Yeah Yeah

@Shawn Philips but also NDE accounts also point out that the truth between beings is a type of honesty and knowing which can't quite hide lies or dishonesty - it's almost a spiritual telepathic knowing between spiritual entities so that you can't hide manipulation tactics but can see through one another's thoughts and intentions honestly and openly. So that level honesty surely can't hide manipulation tactics for reincarnation trap loops. Also the dying brain floods dopamine, serotonin, DMT chemical-like drugs and endorphins these being positive states not negative.

I'm now researching again into 5meo-dmt or DMT in general and might consider a trip in 2026 if I cross paths with the substance, I won't go overboard but I wouldn't mind an ego death - nor do I want psychosis states that leave me disturbed/unnerved afterwards. Unsure how Leo has derealization of identity and sees through reality or how others are imaginary and god realisations yet acts casual about it all, fairly sure I'd personally be a bit loopy if I broke through reality too heavily - and I've had psycadelics experiences which have changed how I function in life but an ego death trip might be interesting for spiritual insights. Might keep doing research.

I hope not I want to be a super free spiritual beings and never reincarnate forcefully - or is there a corresponding attachment of resistant which attaches me to come back - or did I agree to come to this life

No offence man but this is why I've personally done my best to quit weed and substances so I can better articulate my ideas clearer; I'm unsure exactly what you're trying to express. Essentially if there is solipsism as Leo puts it, and I'm the only one in the room (me being conscious I know this) then I'm that king you mention in the land of divine self god-hood, and you all are peasants (fictional props) - Mind you: here I'm using your language, to elaborate on your terms how I'd then be a "special" king in the land of solipsism, while others are not of equal regal quality but fictional characters make believe to strengthen this dreamland. Mathematically coherent if 1+1 equals 2 then I should also have powers over this dream land as the special kingly god hood and make my dream more into a heavenly paradise or any way I would so choose: beautiful virgins, youth, billion dollars, technology like a personal giant Terrance McKenna style spaceship, an iron man suit, superhero abilities, artistic genius, rockstar fame with concerts and retro vice city sunset lambos near the beach, incredible parties every weekend, nobel prize for world peace, life extension, happiness instead of survival, ecstacy drugs without the negative comedowns that enhance the quality of life

Heard Alan Watts say a similar thing, which makes seeking feel futile like a snake chasing its own tail. Or this advice sounds like a koan: what is the sound of a one hand clap? Fairly sure most gurus do this intentionally by frustrating the seeker until they no longer need answers and just sit with themselves in the absurdity of it all, then act like that's enlightenment.

See Leo would be suggesting it is me that is the only one in this forum since I know I am conscious ... So how do I get god realisation and make all my dreams come true and enter god mode where I can design infinite fun games and have a good time

If you really are me make me say something you're now thinking of ... If you can't then what relative use is arguing about solipsism if others behave how they choose anyways

@Dodo no - removing god mode is lame, I also want to awaken to god mode and drop being a shitty boring mediocre dumbass interchangeable human

@Ramasta9 Humans have always freaked out about new tools. The printing press? Threatened the churches and kings. Bronze-age weaponry? Some swore it’d start a war with the gods. Fire? They thought it would burn down the world. Some adapt fast and get the evolutionary edge. Others panic and miss the ride entirely.

@Ramasta9 Chill—it actually helps me regulate. Where else am I supposed to put these questions? I’ve done the “right” things: four days ago I voluntarily went to the emergency department, a mental ward, a hotline, and spent hours with a professional. None of it touched the core issue. As Shakespeare put it, “To be or not to be—that is the question,” and Camus goes further: the question of suicide comes before any other philosophical inquiry, because until you decide whether life is worth living, every other question is secondary. That’s not pathology—that’s philosophy.

Your question acts as if you have a way to.reach the solipsistic realisation ... How do you even awaken? Like do I consciously self-introspect myself imaginative existence and do I need drugs or is this easily achievable sober?

I believe in anti-natalisim and humanity was a mistake

People are obsessed with being a solipsistic God - Actually hilarious how absurd and rediculous this becomes 🤣

I’m hoping for the latter outcome — a state where I can consciously dream any dream I choose, with high intelligence and awareness. Not looping myself endlessly through some blissed-out white light, forgetting how grinding and difficult contrast can be, only to choose to do it all over again out of naïve positivity and end up back here. I want to be deeply intelligent, to experience something like heaven freely, and maybe only later choose to lose myself again — like getting on a roller coaster by choice. Maybe this life is the result of that kind of amnesia: getting bored with total freedom and choosing limitation. That’s my hope — not reincarnation driven by the state I die in, karmic lessons, or unfinished business. This leans with Bashar, Leo Gura and Alan Watts The problem is lack of evidence or verification to which it is. Leo however says I am imagining this life, and it's all imagination, yet he hasn't made a video about imagination itself or it's qualities and the dimensions of it, or it's possibilities - and have had a difficult time unlocking this god mode awakening without drugs. It's been a big claim yet difficult to self-actualize, so either it's false or I'm doing it wrong. I’m hoping for the latter outcome — a state where I can consciously dream any dream I choose, with high intelligence and awareness. Not looping myself endlessly through some blissed-out white light, forgetting how grinding and difficult contrast can be, only to choose to do it all over again out of naïve positivity and end up back here. I want to be deeply intelligent, to experience something like heaven freely, and maybe only later choose to lose myself again — like getting on a roller coaster by choice. Maybe this life is the result of that kind of amnesia: getting bored with total freedom and choosing limitation. That’s my hope — not reincarnation driven by the state I die in, karmic lessons, or unfinished business. This view broadly aligns with Bashar, Leo Gura, and Alan Watts. The problem, however, is the lack of evidence or direct verification for any of it — including from those making the claims. Leo in particular asserts that this entire life is imagination, that reality is fundamentally imagined by consciousness. But this raises unresolved issues. If imagination is the foundational substance of reality, then imagination itself should be examinable, articulable, and experientially navigable in a precise way — its structure, limits, dimensions, qualities, and degrees of freedom. Yet there is surprisingly little direct exploration of imagination as such. No clear phenomenology of it. No detailed mapping of how imagination differs across states, depths, or levels of realization. No rigorous account of how one stabilizes or sustains this so-called “God-mode” awakening without chemical intervention. If imagination is truly infinite and sovereign, why does accessing it seem so unreliable, transient, or dependent on extreme states? Why does realization collapse back into ordinary limitation so easily? Why does the claim remain massive, while embodiment remains elusive? This leaves an uncomfortable fork: either the claim is overstated, poorly articulated, or incomplete — or the method of self-actualization being proposed is insufficient to realize what is being asserted. In either case, “it’s all imagination” remains more metaphysical assertion than lived, verifiable capacity. Surprisingly Leo has not made a video I don't think about imagination as of yet, to actually explain his claim around this phenomenology.

I get what user Human Mint says - Some NDE (near death experience) reports do say this is like a primitive human experience which we can get sticky with monkey brain survival fear based beliefs and habits which are low density negativity (hate), yet that's not what exists in the white light higher density realms of openness, expansion and love.