Bobby_2021

Do you have proof?

Omg this is so hilarious.

Wow such an accurate analysis of everything I have said. Thanks for your advice. Now I am a male feminist.

I dunno. Just feels like it. ?

I do agree that men are good at giving advice on how to initiate a relationship. Men are good at keeping other men accountable for putting in the work and get results when it is in their control to do so while doing the maximum work. But the same cannot be expected of women. According to women other women are just queens and men should all the work and be responsible for everything. They all purport some version of that which I do not agree at all. Many women can't even describe the list of things to be expected of a woman in a relationship while they are more than happy to give a list of things that men are required to follow.

The dude in the video is not talking about attraction or falling in love but rather maintain a long term relationship. For initiating attraction, men do not fall in love by receiving adoration. The man has to put on his romantic chaser hat and shoot his shot. The giver is NOT the adorer. The adorer is the taker, emotion wise. The adorer gets/takes a lot of emotions from adoring the woman or the man. I personally love to adore someone else since that is way more exciting than being beloved. And women particularly want to feel the roller-coaster of emotions. This is a privilege extended only to the adorer. Most people would want to be adorers if given the chance. Being the beloved doesn't involve much work. It's just standing there thinking if you are ready to be loved by the dudes around you. Which is what is happening in the attraction phase. You love to love others simple because of what it makes you feel. All the beloved has to do is to give the green signal for allowing herself and opening herself up to be loved. You can have heterosexual relationships to loosely fit two of the abstractions given below. 1. The father-daughter dynamic. 2. The mother-son dynamic. The dude in the video is talking about the first dynamic where the woman respects and adores her man like would a daughter adores her father and sees his as her hero. The man loves her as if she is a child. He loves her for what she is. He takes care of things so that there isn't anything too harsh that she has to worry about. In return he requires her to be a good girl, not cause too much havoc, do her simple duties etc. Adoration should not be mixed up with love. And the dude is not saying that one should not adore the woman. Both can adore and love each other as much as they want. It is just that it is better when the woman adores the man more. If you want another way to think about the dynamic, then think of the 3. Celebrity-Fan dynamic A celebrity loves his/her fans, but they do not adore their fans. And they do not get a roller coaster of emotions when they are signing at a concert. They are just doing their job and getting paid for it. But the fans attending the concert are having an intense flow of emotions of their lifetime that they consider it worth paying hundreds of dollars for dancing in a crowded venue full of strangers.

It's not. They are not able to get verification for obvious reasons.

Owned & ratioed Hilary Clinton ??

Here is a real life incident where I observed lots of balancing take place. I just met a man who was engaging in a verbal fight with the cashier in the hospital because she demanded 200 bucks extra from him and he didn't really had that money with him.(or barely had it) Someone else in the administration told him earlier the total amount was 200 less of what was actually demanded of him later. He was slightly drunk, pissed off and his eyes were red and the veins were clear. He was outside the radiology department awaiting the scan report of some brain disease that he or his close relative was facing. This is the setting and I was watching in awe of the balancing people had to do in that scene. 1. He was struggling to balance his finances. 2. He was struggling to balance his consciousness, trying to stay clear without getting out of control in the hospital. 3. His mother was near his trying to keep him acting out of control. She was struggling to strike a balance to him. 4. The cashier was busy counting the money and typing on a screen trying to balance the cash, while also balancing herself so as not lash out against the man. 5. Everyone in the hall, was looking at him trying to predict his next move, which is balancing his current behaviour with the future behaviour. 6. He was struggling to balance the mixed emotions from reading the possibly not so good brain scan report and calculating what would happen in the future. For me all the intense balancing was visible to me in his cold red eyes instantly. And it was such a revelation to me that so much was happening at all.

Lately I have been noticing the excusite balance around me and boy it's so scintillating things I have ever seen. Generally speaking the more intense the experience of something, the stronger the opposing forces of balance would be. This was a frame of viewing reality that was so distant to me and I almost never exercised it except when I am in nature and trees. But balance is everywhere. Especially among humans. And the sheer amount of balancing present in day to day is mind boggling. I can't believe that I didn't notice so much of what was happening around me. Lately I have been noticing that I am also struggling to balance my life as well. Every interaction with people is a balancing act. Generally speaking it's a good idea to balance thing that are similar to each other or requires same skills steps at one time. If you are engaged in balancing people and work both of which are demanding, then that can destroy the balance which you already had in your life. Balance is delicate and fragile. It's a good idea to be aware yourself that you are about to engage in a balancing act, when you are about to do certain stuff. And make it completely clear to you what you are doing. This can make things less overwhelming significantly.

Life is cycle of struggle to balancing yourself and your environment and short periods of appreciating the balance around you. Exquisite.

Not much of a journal guy but I will post any rants, information, thoughts, insights, revelations, wisdom I get from real life in here.?‍? Kinda weird but let's see how this goes. Anyone is free to read and post their opinions and advice.

I just made it up.

Onlyfans did a brilliant marketing campaign. They bought houses for some girls and asked them to post it on social media as if they were earnings from their OF content. Now desperate single moms will strip on camera thinking they will afford a house one day.

This is the truth. ?

You are here to learn. Less time correcting others and wanting them to behave in ways that you like. It's not going to happen.

Course when sir?

Will the course contains guidelines to reach this level of understanding?

@StarStruck dude you do not talk like yellow. ?

