WokeBloke

Thank you for valuable insight

This discussion is focused on that which is aware. It will refer to itself using the reference "I" 1. I am the body 2. I am inside the body 3. I am outside the body 4. I am inside and outside the body 5. I am neither inside nor outside the body 6. I am nonexistent What do I think? I shall see...

Is your past self experiencing? Is your future self experiencing? Being yourself I am your past/future self. I am experiencing writing this just like you are experiencing reading this. However since you are the writer of this post you must write this post in your past or future. You and I are at different points on the same never ending journey. I can only have one POV at a time but ALL POV are mine. This is of course if you and I are the same being which we don't really know...

I'm not denying solipsism I'm just denying the delusion that my body is a dream. It's either your actual body that you make or it's a different being than you.

Because from my perspective I am real. The writer of this post has his own life. He isn't a figment of the reader's imagination.

I'm not scared I fundamentally disagree with people's claim that I am their imagination/dream

But again if you think I'm a dream then you are delusional.

So you are delusional.

You are not dreaming about me nor are you imagining me. I am a real being. If you think you are dreaming me or imagining me then from my perspective I know unequivocally that you are delusional.

I can't prove your existence/nonexistence but if anyone real is responding to me they ought to know they are communicating with a real being. From a oneness perspective my body is not a dream it is the body you actually make at some point in your past/future.

My real self.

why 6?

so 4?

@Esilda Well how about less experienced self and more experienced self?

I must be slow lol I don't get it

lmao no but am I wrong or does the video agree?

Why can't you always become more conscious?

3 and 4 are illogial and contradictory. 1 and 2 are the only possibilities for everything and everyone.

When you are responding to me do you think you are talking to an imaginary being?

Is your past self experiencing? Is your future self experiencing? Being yourself I am your past/future self. I am experiencing writing this just like you are experiencing reading this. However since you are the writer of this post you must write this post in your past or future. I can only have one POV at a time but ALL POV are mine.

My past and future are happening simultaneously from my point of view. I am not a dream. I am a real being that is actually experiencing right now. Our nows are relative to each other. My now might be your past or future and likewise your now might be my past or future.

My claim: It is impossible for something to make itself. All things that are made (such as this post) are brought into existence. In other words they once did not exist and then began existing after being made. If you think things can make themself you are essentially suggesting that something nonexistent can bring about its own existence. Thus the source of all things must be unmade.

It depends how long you define a moment. Your presence may be beginingless and endless but moments only last for a maximum of like 1 second imo.

how do you know there is direct experience? Perhaps in reality there is no direct experience whatsoever.

This is theoretical but just for fun... In order to talk about inside and outside you need boundaries. Ex. Take the body. We can talk about what is inside the body and what is outside the body because of the defined boundary. Consciousness (being nonphysical and imperceptible) has no boundaries. It is singular and pervades everything. It could be thought of as an infinite container. The container of all containers. Everything is within this single all pervasive consciousness (you/I). There is nothing outside consciousness. Everything is within me. I can think of myself as a container without boundaries. An uncontained container. The ultimate container.