Something Funny

All things considered, the overall state of affairs looks kind of grim at Israel right now, not gonna lie.

Umm, no. No modern country, that is considered to be civilized does that. Can you give at least one example?

Right, collective unconscious. Totally not huge fashion brands and celebrities brainwashing you into it, lol.

It actually can be bought. "Taste" is a result of you getting lots of experience by trying different things and seeing what looks good and what doesn't. So you "buy" taste by experimenting with a lot of stuff, which requires money.

Yeah, so you don't know why something does or doesn't become trendy yourself.

I am actually just genuinely curious, like who decides that, lol? Is it big fashion brains updating their lines of clothes to a different style and you all go like "eww, the old ones are out of trend now". Is it some fashion shows that you are watching weekly? Do things that get out of trend start instantly looking ugly for you?

@StarStruck 1. They are not skin tight, they are pretty loose actually 2. Who cares what is a current trend lol, you guys are such sheep. "Trendy circles"

@StarStruck lmao I am dumb, haha.

@Princess Arabia because they didn't? They didn't have the modern fabrics for it and I am pretty sure that design wise they would be nothing alike. Do you have any proof that they did?

@Princess Arabia men using long, almost knee level shorts for swimming instead of swim panties or a full body swim suit is pretty new.

Sorry. I mean, all clothes mentioned in this thread are like 100 years old max. Lots of new styles appeared in the last cebtury. And its very myopic to say that it is it and there won't be anything new anymore. If you are talking about what's new new right now, like in the last decade then idk, I am not really following conventional fashion trends. Barefoot shoes are a pretty new thing. Sustainable clothing in general is a new idea. Those types of pants that are like a mix of jogging pants and jeans seem pretty new to me. But maybe they are actually not, I am not sure. Toe socks are new.

That's not true

@StarStruck to be honest, it looks great. But why do you have your watch upside down?

@Nivsch okay guys, I am really tired with this already to be honest. Go on do whatever you want. Time will make things just.

Sissy

@Nivsch it was a very strategically necessary attack, right? Can you enlighten me on its purpose, please?

So after you destroy those "strategical" buildings, they can't use other building and features of terrain next to help them defend their positions, right? Right?

@Nivsch sorry, but the more I think about it, the more ridiculous it is. Basically, according to your logic, Israel should level every building, every bit of infrastructure with the ground, killing everyone else in the process, until Gaza is as flat as a field, so that they feel safe enough. Is that what you are advocating for?

Like I've said. You've already basically leveled Gaza with the ground. When will the threat be "diminished" enough?

Ahaha. Love how you've chaged the number from 1000 to 100. Some profound military knowledge that is. Totally not just guessing random numbers. Also, of course it's better to blow up civilians than to risk the lives of your own soldiers, we get it guys

You won't lose 1000 soldiers a day. Even Russia doesn't lose that much with their shit troops, shit command, and "lets just throw human meat at them" strategy. Israel has one of the best, well trained militaries in the world. Also, how are airstrikes going to help against tunnels build specifically to counter airstrike. And you've already basically leveled Gaza to the ground, is it safe to go in now?

Use infantry to occupy Gaza and eliminate Hamas soldiers, while also not denying basic necessities like Food, Water, and first aid to civilian population? Hunt down and kill Hamas leaders using joined forces of the best intelligence agencies in the world??

Ahahaha. Okay, you are right, I am done. I can argue with stupid people, but there is no point in arguing with someone who has no integrity.

Show me a post where I am justifying Hamas. That was not the question. My question is: is there anything Israel can do (kill a 100000 civilians, commit xyz warcrimes, starve people to death) to make you say "okay, that's to far, I can't justify that"? Because this is a thread about Israel / Palestine conflict? Start a thread about something else and I will share my opinion on that as well. Because it triggers me a lot. You using those dirty manipulation tactics, like your question above triggers me a lot. It's like getting stabbed in the gut by a friend. Apparently not.

This is not an equal war. While Palestinians have bombs dropped on them, Israelis eat ice cream in a park. Attacks on Israel are done using guerilla tactics by a terrorist organization It was not an active combat situation with Israeli lives at stake, so it's not an unrealistic standard to expect Israel to be more considerate of civilian lives when conducting pre-planned, strategic strikes on specific individuals. Calling Palestinian deaths "casualities of an opponent" is fucked up in itself. They were refugees, in a refugee camp. It is called a war crime.