Bobby_2021

Musk is certainly overrated and he operates within a bubble. According to the prediction of the "intern", twitter should crash because of Musks incompetence. I don't think so. Results speak for themselves. Not to mention you don't make all the decisions yourself in a big ass company. There will be plenty of people around him aiding him in his work. What else do you think? He would be dumb if he is trying to do everything by himself, which many Musk fanboys think is the case.

"Just a mistake."

If we can't kill anyone, how is there any freedom?

Yeah I do follow it. NSFW content is usually soft and artistic on social media. Twitter doesn't crack down on it because it brings clicks and revenue. It treats people like humans and not animals in many porn sites.

Absolutely. It's possible to conduct a totally anonymous platform solely for the discussion of ideas. It is possible and that would be my dream come true. Although making it a restriction to not show your face is unnecessary in my opinion. If they are fine with posting a pic of their face, I can't stop it.

https://twitter.com/Cobratate?t=pHkDnrTj8pnuRW6Qr4a_Sg&s=09 400k followers in a day. Tate is uncancelled, back on twitter along with Jordan Peterson and Babylon Bee.

The real question is, should her baby be also sent to prison? Isn't the baby innocent?

Pls PM me some stuff if you don mind. Twitter isn't going down. WhatsApp runs with less than 100 engineers. Instagram has over 300 I guess. A tech company dosen't need thousands of employees. All they are doing is to run a website and a couple of apps. It's nearly not as complex as a rocket. Even kids make websites and apps. The only issue is managing scalability. Still, not that big of a deal. There are plenty of shitty hiring practices plaguing tech companies. Like based on race, affirmative action, gender etc instead of talent & competency. Most of such employees are a drag on the company. It's usually not a issue since they rake in millions in profit anyway. But twitter can't possibly do that with 7000 employees. Needs to lay off the unnecessary workers who were a drag on the business in the first place. You really don't need this much people to run a website lmaoo.. most of it is to done to appease the public and to show that they are liberal and progressive. That's exactly why they were running at a loss in the first place. Once this continues for years, twitter needs ro resort to donations from wealthy investors who push their own political dogma into it. Twitter needs less than a thousand engineers at max, if they are being run by decent businessman who wants to make a profit. It was basically running at a loss before Musk. Fixing a billion dollar shitty company ran by far left weirdos for years is not a simple task. He will emerge as a clear winner when the dust settles.

Absolutely. All regimes has some level of authoritarianism inside them. Democracy and freedom is just a facade. People who speak with a face attached have to self censor. They could never truly express themselves. I do agree that it's a problem that trolls take advantage of this situation and spread truly hateful stuff. That must be dealt with somehow. I am only talking about well meaning people and protecting their interests. These people are the only people with true freedom of speech.

You are supposed to have an honest conversation with your potential wife/husband before you marry. Complete disclosure regarding everything, even if you support nazi ideas. Everything about their past must be available to each other. This is the way. But the whole world do not need to know about your opinion on everything. This is true fairness. As far as employers are concerned, the primary aspects should be competency. I don't think that the employees worldview affect their competency in working at a company. What matters is hardwork, teamwork, IQ, personality, treating each other nice and respectfully etc. Even a nazi can do this. I am not saying you should hire a nazi anyway. According to your statement, businesses should have the freedom to not hire nazis just like they have the freedom to not hire people based on gender ideas. What if a business decides that people who promote gender ideas are not a good fit for the company? This should be illegal. Companies should not make hiring decisions based on your social media accounts. It's your personal life. Plus, you can lock your account any time so that no employer can search you. It's not like they have to know every detail of your life to get employed. Just screen for talent and competency in whatever they are working in. Maybe attitude and personality. Nothing more. Bringing up nazis in every debate isn't smart. I don't approve of Nazis. There are exceptions to every rule. Nazis are an exception. Nazism shouldn't be tolerated in any form. Jack knows ?

