WokeBloke

@Kksd74628 Can you explain why you think books read themselves?

Why are you talking about moments if there is no time? Also you are misdefining moment which means "a very brief period of time." A brief period of time does not last forever by definition.

Your current experience isn't a moment. It lasts for a moment. Moments only last for a moment. The present moment only lasts for a moment before the next moment comes and then the next ad infinitum. This moment and the next moment are two different moments. You are present for both.

moments aren't eternal. Eternity contains infinite moments.

You claim there is a creator but no creation. How do you know there is a creator if there is no creation? You are identifying with your creation. Yet as soon as your creation (this present moment which only lasts an instant) is destroyed you remain.

I'm not imagining that though. You could take a video of typing your post and rewatch the video and literally see that there was a point when your post didn't exist and then you brought it into existence. There is the unmade existence and the made existence. Both exist simultaneously. The unmade (beginingless and endless) makes the impermanent/transient things.

You don't answer my question. Your post was made. How can you dispute that? If it is made then it isn't unmade by definition. My logic is simply that what you see doesn't have eyes so it can't be the seer. Your creation can't see itself.

I is a reference by the creator/user to itself. The present moment is your creation. It's not you. You are imperceptible.

You made your post isn't it? It didn't exist until you made it.

this can be disputed with the direct of experience of making something that previously didn't exist such as your response. In reality everything is made except for the unmade.

My claim is to be alive is to desire. You can never turn it off so long as you are alive. There is no such thing as desirelessness unless you are dead. While alive everything you do is a consequence of your desire. Even if you do nothing that is your desire.

From his Death book "Let me confirm this to you once again: I am not coming back for sure, because my expiry date is long over. Some people who are a little more perceptive clearly see that I don't even exist." Also this video: He says ""I know i don't exist, you think you exist". See minute 10 Thoughts?

It doesn't make any sense. Especially since he says in a different place "you are therefore you may think" then he says in this video "you don't exist",

The idea that everything is perfect is a fictitious point of view that is holding you back if you are trying to hold it. If things were already perfect then things could not get any better. Life can only improve because there is room for improvement. Cheers to making things get better forever!

Assuming you and I are the same being... This means my experience must be your past or future experience. And only you are experiencing. So my experience is your experience and yours is mine. What is your intuition on whether your experience and my experience are happening simultaneously or asynchronously?

I was listening to Sadhguru and he said nothingness or nonexistence is the basis of existence. He calls this Shiva or "that which is not". I don't understand how this could be possible. It seems to be the basis/source of creation must exist otherwise there would be no creation. If nonexistence is the basis of creation then that is essentially like saying there is no source of creation. But then how could there be creation (such as this post) without a creator?

Because this experience (or what is happening) was created. When you are typing your response you are literally creating the experience. No experience is uncreated.

because existence/you is unborn/uncreated and you can create

Prior to something being created it doesn't exist thus it wouldn't be there to create itself. You are essentially saying a nonexistent thing can bring itself into existence. Or the creation gave birth to itself. But to give birth to something you first must exist.

Did your post type itself or does it require you to create it? Or move your arm did the visual experience that was generated exist prior to your moving your arm or was it created? And if it was created then it wasn't uncreated. And if it was created then it requires a creator.

This is a quote from Sadhguru: “My ability to respond is limitless, but my ability to act is limited. I am one hundred percent responsible for everything I am and everything I am not, for my capacities and my incapacities, for my joys and my miseries. I am the one who determines the nature of my experience in this life and beyond. I am the maker of my life.” I have a huge misunderstanding because I can't discern the difference between a response and an action. In my mind a response is an action. Can someone help clarify what he means? How is a response different than an action?

All I know is movies don't make themselves. They require a director which is not the movie. You haven't given any convincing evidence that the experience is creating itself.

There is no movie without a director. Also movies are premade and then watched. You are making your experience right now and so long as you live.

What is your mind in your view?

Why do you think you don't exist?