JuliusCaesar

Indeed. Debt is inherently good; however, it becomes deleterious when abused. A most intelligent decision, Citizen. All true. About this I wonder myself actually.

Out of curiosity, what weed/blend if it was a blend specifically was in the dab?

That was literal.

The One Infinite Creator is the only thing in existence. Therefore, the Infinite Creator only serves the Infinite Creator.

Does that mean that 5 MeO-DMT+ Cannabis = profit? I wonder how it would affect other classes of drugs like Dissociative, Anthelmintics, Antiviral, Analgesics etc.

@NoN-RaTiOnAL How is that you walk? It cannot possibly occur by some brain located process because there are humans without a brain who walk. Furthermore, you probably know intuitively that you could have a sleeping dream in which you could walk, but if your skull were opened there may not be anything contained therein. Just as it albeit very seldomly is in the waking dream.

Yes, you have to experiment independently. Otherwise, with our western upbringing it just sounds like impossible nonsense.

While that's an interesting theory. It would mean that nearly all Americans are demons. Including anyone on this forum who has ever flown commercial hint hint. How humorous.

Well said, and very true.

@longusername12345 If you want to start a business. Then in all likelihood you need a solid credit history. Without it, you're seriously hindering the growth potential of your endeavor most of the time. As you'd usually benefit from using financing to expand your enterprise. If you don't want to start a business but feel that you can handle the responsibility of having the ability to spend money you don't have without burning yourself in the process. Then having a credit card can be very beneficial. Most give you cashback, and some of the signup bonuses are exorbitant. That's good for you, they want you to get the card hoping you'll mess up and get deep in debt with it and pay 28%+ APR on the debt, so they'll often give you sign up deals that are heavily in your favor. Also, if you ever want to take a loan, let's say to buy a home, or a car, or anything for that matter then you probably need good credit anyway. Of course, if you don't ever want to borrow money, and you don't want to play the credit game for profit. Then I suppose there isn't really any good reason to get a credit card. Especially if you can't handle the responsibility. Oh, and one more thing, there are quite a few, though not the majority of cards offering 0% interest for a certain duration of time, usually about 18 months or slightly more/less. And there's also this thing called Manufactured Spending, which I probably won't discuss much here, but it can be a profitable technique. In the right hands it's very powerful, in the wrong hands you'll wind up in jail somehow even though you're probably not violating any laws.

To anyone who may have been wondering. My writing this as Ex and not EX is not a typo in spite of the fact that I was using Roman Capitals when writing in Latin. I did that to imply that Ex is not just a Latin word, but also an English word. I'll use it in a sentence. "My Ex-Consort struck her upon the cheek with excessive force when she saw us kissing." Here, Ex-Consort means my prior consort. That is to say that I came out of the previous woman either to go into a state of being single, or to take a new Consort.

While the grammar and core vocabulary of English is derived from Proto-Germanic. The majority of the English language's total vocabulary is derived from Latin. Some of it is directly from Latin, as I've before mentioned there are literal Latin phrases in colloquial use of the English language such as ET CETERA, or for example, EXEMPLI GRATIA abbreviated as E.g., in writing. Furthermore, because almost all English words not part of the core vocab are Latin, e.g., any word ending in -tion such as Emancipation (from Latin EMANCIPATIO, which is EX MANCIPATIO rendered one word. Ex means from or out of, MANCIPATIO refers to a place where slaves are auctioned). Or Interception, from INTERCEPTIO. Which as INTERCEPTIONEM means essentially exactly the same thing in the ancient language as it does in Modern English, as by adding the -NEM to it, that suffix makes INTERCEPTIO a direct object since it's in the accusative case. So, the case for learning Latin in order to learn English is clear. The bottom line is there's a great deal of Latin in the current English language. However, in defense of the French Language. It is true that some Latin words in English came to it through French in the Middle Ages. In addition, French is undeniably Vulgar Latin at least in its written form. And to some extent, perhaps a great extent in the spoken form as well. Though the pronunciation rules and application thereof are somewhat murky. Which is a stark contrast to the ancient language because after all the Romans invented the letter system I'm using here. And as such, they made it 100% phonetic, whereas French is derived from multiple languages using the Roman letter system and as such can have some wonky pronunciations. Italian, Spanish, and Portuguese don't really have that problem, at least not anywhere near the degree to which it exists in the French language.

You're most welcome.

