Sugarcoat

I agree

You can evolve alongside the company of others. Don’t have to pause your social life to develop

lol people trying so hard to figure out half of the world’s population to try to gain an advantage. You will never figure out half of the population because they’re all individuals. What you can do instead is figure out yourself and that will get you a long way People do all this figuring out because they wanna have advantage in the dating market. The thing is that when you form a view in your head of “how women work” , when you meet a woman it’s like you’re overlooking some of her individuality and you instead see in front of you this projected idea of “how women work” that you have gathered/developed over the years. It’s like you’re not meeting her at face value but rather your own idea of women is warping your view of her and affecting the pure interaction

Maybe it doesn’t fully connect to this topic but not every woman can recognize the same high value man. Why is it that some insecure women are attracted to narcissistic (low value) men? The same woman might stumble across a high value man but might not be attracted to him. She might not even recognize him as high value, she might feel she isn’t worthy of him, she might see him as friendly only etc. So even if a guy improves himself and becomes high value (what that means can be discussed, it’s not so objective) he might be able to attract more women but still far from all. Because it takes for the woman to be kinda high value herself to recognize him as such, such as being secure in herself. A woman might get with an average guy precisely because she is average herself so that’s what resonates with her. It’s not really true always that women are attracted to men above them, it can feel like they don’t “click” and can’t understand each other, she might even be intimidated, or even judge him somehow. But if you become high value man you’ll be able to attract higher quality women as they’ll resonate with you

You’re just flexing that you’re the perfect balance

Is one of them angry and the other not?

I never get angry we should reproduce and create the most healthy balanced children jk sorry

How was your solipsistic awakening?

I don’t know the difference

@Salvijus how old are you? 28 right. I feel like you’ve told me before you’re 27

I promise I’m conscious 😂😂stop this silly nonsense Solipsism is lowkey dangerous. Like imagine a murderer in court being like “yea so reality is solipsistic so my victim isn’t conscious and didn’t suffer so it’s ok”

If you see yourself as the prize (which is self confidence) you’ll be more likely to attract someone that is the prize, so you’ll both be the prize.

It’s Chad

Thanks

Ok. I thought literally read diagonally

Happy birthday Didnt mean to stress you(if that’s part of your stress you know)

Chad of Toulouse

”which I read diagonally” bruh just when I thought you couldn’t get harder to comprehend

Loll

I extracted dmt from that bark and it worked! I only got a really small yield though so that’s a bit tricky

Same. There’s shops on dark web but it feels kinda risky

Hahahaha best pervert

Watching from a safe distance.

Some woman should do the opposite experiment: walking around naked and seeing if she gets approached. lol

I got evaluated for autism but didn’t meet enough criteria for the diagnosis. Autism apparently needs to show in childhood, and I didn’t have the symptoms in childhood so that’s one of the reasons I didn’t get the diagnosis. Doctors write in my journal that I have delusions. Imagine being so outside the norm, having such unique experiences that it’s labeled as delusion. That’s my situation. It doesn’t bother me though. Autism has certain criteria. And when you’re properly evaluated they look to see if you fit those criteria. Maybe you just fit enough criteria to get the diagnosis (doesn’t sound like it according to your post, don’t know what the hell you told them about yourself that made you fit the criteria). Then it’s a valid diagnosis. But then it could be debated if someone could fit criteria for a diagnosis but still not have the diagnosis. But then it’s a question of, what even defines the diagnosis? Is it something that could be observed in the brain? Is there such a thing as an “autistic brain”. If it is, then that’s a very reliable criteria to fill. In order to answer wether your diagnosis is reliable or not, you’d have to research the autism criteria, what defines it, what the science behind it says, and then secondly you’d have to see if the place and psychologist that evaluated you follow the standard science properly.