Something Funny

Exactly, nothing bad will happen. So why don't you put your money where your mouth is?

@Jowblob shoot yourself in the head then, you are God and it's just a dream after all

@Jowblob 30 and still as smart as a muppet. Tragic...

@Frylock "everyday americans", what a pos

Nooo, that's the time when we should try our best.

How do you know if that's even real or if it's just some bullshit that he says?

Yeah, worse for 50 years

If Kamala gets elected, do you expect any kind of significant changes in internal / external politics?

@Leo Gura your blog post on theft reminded me of something I heard from a twitch streamer who is an ex-pro gamer. He was talking about how in a zero sum game, taking away resources from your opponent in more efficient than doing your own thing. For example, if you opponent has a goldmine, and you get your own goldmine, than you are 1:1, and are equal. But if you take your opponents goldmine then it's -1 for him and +1 for you, so you are up two gold mines, instead of 1, essentially. For some reason, I find this really interesting to think about and wonder how much it applies to the real life.

Lol it's insane that shit like that is tolerated in America.

@cistanche_enjoyer you can't be nothing like trump and be on trump's team. A good person wouldn't be working with him.

@Spiritedness those are concepts from Leo's life purpose course. But yeah, they are based on books.

lol

@Leo Gura is there anything to be done practically to deal with this issue or should we just grab the popcorn?

No, this is not common sense. And I, as a person who actually speaks russian and ukrainian, and uses ukrainian social media don't see them "saying it all over it". But even if they were, your source for your claim is just some random social media posts? The same social media posts that conservatives use to fuel their conspiracy theories? The same social media posts that red pillers / black pillers / etc., use to justify their views on women? I am just giving those examples to show that social media isn't exactly an accurate representation of reality. Especially on the topic like this where you have no idea who the post was made by and for what reason. I am trying to be open minded here and be willing to consider what you are saying as long as you have something to back your words up with. But it looks like you are just talking out of your ass. Again, any sources for this? Or are you just speaking empty words because you feel like it. And what's Russian nuclear doctrine and how do you know what it is? There are many political reasons for that. Also, this is no longer a unanimous opinion among western countries. They didn't allow lots of other stuff before which is now allowed. You could provide some evidence for your logic. Because there is none so far, and I have a lot of counter evidence, saying that Russia is not going to nuke anybody with or without long range missiles. Ukraine has already attacked targets within Russia many times and Ukraine has alreadt invaded Russia with an actual ground army. How many Russian red lines have we crossed already? It is kind of hard to take on faith a person, who seems so biased while also having nothing to backup what he says. To me, it seems unlikely that Russia will use nukes for anything, other than some edge case scenario where its existence will be in danger. Putin and his cronies are too selfish and have too many golden palaces to lose to start a nuclear apocalypse "just because".

@PurpleTree shhh, don't disrupt their nice little agenda

You know this how? You know this how? You know this how? You know this how?

I highly doubt its capacity to give good advise. There is another issue of turning actualized.org into a circlejerk. And of course the fact that it's unethical. But you do you, I guess.

0:00 - 0:03 what have my ears ever done to you?

@krockerman I guess, arguing about it too much is useless. Let results speak for themselves.

@krockerman do you know how it actually works? The core principles are still the same, it just prompts itself multiple times in a row to get a more refined answer.

What I am questioning, is that just because's it has Leo's flavour added to it doesn't mean that the response itself will be of a better quality. It could work well for medicine and law because there it just needs to tell you specific facts. Like: "Hi ChatGPT, can you please find me case law on public masturbation". I don't see how this is helpful for actualized.org since this work is more about developing intuitive understanding of the topic. This is how I see it

You do realise that just because it acts confident and knowledgeable, doesn't mean that it actually understands anything, right? It just regurgitates whatever it information it got from the content it was fed. This point of "maybe we shouldn't tell Ai about alien consciousness / metaphysics/psychedelics/etc., because it is not evolved enough" that many of you keep mentioning is so hilarious to me. You are acting as if it would need some advanced reasoning skills to grasp those topics. IT IS NOT GRASPING ANYTHING. It is a language model. It just copies words. Alien consciousness is not somehow more linguistically challenging for AI to talk about (the only argument you could make is that Leo just didn't talk about it enough for AI to have enough data to work with). IT IS NOT THINKING It just predicts what the next word in a sentence should be based on the data it has analysed so far. If anything, the greatest strength of AI is the vastness of information that it was fed. The amount of data that humans couldn't possibly study in their lifetime. This is what makes it so useful.

You can do all that with regular chatgpt / claude / whatever. There is nothing special about "Leo AI". It won't magically develop more advanced thinking skills, just because it was fed Leo's videos exclusively. At best, it's just an AI re-skin for those who want AI to sound like Leo. I think that's stretching it, but I am not here to have an AI debate.

You all are so cringe