Bobby_2021

He is not tweeting them directly. They are probably managed by his social media team.

This is false equivalency. Women can improve herself out of choice. For men, getting into powerful positions is a matter of life and death. A man who cannot be of use/value is treated like shit in society. And most men inherently understand this. So they suffer like hell to get there. And I don't claim that men have it bad overall. Who has it worse? Men or women? I don't know. With respect to expectations from society, men have it worse. The feelings & chemistry is not that random as you would like to think. You get feelings for chads because their conduct signals high status, playfulness etc. Men would get a lot more chemistry from women by signalling high status. Most women are not self aware enough to accept this. When they say that she wants an emotional, nice, kind sweet guy, she is implying that she gets a sexy hot jacked stud who also mentioned qualities like nice, kind emotional as an icing on the cake. Women has two sets of qualities they want in men. The sexy ones and the unsexy ones. Women are unaware and hude their preferences of the sexy stuff and make it everything about unsexy stuff. Again, I don't expect you to see this and most probably you don't. From your perspective it's all Fallin in love in the magic of the moment. Not that he already hit the standard, but that he already surpassed the threshold the woman had for him. Of course relationships are continuous work. Or you can get a young 22 year old woman and develop her into her ideal self with your experience and guidance and she will play along. That way you get both pussy and high value. Nothing is lost. The thing is that by the time she matures a lot of time would have already passed which makes for worsened prospects when it comes to having children. Not saying that it is, but I was responding to an argument on current dating dynamics. I was responding to a guy who said pussy was the main thing that gives women leverage over men. Obviously I don't agree to it. But I was discussing further points with him, not that I agree with all of it.

It's just a 6 min video that shares something that many men struggle to understand. You wouldn't expect it to reveal the secrets of the universe per se. Women/male feminists will dismiss the point of the video simply because of the "vibe" without actually listening to the actual content of the video nor discussing what's being said. It actually ties down well with my earlier post explaining why men want submissive exactly like an employee is submissive to the employer. Generally I think guy is trying to communicate important stuff in a decent manner.

Naah bro look at the stats. As a women's IQ increases(in the case of College educated women for example) the more she struggles to find a partner because she is effectively reducing the pool of men she can select from. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2015/nov/10/dating-gap-hook-up-culture-female-graduates A woman with a masters degree will be hesitant to marry a man without a degree at all, for various reasons that are strenuous for me to explain here. At the same time, a man with a masters degree is more than happy to be with a woman without a degree, thus even lowering the chances for women with masters degrees. As we know women are graduating at higher rate than men in colleges. "I Don't think". I am not speaking of the things I think are the way they are, and neither does a few exceptions disprove the rule. These are not the requirements for a man that he must fulfill to get into a relationship. These are just the pressures society puts on men in general. The consequence of failing these expectations is what causes men to kill themselves at a higher rate than women. These expectations also forces men to level up. You can argue that the average man doesn't level up and stays in him mom's basement playing video games. But even an 70th percentile man is far superior in what he brings to a relationship compared to 99 percentile woman precisely because of heavy expectations put on to you by society. It's dead wrong to say that women have more social skills than men simply because she has a wider network of people to talk to. A woman can be a complete introvert, but if she is pretty and she smiles she will get accepted into almost any social circles. Women have a low barrier of entry. Who cares about a man who stands there and smiles. He would get called a creep in no times lol. He needs to work to be a Charming dude if he doesn't have that already. Men have real problems that need real tangible solutions. It's met by by working on yourself and acquiring skills. Therapy where you pay thousands of dollars for some woman to nod to the things you say is particularly of prime importance. It's nice to have, but not necessary at all. You are overinflating the importance of "opening up" which is nothing more than some wishy washy hippy value. If men don't have real solutions then they are happy with gym, some fresh air and some hobbies, passions. Men kill themselves more because of unmet expectations. Opening up isn't a solution. The solution is to reduce the expectations. But meeting tough expectations also forces you to level up significantly. It's a double edged sword. Listen, In this kind of wretched economy, staying at home washing plates and changing diapers of your kids is much better than grinding and selling your soul to some exploitative corporation for 60 hours a week. You are making it sound like changing diapers is a huge burden and providing resources is a cake walk. I will happily stay at home watching YouTube videos, washing plates, reading, and working on myself if my partner can handle all the financial aspects. I consider it a huge advantage. And it's also a steriotypes than men don't change diapers or teach kids. Even the most patriarchal men do it without making much qualms. It's not something that requires immense skill to do.

I don't actually disagree with your statement. But it's incomplete. Most men are not drooling over some 35 year old pussy while a 23 year old pussy can leverage over most men. That's true. Nuance matters. 1. Basing woman's value on pussy & boobas is typical of red pill guys and somewhat disrespectful to women. So I was a bit surprised to see you base your arguments on a typical red pill talking point. Obviously every (real) woman has it and it's going to grow old and depreciate in value. So better have something else more valuable than her body parts. 2. Men have to work on a lot of tangible things both for short term and long term relationships. You have to be charming and attractive, develop social skills and make money, build a network, etc. All these things are expected of men by society. While women are under no pressure to develop these stuff. So whatever non-pussy leverage points (feel free to elaborate) you can come up with, from the average women, it's highly likely that average man has it more. This is especially true since most women never go for the average men as you mentioned. It's usually men who is better than her, so there isn't much she can contribute that he already hasn't. (Except for a big P). 3. Your initial point was that women divorce men since men don't contribute to anything in the relationship and that men are bad partners. But my point is that it's women don't contribute anything significant to the relationship, other than a pussy that deteriorates over time. A man's contribution in a functional relationship is far greater than that of a woman's. Just by getting into a relationship with him, she is indirectly stating that he is an above average man. She wouldn't obviously be with an average man for reasons stated above. If you ask me personally, I still think it's a man's fault that divorce happens. A man's contribution is not merely restricted to love, but an understanding of how women & relationships work. 60% of it is in picking a women who actually feels the need to contribute something tangible to the relationship and holding her to standards. A man already is of standard the moment she is in a relationship.

