Twentyfirst

https://www.instagram.com/p/DKMntK8oCuI/

Real politics of EU, I think UK is a recent member. Basically same organization https://www.instagram.com/p/DKMfAbMS46g/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link https://www.humantiproject.org/uk-admits-its-breaking-own-laws-to-supply-arms-to-israel/#

If you have a visa to USA they search your social media at customs. For China you can just go without search ☠️

Funny that you think tech or economy are the top two things you said. There are metrics beyond this you know

He doesn't understand true civility or development. Reading too much western papers, psychology, and politics (which are all biased against anything non western) and ignoring behavior and patterns. "The CIA told me Afghan is underdeveloped so no point in traveling there to see myself"

But Hamas isn't allowed to civilize. They can't have above ground headquarters, an official army, be in leadership positions without being assassinated (you aren't allowed to assassinate leaders of other countries even if its without civilians nearby, by international law), proper nation borders, agriculture the way they want, access to land/sea/air borders, and so on. They are desperate and fighting an uphill battle. The last thing Israel wants is a more civilized (in the way you define civilized) opponent

I looked up hard vs soft power on google AI Soft power and hard power are distinct approaches to influencing international relations. Hard power relies on coercive measures like military force or economic sanctions, while soft power involves persuasion and attraction through cultural influence, values, and policies. Soft power aims to co-opt others to share one's agenda, whereas hard power compels them through costs and benefits. Hard Power: Definition: Hard power uses coercion and/or payment to achieve goals. It relies on military force, economic sanctions, and other forms of pressure. Examples: Military intervention, trade embargoes, and economic aid tied to policy compliance. Advantages: Can achieve quick results and enforce compliance. Disadvantages: Can lead to resentment and backlash, damaging relationships and potentially leading to unintended consequences. Soft Power: Definition: Soft power is the ability to attract and persuade others to share one's values and objectives through cultural influence, political values, and foreign policy. Examples: Cultural exchange programs, educational initiatives, international organizations, and promoting democratic values. Advantages: Builds long-term relationships and fosters mutual understanding and cooperation. Disadvantages: Can be slower to produce results and may not be effective if values are not shared or perceived negatively. Key Differences: Approach Hard Power: Coercion, threats, incentives Soft Power: Attraction, persuasion, influence Focus Hard Power: Immediate results, compliance Soft Power: Long-term relationships, shared values Mechanism Hard power: Force, economic leverage Soft Power: Culture, values, foreign policy Examples Hard Power: Military intervention, sanctions Soft Power: Cultural exchange, diplomatic efforts In essence: Hard power is about getting others to do what you want through force or payment, while soft power is about getting them to want what you want. A successful foreign policy often requires a balanced approach, using both hard and soft power strategically.

So you think Arabs who never took place in the holocaust should promise Jews that there will never be another holocaust or else the Jews will kill the Arabs What if the Arabs promise the Jews there won't be another holocaust but Europe alone does another holocaust? Is that the Arabs breaking their promise?

I know the Jews are resilient. But for a stateless people of such small population the Jews are resilient because they know how to sway large powers, today it's the US You won't fight to the death. That's delusion Well you said you won't be convinced that another holocaust won't happen. Hey, get it over man. You people are not that special. Nobody is thinking about you that much If it's really the religious thing just know that is a common practice of colonizers. Why do you think in Islam you aren't allowed to have pictures of the prophet? Because people like you use religion to steal. White colonizers would have a picture of Jesus with a white appearance, even though Jesus is middle eastern, and they would trick gullible colored people into thinking that they were closer to god than they were therefore they were higher beings. I mean it sounds so pretty, we were here then we were exiled and now we return, really it sounds beautiful. But it's bullshit and it's illegal, you can't legally claim land that way You zionists always talk about peace and healing as you are burning people alive. Just let go of everything you learned from the zionists. It won't help anything and it won't help you. Stop being jealous of Palestinians who god gave land to and resentful that god made your people stateless. That birthright envy causes you to dehumanize them and want to steal what is rightfully theirs rather than just make trade and deals with them. Offer what you have to them and they will offer what you want (land) to you, this is how peaceful and healed societies operate. Same goes for all the colonizers...if the EU wants gold from Africa they can make barter like everyone else. Why make it difficult other than because you are envious? That's all it takes man