Yes. Absolutely. But this also implies that a business should be allowed to run even if they have a nazi ceo. A business can run just fine even with a Nazi CEO. In reality, the government wouldn't allow it. The government isn't a neural entity and it's not supposed to be. You are talking idealistic things. And Nazism shouldn't be tolerated since it's an ideology of violence. Yes, even for anon accounts. In todays world you may be banned from companies for posting men can't get pregnant. The levels of delusion are super high. If you say that you are facing discrimination as a man, or even worse, as a white man, then you maybe blacklisted for life. You can be fired for not wanting to participate in pride marches. This happens in many tech companies and people are afraid to talk about it. Celebrities and famous people who own companies like you can live and provide for the people just fine even if you are banned. But that also means you will get death threats for you and your loved ones, even for spreading truthful ideas. The common man has no time and resources to deal with this kind of stuff. Being fired or blacklisted could mean the end for him.

@Leo Gura The minority of the best accounts on twitter are mostly anon, small or big. They even produce intellectually original content and can grow an audience while requiring little capital as compared to YouTube. Overall the quality of ideas isn't that much high as your standards. But you are not supposed to rank ideas based on their quality in a marketplace of ideas like twitter. All ideas should be allowed to exist, theoretically. Trolls are acknowledged and ridiculed as they rightly deserve. It's impossible for you get to even 100 followers by trolling alone. That's why block feature exist. Individual human trolls aren't even a serious problem while bots are the real pain in the ass to deal with. The real serious problem is allowing only one sided views to propagate the platform and any minor disagreements the "current thing" and you are immediately a racist/fascist. For ex if you are not in complete support of the west and Ukraine, then you are a fascist. There is no way nuance can happen in such an environment. This is the problem with twitter and social media in general where short form content is the main thing. People should be less triggered with ideas and must be able to discuss things with a calm mind, first. Then I will happily come out with my face like Sadhguru. Also Sadhguru is already a millionaire. It's not like he has too much to lose by saying the wrong thing. This isn't the case for most of the people. Having to submit your id to the service provider platforms won't break the anonymity, if you trust the people running it of course. They can track you easily anyway. What matters is that is, that information shouldn't go public at any cost. Not only you, but those depending on you will have their lives sabotaged if sensitive information get out of your hand.

I strongly disagree with him on the matter of anonymity. In a world were people lose their careers because they posted something on social media 13 years ago, anonymity is the only thing that can guarantee some degree of free speech. Whether you have your real face attached along with your opinions will not give any validity to your claims. Infact the opposite is true for many of us. You can speak more freely an openly without having random people on the internet judging you for your ideas. This won't happen in an ideal world. But in reality people are just waiting to be triggered and get all personal about random opinions of random people. This makes speaking your mind out harder. That's why anonymity matters although sufficient moderation is also necessary. "Give a man a mask and he will show you his true face".

His presentation in videos is perfect. People need to toughen up and not get triggered with the slightest disagreements.

@11.07 This guy dosen't even know how modern IQ tests are done. That's how IQ was measured "historically" as written in the wiki page he himself quoted. It was already found to be wrong and rejected from the mainstream as a method of measuring IQ. Overall, IQ tests during teenage shows little variation to tests in adulthood. He presents many good arguments in the video, but the fact that he misses how IQ is even measured is so disheartening. Makes me question if I want to deconstruct other good arguments made in the video. I may or may not do that at a later time. Good research takes time to read and digest. Of course I don't want any set of people to be over-represented in power. It's anti democratic and eventually collapse if it's allowed to run without check. I am only *explaining* why jews do well. I am NOT saying that we must allow them to be over-represented simply because they are smart. Smart people are good at rigging hierarchies for their own benifit. Also, smart people could choose not to do that on their own. Jews just didn't hold back. These leftist intellectuals will never make peace with the fact that genetics make people, cultures fundamentally different from each other. What else do you expect? I will be more suprised if they were completely equal in genetic abilities. Because some outside force like God would need to keep them equal. Since such a petty God dosen't exist, we will see differences in abilities between cultures. Humans are merely executing the genetic memory ingrained in them. Then a bunch of humans come together and make culture, a social construction. The parameters for the construction is genetics in the humans themselves. Genetics goes far deeper than you think.

