Something Funny

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    3,745

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Something Funny

  1. Posted · Edited by Something Funny

    6 minutes ago, NewKidOnTheBlock said:

    Sounds like a slave thinking to me. Also a set of values dictated to you by women (as a collective). Not saying embodying these qualities sometimes isn't usefull but I don't hold that shit like a religion. Seems like you are quite keen on following various religions like a slave.

    You clearly know nothing of what this whole spirituality and self-actualization work is about. How do people like you even find this forum?

    6 minutes ago, NewKidOnTheBlock said:

    wouldn't be afraid of it literaly because I am not eating soy in the first place LOL seems like it would effect you much more tho. You seem quite emotional. You can only be insecure about something that is actually true or could ne true about you. In most cases. Not all of course.

    6 minutes ago, NewKidOnTheBlock said:

    Huh?

    Zero self awareness...

  6. Posted · Edited by Something Funny

    Its ironic that this obsession is what makes you less masculine and actually an antithesis to what a real man is.

    A man is supposed to be confident, stoic, able to endure harsh conditions, grounded in higher values, thinking big vs focusing on petty things. 

    And you are obsessed with your looks, like a little girl, living in comfort, and stuffing your belly.  Those are all feminine qualities.

    God forbid someone thinks that your muscles are not big enough.

    God forbid people think that you are a soy boy. You are so afraid of it, you think it is some bad insult, lol.

    You are obsessed with external opinions instead of being grounded in your own principles.

    All about pretending and not being.

    Pathetic

  15. Posted

    @Ero i am not talking about 84 or 100.

    I am just pointing that simply calculating an average, like:

    2000g (eating a full chicken) = 4761 ca

    Therefore 84g = 200ca

    Is incorrect

    Because humans don't take a little bite out of every part.

    If you are eating chicken with your family, someone will get a leg, someone a wing, someone a breast. So everyone will eat a different amount of calories per 84g.

  17. Posted

    2 minutes ago, Ero said:

    Calories are a unit of energy, equal to approximately 4.2 joules. The method is based on burning and measuring the energy produced. 

    No but I am asking how you actually measure a chicken as 84 grams.

    Since every part has different caloric value. You would need to decide which part you are going to add to those 84g, in what proportion. How is that decided?

  18. Posted

    Just now, NewKidOnTheBlock said:

    Untill my question regarding over 5 missing micronutrients will be sufficiently answered (B12, iron, calcium, omega-3 fatty acids, zinc and more) in regards to using supplements on the same level of efficiency as meat (and legit ones) I will continue to lavish my taste buds on some tasty lean non processed meat

    B12 was already answered.

    Vegetables are full of calcium.

    Iron is easy to supplement.

    You still need to take omega 3 supplements, even as a meat eater.

    Zinc is easy to supplement.

    It's not my fault you are completely divorced from logic and ability to learn

  20. Posted

    5 minutes ago, Ero said:

    200 calores for 84 grams, i.e 240 calories per 100 g

    How do you calculate whole chicken per 84g?

    Honest question.

    6 minutes ago, Ero said:

    I am 98kg at 7-8% body fat. And I exercise regularly. So, there's a difference

    I am sorry, I thought we were discussing a scenario where a person has not enough money to eat properly at all.

    Obviously, if you are exercising regularly, you will need more food.

  21. Posted · Edited by Something Funny

    4 minutes ago, NewKidOnTheBlock said:

    why I should believe that the current supplements availible are sufficient in nourishing us with over 5 micronutrients missing in a vegan diet.

    What nutrient exactly do you think a vegan diet can't provide despite the supplements and a good diet planning? 

    You can't even be specific because you are talking out of your ass.

  22. Posted

    @NewKidOnTheBlock

    1 minute ago, NewKidOnTheBlock said:

    But his response was mainly about the LDL cholesterol, and none of you provided a sufficient enough reason why I shouldn't eat meat at all, or even in a reasonable quantity, and why I should believe that the current supplements availible are sufficient in nourishing us with over 5 micronutrients missing in a vegan diet.

    That was not the point. The point was that your claim about vegan diet being less healthy than an omnivore one was full of shit and you couldn't neither provide any evidence that would support your claim nor disprove evidence that they showed you.