You won't fight to the death over it. If America pulls out you will run away. You can't handle 20 months of bombs. Especially for land you are not native to. It's just another Zionist propaganda to say that the Israelis will fight to the death. Meanwhile there is so much artificial support that if you took it away and equalized it there is no way the Israelis would stick around. It's easy to fight to the death when you have tanks, guns, and the biggest superpower in the world behind you vs a 10 year old girl with rocks. You will kill for the land, just like any colonizer would, but you won't die for it The holocaust isn't the reason there is a problem. It's Zionism. The Balfour Declaration was decades before the Holocaust even occurred Even if they remove Bibi and do a 2 state solution. People like you will still have to acknowledge all the crimes, acknowledge your grandparents are from EU, acknowledge that there is an indigenous population with more claim to the land, apologize etc etc. Without this acknowledgment you will never fully integrate into the region (Gulf money) and you will be like a southerner in USA shouting "the south will rise again" with nobody around to listen. You can't say you want a 2 state solution and also say you want to remain a hardcore religious racist that gets his worldview from a terrorist faction of Judaism

That's what the conflict is all about. They will fight it out and someone will win Only one culture, Israel, needs integration, the other is already integrated Money equals peace and peace equals money I guess. Future prosperity is a good vision. The region is extremely rich in resources and location. The entire fighting is senseless since there was never any problems between the two before. Once sense comes back there should be a path to move forward

I hear you but I am personally just not buying it. The holocaust is already etched into everybody's mind at a young age through school, movies, and word of mouth. Hitler is already more evil than other 20th century dictators who killed far more people. Nobody cares about the other hundreds of millions of people who died in WW2. You can get arrested in EU for praising Hitler. Germany has paid hundreds of billions of dollars in reparations. In German schools after WW2 they showed little German kids pictures of mass burials and told them "it's your fault". Just do a test experiment almost anywhere in the world go out and ask 100 people about 5 dictators and the one that will get an automatic emotional response is Hitler They use the holocaust as an excuse to steal land. Or at least they do it enough to where this accusation can be agreed upon by many. This is one of the biggest issues with the current day Israelis is that they are both victims and oppressors at the same time. I don't think the Nazis needed "mental safe spaces" as they were carrying out their genocide I said before I think a good solution would be if the Israelis voluntarily left since they want to live out Western values which are incompatible with the region. Behind that I am in favor of a non violent approach to a one state solution. At that point it would become Palestine will a Jewish minority just like it has always been. The only successful Palestine was under this model. Obviously they will have to renunciate Zionism just like the Germans had to renunciate Nazism. Zionism is a racist and violent ideology I think since it's a democracy then it would be governed by the majority which are Palestinians. Plus I think the entire country will go under the umbrella of the Gulf and they will run it how they see fit in accordance with the rest of the region. The money will come from the Gulf too since at that point America will stop paying for the Jews and the Palestinians will need rebuilding. Everyone will be forced to live side by side and the Israelis that are too resentful of losing the Jewish state will get passports elsewhere because they won't be able to fight the momentum The ending is already written in stone imo. Just the events leading up to that will be random but everyone knows how this ends. Anyone advocating for forcible ethnic cleansing of either side is violent. Anyone suggesting a two state solution for anything less than a stepping stone to a one state is just misinformed or nefarious. One state

Yeah but why did they kill Hitler and the Nazi's? Why not seek to understand them and then just chill out with them by the beach Zionism needs to go for peace to stabilize. Period

@Apparition of Jack You still don't understand. Throughout the history of all Jewish persecution it was the Muslims that always protected them. It made no sense to create an adversarial relationship with them. Flip the situation. I am friends with you and you are friends with me. Some guy named Germany steals from you and kills your family. I empathize with you from getting harmed by Germany. Then you and Germany come visit me to try to steal from me and kill my family. Without Germanys help you would not be able to steal from me yet you claim you are a victim of Germany and of me. How can I continue to empathize with your holocaust if your friendship with the people who holocausted you is genociding me. Make it make sense Remind me when Rwanda or Cambodia went to colonize another people out of their pain and fear? This sense of wanting to protect the Jews out of guilt is the problem. How much money and support has been sent to Israel so they can destroy Palestine? By trying to solve anti semitism, with Israel, it has only created more anti semitism You are way off

https://x.com/henri_fjord/status/1927130048873537584

Im sure Washington was for sale before Trump. Trump just has enough balls to do it in front of everyones faces Larry Fink called and he said PurpleTree will own nothing and be happy 😃

