Bobby_2021

Hei you?✌️

Explicit answers would help. From reading @Razard86 @LSD-Rumi I think the answer is that I am simultaneously the Leo avatar, and the Leo individual, so as Razard, avatar and individual and Rumi, avatar and individual while also being Bobby, individually.

When you say "You are Leo" Do you mean the avatar Leo that appears on the screen talking to me in actualised.org YouTube videos? OR I am the actual individual Leo who is living his life in LA, with seperate thoughts and emotions feelings etc. Simultaneously also leading a life in India, typing on this forum right now. Which one is it? Is it both?

Same. If you could afford to migrate, then you are already highly skilled worker. Normies cannot migrate. Indian Americans are the primary example of this. Not the only one of course. Largely it does. Wealthy parents have privileged kids whose privilege compounds. Because jobs in the past didn't require IQ. Anyone who decided to work hard could make it. So the migrants didn't have any particular power to leverage. These days jobs in tech, finance etc require high Iq and hard work. Modern times also have increased upward mobility compared to past. So high Iq migrants leveraged that.

Indian immigrants to the west are nitpicked for high IQ and hardworking and they are already decently rich back home. Only high IQ Indians are allowed to pass the barrier to migration. They will crack tests faster and get accepted into jobs and their children are also usually high IQ and also hardworking & disciplined. This can easily compound over a few generations. This is why the small minorities (for eg Indian Americans) do better compared to whites who have a lot of systemic advantages. If you allow random people to migrate to US/Europe, the exact opposite would happen. (Riots in Sweden for example.)

Colleges must cancel expensive degree programs that offer no serious job prospects.

Almost the entirety of left wing is made up of hypocrisy. Would criticize capitalism as evil, but wants all the benifits of capitalism. Wants Jeff Bezos to redistribute his wealth, but hesitant to redistribute their own wealth. Will rally for affordable housing, but bribes officials to design houses in the least efficient manner so as to not let the housing prices fall. Rich LW billionares will often state that they are for higher taxation of the rich, but then bribes government officials into passing polices that favour he rich. Equality for thee, but not for me.

He said that everyone needs to memorize their credit card details, and he himself needs to check his credit card to buy something.

Thanks. ✌️

Ok. I missed it then.

Please send the link to the video. I remember watching, from the points you liad out in the post, but can't remember the title.

A nurse in Canada makes a decent amount of money. More than enough to live by her own. Gather more information about her finances. It's ok to split spending when you are living together. I wouldn't be comfortable simply sending money with no questions asked.

What is the question/topic of discussion lol?

He still plays around with crypto and makes money during crypto pumps. He does make money from crypto. He had dozens of businesses that failed before the webcam business became a success. He does have a web cam course. He explains all the steps in how to get girls to strip to the camera, the paper work etc to make it work. I even watched it for free. Most probably HU members have access to it. The thing is there is a lot of stuff happening in HU. You were told by youtubers that put clickbaity titles the only thing going on there is affiliate marketing. Tate's casio buisness operates at a net loss. He dosen't make money from that as far as I can tell at the moment. The point is that if you don't make money the first you can leave instantly. You will only lose $50 then. You have to stay only if you can cover the fee the initial month itself. He atleast promises instant money and support which a lot of scammers do not. So it's results oriented. Obviously you won't reach that kind of lifestyle. He is presenting that as proof of work. He needs that to be the masculine role model he presents himself to be. By the time he explains his business idea which made him millions, others might have hopped onto it, and the market would have saturated. So making money is always a new endeavor. At the end of that day he is obligated to pay the value of $49/mo in my opinion. To expect his lifestyle and buggatis after paying the money for a few cups of coffee is putting unreal expectations. The larger point is that the skills gained in hu will help you build wealth in the long run. You don't have to be a supporter or a fan to think rationally and critically through a topic, or to see the legitimacy of his work or what he says. All you guys flock like sheep, into believing click bait media headlines and fake allegations and categorises everyone else as "less developed" deluded Tate fans. Tate himself had close relationships with 500+ women and none of them had a problem with him. Not a single case of misbehaviour or criminal activity. It's too easy to see that you guys are motivated by hate and outrage.

Valid point. That dosen't mean broke people can teach you about money either. It's hard to find exceptional teachers. Ideally you must listen to a lot of people and choose the correct type of stuff that works for you.

