Guardian

from the point of view of a limited perceiver nested in physical reality Updated

as most ones know by following actualized.org more or less, reality is limitless. parallel to one's timeline and space there are infinite other ones without any gap in between. think of the real number line. pick a number a and b. between those 2 numbers there are infinitely many other numbers. find the middle of these numbers c = (a+b)/2. any number from c that is closer to a is its own timeline more representative of the reality that a stands for. similar for b. a and b are each representatives of a timeline and just like there are infinitely many numbers inbetween 2 numbers, there are infinitely many on the whole numberline and so it is with timelines and ''realities'' so to speak. the spread between a timeline that one calls 'physical reality of unbreakable laws' and something one calls fantasy just seems for one's mind wide. however, when one fantasizes, one actually experiences that reality just on a more or less 'weaker' perception than the one, one is unconsciosly grounded in as physical reality. so don't discourage or scorn about wandering one's mind/daydreaming/loving fiction etc. and try not to draw solid distinction and buy into explanation as to why one is non-sense and the other is truth. these are all valid realities in their own right, one's experience of them just may be different and experience can be shifted.

this is a good basis of any theory that works with a number of infinite or arbitrarily finite distinctions. however, it isn't clear as to why distinction can be removed, moved or redefined or why there are not any in essence hint: combine step 1 and 3

now here is a mammoth task for the interested. assume we have a number line that is representative of a physical reality with its own natural laws where each point on that number line stands for a time line within that physical composition. what would be if we add another number line that stand for another physical composition with its own natural laws more or less different from the first one? and then three and four and so on... ? remember each point is a whole time line within that composition. there are infinitely many points and between two points there are infinitely many points as well.

what are your thoughts about deeper discussion and sharing of metaphysical concepts? what do you think about the demographic of reddit? it seems to me that it is a common theme on reddit to share superficial opinions, no? i know there are subreddits for specific topics like psychology and metaphysics, but even those seem to fear ideas like self-reference, self-reflection and infinite regression, vision... etc. as far as i have experienced at least.

from within existence with the experience of continuity, non-existence is felt like an infinite process of self-colapsing its existence. which depiction fits better than a black whole?

one cannot make something one's passion. passion is not something one thinks about or trains oneself into. it is given by one's heart, period. if one needs to push oneself to do something, it is not one's passion. one possibility of what this is, one describes as making it one's passion, is according to one's belief, something that may lead one to one's passion in a socially least edgy manner. passion is discovered and felt and any activity as well as curiosity comes naturally from within. to recognize passion watch for these hints: continuous self-discipline is not required within one's passion. ( one does not need to remind oneself to do it, especially sequentially ) time is felt annoyance-less and passes by shorter within one's passion.

this would be how i see the two positions on the (non) existence of non-existence.

by not existing, non-existence exists in its nature of not being in existence ( therefore existing ). another perspective on what has been said here: (time stamped) but would both in essence be the same, measured by their of their implications towards existence ?

it is so hard to speak that which is considered taboo, be cringe, expose one's shames or be '' inappropriately'' impulsively honest all intentionally ( without being unethical of course ) or just speak to advocate for what one believes to be the higher good of that which is not normal. actually in real life in sequences to friends to strangers feels like being alone against most. i'm going to take a break.

but then what else will i want to do with my life

the priest uses more immediate intuition to arrive to a belief as reality the mage uses more understanding chains and memory to conclude a belief as reality hence mages minds are messy and priests work more with faith

it is totally fine not to make-up or act sweet and innocent as a women when it doesn't feel true. you could view external non-confirmation of your non-conformance to usual images as filtering out the distractors and aligning yourself further with your true self. by not conforming for the sake of conforming or for a superficial image, you are allowing more men to learn and recognize natural beauty and will be able to recognize/encounter those people easier that form value based relationships. for a deeper personality matching can occure when less false blinders stand in the way. for people that see what more you are better want to see that you do not mask what more you are or can be.

there was no mention of it being easy but the pain is felt people that judge by the usual attraction factors are still children, mostly but if one is still attracted to another displaying such characteristics ( besides the dislike for intuiting that they might not like one for how one wants oneself to be ) one should not be hindered from still "approaching", if emotionally there exists still some form of attraction ( even though intellectually the limits a painfully apparent ) do engage and when there will be judgment and denial for not being a typical expectation express intention and leave this will send them on a path on which they will be confronted with the limitations of such perceptions one has to allow oneself to be hurt to grow

English Subtitles are available. Martin Sonneborn has been broadcasting into the public, to his perception, the less reasonable ( and unfortunately dominant and ruling ) parts of the european union ever since elected into the european parliament. - Tüp means (incompetent/irrelevant) Guy - Schmierlapp means "dirt rag" -Heiko Maaß was a right wing ( maybe fascist ) German Minister. - Christian Lindner was a deep (toxic) liberalist runnning a party in Germany called FDP. - Quark means Curd - CSU/CDU was a conservative party in Germany - dalli-dalli is a word play, meaning ASAP - Angela Merkel was the current chancellor of Germany - VonDerLeyen was the current President of the EU Commission - Olaf Scholz who was a german minister, was one of the next possible chancellor candidates, provided by a party called SPD.