Stay strong comrade. ? Our revolution will be smooth and quick. Until then, stay low.

Lmao . Can't you think of anything but pussy and boobas ? ?? Think harder. It's like the bare minimum. Whatever, I have to appreciate the honesty for laying it out so cold. The fact is that most women don't have anything to contribute to relationships but pussy. There is no longer a social pressure for women to develop herself while men have to face monumental expectations from society. This is trying to escape reality by switching on a pragmatic approach. According to the current dating dynamics it is be okay for men to dumb 25 year old pussy for 20 year old pussy. Guess what? Pussy gets old. I guess you have no moral qualms when men go for younger, higher quality pussy, because apparently that's what gives women "leverage" over men. I get it. We are all supposed to wake up everyday play like kids singing ring o roses ring o roses while government acts as our big daddy welfare state.

What exactly does women contribute in progressive modern relationships?

How do you deal with things that trigger you? For a lot of time I used to expose myself to things that trigger me until I become sensitised to the trigger. For some reason I changed that strategy and stopped exposing myself to such experiences due to it's uncomfortable nature. I feel now that my earlier approach of exposing myself repeatedly to it was the better approach. I am not just talking about hardcore triggering material specially designed to trigger people. (Although I love to hear your opinion on that as well). I am talking about normal experiences in everyday life that triggers you? How do you approach your triggers? Thoughts?

@Emerald In the 1950s women were expected to be housewives being dependent on her husband for finances. Now that we have gone past that, what are the qualities a woman must have in the modern age to be in a functional relationship?

Is anyone here interested in discussing the content of the video posted by op? What do you think about it?

Important point. Going to save this. ?

US is a third world country with lots of rich people.

It's so funny. Me: "I like a submissive feminine girl." People in this thread: "How dare you make women jump through hoops like a dog you disgusting misogynist patriarchal pig." Nuance left the chat.

@Mesopotamian getting to US maybe harder than many of it's counterparts, which gives you a much better life as well. There is no reason to not consider it.

Peterson has lost it. Better to not listen to him to preserve your sanity.

I understand where you are coming from and there are a lot of variables to talk about specifically based on who you are and what you want. With that said, US is least best of all Ultra developed countries. If you are rich in US you are in heaven. It's a hell hole if you are poor, or living pay check to pay check.

@Carl-Richard Listen mate, you don't have to ask questions if you are not serious about wanting the answer.

Thanks @Salvijus. I have noticed that protecting myself from normal triggers gives a level of comfort and you would want to protect your again by shielding yourself from even more triggers. Before you know it, you are in a bubble of delusion and grossly out of touch with reality.

@Leo Gura Some suggestions. 1. Show the list of accounts that got banned so that everyone knows exactly what kind of behaviour is to be avoided. Like a real example to show exactly what behaviour will not ve tolerated. 2. If some members is repeatedly getting in fights or heated arguments frequently with many different members, then it's clear who the problem is. Warn them with temporary restrictions and ban them is they continue such behaviour. The problem is that such behaviour also triggers immature tendencies in other people as well. Disagreements should be impersonal. Using this forum to attack other members is the most despicable behaviour and waste of resources. Also having truma from the past should not be an excuse for hostile behaviour. 3. Ending anonymity is a not going in a good direction. Anonymity is the only shield to force people to attack the ideas and not the messenger. Ideas should be discussed on it's own merits without assigning it the attributes of the one who holds them. Is attaching a face going to strengthen the quality or validity of the arguments/insights posted in here? No. Haven't people with faces behaved in retarded ways in the past? Yes. It seems like an unnecessary step given that you take steps to address and enforce all the other rules you mentioned. Those rules alone are good enough. Many of us do a great deal of censoring in the real world so as to not make any unnecessary enemies over some crappy ideas. I have seen how much people get emotional and hate over some irrelevant comment I put. And I will not risk getting death threats or some coworker threatening to report my posts, lose my job and get blacklisted. It's just needless drama. I will have to stop posting incase you enforce identification. It's not a difficult choice for me given the risk and how so little the reward is. I can talk my mind freely only if I am assured safety from attacks. Even by revealing the country I am from, people already make judgements like "oh so you are just blue & repressed" "muh evolve higher". Which is just downright silly. 4. Little bit of immaturity should be tolerated and allow them some space to grow and become teachable. It will also be a good experience for other members on how to deal with immaturity in others, empathise with them, and teach them. Extreme immaturity should not be tolerated at all costs.

It's counter intuitive. If you look forward to save every insights that happens then you are scaring the muse away. You can't even generate a lot of insights. When you are detached, they start revealing themselves more. That's the nature of insights.

Can you access alien intelligence in sober states? Atleast in some parts ?

@Carl-Richard "how so" what?

If I were you I would scrutinize the internet and gather as much as data to get myself out of there, while building a network and skill sets. Not saying that it's easy in any sense, but it's what it is. You can adapt to any socio economic circumstance by being a highly developed individual. Work to increase your psychological development, put yourself in places where you could get lucky, and hope luck comes to you. You are living life in hard mode. I don't know what resources you have at the moment, but I guess it's worth trying. You will have a great story to tell your grandkids. I am trying somewhat the same thing here. Rough times are being particularly harsh on poor countries.