JuliusCaesar

You are Jesus, you alone are God.

Moral frameworks exist within the human conceptual matrix. Everything that exists does so out of and being the embodiment of infinite love. So suicide is infinite love, fearing death is infinite love, the people trying to convince you not to kill yourself is infinite love etc etc. As to what moral frameworks Leo does or doesn't use. Leo would seem to be utilizing some combination of all of the those. But he most certainly is not a hedonist, at least not to the same extent that he's a non dualistic cosmologist for example. We know this because he thinks for example not very highly of recreational drug use(a position he and I share). Were he a hedonist he would love recreational drug use.

The only reason they're afraid is that they actually think omar30 is going to hell if he doesn't believe and do exactly as they do and believe. So actually they're afraid for him because they love him. But simultaneously they're also afraid for themselves, that he may convince them their views are wrong; meaning they'll then believe false things( false according to their current worldview) that'll land them in hell because of his influence. If you want them to accept the truth. You're going to need to do it in a way that you never contradict the false things they currently believe(meaning specifically that you basically never argue with their wrong ideas but submit or at least pretend to submit to them). And then you have the possibility to show them from their scriptures(the Quran and Hadith) as well as the writings of the Sufis that what you want them to believe is actually not so different from what they currently believe. In fact these things must in their perception seem identical(which shouldn't be too difficult as it's rather obvious that they're ultimately all the same concept merely appearing to be separate and conflicting ideaas). Meanwhile you're chipping away at their nonsense bit by bit with them non the wiser. Eventually converting them into believers of the truth(or whatever lies you intend to foist upon them, as this method can also be used to convince anyone of anything regardless of it's actual veracity).

I can sympathize with this. I'm a practicing Roman Catholic, and as such I'm every week in a community of people who have views radically different from what I know to be the truth. But I hold my tongue because I know at their level of development(Stages Orange and Blue) it's highly unlikely that they'll accept my views. And depending on how specifically I articulate things to them, they might even try to have me institutionalized. So occasionally I'll tell them things but in an incredibly vague manner. Like if I want to tell one of my catholic friends that I'm Omnipresent, I would say to them "You are everything and nothing". And they would probably misinterpret and misunderstand what I'm saying to mean is that they're between two extremes. On the one hand there's practically unlimited possibility as to what they could become, or they could be nothing hence they're in the middle. You see how they take a high level teaching and dumb it down into some kind of low level relative truth about possibility which isn't really as hard hitting as I want it to be? Oh well, most of the alternatives are unfavorable. So in general I just keep my big fat enlightened God realized mouth shut.

The universe is like a dictatorship, and I it's dictator.

No, hell is mostly just a teaching to coerce ignorant savages into behaving decently and treating each other fairly.

I see, the people who acquire servitors by doing a ritual I'd assume are in more or less the same boat. Because they know that it seems like a spirit they summoned, but whether or not it had a real existence prior to them summoning it they don't know. And as such they don't really have a clue why their magick worked. Kind of like driving a car, you don't need to understand the physics that makes the engine work in order to be able to drive. And likewise you don't really need to understand how magick works or how reality works in order to operate them or within them.

There's some massive oversimplifications here in these explanations. But I don't feel like rectifying them in any detailed manner. All is one, there's no difference between Jesus or Vishnu, or you or me or even a rock. We're all God pretending to be an infinite amount of different things, including humans, gods, inanimate objects etc etc.

