Bobby_2021

Normies are not visionaries. They can't see the problem with the system unless they feel the pain real hard. Like really fucking hard. If you argue for taxation of billionaires, then some weirdos will come and make weird arguments for why that's unnecessary. So I stopped making a fuss about it. These normies can easily make a change if they make a sustained effort. But as soon as they get organised in that manner they will sway off track with some quick buck given to them by government or get deluded into believing that they are slaves. The masses have to feel pain, more of it. That's the only way they will learn. That's why I stopped arguing for progressive politics. People are not seeing two weeks into the future. Their development is stunted beyond hope. Let them suffer. In the mean time, you should make yourself safe from such hardships and spread the message advocating for change in the most conscious and dispassionate manner.

My guy just chill. I was just ranting stuff.

Leo is not fully awakened. Every other week he comes up with a level higher awakenings, which is fine and good progress, but to claim absolute comprehension is so demonstrably false unless you have absolute completeness in your awakening. If there are new things to awaken to, then that only means that the previous awakenings wasn't complete. Just imagine Leo 10 years from now. He will think of himself as an idiot for saying things like these. If he can go atleast 5 years into the future and claim that he was completely awakenend with complete comprehension of reality 5 years ago and that's it, I will agree to it. You can't claim complete comprehension unless you were in the same level of comprehension for atleast a couple of years.

It's a given, that this type of work overwhelmingly attracts men for whatever reasons. And then people try to argue over the reasons trying to score points. Men need to take more responsibility in calmly stating their arguments without fallacies and less generalisations, and most importantly to make them look less. Wanting to look higher and the other lower will always result in chimp like behaviour that we saw in that thread. At the end of the day it's just pure interest and genetics at play here for explaining the overwhelming presence of men here. And I couldn't care less if women are here or not. But oppressing one side of the voice by sheer size and strength is not civilized behaviour.

We all will use the fourm for the last time one day.

It's not that simple. There are issues at both sides here. Men are usually too brash, loud & direct in their approach gets seen more and those with subtitle & nuanced points of view gets swept under the rug. At the same time women make silly arguments like "Oh it's because you are an incel stuck up in your mom's basement" kind of ad hominem instead of discussing what's wrong about the other side in an impersonal manner. I don't think either side is represented, understood or discussed accurately. Is just people blindly misinterpreting, name calling, and trying to talk over each other. So having a seperate section is like a temporary solution.

Yep. Quite necessary. Good work.

We can start with people who are obviously women. And it's not a strict criteria to include only women in that section. It's rather a "feminity section" rather than a woman's section. If women at large find that some men are ideologically compatible with their ways, then they too can participate. I don't see a huge problem with that. Else there will be constant nagging voice in the background that the fourm is oppressive to women. And women who join here will continue to leave. And to change our ways to accomodate them isn't practical. Masculinity is simply more direct, simple, straight and efficient. The least we can do is to create a sub fourm. It's up for Leo to decide. @Leo Gura

If some group of people claim that they can do spirituality in different ways and the current working of the platform is hindering them, then it makes sense to listen to them.

Or atleast create a topic that's pinned in some section that women only can comment. Just a suggestion from my part.

It's mind boggling what glorified pattern recognition is capable of. Insane.

Interesting. ?

I will be surprised if China will exist as a state like it is today by 2030. Their short competitiveness fueled by an authoritarian government is soon going to pay it's long term price. To make matters worse, they may try to invade taiwan. This is a serious possibility. That will be the nail in the coffin for China.

??? ???

Especially with the style that Leo has got, even most men can't digest it let alone women. You have to be impersonal while doing this, and for most women this just doesn't align with her true self. Most of the philosophy readers are men while most of the romance readers are women. Debating about existence comes naturally to many(not most) men. See this stuff is harsh and nuanced. There is no way we are going to make this sound nice to you and encourage you to accept this so that women may find it appealing. You are at the forefront of exploring human consciousness and among the first in history to delve into this type of things. Edit: Many things that are seen as backward and bigoted by the current progressives are simply the Truth. Even some tenants of Red pill can be true. Simply because something feels disrespectful to you has no bearing on it's Truth. It's cringe when people call Leo who is a bold leftist by any reasonable standards as misogynist/bigoted/transphobic. These people have lost all connections to reality whatsoever and have become increasingly dogmatic with progressive views. And obviously they don't see themselves like that.

Wasn't that just an observation? You just made a distinction in reality that you exist. Is it comprehension or observation? If reality is amechanical, observation is all there is.

