-
Content count
369 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by michaelcycle00
-
michaelcycle00 replied to WokeBloke's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Just drop it fam, it's dead simple. -
michaelcycle00 replied to Godishere's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
I have the exact same question(s). The easiest way out is to just assume solipsism. But it may not be the case since God, as me for example, michaelcycle00's POV, is not aware of himself being omnipotent and omniscient, among every other quality God possesses. I'm able to hide that from myself, so who's to say I can't also hide an infinitude of other selves/POVs? I guess you could say that what I'm talking about is a state and not a separate experience but at that point I'd say we're just arguing semantics. But time definitely poses a problem, especially when you account for its relativity. The question really is, do we share the same dream, or does every conscious observer create the present moment in a completely solipsistic way? Maybe someone could shed light on this, preferably someone who's received insights related to this on a trip. -
michaelcycle00 replied to Yeah Yeah's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Very beautifully put, but you might wanna expand on this. So, why are you telling us this? If God made you a millionaire and had you find your soulmate, then aren't you God and we are just a bunch of pixels on a screen? It is either your dream personally, or it is mine/somebody else's. Or are you proposing that we live in different personal realities and somehow this forum is the breach between them that allows us to communicate? -
michaelcycle00 replied to Max Gross's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Sounds like some bull. This past life regression thing. You'll imagine whatever you want to imagine since you're everyone anyway. I think that for whatever reason your subconscious decided to imagine that for you, but the awakening was entirely your own doing. -
michaelcycle00 replied to Someone here's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
You really should stop parroting what more advanced members here say and then just put your signature on it. I notice that you try to connect the dots intellectually between one thing and the other but that's not how you're gonna realize the Truth. You're 25, do you not work and therefore have some money? If you really wanna find out what lies beyond the veil then you should just buy some Psychedelics already. -
michaelcycle00 replied to Seth's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Yeah... I was more so referring to nothing as infinite possibilities beyond our comprehension. Of course, we could just flip any and everything and just end it with "it's just nothing", but then what would be the point of discussion? -
Most men won’t go this far, but yes, there’s a good amount of fragile ego pieces of shit like this dude. If I was a woman I’d also avoid most men. Your best bet is learning how to read a person before you interact with them. I’m lucky to have been born being really good at this. It’s like I literally foreshadow incidents in my life.
-
michaelcycle00 replied to Seth's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Can you expand? I’ve also thought that consciousness couldn’t be the ending point of Infinity, although perhaps it has to be that way (or not). I’ve noticed that people in this forum put all sorts of caps on God. That creation can only be this way. That you need suffering to contrast it with the good, etc. However, existence itself is literally ridden with all sorts of paradoxes. Knowing this, how could there be any sort of limit unless it was imposed by the Godhead? I see an existence that is only good entirely plausible. I mean, hasn’t God been pure infinite love for an eternity? In the same way, why would consciousness be the ending point? Since God doesn’t need anything or any type of mechanism to do anything at all… you’d think consciousness is just an aspect of it, not the totality. I’d love it if you shared what you know though. -
Right. Interesting, I don’t remember saying that wasn’t the case, so you’ve revealed your lack of reading comprehension a tad here. I’d have to date a very introverted girl to trust her like that. Your average extroverted girl, even if she’s a good person, is very likely to be swayed by another dude and her fall for it. It’s just in her nature. It’s not even “not trusting her” as much as putting a deer in front of a Tiger and expecting him not to eat it is being distrustful of the Tiger.
-
Haha, I meant after getting to know her, if she has 2 or more male friends I wouldn't pursue a relationship with her. Preferably to have 0 though, just to be sure. But yeah if she's with 2 dudes I wouldn't approach. For the same reasons I mentioned. Well, you're probably too naive then. Unless it's some emo or masculine-looking girl, you should pretty much count on it. Yeah exactly. Btw, you can quote multiple times in the same reply. You don't have to open multiple entries for every single thing you want to quote and respond to.