Not exactly, power and consciousness are different dimensions of consciousness. In an Omnipotent(infinite power) state you can think objects into and out of existence, or alter the laws of physics. Consciousness however is more like just pure awareness/being. So being infinitely conscious doesn't necessarily mean that you'd be affecting reality with your mind at such a level(though you'd certainly be aware of the fact that you're creating everything out of nothing, which is one of the reasons infinite consciousness is valuable). Well, Leo's way of accomplishing this is doing 5 MEO DMT. It has some impact on your baseline consciousness but is very minimal. You basically become infinite for a finite duration of time(relative to consensus reality) then return to something about 99.9% the same as your old baseline consciousness. I've not done 5 MEO, I only know about it's effects studying the experiences of others. However, I have done other psychedelics. And the most impactful experience I had was when I accidentally did 25I NBOMe(I ordered 1P-LSD, but based on the effects it had I know it couldn't possibly be LSD, as my trip was perfectly consistent with NBOMe trip reports, in the future I'll never do a psychedelic without subjecting it to GC/MS first.). Safety precautions aside, I experienced ego death and infinite love, and also realized that I'm the creator of the universe. Then the next day when I sobered up, I rejected the experience entirely thinking it was just delusion. However, later on practicing lucid dreaming I discovered that I actually am God. What happened is I had 3 precognitive dreams that occurred seemingly randomly and months apart from one another. In which I became aware of future events that should have been humanly impossible to know. And then I had a dream where I was trying to control the dream(because I knew it was a dream due to strange things occurring in it that couldn't happen in the waking world) but I failed to do so. My dad was in the dream, and I asked him about it. Describing to him all of my failed endeavors, like when I try to walk through a wall I bounce off it as though it were solid, so I asked him "How do I create reality?", and he told me "We're already creating reality". When I awoke from the dream I had an existential crisis because I had to come to terms with the fact that I'm God(based on the fact that I've became aware of future events in the waking world from the dream state which came to pass as I was shown they would, I knew I could rely on it for accurate information about the nature of reality). I debated the subject in my own mind thinking something along the lines of "that means I made Hitler and all the things he did, and children starving in Africa. how could I do that"? But when I thought about it more, I realized I had no logical objection to the notion that I'm God. And any logical objection you could make would be easily shot down. Like if you asked me how it is that I can be God and therefore know everything but simultaneously also not know everything as a human. To be omniscient(all knowing) I would have to know what it's like not to know. So the reason I didn't know things is precisely because I know everything. To add another dimension of understanding, I know all things unconsciously, but consciously my knowledge is finite. Because by becoming conscious of the unconscious my knowledge expanded to include things in a way that's impossible(given the notion that I'm not God it would be impossible). Consciously it's true that you don't know when you're in your bed dreaming or in the waking world. However, unconsciously you know everything(because unconsciously you're creating everything, and therefore know everything about it). Also you can become conscious of the unconscious. So yes you're wrong, and the reason for it is that while you're not infinitely powerful from your human state. Your power level(degree of omnipotence) is not perfectly 0, but is just slightly higher than that. So you can affect reality with your thoughts, but to do anything substantial(like curing a disease for example) you'd need to issue the command a ridiculous number of times(like in the 100,000's or even more) before reality responds to it faithfully. Making yourself remember your dreams is one of the easiest things you can do with finite power. You could literally just sit with eyes closed for like 10 minutes before bed thinking "I remember my dreams" repeatedly and even with that little practice you'd notice some effect. If you want more understanding relative to how well this will work and why(like why I recommend closing your eyes for example). Then you should read the comment I made on the post below. But basically, when you have your eyes closed, your brainwaves slowdown, so you get slightly closer to being unconscious(the level of the Godhead which is infinitely powerful).

Another example would be for instance. That only the gods of the Olympus truly exist and rule over this mortal realm. And therefore all the other religions are nonsense and false.

I'll get the ball rolling and provide a few examples of extremism myself. Consider Leo's political position that Donald Trump is a horrible choice for the Presidency. Someone might say something like "All Trump supporters are inherently racist white supremacists, simply because they support Trump". That statement is overly dogmatic because it defames people in an inflammatory way that isn't entirely true(or that is to say, true in all cases, or even in most cases). Ultimately because the statement lacks nuance, it becomes a potentially dangerous thing to say. This is why dogma sees censorship on this forum.