And what happened after crunching the numbers? It's not like anyone is eager to change their minds after seeing rigorous research. And it's mind bogglingly tedious and time consuming. I will rather state when I say and let other state what they say without any compulsion to back it up with sources. It's good if you do, but not necessary. There is nothing to discuss here from a logical point of view. Studies simply present their findings. That's all. There is little thought processes involved. I have experts who work in the industry who advice me. It's not like people decide what to eat after looking at studies. Because my stomach felt bad after eating them on a couple of occasions. And don't complicate this stuff. You don't need an epistemic process to pick what to eat. If it makes you feel any better, human bodies have adapted to eating real meat for millions of years while the same couldn't be said about processed foods. Even normal processed foods aren't healthy. Corporations are not completely honest In disclosing the contents of their products. Plenty of sneaky manipulations into this. Wait for real world data.

It was not a personal attack. It should rather be seen as an accusation of hypocrisy. You made a personal statement and gave an explanation for it, which I disagreed with. I get how you perceived it as an attack. Saying that you are not a vegan isn't enough to prove that you don't have an agenda to promote veganism. Infact the major promoters of veganism (corporate overlords) are usually not vegan. Imagine for a moment Bill Gates promoting veganism or vegan meat, and then you google his diet only to see that he gorge on McDonalds and beef burgers. This just do not sit well. Actions speak a lot more in this case. Climate hypocrisy is real. You will be questioned on your choices as and when you reveal them voluntarily. At the end of the day, even beef burgers are also processed foods although not as much as vegan meat. Avoid processed foods altogether is what I would suggest. If you can find specific niche of people with a particular profile of health who could benefit from vegan burgers, then go ahead. But I doubt whether this will be good for people at large. And I haven't dealt with the nuances of complicated studies enough to give an opinion. I have "experts" in the pharma industry tell me to avoid seed oils and similarly processed foods. I am not up for an intricate discussion. I have outsourced my thinking to some other scientist in the industry. He has told me so much jargons like Epa, Dha, omega 3 to 6 ratios, which honestly I don't care, neither serve me to know. All I want to know is if this thing is safe to put in my mouth. I am not going to grind through 20 research papers to get a yes or no on this. Of course I understand. Money, ethics, climate change are all valid reasons for going for plant meat. Except for health reasons. A few studies saying that it's okay isn't simply enough. Although the climate change argument is weak to be honest. It's possible to grow beef with minimal impact to the climate. Most of the climate emissions are coming from 3rd world countries that has inefficient production of beef. I talked about this on an earlier post. https://youtu.be/sGG-A80Tl5g Thinking that you are saving the planet by not eating beef might take attention and effort away from areas where it does actually matter. Not true. Watch the video I linked above. Sure maybe. But how would you know that it won't lead to a whole another slew of problems that normally associated with consuming processed foods? Our bodies are not designed to process, processed foods, while we have been eating meat for millions of years and our bodies are well adapted to it. And people don't make dietary choices after reading research papers and listening to scientists. I see Arnold Schwarzenegger promoting vegan meat while the same dude gorged on beef when he was the most healthy in his prime. I going to pay attention to his actions, not his words. Same with Bill Gates. They way promote this thing is so forced & inorganic (ironically) that it's a huge red flag. You can say this is irrational fear, but I don't lose anything. If I am wrong I am happy to find that out after letting the scientists research on this for another 40 years. You would have plenty of real world data by that time instead of of a controlled lab studies being done with an agenda. These start-up are being funded by billionaires with the state being in on it as well. Do you think they will happily report anything mildly suspicious popping up in their studies? And I am not actively urging anyone to follow any strict diet. I am urging people to ditch everything processed, including processed beef.

People don't realise how scary this is. Imagine mixing n number of chemicals and the final mixture tasting like Apple/ orange/chicken / beef or literally any food that you ever ate. The fact that they can even achieve this is astounding. They can reach any configuration of taste, appearance & smell simply by mixing hundreds of chemicals together at just the right proportions and people are more than happy to take it in. Think about it this way. Will you take it in if it didn't smell or taste like meat? It's still more or less the same thing but a different configurations of chemicals. I like mushrooms a lot. They give somewhat the same vibes as natural meat. What's the final conclusion? Seed oils good or bad? This is not an admirable position to take as you make it out to be. You are eating healthy while advocating others to eat trash. You should go vegan first before asking others to go vegan. That's how you make it clear that you have no agenda. Bill Gates is not a vegan either, but he still wants others to go vegan because muh climate change. I can eat whatever I want and Gates will pay me for spreading veganism. He is subconsciously persuading others to go vegan.

@Michael569 Thanks for your input. We are cool. Delving into the nuances of studies can be done, but it's a waste of time since studies can be bought and sold these days. These hyper processed chemicals can have an impact on your system on a longer time span than any of those studies care to mention. My biggest worry is that the primary reason they try so hard to normalise plant based meat is due to climate change and ethical concerns. Which is why people have extremely emotional takes on something as simple as food. As a rule of thumb, it's better to stay away from heavily processed foods like seed oils, no matter whatever science or studies might say. Many studies even calim that there are "acceptable levels" toxic chemicals that are allowed in your body, while there is none. I will stick to my real life experience on this one. And it's my obligation to inform any vegan on this issue so that they make a conscious choice and not let Bill Gates guilt trip them into eating vegan meat, even when he himself enjoys normal stake in his private jet.