Jannes

I always wonder if a piece of shit can smell itself.

Whenever a lower stage in spiral dynamics misbehaves there is always a bunch of material for the higher stage to work with. If people become agressive and tribal-ish stage blue becomes horny to order everything. When orderly people act like dumb sheep, wallstreet people become horny to gain money and influence. And looking at what is going on in the US, there is plenty of material for empathy.

Yeah it would massively help their reputation but they would be seen as a massive hypocrit if they then go on to invade Taiwan. Maybe they can postpone that for a bit. And all of these trade deals with the US are also a bit of a protection. If that all falls apart then what does the US loose when they (further) violate international law. Lol, wtf am I saying. Okay so some form of reaction needs to be had like a big round of tarrifs but maybe not overdo it so much that the US goes "fuck it, whats there to loose anyway". And again, your Links dont work.

Nice. Maybe in the time of need some unexpected friends arise. The military itself might even strike. But we better not let it come to this.

Trump and Putin are lovebirds. The investment of the US hasnt fully stopped, but its just a fraction of what it was before. https://usafacts.org/answers/how-much-foreign-aid-does-the-us-provide/countries/ukraine/?utm_source=chatgpt.com This graph doesnt actually show the weapons, loans, intelligence, ... which adds about another 100 Billion the total 100 Billion USAID support. In 2026 USAID it will be something like 400 Million plus 800 Million in military support. ... If US support stopped the biggest hit would probably be the loss of US intelligence. France can also provide, but not with the same quality. Why do you think China would work together with Europe in sanctioning the US ?

Doesnt make a difference. Drones are categorically much easier to hit, thats why old tech works. Bro the first link doenst show the video and the other links dont work again. Yeah they should act fast. Everyone is shaking from making a statement to the US. Well at least some European countries sent a few soldiers there on a mission symbolically. When the US takes Greenland, Nato will be gone and so will the support of the US for Ukraine right .. ? If European countries make a statement like a tarrif threat of all of NATO countries + combined if the US takes Greenland and it fails and Trump still takes Greenland, that is basically the same outcome as when Trump takes Greenland without resistance which would lead to the resolution of NATO anyway.

Shooting down drones is orders of magnitude easier then shooting down a fighting yet. I read a bit about operation rough rider. The US destroyed 800 targets and lost 7 unmanned drones in the process. Read that the two F/A-18 Super Hornets were lost in operational accidents, maybe thats propaganda idk. It would be more costly to attack Iran yeah .. You made the point about sanctioning the US if they want to take Greenland. I like the idea more and more. So many countries around the world want a rule based world. You could start with an agreement of all NATO states to sanction the US if they take Greenland and look for more countries around the world to join that agreement. Imagine you get an agreement of half of the countries on this earth threatening tarrifs on the US for destroying the rule based world. That would be a ballsy thing to do.

Oh no, I also dont think its going to happen. I just think the US would have the capacity, if they really wanted to, to destroy Irans military tech. They can shoot down a Boeing perhaps, but B-2 stealth bombers are designed to not be detected by high tech air defense. Without High Tech I think its unlikely you have a chance to shoot down the B-2s. The bunker breaker bombs cost that much, the other bombs are way cheaper.

I am an anti-chameleon It constantly get hurt because of it but I cant help but to be this way

There needs to be a Life is Strange game about the US regime right now with ICE. So much heartbreaking stuff going on right now can easily fill the story line of the game.

Okay, beggs the question if the Air Defense is advanced enough to shoot down the Jets. The B2 bomber could do some tactical bombing of air defense first. None of your links work

Nice Jets. The US has 2300 of those.

Any major basis could just get bombed to the ground by the US and big pieces likes tanks or Jets dont really stand a chance imo but they can loose against Guerilla tactics on the ground. Thats a good point. I cant picture the actual numbers of what recources the US really have. If they wanted to take controll on the ground I am sure they would need to put everything in there and would possibly even loose because they are outnumbered.

@Elliott Okay that point I can understand. But if you own a whole country militarily with minimal losses, thats still a show of strength. Trump said he would help in Iran. That he backs down now is a bigger show of weakness then loosing a Jet.

Worth 23 Billion US Dollars ... Obviously you dont give away everything.

What losses if you just coordinate strikes on air defenses with bombing afterwards. US has a huge technological advantage.

I guess you are speaking about Peter Ralstons speaking voice and not Leos? Well I dont really care about that his speaking isnt perfect, I just feel that it comes from a place of genuine understanding. Thats why it captures me. These professional speakers are just pretending, beautifully so perhaps but still pretending. Appearently.

The US military has limited ground troups. In this aspect they really arent that strong. They absolutely could bomb Iran into the ground if they wanted to. The US spents 997 Billion US Dollars on its military a year, Iran spents 23 Billion US Dollar.

Here we go again. We are "cookivores". We adapted to cooked food, thats why our teeth are so pathetic. Thats why our digestive track is so small.

A nice puzzle

I got an Audio Book from Peter Ralston and I could not listen to more then 30 minutes of it as I know Ralstons original voice and that just didnt seem right. Same with Alan Watts. It would be the same for your book I think.

https://lichess.org/de/training/DBEI3

I would have my disagreements with the message at some points but good on you for trying yourself out in front of the camera, you have a very calm voice and dont shy away to speak to the camera. Its nice to listen to you talk.

Not following my survival instincs feels so good. Letting her go, not holding onto it. But of course its anti survival. Letting the war on survival go, aka embracing death, feels like bliss.