Paranoia is a strong interplay (more so struggle) between realization and its denial within oneself where intuition is pushing strongly for the higher but there is also a strong unwillingness to accept.

in essence simple one is facing a realization pointing to a higher truth once faced it is in your immediate awareness or comprehension there are two paths to follow, one either denies its legitimacy or seeks accepting and integrating what implications one makes of it for oneself. if the denial is chosen, the realizations truth is twisted in need to be continuously pushed out of one's immediate awareness ( comprehension ). when its truth is twisted, one's mind is preoccupied with upholding a false ( false in relation to what it could be when the realization is allowed ) belief system. this false belief system is then held as dear in an emotionally perverted way where the emotion to it is synthetic draining one emotionally and possibly leading to further lies of telling oneself that those emotions are authentic, which is another lie taking up space in one's mind that could instead be reserved for truth. ( both hinder authentic reaction ) when further aspects of the denied realization are perceived in something else, it is done so under the pre-existing twist of the realizations truth leading to a miss-aligned conclusion about the perceived "something else", one that favoures one's position not to change ( because innitialy the realizations legitimacy was denied for that reason ) . this process is an intellectual burden this process can iterate until one has overwhelmed oneself

This is the reason why someone's ontology can be linked to their depression. Depression starts to occure, when one has started to realize at least the falsehood of the emotionality behind the denial of a realization.

the corruption of ontology happens within one's own mind. when ones own vicious selfishness cuts off a stream that would elevate one's mind. the process of elevation can be perceived cold and expansive in the beginning, in any case unpleasant until enough sequences within memory exists that indicate a better outcome in the future. ( in other words, if you can remember from past expansions that it led to something good in the long run ). the elevation is a form of re-admittance followed by a closure ( or re-ignorance ) by oneself onto oneself this viciousness has been birthed by a promise one gave oneself: "I will stay as I am this time" . for allowing a proper ontology can lead to realizing implications that could change ones course of expression through a re-imagination ( re-identification more precisely ) of oneself, breaking that promise: "This will change who I am" . because one loves oneself, one wants to keep one's deepest promises to oneself, but at the same time one loves one's own realizations for the same reason. it is when the battle with oneself favoured the false promise over the realization, is when ontology gets corrupted and re-contextualized to sustain favour of the false promise.

Freedom

I can't stand people's shit excuses to stay where they are to reflect the majority around them. i am done compromising myself for their destructive behaviours.

Not only does organic animal farming require more space leading to less forests to absorb CO2, but also according to the following paper which compared methane emissions with organic animal farming to conventional livestock, does organic animal farming emit more methane into the atmosphere. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10375217/

conflict should not be something to avoid for the sake of personal or cultural growth. functioning avoid of conflict may put off growth. if overdone it may lead to discredibilty or chaos/confusion. using conflict consciously brings forth relative flaws and shadows in yourself and the opposing party to put awareness and resolve on. when confronted and your higher mind/intuition/heart tells you are off track but emotionally you feel upset/in shame, don't suppress the vision by letting the anger control/put you in denial. involve into the anger/denial and express with the intend of growing emotionally where a vision more or less subtly needs you to be.

According to this paper: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476840/ people who got diagnosed with schizophrenia and given neuroleptics were found to have lower brain volume after a longer period of the onset MRI scan. As a control it was tested on animals with similar results. Quote from a conclusion: "During longitudinal follow-up, antipsychotic treatment reflected national prescribing practices in 1991 through 2009. Longer follow-up correlated with smaller brain tissue volumes and larger cerebrospinal fluid volumes. Greater intensity of antipsychotic treatment was associated with indicators of generalized and specific brain tissue reduction after controlling for effects of the other 3 predictors. More antipsychotic treatment was associated with smaller gray matter volumes. Progressive decrement in white matter volume was most evident among patients who received more antipsychotic treatment. Illness severity had relatively modest correlations with tissue volume reduction, and alcohol/illicit drug misuse had no significant associations when effects of the other variables were adjusted." Edit: Another paper might be solidating the findings on even 8 weeks of exposure to anti-psychotics/neuroleptics. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0006322310011716 "Chronic (8 weeks) exposure to both haloperidol and olanzapine resulted in significant decreases in whole-brain volume (6% to 8%) compared with vehicle-treated control subjects, driven mainly by a decrease in frontal cerebral cortex volume (8% to 12%). " nihms405144.pdf

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41386-021-00980-0 On the above study that was mentioned here: - A time span of 3 months seems insufficient to find long term overall brain volume changes on lower doses of anti-psychotics "...Longer-term follow-up would be required to determine the extent to which further volume-loss emerges with additional antipsychotic exposure..." - False conclusion of anti-psychotics being neuroprotective The right conclusion is: Within the time span of 3 months there was an effect on the grey matter of the right pallidum. Which seems typical because people on anti-psychotics execute a lot of involuntary movement. That explains the increase in grey matter of the pallidum. The study also mentions to have found neuroleptics related white mater decline in the cerebellum. s41386-021-00980-0.pdf