YOU ARE A HUMAN ENTITY. As such, you are not this entity you perceive to be other than you. Why do you believe it is a part of yourself? How do you know this isn't some kind of demonic thought form created by another and imposed upon you? If that were so, you could cast it out of yourself. Or maybe, you learn to enslave this other being or whatever the entity is. Make yourself it's master, not the other way around.

Do any of you remember how slowly time passed when you were a child? But when you became a teenager, things went faster. Then as an adult, things went even faster, and when you thought it couldn't get any faster, you grew older, and time flew even more swiftly. Heaven and hell are two sides of the same coin.

@King Merk @Shawn Philips It just goes to show that everyone is different.

@DrugsBunny Have you considered doing an analgesic such as Acetaminophen? Pain killers tend to act as a shield of sorts against many negative thought forms, even if only on a temporary basis. This is in part why so many people rave about the effectiveness of Vicodin as a stress reliever (Hydrocode combined with Acetaminophen). Acetaminophen causes liver damage, N-Acetyl Cysteine reverses liver damage, and has been scientifically shown to counteract Acetaminophen toxicity. Therefore, if you want to do Acetaminophen, it'd be wise to also do NAC. You could try Aspirin too, but note that it's a COX-1 inhibitor, which in essence means, that it blocks the platelet charged with protecting your stomach lining from the high levels of acid native there. Therefore, it must be taken with food. Furthermore, you'd be well advised to take some kind of stomach protecting substance. Such as Sodium Bicarbonate (Baking Soda), Calcium Carbonate (Active Ingredient in Tums), Omeprazole (Active Ingredient in Prilosec OTC) or Esomeprazole (Nexium OTC's Active Ingredient). So as to avoid suffering GI tract damage from the Aspirin. How do you determine which of these substances or combinations thereof is best for you, and how do you calibrate the doses? By reflecting on your direct experiences with consideration of the advice I've given you. That should serve you well.

LSD is a stimulant, and LSD is most certainly beneficial with respect to essentially any purely mental activity. Coffee can be useful with respect to spiritual practices, for much the same reason that cocaine can be useful. But like cocaine, albeit to a much lesser degree, there are/can be adverse effects. You would need to do something else to counteract them. Coffee may not be as potent as crack, but at least it's legal, eh?

Blue do be vibing though.

Is that actually insanity, or did you just become so sane on it that it blew your mind?

And this likely explains why I like to watch Court cases on Tv so much. Individual like Judge Jeanine Pirro, Joe Brown, Judith Sheindlin etc. Though I think Judy might be an STP, she's hard as nails. Either that or her shadow is very very very well developed.