You don't get the value of $1000 courses with $49. Tate himself is extremely talented in sales and marketing. You would be insane to think that he knows nothing about what he is talking about. I know he is talented from the tons of free content he has put there. There is a lot of value you can learn for free. Again, he is only offering the value of a couple of cups of coffee. That's the offer. Take it or leave it. If he had intentions to teach you more valuable stuff, he would have charged more. But that's not being offered in HU anyway. It's like complaining Mcdonald burger is shit. Yeah, because you paying a cheap price for it. Better things do exist, maybe even cheaply. They are just not offered here. Nothing wrong in learning from the devil and ditching him when he has nothing left to offer.

Does anyone still listen to him? ? You cannot be serious.

Leo Messi Leo Gura Leonardo Da Vinci

If you don't have a problem with minors(who are below the age of consent) being allowed to remove their sex organs and take puberty disrupting hormones, so that they can identify with their bullshit made up gender, then you are not morally grounded enough to question the ethics of adult women consensually stripping on camera for content. I do NOT value your opinion because you are already morally degenerate. I don't agree with both of those, just for the record, but the latter is far more forgivable. With HU2, it's a kind of a semi scammy setup with its affiliate marketing. But it teaches you a lot of other good stuff. I haven't tried it and I don't intend to. If you lose, it's only 49$. Not the of end the world or something. He can't be compared with other Scammers. There is a lot of difference with what he is bringing to the table. Masculine world is competitive. There can only be one *best* masculine model. You can list out the most important masculine values and rank order them and score each masculinity gurus. Which one would top the ranks?

Then you should wait in the meantime. Stop your shitty accusations and fake allegations. Click Bait and outrage. Best weapons of the cancel culture.

Don't elevate him to God status. He is just another dude.

Not a single women has come forward saying that Andrew is criminal/rapist/abuser/trafficker. Everything you have talked about is alleged or accused without a single piece of evidence. Yet there are plenty of women who have come forward against many men who are still allowed to exist on social media, because they apparently champion women's rights. I guess you hold on to what you want to see.

Able/capable to win a fight physically or intellectually dosen't mean always starting a fight. Subtle difference. Men who are physically and intellectually strong do not start fights. But if the situation is demanding them to, they won't shy away. If some person tries to rob you or insult you, you better have a strong man to defend you, not some man who is scared to fight. I bet toxic masculinity won't feel so toxic then. P.S. it's the weak men who start fights anyway. [ Will Smith ] Yes of course, as a man you can't shrug orange/red/blue values under the rug. There is no yellow without blue. Don't bring SD stages into every discussion because it will terribly fail short in real life. You won't check if something is red/blue before doing it. You would do what is necessary. And that the duty of men. To do what is necessary. SD has become a quick and easy tool to categorise people and rank order them without having to engage in intellectual discussion about the fact of the matter, which is usually hard. So no wonder why people always resort to using the SD to dismiss what is actually being said. No one would say it's toxic masculinity, or red or blue or gree when you have a flat tire and a man is required to change it. Imagine if he cries in the middle of the road instead of changing the damn tires. That's why a man must forever be physically fit and able to solve any problems that come his way without crying like a little bitch.

For one, I would never allow my daughter/sister to be anywhere near Tate. I do understand that it's not really ethical. I thought that it was implied. Western society has no place for ethics anyway. Otherwise we should have banned porn and adult entertainment altogether because it is inherently exploitative. Else don't really have a ground for criticising his business model, when the progressive and "highly developed" stance is that sex work is as same as any other kind of work. But I am afraid you only see the scamming part of his business. Almost all of the adult entertainment industry money is made by by some dude who doesn't have to strip on camera. Also most of the time, Tate himself did the talking to the men who payed to see the naked models. Those men who thought were talking to the woman were actually talking to Tate. To be frank, these men want some emotional comfort and escape from their loneliness. They got some of it, and they paid for it. Which wouldn't have happened if we banned OnlyFans. The progressives won't allow thag of course. If you ask to ban onlyfans, you are seen as a regressive conservative. Sure you can ask for better pay for the bottom tier workers, but that just simply didn't happen in the case if Tate. He took the most money he can milk out of them. I don't endorse these types of behaviour, but that is business. Same is true for onlyfans. Although majority of those who follow Tate/Trump are low in development, don't use that as a stereotypes to undermine what people are saying about them. You can have low development and still have legitimacy to what you are saying and be high in development and be full if shit. Seriously I am tired of people making silly statements such that I am "low in development" because I said something they don't like. I am over this.