I think you need to define dogma in no uncertain terms. And provide him with examples of what dogma in other paradigms looks like. Such as atheistic materalism, or another theistic religion like Christianity.

@itachi uchiha I think you're missing that fact that we're all God. Pope Francis for example, isn't what he appears to be at all. He's merely God pretending to be Pope Francis. And likewise, you're not the human you think you are. You also are God pretending to a specific human, that apparently has an Islamic background. Furthermore, this screen you're viewing this from isn't a screen at all either; rather it's God pretending to be a screen. All of us are Allah, one God, one Reality.

What he seems to be missing is that Islam is not somehow separate from and different to other religions. But is in an ultimate sense identical to every other alternative. And in the relative sense is basically a small piece of the truth, where other paradigms(like Christianity, and Zoroastrianism for example) also contain small portions of the same truth. So if we want to truly understand theology properly to it's fullest extent, we need to assume something like an Omnitheistic position.

In their defense, probably all of us were once like them the "dumb". I was a materialist for the first 18 years of my life, and Leo was for an even greater duration of his life. As you and everyone else here probably were as well.

Yeah, you basically have been doing it. I ask because it THC seems to dissolve boundaries in a similar fashion to psychedelics. Just not as radically so. Consequently, it can potentiate spiritual practices just as psychedelics can. Yes, but you wouldn't have such materialist based judgement from me as I'm not a materialist. It sounds like the deity used telekinesis to alter spacetime curvature such that two points which were separate previously were now in the same position. Like if you were to have a flat piece of paper with two separate points, you could crunch the paper up so the two points are on top of each other. If you were to fall into such an anomaly, you'd experience yourself in one place one moment, then suddenly somewhere else entirely(as opposed to a sort of gradual falling process like you might imagine going through a wormhole). Naturally, the deity you encountered did the spacetime warping. I can be so certain because while it's theoretically possible for a human to do this, given the typical limitations we normally have it's nearly impossible. At least without seriously altering yourself, or being some kind of edge case that's born with substantial spiritual gifts. Yeah, I've mostly decided to stay away from THC. But my studies into it recently have shown me it isn't necessarily the dumb hippy stoner drug I used to believe it to be. But actually is capable of seeing legitimate use as a psycho spiritual enhancer. Though I still consider other substances like LSD, Psilocin, DMT, 5 MEO DMT, Salvia Divinorum and many others to be superior to it I mean, I thought things were fairly clear before and throughout but yeah. I'm mostly now just convinced you have a very unusual reaction to THC. Either that or I've seriously misunderstood the many stoners out there.

Well of course she's me and furthermore real/unreal just as much as the humans who seem to be outside of you. I'm just interested to know what she has to say about her ontology.