Greetings all, This post is a summary of CSJoseph's "What is Extraverted Thinking Video", for whatever reason it cannot be linked, but if you search it in YT it'll be one of the first options. The symbol for Extraverted Thinking is Te. Extraverted Thinking is essentially rational thinking. So, individuals with high Te reason using rationale. Others have higher Ti and those individuals think logically. A Rational Thinker is one who makes decisions based on statistics, gathering data, fact patterns within data, using majority rule in their reasoning, gathering references from many sources. The ISTJ is a great example of this, they tend to endeavor to gain as many references as possible, such that they become like a Walking Library of Alexandria. A Rational thinker is one who has Te as one of their 4 top cognitive functions. Half of the sixteen types qualify. 1. ISTJ, 2. ESTJ, 3. INTJ, 4. ENTJ, 5. ENFP, 6. INFP, 7. ESFP, and 8. ISFP. Some of these have higher rationale than others, however, with respect to thinking these types tend to prefer using rationale over logic. Let us imagine there's a table with ten thoughts sitting around it, each thought rules either truth or false on a specific issue. Now let's imagine we have ten of these tables all ruling on the same issue. Each one renders a verdict of either true or false, and majority rules. The rational thinker believes whatever the group perceives to be true is in fact true. This is why it's called Extraverted not Introverted Thinking, because the Te user is sourcing thoughts from outside of themself. As opposed to a Ti user doing their own thinking. Te users struggle with making true/false judgments on their own so they outsource their thinking to others they feel are smarter than they. Therefore, they try to surround themselves with intelligent individuals, so that they absorb the smart thoughts of those around them. If you ever hear someone saying something like "I just lost braincells listening to that" then there's a good chance they have high Te, as otherwise they'd be a Ti user in their unconscious. Te thinkers are highly susceptible to groupthink, not good/bad groupthink, that's in the domain of Extraverted Feeling, not Thinking. Te users want to know what the group think to be true. However, it is possible for the Te user to be in a small group with whom they disagree because they're sourcing their thought either from a larger group, or from what they feel is a better source Ie someone with better credentials or something of that nature. Te users value credentials and titles highly. Introverted Thinkers do not care, because from their perspective, what's true is true, how you feel about it is irrelevant. Thusly, it doesn't matter what credential you have, and it doesn't matter if you're a good or bad person etc etc. For instance, 2+2=4, it doesn't matter if Adolf Hitler or Mother Theresa says it, it's still true, the fact that Hitler said it and whatever negative feelings you may have about him will not change that. The bottom line is, Te users care very much about the source, but Ti users tend not to care as much, if at all. Extraverted Thinkers need elegant titles and credentials, because these things actually help them to improve their very real intelligence. If you told Tai Lopez(ENFP) never to buy a book again. You might as well kill him, he cannot function without them. ENFP's need books, they need to read constantly. CSJ feels everyone should read constantly, but Te users value it especially. In social situations, how others think of a Te user tends to dictate how they feel about themselves. It's easy to tear them down, just make them look bad in a public setting and they'll hate you forever. Because everyone around them thinks they're a failure or a bad person or something, the Te user thinks the same thoughts and consequently feels very bad about themself. They assume those people will continue to think less of them, and they can't handle losing face like this. Sometimes people get incredibly sensitive about this, and they'll just leave the group, or they'll fight back with additional reference points and evidence to defend themselves. On the more positive end, they love being in the spotlight, they love to feel the status. Te is all about status, whereas Fe is about recognition but more on that latter. The more they can elevate themselves and their titles and credentials, the better they feel. And when they encounter people with inferior credentials, like if I went to Harvard and you didn't, as a Te user I might say your opinion is automatically beneath mine because you didn't go to Harvard. CSJ learned all of this on the street and is confident that any Jungian Psychologist you throw at him he can take to task. However, Te users don't see it that way, because CSJ doesn't have flashy letters next to his name, that means his opinion in their eyes isn't as valid. Because for Te users it's all about having as many references as possible, as much data, as many elegant titles, as many credentials as possible etc. All because the Extraverted Thinker wants to feel valid.

That's all accurate, but frankly, from an INFJ's perpective, the greatest challenge is getting over performance anxiety. I remember when I first learned to drive, my Dad who's an ESTP told me "Oh, you'll get the hang of it in about 15 minutes". 15 minutes my snow-white ass. More like 15 hours. Si demon is a bitch. I think being a black hole sound nice, Scientists think black holes to be the most powerful force in the Universe. That's a hell of an accomplishment if you ask me. I mean, imagine being so powerful not even light can escape your grasp. Take that Old Spice odor blocker! But you're totally right about the whole INFP teaching the NFJ to have a sense of self. ENFPs naturally, and also STJs are great at doing this also because they have a similar function stack. An ESTJ is like a brilliant star for the INFJ to devour. Yes, Cannabis is often used as a crutch, but a crutch can be useful. For the same reason that analgesics are useful. It' interesting you mention this, because INFPs have an ISTP superego, and the ISTP is like a jack of all trades. So what you're saying makes a lot of sense especially if you live in America which is an SJ dominant society, and as such they probably tend to see you as your superego instead of your ego if you're an INFP in America. Yes, this is why they like INFJs so much because INFJs are very gentle almost as a rule. This would seem to arise because of Si Inferior trying to go aspirational and bulldoze Si Child. ENTPs can be plenty nasty when they want to be. Of course, CSJ seems to have criticism for all of the types, even his own to some extent.

Awesomesauce.

That's so true, just look at Sheogorath/Jyggalag. He was on his own the god of order, and fastidiously recorded the actions taken of free violation by all entities, gods and mortals, in the past, present, and future. He became so powerful because of his great knowledge and predictive power that the other gods feared him greatly, knowing they couldn't possibly hope to outmaneuver him. So they turned him(Jyggalag) into Sheogorath to disarm him. Little do they know, that they have had been doing Jyggalag's will all along. For those of you who aren't Elder Scrolls Nerds. Jyggalag is the god of Order and Logic, and Sheogorath is the god of Insanity and Dementia. If you want to become a ES Nerd, then consulting the following links would be a good start. https://elderscrolls.fandom.com/wiki/Jyggalag https://elderscrolls.fandom.com/wiki/Sheogorath By the way, I see a great many parallels between Dr. Spock of Star Trek and Jyggalag. They're both individuals who rule by Logical Authoritarianism. And they both overpower nearly everyone they encounter. Or at least, Spock manages to route nearly all the humans he encounters anyway.