XxxDenyYourLies

Yes but that's all yourntrolling. If you’re in the bathroom taking a shit then that’s the BATHROOM you're taking a shit. None of it is "reality" or "entirety of reality, you're a literal troll even suggesting this nonsense to people. and what the heck you mean by "you" and then proceed to write (infinity)? What does this outdated discarded math concept (indinity) has to do with anything?

Michael is wrong, you're not imagining shit. He is misleading people. You should not pay attention to trolls. Take for example your eyes, you can only even get aware of something you see after the fact, after your brain process what you are seeing, then milliseconds later you're able to think or "imaigne" something". nothing underlying this process is "imaginary" . The retina reacts to light, it only reacts to light because light is NOT imaginary. That is just a silly small example that alone refutes any troll promoting " imagining everything" nonsense. They hate their idealistic worldview destroyed tho.

You seem to be invested with cute fancy words we've heard before.. " luv ol dat is man" "luv in ur xixect expexienxe" "GodGod-yo-you" "godn multiply..." No evidence for any of that. Must be a personal theory? Where does this premise for god come from? Just out of curiosity, just out of curiosity for sure. And how do you know any of that? how do you know what the "god" you imply here, did or do? where does your whole special knowledge about this "god" (that you assume) comes from? Or maybe, perhaps, you're making all of this up? Like a cope? ... maybe not tho, maybe I'm wrong, let's see

Incoherent, uninformative. dishonest and false. Either you're purposefully misguiding people or you're too naive. First remove phrases like "indirect experience", because they are already assumed as true in conversations so people ignore then fact it's nonsense to use these terms. "It's not an experience, let alone direct, those are different senses. For you to see, you need a fully functional eye and its cells, any malfunction will not allow you to see. The retina reacts to light (external light), none of that is imaginary, no process is imaginary or requires your imagination, that's ridiculous to even ponder that. And the "experience" whatever you label that, is after the fact. Seeing is not an experience, seeing is just the act of seeing, you see because of your eyes. And many processes occur for you to even see. Vsauce has a great video called "you live in the past" where he shows how the brain process things we see before we are even aware of them, which fully debunks this "process if imaginary" nonsense, and don't get me started with "oh but it's layers of imagination man, it's a deeper subconscious level, no, if you can't demonstrate that with evidence, it's just wishful hating talk, because you hate science and want it not to be true. If this process is not imaginary, then what is imaginary? Most likely nothing you say is imaginary is. Probably not even you believe that. Hence the reason you tell people that. For example, Leo used to say because you trip on drugs and your vision get distorted that means your hand really get distorted , and if that's so that means his conclusion was that he could apply that to the world and say "we are consciousness imagination", and that means consciousness is imagining your parents and you and so on and on. He used that niche to pretend this applied to the world and make up a whole theory about it. But I still think he was trying to irritate people by saying "man look your hands, it's consciousness imagining it. Or mixing double-slit experiment saying when some sort of consciousness is not looking at your parents they get sucked into codes and nothingness ". That had to be to irritate people. He even had a video saying when you're not looking at an elephant , the elephant stays in a superposition of every single elephant it could possibly be. Still the elephant was there tho, but that's still false. The elephant still an elephant , when you're not looking at it and quantum mechanics doesn't scale up to the macro world. Also nothing in quantum mechanics say that when a quantum particle is not observed it becomes 8182718818181.....particles... it still one particle that splits in many, there is no number for it, you can't assume infinite, if it's indefinite. For the record, no, you are not imagining your human self into existence. But I can also say "we are the imagination of ourselves" and pretend I sound deep

People in this forum be like "another day posting on a forum that I am a nothingness and I tell others in online discussions how they are also this nothingness-form-person or that they have some infinity void inside them so I can sleep at night, damn I hate to think "I am someone who was born in time and will die someday" . Then this cycle repeats over and over and over. That's how you get people obssessed and addicted and attached to these philosophies. It's so unhealthy and obvious nonsense. We look at these people we can only feel sorry for them. We actually have people in this forum who have been doing this for years, for the reasons I stated. Which is obviously worrying at this point. They need people IRL who'll take care if them or they might get insane someday over these delusions.

iNfiNiTelY mYsTerIoUs why every time someone uses the word "infinitely" I cringe so hard? It's so stupidly overused and misused. Why can't you just say "it's mysterious", why this incessant need to put "infinitely" before every single jibber jabber you say? It's so lame bro Also there is no evidence this is "infinitely mysterious " even if "infinitely" applied to this case. It would still mean we don't know if its mysterious can be revealed or not. If it was "infinitely" mysterious the Universe wouldn't have been created before we were even there to see or we were somewhere else. Many partsof the Universe we didn't go yet. The Universe or parts of it clearly know its mysteries so it's not infinite

Yes, scratched all the idiocy in just one shot. Assuming this is not a troll post and you're really that naive. No. Your post is insane and you love the insanity of it. You would love for it to be true, but you know it isn't, you so know it isn't that you had to create a post about it self-affirming the things you wish was true. A simple thing like correcting what you think visual system is, is enough to debunk your entire idiocy. let me fix it for you: "I was in the living room just looking at the room, when it suddenly dawned on me. “This entire room is outside of me.”. Everything that I was looking at was outside me. My visual field is what allows me to see it. I am the one who is seeing, the same one that I can see in the mirror, and whatever I look at, is outside of me, that's why eye pupils exist, because they wouldn't REACT to something that is not external, knowing that is enough to make me less dumb"(but even IF you'd go from your POV, "oH ThE rOoM Is Me" you'd still saying it from your perspective, inside a body, you'd still seeing it from your centralized consciousness inside your body, so you'dstill making no sense.) another one is the schrodinger's cat thing you mention, which is a thought experiment. It says nothing about "whatever is happening in the universe is happening here and now" , what does that even mean? to conclude the double slit experiment to begin with, it required them to predict things that were not happening "now", and I have no idea what you mean by "here" in your context. We are not even at the same location, relativity says places differ in time, "here" is only a location you're actually in, other locations may not even be at the same time as yours. You entire post is laughable. You are not even connected to the universe, because there is no "universe", don't get me wrong, there ar material things, but not some grandiose new agey hippie dippie universal entity you say "oh that's universe and I am a soul part of it" that's some outdated pantheistic religious nonsense