Ew No.. they can feed off non arable grasslands or byproducts from food factories. The inefficiency of meat production is only happening in third world countries. Meat production can be done extremely efficiently when done using good organisation. I agree to some degree. But this takes more work from progressives. Have progressive leaders say stuff like "we need to return back to the glory days" and then implement UBI.

The deal is finalised. Elon is officially the owner of twitter. He fired the current CEO and legal head (Who was the main culprit behind closing Trump's account)

IQ = Cognitive processing power, calculation, pattern recognition, memory, working memory etc. You can do your computations swiftly. Someone with 140 IQ can pull off calculating advanced calculus in their head half sleep. Someone with IQ 110 can study adv calculus with sufficient practice and repetition. IQ is associated with speed & manipulation. A high IQ person can essentially get more work done in less time. Intelligence is, well, not so easily defined. So I am linking some random videos from the internet to explain it. It's a combination of wisdom, wit, cleverness, cunning, mind reading ability, consciousness, IQ, knowledge, spirituality and much more. Intelligence is much more holistic compared to IQ. Yeah, IQ may be less holistic and myopic. But still, it matters. Studies and popular culture miss this basic distinction.

I just can't bear the fact that these pathetic studies use Intelligence and IQ interchangeably. Intelligence and IQ is not the same thing. They are different. Intelligence is the superset which includes IQ, a small part of it.

What a G. I learnt to use profanities so casually after I watch Leo explain it. Before watching Leo I used to use profanities with Little regret and used to hold back a little. Now I don't see a distinction between profanity and normalcy.

No one knows clearly. I can only give a generic answer that merely explores the possibilities, just as any other evolutionary biologists would explain why differences exist despite all people originating from Africa 200,000 years ago. 1. Pure genetic randomness. Although you cannot boil down IQ to a single gene, or mutations of it, there could have been a mutation which release a certain chemical which creates more grey matter in brain. This possibility itself sounds silly, but something along those lines could be real. We know little of neurology or neuroscience to know the mechanisms of the brain of a high IQ person compared to a low IQ person. I am sure there are real physical difference, perhaps in the way neurons are wired or they may have some neuro transmitter that accelerates the development of new neural connections. Genetics can create random stuff without having any survival value or survival pressure. For example eye colour. 2. Environment exerts a strong selection for IQ all the way from the beginning. You need a certain level of abstraction to think into the future to plan for your hunger or to make a spear. Cows do not have that capability for abstraction. It could have been the case that the earliest differentiable unique ancestors of jews had to endure more pressure and undergo natural selection that killed off the low IQ jews. In general, selection pressure in ancient times were much more stronger than that of today. 3. Differences and varities are fundamental to evolution. What's truly impossible and remarkable is if two individuals or groups have the exact same making. This is even harder to happen in reality than them being different. It's not the case that all africans had to endure the same environment. They could have simply moved out to different places and endure different survival pressures. For evolution to work you only need small differences and that can compound over time. The question "why" become significant only if you feel there ought to be a certain way for things. Evolution dosen't have to justify anything to you. So if you have two different populations, it doesn't have to be equal. No two things in the universe is equal. And add to this the sheer variety of "things" in the universe. To make things even more complex, add to this the sheer amount of time you can play with. It's impossible for the human mind to comprehend the things that can happen over the course of a century. Evolution has hundreds of thousands of years to play with. Maybe a drunken monkey with a paint brush can paint Mona Lisa, if given enough time. It all has to do with time, differences in environments, and genetic varities. All of these three variables are a perfect cooking ground for differences among individuals and groups to compound over and over again. That's how we end up with people of different skin colour, IQ, height, tonality, etc. Notice that cows and dogs have the same Ancestors as you and still there are enormous differences between you and them. All the hypotheticals aside, the reason why jews do better, in my opinion, is because of their good genetics. All the intellectual drama we are playing is to explain away genetic differences. If there are differences among groups in 2022, then there could have been differences 200,000 years ago or 100,000 years ago. I am siding with it because it is the simplest explanation. Genetics which facilitates intellectual power is allowed to have Differences. You certainly won't be surprised when Jamaicans top the Olympic sprints in record numbers compared to Indians, say. They are simply genetically better when it comes to sprinting. Period. As a result they obviously value participating in athletics events because they can easily excel in it compared to Indias, say.

