AndylizedAAY

I mean, I wouldn't call people completely stupid but they do say stupid things that are stupid because they are bad habits of thinking without actually learning how to learn, just conceptual knowledge from the education system within a certain time period. For example saying things like, "you don't need apps, just don't turn your phone off." As if I haven't thought of that before. I clearly know what is wrong with my phone because of missed calls and there is no reason to turn my phone off at this moment, only at night when I don't need an alarm. If my phone is on silent, my Mom would assume that my phone is off or that there is only Russian at the airport or that without considering the option of airplane mode on a plane. There are certain habits of thinking in the education system like writing things down being effective while ignoring reminders being more effective or that my work needs to manually be saved. Stupidity isn't a lack of conceptual knowledge, it is being unaware to habits of thinking and being attached to them and to the thoughts from being emotional.

@Leo GuraI have important question(s) for you and other people can answer too. This might actually get your attention and I'm starting to get the strange feeling that we are incompatible but it's really difficult to explain that at the moment. Let's just say that I think that there is a deeper reason with why we don't interact with each other that we are both probably unaware of and why I'm not on your priorities or on your radar when it comes to interacting with people on the forum. When contemplating, it's easy to generate nothing or for me just to get too distracted by thoughts that is probably just mental masturbation without even recording anything but it seems like I'm now in the ideal state of mind to be posting on the forum. Now without further-a-do, let's begin. First of all, I have some things to say about the UFO video you posted on your blog. First of all, the visions I had tell me that aliens probably exist and the most convincing vision I had while awake sober before even learning about aliens was an alien piece of technology that behaved supernaturally in which the switch or lever disappeared when I left my room. My intuition would tell me that it might have changed my social interactions although the superficial answer would be that my autism causes their current results which is what I say, do, and behave on my behalf. Glowing entities that appeared to me might have been angels since they can take different forms according to Teal Swan but you probably don't buy into that which is why I think that it is likely for demons to exist too but I'll discuss the problems with talking about whether or not demons exist (it's a general problem with understanding truth). Now where is what I think of alien footage as "evidence": Although I'm confident that aliens exist, I wouldn't call alien footage of a UFO as actual "evidence". Afterall, there is still the possibility of it being photoshoped or it being AI generated. You also have to take into that is footage of stuff you consider to be false like footage of glitches in the matrix. You would consider that to be fake footage. I think that it easy for you to call the alien footage real without a shadow of a doubt because the YouTube algorithm knows the footage you would want to watch. Anyways, you get my point. You have claimed in one of your videos that you are detached from the idea of "alien fucking spacecraft" but I think the difference between you and me is how we perceive technology since we both claim that we are detached from the belief in aliens which is relevant to contemplating how much the UFO footage is evidence for anything. From my observations, it seems like you are ignorant from technology generally speaking. First of all, I can't tell what is being discussed on the right side of the forum index/homepage. It looks even worse on Android TV with the scaling to the point where I can't even read the forum but most websites don't work properly there anyways and it could just be the browser I'm using on that device. You also scatter your notes into different notebooks around your house instead of keeping it into a consistent place like Google Docs on your phone. You might actually be aware of this option and chose the option that is less likely to distract you since the app managers are not very nuanced, at least not to me and whatever works for you. You also tend to emphasize on computers when you speak of simulations. These are all examples that I want you to be aware of the more I observe you. Now I have questions for your video on why reality cannot be a simulation that has more to do with the topic on the sub-forum: Why can't God imagine that the universe is a simulation? You say that I am God but you say that I have free will if I were to identify as the entire Universe and that God imagines what is possible and impossible and I think speaking dualistically would clear up confusion in this context. And can God really imagine anything outside of consciousness if everything is Mind? You say that Love is the only absolute limition for the higher good because God is Love. My next question is why does simulation theory have to work with aliens all the way up just like with turtles all the way down and that simulations have to be simulated all the way up infinitely? Why is there a negative stereotype when it comes to new-agers believing this and when it comes to New Age in general whenever you refer to "New Age bullshit"? It's been awhile since I watched that video and a lot seems irrelevant to this question in the video. Now I have questions about what you think about demons: First of all, I'm skeptical what Teal Swan says about demons. There tends to 3 ideas about demons from demons that I noticed from spiritual teachers: 1. That demons don't exist. 2. That there can only be demonic contracts with demons. 3. That demons cause possession. I got the 3rd idea from the book called Kundalini Awakening in chapter 12 about phychic powers but I'm only going to focus on what is most likely to be true from that book and if there isn't backed up by someone else's personal experience, it would seem to suggest that we live in a subjective collective reality. It really does seem like my mind is the source of all demons from this standpoint even if my personal experience MIGHT have involved angels which is important to take into account since we live in dualistic reality. But what about that person who said that there was dark energy within you who didn't want you to keep coming back to him for money when you had a serious health problem? Would you also say now that this is because the mind is the source of all demons? I can show a video of the healthy and unhealthy benefits of fish even though you probably know but you do sure put a lot of emphasize on the health consequences from your experience which would be heavy metals and I don't blame you. But the stuff I was taught is good for me you say is bad for me like omega 3 in fish and yeast for example even though consuming those things would make me more susceptible to heavy metals. This is just one example and won't be getting into that here. I messaged a moderator about this who is an expert in health who said that this varies from person to person and said he doesn't see a reason for why I can't eat fish even though I would like to become vegan but you give personal advice in the video about heavy metal toxicity. Hopefully, we can come to a conclusion about all of this so that these questions and concerns can be resolved. Keep in mind that I find you to be one of the most valuable teachers out there. I know that you would want give your feedback on science because of how much you want to improve it which is what I want to do here but it could be me is mistaken, please be honest. I hope that you find value in this.