-
michaelcycle00 replied to Realms of Wonder's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Right now I'm thinking about how much it'll cost to repair the rear left wheel of my Ford F-150. You? -
Just press your finger on the app for a few seconds and then press delete. Idk what you mean quit social media in an actualized way lmao, there's probably no such thing.
-
Best of luck fam. Just go with the flow, get out of your head. My anxiety kicks in in situations like this as well but deep down I don't give a flying fuck about what they think about me. I know I'm a great dude. Though if she's in a group with a bunch of dudes I just assume she's been ran through or that if anyone in that group has a thing for her the interaction will just end in a confrontation so I pass. If a girl has over 2 male friends (preferably 1 or none at all) then it's an immediate no-go for me. Idk about you though.
-
You're just into transsexual people. That's all. Don't worry about what the term for that is, it doesn't matter. I couldn't find it anyway. As a heterosexual 22 y/o male I can tell you I have never been disgusted by the look of a pussy. The opposite in fact. When I watch porn, and I see a pussy, I start salivating. Like I feel so attracted to it that just fucking it wouldn't cut it. I would need to lick both the vulva and the anus while somehow being able to penetrate the vagina at the same time to feel satisfied. I know this is obviously physically impossible, but that's how strong the impulse is. Telling you this so you get an idea of how straight males feel about it. Not all pussies look, visually speaking, "beautiful", but they certainly all look enticing.
-
michaelcycle00 replied to machiavelli's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
That the current Infinity already takes up everything that exists, which is nothing. Lol. -
michaelcycle00 replied to Michael Jackson's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
But don't you think that they both could have separate, independent realities (relatively speaking) that are ultimately still one? -
michaelcycle00 replied to Fernanda's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
I also haven't (to that extent) but apparently, some people have. Yes, but again, where does the causation come from if not just your mind? Why would someone like Greta turn pro-fossil fuels? Why would someone like Trump suddenly turn into a Democrat? Why would Hitler start loving the Jews without any cause other than your mind? See what I'm trying to say? Yes. Very likely. This is Solipsism though... you're animating everything and *everyone* by shifting the focus of your consciousness to that/them. Lol. I'm sure it can, I just don't see why it would. If the goal is to forget and pretend it's a human in an alien world separate from others then it just needs 1 experience (POV) for that. Not infinitely many. And again, going by this, it actually would be counterproductive to dream and be aware of an infinite number of dreams. It beats the experience. This is why I/you, whatever, are only aware of your ego-self and not of an infinite number of them. This would imply that manifestation is inherently limited and bounded by others' receptivity. So basically you're saying you can't manifest unless other people are in accordance with your will. To my knowledge, from various reputable sources as well as self-experience, this isn't the case. As long as I persisted in my desired state, I've had a 100% success rate. Don't get me wrong Matthew, I want more than anything for others to be real. Like I'd probably go crazy if I found out this wasn't the case. I want you to be real... you are a real one btw (no pun intended), I always read your posts. You're out here asking the right questions. But yeah, I just can't see how that would be possible in the relative domain. Perhaps the relative domain is a lot more radical than we are able to think (fingers crossed). -
@somegirl my bad, I hadn't checked this topic. Oh yeah, typical Redditors. I mean I don't wanna turn into an incel, but I also don't wanna deny logic and how things are, even if it's not to my liking. Like if I'm ugly then I'm just ugly and that's it. I don't want people to pamper me and tell me how handsome I am when it's not the case. Or if I'm too sensitive I don't want people to tell me "no you just haven't learned how to process your emotions", etc. I hate it in fact. I don't wanna live in a bubble of blissful ignorance just because you don't wanna make me or someone else feel bad. Like when I posted here that I wasn't attractive enough, or of the appropriate race to be with like some beautiful white girl. If you didn't read it basically I said that I'd be robbing those girls of the chance of being with like some hot dude who'd satisfy them better and that I didn't wanna be settled with. When I posted that I didn't want people to tell me "no but you're good enough", "you're just insecure" (which is what I got) but to basically guide me on how to make peace with my situation and integrate the TRUTH in a healthy way. Because it's obviously still a really hard pill to swallow. Apparently, they're just "standards". All good You're meeting after all then? I wish you luck! (not being sarcastic)
-
Lol. Are you serious?