We all started as amoeba some four billion years ago. At what point did we become humans? The only thing I can say for sure is that, the reason you are a human and not a cow is because of genetics. That's a real World observation. It's okay to admit that we don't know how we got here. The thing is, genetics is extremely complicated, murky and also random. They both influence each other so intimately to produce what we have now. Especially when you are talking about eons of time, the genetic/environment duality begins to break down. It's correct to say that environment influences genetics. That's why we have to base our conclusions on what we can know for sure. That's all what I wanted to discuss. I am absolutely open to the possibilities being true as well.

Adoption of woke values have been proven to decrease IQ according to the latest research and studies. Source: Trust me bro.

Yeah so Ashkenazi jews having an average iq of 112, which is also close to the average iq of self made millionaires, was merely a coincidence, and has little to do with their success according to you?? Average IQ is a good predictor of the success of any population. Average IQ of a population is the IQ of the average individual. Notice that 50% of the individuals have IQs more than than the average. That's a lot of individuals packed with potential for success. High IQ = More work done in less time. The average jewish person literally has to work less to get the same amount of work done compared to an average asian, say, or any other ethnic group for that matter. So the average jew is more likely to succeed than an average, member of other groups. Pretty simple and straightforward if you ask me. There is absolutely zero confusion between populations & individuals. As far as IQ is concerned, the findings are pretty consistent enough to explain the success of both of them. Please don't make this more hard than it needs to be. I am not forgetting any group difference, while you are trying to forget about the main group difference about IQ. The most fundamental group difference is that their group has an average IQ way higher than that of other groups. Let's say that height is an advantage when it comes to running fast. So the fastest sprinters are usually taller than average. When a group of people are taller than some other group of People, the group with the higher average height is at a huge advantage when it comes to succeeding in a race. The most distinguishing factor that exists within the group is the differences in their average height. It explains why they will dominate the race compared to other groups. Simple. You are essentially ignoring the height, while looking for other things to explain why they win the race. Average height is the main group difference. The most important group difference is the IQ differences of the groups. When you say the average IQ of jews is 112, the sample size is not merely the jews. The sample size includes people of other ethnicities as well. IQ is a relativistic measure that allows you to compare your scores against other who took the test with you. The example you have given above has two samples. Fishes in ocean water and fishes in ponds. And they are evaluated according to different standards. There are no huge predators in ponds, while that's not the case with oceanic fishes. So the coorelations breaks down if you include many big fishes from ponds. Every single person taking the IQ test is evaluated according to the same standard. And you can't compare the results from two samples. That makes it unnecessarily complicated like the example you have given. You cannot seperate individual and groups so simplistically because individuals make up groups. Success and IQ is individualistic. When you look at the list of nobel prize winners, you only see individuals, not groups. Then you start to wonder why many individuals in the winners list come from the same group. 20% of the nobel prize winners are jewish people. Jews are over-represented in the top of the hierarchy. At the same time you are also talking about individuals only, while making the observation that some individuals come from a specific groups. Then the logical question is: what makes that group special? What is their distinguishing factor that seperates them from other groups? Obviously it's a higher average IQ.