Good video, I want to make a few comments on some parts. Around about 10 min or so you're discussing the issue of psychedelic experiences and even meditative states being impermanent. How we can experience high level expansions of consciousness but then return to the previous baseline. While this is a serious problem, simultaneously to some extent we have the opposite of this. Because these experiences can and do tend to leave sort of a residue of their effect on the new baseline state. Instances of people suffering HPPD proves that these things can become permanent(though that may be an obstructive example, it means also the positive aspects of these experiences could be made permanent as well). And I think you're actually an example of this as you can apparently reach high quasi lsd/psilocybin induced states just by smoking THC(which seems to be impossible for normal humans). So you clearly have some subconscious programs still running from your breakthrough trips on serotogenic psychedelics. It's similar to how I struggled for some time to divine via dreaming the future numbers of the powerball for like 2 years. And then after I basically give up(because I realized money is essentially worthless anyway) I've had 3 precognitive dreams since then which seemed to occur at random. Two of them gave me actionable information on what certain financial markets were going to do, and the other one showed me future world events. In all three instances all of the predictions came true, and were things that should be humanly impossible to know. So clearly I wound up downloading a precognition dreaming software in my subconscious. I also think this phenomena is exhibited in Leo, though he may not agree. Regardless of his level of tolerance to psychedelics from birth(he could be some rare individual who's always been unusually sensitive to psychedelics), I think all the 5 MEO DMT he did increased it even further. So now he's got basically this 5MEODMTBreakthrough.exe program constantly running in the background dormant, just waiting for him to do/experience something similar(like taking a tab of LSD, or smoking some NM-DMT) to bring it back to the surface. What I'm getting at is basically there must be a science to altering one's baseline state of consciousness(or maybe it's sort of an art/science combo). Now maybe it's too advanced for the kind of science currently being done by the human species. It just might be that currently exalted concepts like science and technology are too primitive for this sort of work. But it certainly must be possible to bring predictability and competency to this area. Even it if it requires to us to conduct our research from superhuman levels of consciousness. In reference to around the 14 minute mark. Exploring the unknown possibilities of existence is an eternal task. However, without unlimited control of space, time, matter, and consciousness. We'll always have difficulty doing this as our methods will be limited and less than perfect. So while there's no limit to how many new things you can experience/develop spiritually. Pursuing omnipotence would seem to be most sensible thing to do(since it always you to do literally anything). And then at that point, the real work can commence. Now some understanding of relativity is useful with respect to what I'm about to say. We're all omnipotent already, it's just that in our subjective experience it's highly limited. In addition to that, we're also omnibenevolent, omniscient, and omnipresent. Your level of power is affected strongly by your emotions. The more positive you are(basically the more on the love end of the continuum) the more faithfully your thoughts manifest. And the more omniscient you become, you can eventually use it to figure out how to become more powerful. And you can use your power to hike your omniscience. So, your power and knowing levels can basically chase each other like Ouroboros approaching infinity. As for omnipresence, it obviously includes everything so it goes without saying that increasing your presence is likely to also make you more powerful. So they all(presence, knowing, power, and love) are entangled with one another, and basically can be made to feed into and potentiate each other. In reference to the 25 and a half minute mark, what about ganja yoga?

What do you mean her answers have changed over time? What contradicting explanations has she given you?

Why don't you ask you her about her ontological status? I'm sure she has a position on the subject.

Rockefeller tells us to do what no one else is doing. And you say to search where no one else is searching. There's great similarity between the two. I didn't intend to somehow denigrate your experience. I was merely pointing out an obvious similarity between your words and Rockefeller's. That also isn't what Rockefeller was saying either. He was saying that the status quo of accepted sucess is nothing in comparison to the possibilities outside of it. And in any event, my logic that most humans won't follow yours or Rockefeller's advise applies. Most humans tend to operate only within the limitations imposed upon them by society. That applies to everything in the human experience(which can be limited by status quo), not just sucess or discovery.

This is a reminiscent of a JD Rockefeller quote that goes like this "If you want to succeed you should strike out on new paths rather than travel the worn paths of accepted success." The masses always follow whatever intrepid rulers there are in society, and uphold traditions. So this kind of advise is rarely ever implemented by humans.

Such as what?

You're talking about telepathic communication with an amphibious creature? I'm fairly certain that isn't a normal human ability(meaning all humans are telepathic, but hardly anyone ever attempts to use the ability, so in their subjective experience telepathy is impossible), and thus doesn't really apply(at least not to modern materialistic man anyway). As for the massage part that's viable and good advise.

Strictly speaking, of course it's illegal. However, it's going to be difficult to prove that you're using the toads for consumption of 5 MEO. Because whoever wants to charge you would need evidence admissible in court to demonstrate that. Which is going to be nearly impossible given the constitutional protections every American has. That's why for instance Mike Tyson is probably safe from any possibility of legal repercussions, even though it's public knowledge that he's technically breaking the law. Just a disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer, so don't take anything I say as legal advise. The things I'm saying are based on facts and therefore likely to be correct. But it would be a good idea to consult an actual legal expert, if you want to be certain.