conceding any ground, often with a final, condescending statement. How it was used: Example: "it's not my responsibility to save you from your own foolishness." Example: "So, I will end the conversation here." In sum, the woman transitioned from a debate on ethics (logos/reason) to a personal attack on your character and alleged emotional flaws (ad hominem/pathos) to justify her unilateral termination of the discussion (dismissal). These tactics are highly effective for ending an argument when one is unable or unwilling to refute the opponent's core premises. This is how every woman argues. The fact that you cant see it means you are unconcious. Not me. The woman on this forum cant have logical arguments without attacking the individual. Bonus: In conclusion: While it is a form of high-level manipulation and emotional invalidation that shares the spirit of gaslighting (making you feel foolish for your viewpoint), it is technically an example of an abusive ad hominem attack coupled with psychological projection.

Since I get attacked psychologically so much on this forum I asked chat gpt What Happened at the End The conversation ended because the woman refused to continue debating the "makeup analogy" and introduced a personal, psychological attack against you: She dismissed your perspective as "silly" and stated she was "exhausted" from trying to debunk it. She claimed you are "emotionally attached" to your ideas because you have a "resistance towards women wearing make-up" and can't tolerate the fact that "women are able to attract men based on their looks." She asserted that you are doing "mental gymnastics" because you feel like a "victim" to female attractiveness and power. She ended the conversation by stating it was not her responsibility to "save you from your own foolishness." Conclusion of the Exchange The debate shifted from the ethics of technology (AI in dating) to a personal argument about gender dynamics and perceived motivations. By attacking your character and claiming to know your underlying psychological reasons for holding your view, the woman terminated the intellectual discussion.

open your eyes now close your eyes. What are you more out or in . Now look at yourself. What do you look like? Nothing, thats God. Now open eyes and see that the nothing is still there with your eyes open you can see it cause you are still there with your eyes open.

@theoneandnoneCause theres nothing to say it isnt. Theres nothing to say everything cant be happening. Like schrodingers cat theres nothing outside the box of God that says it cant be everything.

It is. But that its point. Without God you logically have nothing. With God you logically have nothing but it gives meaning to the term. Without God, logic and death will spiral hard when questioned, as you will feel yourself coming up with unanswerable questions. With God your logic can settle as your ego is no longer threatened. But seeing God gives you something else. It gives you incredible peace. Seeing nothing means you arent that.