Is there even an amechanical example? Amechanical = Pure perception. [Pure perception means that it's amechanical and nothing below the surface powering it. What you see/experience is all.] You can validate/invalidate these statement for me. 1. Reality is nothing but distinctions. 2. You can comprehend the nature distinction. 3. Therefore you have comprehended reality. You have to admit that this is comprehending reality with completeness atleast at some level. Instead of merely repeating "I am aware and you are asleep" try to point out the flaw in the logic if what I am saying. Am I incomplete in my understanding? Is there something to reality more than distinctions? Atleast say things like "you can't express this with language". We are asking you because we have mostly exhausted the methods we have at our disposal, at least that is my case. I would even talk about this on the fourm if I had access to psychedelics. Most of the time you give explicit answers. That's your style of teaching. So when you fail to give explicit answers, people naturally assume it's because you don't know it. If you could give an explicit answer you would have given it already.

Babies with severe genetics defects guaranteed suffering throughout their lives. Both for parents and kids. And most of these disease are not even founded or understood by medical sciences. Good luck dealing with it. Makes your life hell seeing children suffer like this. Legit concern.

??

Casually banging her is okay but it's deeply immoral to have a child with your sister.

Become God is one thing. Understanding is different. Which I why I clearly mentioned "excluding being/awakenings". Naah. You won't get anything by this. Watch and re-watch all of them.

Just because we pause our AI developments doesn't mean that China will stop their developments. We are actively hindering ourselves. I think you are reading too much into it. The current AI scare is silly. It still gets many programing problems wrong and it's mostly glorified pattern matching.

Cool. God is the imagination of all possible distinctions. Is there anything to understand of God more than this? (Excluding being/experiences of awakenings)

Choosing to be trans is not a particularly a realisation, but rather a choice. Hey there are all sorts of identities and mental constructions out there. Pick a mental construction of your choosing. Do you want to identify as a helicopter? Go ahead. It all depends of what construction you are happy with. Your ego is like a clothing. Pick one you like. I would advice people not subject their bodies to alter it to what you think it should be like. You body is perfect as it is, as long as it is working properly and healthy.

Apologies for the confusion. What I meant is that I understood what you were saying. But at the same time, I don't see what is there to understand about reality as a whole. Understanding things is a noble pursuit and I would love to realise that you can understand reality as a whole. At this point I can only understand finite things and it's a great source of joy for me. For me Understanding whole of reality is a lesser complicated phenomenon than understanding a doorknob or a tree. Precisely because it's amechanical. This is what I wanted to know. But my point is subtler, still. I am saying that understanding reality is trivial and not something profound. You can just dream up distinctions. That's all. What's so awesome about it? I do this every night in my sleep. Reality is the same as nightly dreams, but it has more distinctions. Literally what else there is. As far as reality/God is concerned, you can simply imagine up a tree or a dog and that would make up no difference. Now, I am talking about understanding reality in sober states regardless of whether you have used psychedelics before. Yes. My life and everything within it is finite. So yeah you can understand it. Also it heavily depends on underlying mechanics. What I don't understand is how it relates to understanding REALITY AS A WHOLE. Reality is infinite. Everything that can be imagined is imagined in reality. Reality is every configuration of all possible distinctions. What's there to understand about it other than this? This is not true. To understand that reality is amechanical requires you to not make up human bullshit. There is no requirement of serious understanding. Mechanics is pure bullshit. Of course reality is amechanical. Realisation of amechanicalness of reality is a function inversely proportional to the amount of bullshit in you. Not having bullshit is not UNDERSTANDING. All mechanics is either made up bullshit based on observations. The doorknob could be working in a way that your understanding cannot grasp. Let's say that you have a chimpanzee, and everytime that chimp pushes the doorknob, a banana is given to it by a machine. The will radically alter chimp's understanding of the doorknob. As far as it is concerned, it's understanding is that you get a banana when you push the knob. And it's correct from it's own perspective perfectly as it is. Maybe you as a human may invalidate that Understanding because you understand the doorknob at even more depth. An alien consciousness may invalidate the human understanding if the knob. This actually makes sense since FINITE REALITY IS SELF DECEPTION. You do not understand reality. God is fooling you into making you think that you understand finite things. The invention of mechanics is simply self deception. The doorknob is merely perception/ imagination and nothing more. You don't even understand the doorknob, forget the entirety of reality. There is no mechanics to the doorknob. The finite understanding based on mechanics is SELF DECEPTION. Now with all that said, I don't know if you think that being and comprehension is one thing or not. If at sufficiently high states of consciousness, if being becomes the same as understanding, then I am wrong. Being is dreaming. Dreaming is existence. If dreaming is understanding or virtue of it, then God can comprehend itself. You should make a video on comprehension.