Guardian

this is a good basis of any theory that works with a number of infinite or arbitrarily finite distinctions. however, it isn't clear as to why distinction can be removed, moved or redefined or why there are not any in essence hint: combine step 1 and 3

now here is a mammoth task for the interested. assume we have a number line that is representative of a physical reality with its own natural laws where each point on that number line stands for a time line within that physical composition. what would be if we add another number line that stand for another physical composition with its own natural laws more or less different from the first one? and then three and four and so on... ? remember each point is a whole time line within that composition. there are infinitely many points and between two points there are infinitely many points as well.

as most ones know by following actualized.org more or less, reality is limitless. parallel to one's timeline and space there are infinite other ones without any gap in between. think of the real number line. pick a number a and b. between those 2 numbers there are infinitely many other numbers. find the middle of these numbers c = (a+b)/2. any number from c that is closer to a is its own timeline more representative of the reality that a stands for. similar for b. a and b are each representatives of a timeline and just like there are infinitely many numbers inbetween 2 numbers, there are infinitely many on the whole numberline and so it is with timelines and ''realities'' so to speak. the spread between a timeline that one calls 'physical reality of unbreakable laws' and something one calls fantasy just seems for one's mind wide. however, when one fantasizes, one actually experiences that reality just on a more or less 'weaker' perception than the one, one is unconsciosly grounded in as physical reality. so don't discourage or scorn about wandering one's mind/daydreaming/loving fiction etc. and try not to draw solid distinction and buy into explanation as to why one is non-sense and the other is truth. these are all valid realities in their own right, one's experience of them just may be different and experience can be shifted.

from within existence with the experience of continuity, non-existence is felt like an infinite process of self-colapsing its existence. which depiction fits better than a black whole?

from the point of view of a limited perceiver nested in physical reality Updated

one cannot make something one's passion. passion is not something one thinks about or trains oneself into. it is given by one's heart, period. if one needs to push oneself to do something, it is not one's passion. one possibility of what this is, one describes as making it one's passion, is according to one's belief, something that may lead one to one's passion in a socially least edgy manner. passion is discovered and felt and any activity as well as curiosity comes naturally from within. to recognize passion watch for these hints: continuous self-discipline is not required within one's passion. ( one does not need to remind oneself to do it, especially sequentially ) time is felt annoyance-less and passes by shorter within one's passion.

what are your thoughts about deeper discussion and sharing of metaphysical concepts? what do you think about the demographic of reddit? it seems to me that it is a common theme on reddit to share superficial opinions, no? i know there are subreddits for specific topics like psychology and metaphysics, but even those seem to fear ideas like self-reference, self-reflection and infinite regression, vision... etc. as far as i have experienced at least.

this would be how i see the two positions on the (non) existence of non-existence.

by not existing, non-existence exists in its nature of not being in existence ( therefore existing ). another perspective on what has been said here: (time stamped) but would both in essence be the same, measured by their of their implications towards existence ?

but then what else will i want to do with my life

it is so hard to speak that which is considered taboo, be cringe, expose one's shames or be '' inappropriately'' impulsively honest all intentionally ( without being unethical of course ) or just speak to advocate for what one believes to be the higher good of that which is not normal. actually in real life in sequences to friends to strangers feels like being alone against most. i'm going to take a break.

there was no mention of it being easy but the pain is felt people that judge by the usual attraction factors are still children, mostly but if one is still attracted to another displaying such characteristics ( besides the dislike for intuiting that they might not like one for how one wants oneself to be ) one should not be hindered from still "approaching", if emotionally there exists still some form of attraction ( even though intellectually the limits a painfully apparent ) do engage and when there will be judgment and denial for not being a typical expectation express intention and leave this will send them on a path on which they will be confronted with the limitations of such perceptions one has to allow oneself to be hurt to grow

it is totally fine not to make-up or act sweet and innocent as a women when it doesn't feel true. you could view external non-confirmation of your non-conformance to usual images as filtering out the distractors and aligning yourself further with your true self. by not conforming for the sake of conforming or for a superficial image, you are allowing more men to learn and recognize natural beauty and will be able to recognize/encounter those people easier that form value based relationships. for a deeper personality matching can occure when less false blinders stand in the way. for people that see what more you are better want to see that you do not mask what more you are or can be.

English Subtitles are available. Martin Sonneborn has been broadcasting into the public, to his perception, the less reasonable ( and unfortunately dominant and ruling ) parts of the european union ever since elected into the european parliament. - Tüp means (incompetent/irrelevant) Guy - Schmierlapp means "dirt rag" -Heiko Maaß was a right wing ( maybe fascist ) German Minister. - Christian Lindner was a deep (toxic) liberalist runnning a party in Germany called FDP. - Quark means Curd - CSU/CDU was a conservative party in Germany - dalli-dalli is a word play, meaning ASAP - Angela Merkel was the current chancellor of Germany - VonDerLeyen was the current President of the EU Commission - Olaf Scholz who was a german minister, was one of the next possible chancellor candidates, provided by a party called SPD.

Paranoia is a strong interplay (more so struggle) between realization and its denial within oneself where intuition is pushing strongly for the higher but there is also a strong unwillingness to accept.