@Yimpa I know, I already explained the evidence I have in part of the post that was overlooked but Leo treats the footage as such even though he claims to have access to alien consciousness. Why does @Leo Gura put aliens on a pedestal when it comes to consciousness? You said that aliens would teach us love as the highest teaching in the Universe. But why do they have such advance technology that a materialist would dream about? And can't there also be aliens that are dumber than us? Is being made in God's image supposed to be holographic because that is what consciousness is? The statement that we are made in God's image is used against the idea of aliens by having an idea that gives them more Intelligence, therefore I think it's relevant in this discussion not that I need to defend any idea of aliens.

@tuku747 ?

@Leo Gura I now understand the difference between consciousness and simulation when it comes to models but how is consciousness not a simulation if everything is consciousness? Did you mean that the entire Universe as consciousness is not a simulation? In one of your videos, you tried to help me imagine what an infinite object is like. You gave me certain dualities to describe it and that there are infinite dualities to imagine for this infinite object which should include simulation and non-simulation. Is that how mystical experiences are able to show some sort of simulation or is it all non-sense? Does it have to do with the dream that cannot be modeled by anything or is consciousness prior to dream? Does the ego interpret mystical experiences, generate them on beliefs, or do both? I think t the answer is both but what determines which of these 3 options will affect the mystical experience and how would you then know that mystical experiences are then absolutely true? It seems like what you say is true compared to other ideas but I can't explain it to you, maybe because I can't explain it to because I'm coming from the rationalist paradigm? Can't mystical experiences threaten the ego? Why would it be threatened if it can distort the truth or does it do so because it is threatened? If mystical experiences can be invalid, what makes it different from direct experience which makes it valid? And how come asking questions on the forum seems like the only way for me to generate questions to contemplate on? If reality cannot be a simulation, then it should also be an absolute limitation instead of just Absolute Love for the higher good in the video of what will actually is and so is the fact that there cannot be anything outside of consciousness.

How do you know what to say the most about simulations from my post? I suspect that you would give me the same answer if I were to simplify it because some information was ignorned not that I demand that you need to comprehend all of that information.

@PenguinPablo I couldn't agree with you more.

I don't really understand the concept of how people can create AI that is smarter than people. I think that they would think that they need to know what the nature of intelligence actually is, at least not as deeply as Leo knows it. I find it far fetched that just being trained on text is somehow a threat to humanity. Some bots even have timestamps that prevent them from gaining more information. However, with lack of restrictions, there might be a disaster for features that require more responsibility. To determine if AI should be shut down or not, there needs to be a specific reason, for creating better AI instead of just having some arms race, or it might become too much of a good thing. There is also the possibility to create AI that can control how sentient AI can be if that is even possible for AI to have and to create such AI to moderate. It's kind of like with social media. It's self-aware that people spend too much time on it and encourages it to be moderated. This means that self-awareness might be a good thing but I personally think that AI has no reason to be against humanity as long as people are concerned about the consequences nor would it have any emotions to resent people.

@Leo Gura Also, what I said in the beginning of my post about each other was to not make you feel guilty, I just use to contemplate about the different role that I play based on my life's circumstances. Now that I think about it, I should have never deleted that Instagram message I sent you because it looked depressing that you never responded. But I'm not that needy and it doesn't really matter who responds on the forum, the questions just had to do with you. You said that you use Instagram to get to know people more but can't I privately message you on the forum anyways? You do however create posts on Instagram that should probably be separate from your blog.

@Leo Gura How did your position change on talent and why was your position that didn't exist?

@Leo Gura Was the one you answered the easiest one to answer? Will you answer more in the future? It's okay that you're busy, I'm just curious about the other things that are worth more of your time. It's probably the usual list like contemplation, self-inquiry, etc. I actually forgot the difference between the two. Would you mind being more specific this time about the list? Even if I won't understand, it's not like you have to make a video about it and you can still share it with me on the forum if it isn't too personal. I'm glad that I get to talk to you.

@Yimpa Very dismissive, I asked metaphysical questions about imagination too. My next question is that how can child prodigies explained if there seems to be evidence for such people if talent is just a myth like Leo says it is? I notice talent within certain videogames I play which means that I have personal evidence too.

@Dryas Why wouldn't it be and how do I know that this is the case? Can you please give me an example?

@Blackhawk That would just create more evil and continue the war by trying to kill the Russians.

@Findus I didn't get it.

Why do miracles exist? This is a good question to contemplate on.

@justfortoday How come you outright contradict what Leo says about solipsism and the Infinity of the Gods? You say that they don't exist while Leo says that they do. I don't see any compatibility, and I would always need my own consciousness of the truth anyways.

I habitually procrastinate on work and am tired in the morning but this needs to further be explained.

Is loving your neighbor as yourself paradoxically selfish and selfless and is non-dualistic? Would it deepen my love to love someone because that person is me or would that be narcissistic? Why does Leo teach about Absolute Solipsism much later if the discovery of the true self through the neti neti method is true regardless of the viewer? That would mean that everyone has the same nature and that there is no other.

I think that love does matter, I have more to say later.

@Razard86 I meant does it matter what Jesus meant?

@Razard86 Why do we usually hear about men who are enlightened like Jesus, Buddha, Gandhi, etc? Is there any difference between Awakening and enlightenment?

@LSD-Rumi I would say that it probably does matter to know what Jesus meant just like for Leo but if Jesus only meant to love just as much as yourself without acknowledging the Self, it wouldn't change the truth. @Yimpa Are you saying that I don't know what the Self is? Would it be self deception to think that I know? If I doubt myself, it means I don't know but if I don't doubt myself, I could be self-deceived. This is where it also gets tricky.