Atb210201

You see even if everything else you've said was true to some extent but this right here is just the opposite. You're thinking of it backwards. Porn is the practice of promiscuity in its essence.

I think yes because the promiscuity has gotten out of hand.

Well you have a point but still we gotta try. And we're headed in that direction already I believe.

That was a joke. I know I'm mostly to blame for my own addiction.

I might be up there as well hanging myself with them. But seriously I do think it's an addiction and I'm addicted to it and not healthy at all but I'm just too addicted to quit it myself. So I'll let the government get rid of it for me to force me to quit

In time it will become a taboo and shameful activity to film your sex and show it to others. Then nobody would feel good about doing it.

My point was get rid of the porn not restrict the ways to reach it. It is possible but maybe we need to get ready for it step by step and gradually comeback. I think we are headed there sooner or later the world will get rid of porn altogether.

That's just the same as saying we can't do anything about anything everyone will just do what they want and we can't prevent anything from happening so let's just let it be as it is.

When there is no porn how can someone watch it to be monitored? I'm saying get rid of all the porn not monitor everyone.

Easy, there just needs to be rules against it, not letting it be allowed in any way, shape, or form. Tech companies will follow with porn restriction rules. You have to understand someone is already allowing it to be there in the first place that we're here now. That allowance must just stop then it will be on the other way and turn around.

It definitely is not impossible. It is very much possible. Just like it is possible to cure a sickness completely by finding the cure for it and eradicate it. Let it become appealing it's fine it will become natural again in time.

Was it there 200 years ago? No it wasn't it is a fake need created in modern society. I suffer from needing and being addicted to it too. But it's not a real need of a human being. It's a fake need created to make money and spread promiscuity and shameless behaviour around a natural and sacred thing. Which BTW the only true purpose of it is bringing new life into this realm not developing fetishes and fantasies about it for more pleasure. It is possible to get rid of it completely as if it never even existed because it's not a real need it's a fake need for addicts who are addicted to it. Same as drugs if we remove them completely it would solve the problem of addiction so much better than having them and controlling them. Yes there might be resistances but we'll get over it and heal as a society.

I don't know about the value of semen retention but masturbation is definitely compulsive in all its forms. How can it not be compulsive? Even doing it once is too much already.

Why should it be there in the first place? I'd say cut it from its roots.

Because it's a disgrace to a society if its population is concerned with lust rather than creating a healthy family and becoming a mother and a father raising the future (children). I think that's the best purpose of human life after spirituality and realising one's self, which is BTW in the same direction that is in line with creating a healthy society. Porn is just lust there is nothing educational about it. If it educates you about something it is educating you about lust nothing more. Therefore creating a lustful society as we're watching today.

True, thank you. I also want to add figures like Rumi, Attar, Khayyam, Hafiz, Sa'di, Shah Nimatullah Wali, Avicenna (Ibn Sina), Al-Khwarizmi (whose name is in Algorithm) etc... All Persian mystics, poets, mathematicians, and philosophers.

I'd like to think of myself as interdisciplinary or interreligious, you could say I'm more spiritual than religious because the heart of the religions is more important to me than the codes of life they promote but also I like to realize what's behind the codes of life they promote and why they promote them. Also, I'm more inclined towards sufism and like to think of myself as a practitioner of sufism, but I'm not good at it. In sufism there are three levels of religion which is sharia (codes or laws of life) , tariqat (the ways of reaching The Truth) like the Tao (the way) , and haghighat (The Truth).

A good move on England's part if true I must say. Very good. Although I myself am guilty of liking hardcore porn but I do wish for it to be banned altogether from the Internet.

Ah yes but I don't trust the Aryan part being truly what he himself stated or what has been added to the inscription later by others. Anyhow I find more peace and strength in seeing myself as a Persian instead of an Iranian. Persia is better known in the world rather than Iran and has a better reputation as well.

Well maybe Cyrus in the Babylonian Cylinder referred to himself as the King of Anshan but Darius in the Inscription of Naghsh-e Rostam called himself Parsi if you want to know about another King.

Anyway we're getting away from this post's main topic. But also these are all intertwined threads with each other on the Global scale and the big picture of Things. But we'll get there later.

Yes the Sassanids dynasty tried to impose the name Iran or Eransahr the same way the British is doing today. They are all the same or dare I even say the continuation of one another. The Sassanids dynasty was a corrupt class based government ruled mostly by corrupt zoroastrian preists.

Persia and Persian is not an ethnicity. It is an ancient civilization. The most ancient civilization of all time.

We pronounce Persian as Parsi. It's the same as Farsi but with a P instead of F. Farsi itself is another thing because Arabs don't have P so they called us Farsi in history and another clue that we are being robbed of our true identity is exactly this. The second Shah of Pahlavi named all our literature books "Farsi" instead of "Parsi" which is not right it must start with P not F and this is also because he was a puppet of the British.

If it proves something it's that Persian Identity is more fundamental than Iranian Identity.