-
michaelcycle00 replied to Michael Jackson's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
God’s love is biased. He cannot NOT love every part of his being because then creation wouldn’t work. I guess you could say “he” is loving in the sense that he allows us to be able to choose what to love and what not to. There are many things I will never love about existence. I can definitely see unfathomable intelligence in all of creation, but certainly not “love”, not the love we know of at least. So I prefer to call it something along the lines of “absolute acceptance”. Existence can’t deny itself because it’s all there is, so it compensates with infinite love. -
michaelcycle00 replied to Fernanda's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
I didn't do/haven't done that in particular. It's just an example from other people's success stories. On Neville Goddard's sub (Reddit) you'll find hundreds of these success stories. Mostly from women who wanted their exes back or their crushes to like them back. I used to want to do this in order to get a girlfriend but nowadays I'm not so sure I want a relationship (due to many things) or to manifest some perfect girl for me even. It'd just make me more solipsistic than I already am and I can't function as a human that way. It's pretty scary honestly. Yep, that's what most people on this train say. I've contemplated that already, and there are still inconsistencies. Think about how the people in your life play a part in your storyline. Your father, mother, brother, your co-workers, your friends, Trump, Biden, Greta Thunberg, etc lol. Let's say Greta Thunberg was your sister. You've become sick to death of her parroting about climate change in the last years and you'd like her to change. You want her to become pro-fossil fuels, buy a Hummer H1, and brag about it on Instagram. This would obviously make no sense at all. But it's your will. So you manifest her to become like that. And she does, all of a sudden, 3 days later she says she's pro-fossil fuels and is looking to buy a Hummer H1. You'd probably be like "did you just hit your head or something?". Now, this doesn't negate what you just said, what does is that she would STILL have to be YOUR SISTER GRETA THUNBERG WHO YOU GREW UP WITH. So for example, whatever childhood memories you had with her would have to remain the same. If you remember stubbing your toe against a lego she was using to build a house in the living room when she was 5, she would have to remember that moment, and any other that you shared together, for the sake of consistency. What I'm saying is that for your scenario to work everything else up to that moment would need to be the exact same. How do you solve this? Do you think an infinite amount of the same realities you have lived and are currently living are being spawned over and over again except with that slight difference where your sister is no longer a climate change activist, but the complete opposite? Among many other changes you could've made to your reality through manifestation. And if the past is the exact same, why would that happen anyway? Why would people or circumstances change out of nowhere, for no reason at all? Other than that you made them be this way. None of this is possible if they're sentient just like you are. My point being that even with infinite realities, it doesn't really make sense. And if God is subdividing endlessly and creating the entire life of other people just so that you get to experience them in the way that you want them to, doesn't that scream "you're God, it's all fake!" even more? But yeah it's pretty weird. -
michaelcycle00 replied to Fernanda's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
How do you explain bending other people to your will through manifestation. Say a woman found you repulsive and then you manifested her to fall madly in love with you. What would this tell you about “others”? To me it tells me that they’re just, for the sake of understanding, very advanced projections of my mind. Like holograms. I believe that everything in my immediate awareness is in a quantum superposition, including other people, until I measure it through my 5 senses. I’ve been able to change people around me just by changing my thoughts and feelings on them… literally no action other than that. This cannot co-exist with the argument of multiple minds. -
