Jannes

There needs to be a Life is Strange game about the US regime right now with ICE. So much heartbreaking stuff going on right now can easily fill the story line of the game.

Okay, beggs the question if the Air Defense is advanced enough to shoot down the Jets. The B2 bomber could do some tactical bombing of air defense first. None of your links work

Nice Jets. The US has 2300 of those.

Any major basis could just get bombed to the ground by the US and big pieces likes tanks or Jets dont really stand a chance imo but they can loose against Guerilla tactics on the ground. Thats a good point. I cant picture the actual numbers of what recources the US really have. If they wanted to take controll on the ground I am sure they would need to put everything in there and would possibly even loose because they are outnumbered.

@Elliott Okay that point I can understand. But if you own a whole country militarily with minimal losses, thats still a show of strength. Trump said he would help in Iran. That he backs down now is a bigger show of weakness then loosing a Jet.

Worth 23 Billion US Dollars ... Obviously you dont give away everything.

What losses if you just coordinate strikes on air defenses with bombing afterwards. US has a huge technological advantage.

I guess you are speaking about Peter Ralstons speaking voice and not Leos? Well I dont really care about that his speaking isnt perfect, I just feel that it comes from a place of genuine understanding. Thats why it captures me. These professional speakers are just pretending, beautifully so perhaps but still pretending. Appearently.

The US military has limited ground troups. In this aspect they really arent that strong. They absolutely could bomb Iran into the ground if they wanted to. The US spents 997 Billion US Dollars on its military a year, Iran spents 23 Billion US Dollar.

Here we go again. We are "cookivores". We adapted to cooked food, thats why our teeth are so pathetic. Thats why our digestive track is so small.

A nice puzzle

I got an Audio Book from Peter Ralston and I could not listen to more then 30 minutes of it as I know Ralstons original voice and that just didnt seem right. Same with Alan Watts. It would be the same for your book I think.

https://lichess.org/de/training/DBEI3

I would have my disagreements with the message at some points but good on you for trying yourself out in front of the camera, you have a very calm voice and dont shy away to speak to the camera. Its nice to listen to you talk.

Not following my survival instincs feels so good. Letting her go, not holding onto it. But of course its anti survival. Letting the war on survival go, aka embracing death, feels like bliss.

It feels like I am fucking up so badly atm. I have got this girl in my social circle and she seems very interested in me. I also thought about it, but I am not fully emotionally interested and sexually only kind of. We are cool, there is trust, but there isnt really the vibe and chemistry. I would probably run through open doors with her, if I escalated but I am just not sure if I actually want it. She stroked over my arm yesterday when whe chatted and I just didnt really feel good about it. She will probably look for someone else now .. that seemed to be in the air when I arrived yesterday. And that will kind of hurt because I am partially invested. Maybe I can talk with a friend about it.

That would be a helpful game. An "open source democracy starter pack". Oftentimes when a regime is taken over, its not that easy to put a new, non corrupt government into power. Its all just chaos. If you had a blueprint to follow to get the building blocks for making a democracy, that could transform many countries. It would maybe even motivate protests earlier, because they know that they could get into the building of a democracy at the end of a regime change and not fall into deeper chaos.

Denmark is lterally the least corrupt country on earth with a CPI of 90!! (US is at 69 in 2023) And the second happiest country on earth with a score of 7.58 of 10. Not sure if that is a blessing or a curse with dealing with the US atm.

Maybe. Is that just one example or the rule?

China is authoritarian too .. well not as corrupt as Russia though. Well idk, very possible that you are right, I cant really tell as I havent contemplated this dynamic deeply enough.

1) Thats a good point 2) The US alone sends most of the weapons. So I think Russia will see the chance to get more territory. The US will get back on track in a few years. 3) Why? China and Russia are cool with each other from what I know.

The peace price committee didnt give Trump the peace price, it was the bullshit decision of one women. The thread of Russia exists though and without the US support Ukraine cant defend itself. Russia also has nukes and seems to be more desperate so thats a dangerous situation. So Europe has to keep being friends with the US as long as possible. That Europe still pays for Russian oil is pathetic, I can agree on that.

Of course they oppose Trump and Putin. Europe is dependet on the US for survival though.

That was a surprisingly nice coaching. Got a new technique for getting out of my head while coaching He also offered to give me more frequent coachings when I need it, next coaching will be in about 2 - 3 weeks .. My focus seems to be good (which is interesting), I am not viewing long enough before getting into the interpretation though which is the big thing. And my interpretation also isnt on point.