wildflower

Yeah Ive had some insanely joyful experiences on psychedelic's too, Im talking bout your sober default state bro, you can't be high on DMT 24/7 unfortunately

Lol Im just playing Leo at his own game, look how he communicates with others

But here's what your not understanding: you dont look like your having a good time; your realisations have turned you into a lonely miserable human with no joy Rather be a happy loving accepting Buddhist than a egotistical lonely bitter philosopher? What has your worked brought you besides separation, and division?

Pickup is about as low consciousness as you get lol, its tool is the same with all other rock bottoms, the path brings you to a point where the are no other options but to wake up, Leo is just reverberating his own delusions to you guys and harming you all. There is nothing but harm, selfishness, and suffering in pickup, and if you have a even modicum of consciousness this will be patently obvious The reason why most people do it when young, is because your are in a low conscious state lol, Leo is 36/37 and still stuck in the same baseline state of consciousness as a 21 year old

There is no other path, we label the path 'buddhist' they are just words. Either that are take psychedelic's for peak experiences? Great peak 'God realisation' experience, what does it bring you? suffering and delusion when you sober up... Either Leo renounces his finite egoic self and embraces infinite Love or as you become Nothing (what you call the buddhist path) or you live as a zen devil, the choices are yours

That video is incorrect though, your axis is wrong, and when you refer to Buddhism,. you refer to 20% of Buddhism and talk as though is 100% (you do this type of absolute speech all the time btw) Buddhism covers both sides of your stupid axis lol, it covers the downregulation of conciousness via vipassna, and on the other side it goes to INFINITE conciouss via Jhana, more complete then 5meo -- you just haven't experienced it, and your ignorant, and you foolishly dont know what your talking about

subject and object collapses, your subjective experience is objective absiolute etc etc

Ignore most of the robotic fools who espouse the same rehearsed crap they inherited from Leo. What you are asking is, can a computer become self referential, and assume a pseudo independent identity, then yes, it's inevitable. The human biology is too constraint and selfish, AI/computers will be more selfless, which is ultimately the universe goal Dont conflate conciousness with self referencing seperation

The problem is Leo is inconsistent and equivocating in his communication so you will get confused Essentially the human perspective is just a single lens, so your belief that you have this innate inbuilt inherent objective attraction, isn't ultimate true Everything can be transcend... EVERYTHING including your humanity, and when you do, you realise being a human is a bias, and you want to overcome as much as possible.... ever wonder why monks etc renounce biology? do you see the meta pattern here? (leo himself still hasn't grasped this pattern)

As the title suggests

God is Infinity is Nothingness is Love self/ego/me/i is the mechanism of segregation/separation and the deluded negation of God Then renunciation of self is the highest embodiment of God Buddhism is the highest form of renounciation

No Buddhism isn't a belief system, its a set of tools to disidentify with the ego, and renounce to God,

This forum never stops amazing me, your post is deluded, ill informed, and just pollutes the discourse

Im not talking about Siddharta, or his moniker the Buddha. Thats like when talking about gravity having high utility; 'if you meet einstein, kill him' The Buddha espoused a model for renunciation, no other model comes close, its almost perfect. This renunciation model, is literally the embodiment of Love

Renounce renouncing Buddhism you fool

Loving itself is the act of renunciation lol, that's the very mechanism of Love. ego is the negation of Love, the ego's main tool 'I' is the tool of separation and segregation. The more God loves itself, the more the ego dies (i.e. renunciation of ego/separation/segregation/selfishness)

Nobody addressed anything I said in my opening post, are you zombies?

@Yali i don't want to converse with you on this topic, you're an imbecile when it comes to Jung and his work (no offence), and you are just polluting the discourse

@Yali no not at all socionics intertype is stupid, not true, inaccurate and flawed. But I don't want to discuss it. I outlined the theory above of romantic compatibility, this is how you chose your 'other half' because literally they embody the positive of the negative half of yourself!

--

@Leo Gura We've been through this before, but Jung (who was an INTP) created a schema of the pysche that identifies patterns, that are as accurate as any other science. He basically said this; consciousness - your pysche - can be split into four fundamental dimensions. Sensate reality Thinking Feeling Intuition Each dimension performs two functions based on a subject/object dichotomy. Internal sensate reality && External sensate reality Internal Thinking && External thinking etc etc This gives 8 functions of consciousness. Notice for example Wittgenstein Tactatus and 'logical space' being inherently logical is just talking about the Thinking dimension of consciousness! The pysche creates a hierarchy based around preference of the 8 functions. How you create this hierarchy is your what each personality archetype or perspective is Each of the 8 functions has an associated archetypal energy, INTP means internal thinking (logic) is expressed positively through the hero archetype, INTP's are heroic with truth for example. There parent archetype is wrapper around metaphysics (external intuition), so INTP's are parental trying to help people with metaphysics (can you see this pattern perhaps in yourself)? Your ego is the first 4 functions, and your shadow your last 4. You project and blame the last 4 onto the world as not you or not mine. The shadow is expressed via negative archetypal energies, thats why your ego doesn't identify with them (demon [angry frustrated aggressive etc], trickster, critic, opposing etc etc) The goal of Jungs work is to integrate all 8 functions of conciousness into concious control, to remove the negative shadow archetypes and intergate them into a complete whole pysche Your top romantic match is your shadow, they embody the positive ideal of the negative parts of yourself, and make you whole. You project your shadow onto your shadow match, and they can circumvent it, as they have that perspective but with positive archetypal energies rather than negatives I already sent you the discord where I explicate and teach jung and subsequent peoples work. Its just as important or significant if not more so than holism

One day hopefully you'll see how ridiculously close minded and naïve you where to psychology and it's placement in human relationships. I don't mean to be rude but your stance on there being no identifiable patterns to human psychology that can predict relationship success or correlation, is just plain stupid, naïve and close minded

And to add to our repertoire, God is also an Absolute Genius

But Leo you need to stop fucking around... Either the goal is to dive into singularity of Love forever [which we have been before] Or try to asymptomatically create a symbiosis here in this universe everything else is bullshit, and your delivery style and teachings are muddled, are we: 1) unifying into a singularity of love, or 2) going to try to create this asymptote of near unity together here in this dreamspace, their are no other questions, conversation or discussions needed its binary as a choice

Reality collapses, and then what?