True. I guess society dictates it like that. In my case though, I tend to research a lot, about everything, so I always contrast the positive and the negative before I get to a conclusion. Society's expectations don't sway me in that sense. Yeah... I've never been one to give news much credit, but since most of the news I read is on Twitter, when I get to the replies and there are like 1000 women saying "you shouldn't approach women on the street because it's creepy and they're just going about their business" I'm gonna think that that's the general consensus. Although to be fair it's mostly Karens or LGBTQ+ people. Deep research on the internet. Social media and forums mostly. Forums are the best because you can see what people really think when no one can judge them in real life. Girls' forums can make a guy extremely insecure let me tell you that much. Never-ending lists of attributes that even the top 1% don't fully match. I agree with this. I get that, all I'm saying is that the odds are higher in that he's just trying to sleep around rather than wanting something serious. Even if you're attractive, you also said it yourself, there are many other attractive girls in his comments and following, which is why I asked "are you a supermodel?" inferring that if you were that much more attractive than all those other girls it'd make sense that he'd message you and not any of all the others since Instagram is a bit (more like very) superficial as you said, which is obvious. But yes, there is a chance that you in a particular captivated him among all those others and he wants something serious, it's just statistically not very likely. That's literally all I'm saying. I know, not sure why you're treating me like some dumb toddler. I thought I'd made my point clear. Another red flag. I did something similar back in December last year. Matched with a girl on a dating app, but I wasn't attracted to her. I was just swiping right on everyone because I wanted to talk to a girl because I was bored and that's what I felt like doing at the moment. So we had a brief conversation that night, then another in the morning the next day, and that was the end of it. No one left the other on read. It was just a small thing caused by boredom and I never messaged her again. My point stands here. If he wanted you, he would've messaged you again. Trust me, I'm a guy, I know. You're not at the top of his head or seen as important. I think this is obvious for guys and girls alike. Even if he was super busy, if he cared about you he'd make some time to have a chat with you, or at least have the decency to say "hey, it was nice chatting with you, but right now I'm at a point in my life where I'm not able to be in a relationship. When I'm ready I'll make sure to let you know" or similar. I'm still unsure if you aren't contemplating any of these things or just deciding to overlook them (respectfully).
-
Simple, he sees them as objects he can use for his own pleasure and therefore doesn’t feel bad about playing them in order to get his pp wet. I think that’s what we call “game” nowadays. I’m blunt and direct while still being a good person and people still take me as rude and arrogant. You just can’t challenge someone else’s beliefs because the either crumble or get aggressive. Yeah, I’ve been trying to. It’s harder than you would expect. I think it’s more about being unapologetic because you’re always gonna piss people off for not being like them and adapting to their expectations.
-
No, I’m not suggesting that. What I’m saying is that me and everyone who feels the way I do should stop feeling shame about their sexual nature. Stop listening to women and the media as well, since they’re talking from the place of being a victim, so you’re bound to get even more repressed. They’ll tell you approaching is bad, wanting sex is bad, taking the lead is bad… and in the end it’s all a hoax that does more bad than good. It’s all a matter of being clear about who you are as a person, and that you won’t let society dictate what you should or shouldn’t do (within the bounds of what’s reasonable of course). Wouldn’t really fulfill me, but if the only 2 options were die alone and a virgin or be a fuckboy I’d take the latter. But again, what I said above is what I really think is the best course of action. I literally read it not too long ago (among like 30 other posts), not that hard to forget given the quality of most posts. I didn’t say there was anything wrong with you finding him interesting. Based on your description, if I was a girl I’d find him interesting as well. But you still let your guard down for him very innocently. And no, I don’t. My account is private and I’m not one to be posting pictures for the world to see. No, not because of that. He most likely is a fuckboy because he messaged you (I don’t remember who messaged who first) to meet or whatever (obviously, he has to lead up from somewhere lol), on Instagram, where you can find millions of super hot girls, and he did so based on your pictures alone. Quite the coincidence. Do you look like a supermodel by any chance? Or doesn’t it make more sense that he just wants to fuck, since he doesn’t know you, and therefore wouldn’t make sense that he messaged you because he sees you as relationship potential? Added to this is the fact that he didn’t message you back promptly (or at all I guess), so you’re not even on the top of his head. So what we can deduct by this is that he most likely just sees you as another Instagram girl he has a chance to sleep with. If you can’t see this, then I don’t know what to say.