johnlocke18

@JuliusCaesar You’re still not arguing my point. Now you’re just saying I’m not conscious enough, okay, well since I can perceive something as evil that means it exists, illusory or not. Meaning it’s apart of everything, meaning not everything is good.

@JuliusCaesar You said that I’m arguing objective evil exists, when I only said it exists subjectively, meaning it’s apart of everything. So, yes you put words in my mouth. Either you mean all good or you don’t, and if I can perceive evil then it exists, illusory or not. So that means not everything is good.

@Leo Gura I’ll simplify one more time, if I can perceive something is evil then that means it exists real or not. Meaning that not everything is infinite love (affection or pleasure by definition.) You didn’t address that, you just pointed out I’m imagining it which I already acknowledged in the op.

@JuliusCaesar I’m not arguing that objective evil exists so you’re still not getting my point. I said illusory or not, meaning subjective or objective. Even if evil is illusory it’s still apart of everything meaning not everything is good. You’re putting words in my mouth.

@JuliusCaesar The reason I’m saying you don’t understand me is because you said it’s an illusion, when I already explained even if it’s an illusion that means it’s still apart of everything, meaning not everything is good. So you didn’t address my point.

@Leo Gura You said everything is love, which the only definitions mean affection or pleasure. Which isn’t true because other things like pain exist, illusory or not. You can’t blame me if you’re not using the word that you mean. You’re not addressing my point that you’re using the wrong word and confusing people. Either it’s infinite love or it’s not, and either that’s what you mean or it’s not.

@JuliusCaesar The definition of love is either affection or pleasure, and if everything is that then evil can’t be apart of it. And since people are capable of perceiving things as evil, that means evil is apart of it, which means it isn’t love by definition. You guys aren’t understanding what I’m saying.

@Leo Gura It’s not that I’m too stubborn, you’re just not saying what you mean. If you don’t mean reality is infinite affection or pleasure, then don’t use the word that means that! You’re not understanding my point, but I get what you’re saying. You’re using love in place of the word acceptance. But you’re too stubborn to accept you’re just changing the definition of a word which causes misunderstandings, then you blame the people you’re using it towards.

@Leo Gura Both definitions of love means deep pleasure or deep affection of something. Egoic or not. So, evil by definition can’t be apart of it. Otherwise, you’re just using the wrong word and not saying what you mean.

@Leo Gura There can be nothing outside of infinity by definition, and if there’s fear or self deception then it’s not love by definition. Either you mean infinite love or you don’t.

@Leo Gura Then god isn’t infinite love by definition if even the idea of evil exists. Either god or myself is infinite love or not.

@JuliusCaesar Yeah but that doesn’t address my point. If it exists even subjectively, then it exists. Which would mean by definition god isn’t infinite love.

DO NOT take psychedelics with anything that acts on serotonin receptors, or you’ll get serotonin syndrome which is deadly. Idk about a lot of them but I know for sure not to do that.

Basically, if it’s infinite love by definition, evil can’t be apart of it. Any objections like it’s beyond my understanding, it’s unlimited, or it’s a paradox just means you’re not saying what you mean. Either it’s all powerful love or it’s not. Which it’s not if evil is apart of it in any form.

@Leo Gura Unless you meant if they only do it once a week? Still it should only take them a few weeks to do a hundred and if they aren’t hesitating they can easily do 20 in a day. And personally I think you should tell noobs to approach with friends. Even if you do good, going out alone will make make most women suspicious of why you’re talking to them.

@Javfly33 Don’t overthink things man or let people you don’t know tell you how it is. Find out yourself or make friends with people that you know get laid.

@Leo Gura Hold on there. A few months for a hundred approaches? I could do 10 in a day with severe social anxiety and got 3 numbers on average out of those. Saying it takes months do do little things or that it takes hundreds of approaches to get laid is holding back people big time. Sure, you may have struggled that much but I feel like you’re getting this off rsd from what they told you.The the more people struggle the more money their company gets so I don’t think it’s a good idea to put their expectations on people. They may get laid but the way they go about it overcomplicates things and some of their mindsets cause dudes to come off as creepy. I tested a lot of their stuff and it’s way better to just make friends that get laid a lot naturally instead of over complicating things. You might say that they can’t explain it, but that’s a good thing because this theorizing is causing dudes unnecessary struggle.

In a recent video you said that having a strong trip and thinking you have healing powers and a few other things is delusional and a problem. A year ago you did exactly that and a youtuber recently pointed this out and gave evidence. You then denied that you were talking about your self and still stick to what you said, so you really are implying if anyone but you does it it’s delusional. I looked at his criticisms and he points out things that you actually say and do, which are true criticisms with evidence. You then cherry picked things like him saying you claimed to be a messiah (which you did imply saying the universe is grooming you), and then made it out like he was full on slandering you and trying to get views off you. Maybe he was getting views, (which isn’t different than you criticizing Jordan Peterson) but his criticisms all have evidence, you called him something of a ranting child, but you’re the one who did that just because he pointed out things you actually did, that has genuinely caused people problems, even a suicide. You also put words in his mouth when he says multiple times you’re not a cult leader, but your followers make you look like one. You do this every time someone criticizes you and you never consider anything people tell you, and then you accuse them of doing everything you do while deflecting, even after you do damage. You’re a hypocrite who can’t take an ounce of criticism but dishes it out.

I’ll sum this up. Leo claimed crazy stuff. Then called it delusional. Now he’s back to claiming it. You guys can call off work to argue whether the stuff is possible but my main point is he contradicted himself. And this negatively influences his followers. Especially the unstable ones.

@Inliytened1 And you’re just assuming that actually happened to him and telling me to be grateful. Unless you used telepathy lol. Good job on making him look more like a cult leader putting him on a pedestal.

@RendHeaven Nah lol. He claimed something then called it delusional. Now he’s back to claiming it. It probably confuses and frustrated a lot of his audience and is mentally harmful to them. He contradicted himself and does it a lot it doesn’t matter how “awake” he is. In my opinion, you guys are in a fantasy but factually, Leo contradicts himself and has a bad influence on a lot of people’s mental health.

I’ll sum this up. Leo claimed crazy stuff. Then called it delusional. Now he’s back to claiming it. You guys can call off work to argue whether the stuff is possible but my main point is he contradicted himself. And this negatively influences his followers.

@Preety_India I never said anything about psychedelics bringing all awakening. Leo did. And I’m questioning it lolol this is getting ridiculous. You’re looking at things in a distorted way because Leo did claim this stuff and then he called it delusional. And you’re defending him as if he didn’t.

@Thought Art You’re the one not “going all the way” the stuff in that video can be debunked. You want to believe it so you turn your head to really looking into it. And being skeptical of you skepticism is just playing mind games. You simply be skeptical and see if something is real or not. And no actualized has turned into a dogma. It’s just blindly believing stuff or you’re close minded.

@Preety_India It’s not false equivalence. Gaslighting is bad just like hitting. And I’m not allowing myself to be gaslighted. This is the definition of open mindedness. You seem to think it means blindly believing. Which is why you criticize me for healthy skepticism.