@Nemra Proof Israel has no ancestral ties. They had an attack on Oct 7 and at least 500,000 fled the country even though it would have been hard for Hamas to make another successful attack Gaza has had Nagasaki level bombs for 20 months and Trump promised them palaces in faraway lands and nobody leaves

Meanwhile, today Western leaders sold out to corporations and bailout banks at the expense of their own positions and people You think Putin will let some tech billionaire sway him? You think Singapore will let some Madoff scammer get anything less than the death penalty? You think MBS will accept some Epstein island? Why do you think the gulf is giving Trump so much money?

Did you watch the 3 videos I posted in that ancestral ties comment? Ancestral ties are real. Which is exactly why the right of return is in the international law

That's not what happened. The Europeans were oppressive to the Jews for many centuries. Blaming them for everything and using them as a scapegoat. Then came the Jewish question which was "What to do with all the Jews". All this prepared the soil for Hitler to grow and after the holocaust they changed it from a genocide to an ethnic cleansing which is just another way to scapegoat them. Maybe the Jews were involved in shady banking stuff but that's because in the West if you gain enough money you can bribe your way to a higher position than the leaders themselves The zionist Jews spent so much time in Europe they learned these violent colonization and propaganda tactics that they brought with them to Palestine. The ironic thing is they are using the assistance of the same people that tried to destroy them to destroy the only friends they ever had. Middle Eastern Jews were always safe in Palestine. Even a good portion of the initial European Jews were welcomed with open arms and Palestinians took them into their home. But when those Palestinians went out for a few days they would come back and the doors were locked. It's super messed up. You can't really blame Palestinians for what they have become more than you can blame Jews. That's why I say this is a western problem not a jewish or middle eastern problem

Don't forget that Zionists were debating whether they should make a state in Uganda or Madagascar. Something like that I don't remember exactly The religious homeland is mostly an excuse for colonization

Then how come there were Middle Eastern Jews living in Palestine and never got kicked out? Prove that the European Jews have ties. Let's do DNA tests You are missing a large point. Even if you have ties it doesn't give right to kick out 750,000 people from their homes without payment and creating a refugee crisis. European Jews are extremely violent so it left a bad taste in everyone's mouth. They didn't just come claiming ancestral ties but also came by ignoring Palestinian ties which are more rooted since they never left for thousands of years

Nope. Zionism only works if the Jews take a land that doesn't already belong to a group of people. Since they stole land zionism is incredibly stupid, dangerous for everyone, expensive and requires constant maintenance, exhausting, and will never work as an idea. Right now I would become a zionist myself if it meant the Jews get their own state without theft, I would love that for them why not Why are Europeans complaining about immigrants? Why don't the Swedish go to Norway? Plenty of land there. Why don't the British swim to Ireland. Isn't it all the same thing anyway? The French should move to Spain while the Spanish move to Portugal and the Portuguese move to France. Wouldn't that make perfect sense? Aren't Germans and Austrians the same thing or something? We should move them all to Netherlands Zionists started coming to Palestine before 48 so it was an overflow of immigrants. The real issue started with the Nakba ethnic cleansing not the Palestinians living among immigrants. The ethnic cleansing is an uprooting of a people to their land. When people have ancestral ties to a land breaking that chain causes extreme psychological stresses. Palestinians have the keys to their homes to this day proving they are eager to return. Native Americans described the same phenomenon of not being able to live outside of their land. Don't forget the right of return to all Palestinians and their children are granted by international law https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMm1zbk4Ef8

Don't forget that the primary motivation of the west is anti semitism. The holocaust was an antisemitic genocide of Jews in Europe and Israel was and still is an antisemitic ethnic cleansing of Jews out of Europe. The money, the support, the turning a blind eye is to prevent Jews from ever having to come back. They hate Jews, always have. In this way humanity (Europe) failed Jews by persecuting them for 2,000 years or whatever and now this. I empathize with the Jews in that regard