Bobby_2021

Naah Modi govt has a weird obsession with "finding our roots" and "finding ourselves in the past" while we should be doubling down on building a great future. But naah let us change names and languages and currencies. The same government recently decreased the funding for research endeavours but will take credit for the chandrayaan moon landing. They don't do anything real that will actually benefit the Indians. --- At this point, if you are an Indian, and not planning to leave India, you are pulling yourself down. It's better to escape this clown game altogether.

Our govt is wasting time debating and changing languages, currency and now the name of the country. What a spectacular waste.

@StarStruck His real life business were bleeding money. That closed casinos were kept alive from the money from only fans and HU. Source: Tate's Twitter account. These are the only two "business" that made him money. One of them have got him arrested and the other is slowly losing it's grip. To be fair, I don't the HU is a scam though.

@StarStruck There are far more sinister things that the Tates have done that will soon be revealed to the public that their PR team will be helpless against. Tate has barely clung on by the meticulous effort of his bots/people who do PR work and the lack of information about the Truth of the matter because it's Romania and there is an obvious language barrier. He is not going to hold well for so long. Hell fire is waiting for them. I just thought that I should let you know because Tate would tell you that he is falsely accused of these things.

This has been instructed to Tate by his lawyer, Tina Glandian. She also represented Mike Tyson after he got in trouble and suggested the same move to Mike. Donate to charity in exchange for a lighter sentence. This is purely a legal move. Judge will evaluate the character of Tate. Donation and pledging donation is good mark for Tates.

Are you unable to watch it in private? If you are can, then do. There is no benefit to announcing that you watch this sort of content in your social circle. Instead embody the values and take action. Let the results speak for themselves.

@Topspin715 This is not a question I can answer and it feels incomplete no matter however I put it. Let me try. The Tate you are seeing now, speaking red pill talking points is not the actual Tate. What you saw in the viral tik tok clips is the result of a planned marketing campaign for him to break into the mainstream. So you wouldn't find anything much valuable in what he says, if that's your only source of Tate. He used to a lot more candid an open in his twitter interactions pre fame. He came up in anon accounts which only a few of us knew about. Once he gets to around 60k followers, twitter would close it down and he would pop up again after a while. He would post wild threads and videos. Some of them involved getting in street fight with gangs. That's not anything valuable by itself. What's enticing was his life philosophy surrounding it. He embodied freedom and existing as a force of nature. He emphasised meticulous obsession towards getting to the top, although it's unfortunate the methods he used to realize it. Despite being associated with the mafia he still used to post chess puzzles and used his intellect. The biggest difference is that Tate lived what he spoke. He had a powerful vision which is why he was able to convince huge swaths of population to follow him. He did convince me out of passive income bullshit. The idea that work is something to dread is not true. Your whole life can be nothing but work. Do what you are good at and outsource the rest. He actually did and took action on all of these. His sheer competitiveness was something else. He taught me to take life by what you are given at. He would walk up straight into a bar without a penny in his pocket and the only was he can get a place to stay is if he can convince a girl to get him to her house. He made a lot of intellectually original content on Twitter back in 2021. It was really wild. I mean the things that he actually did. He embodied the actual hyper masculine character he is playing. It's no wonder that military age men find him appealing. He also taught me to be aware and alert at all times and br disciplined enough to not misplace things and forget about stuff. The whole idea is to do things like professionals. If you put something somewhere remember it. Searching for stuff that you forgot comes across as unprofessional. Also to train your body and be in peak physical shape at all times and fight when necessary. Those are some of the things I directly benefited from. I really wish I had the screenshots of those threads. I would post them somewhere when I find them. It was really something you have never seen. And then comes all the hours of podcast he did with his brother and that had many impressive stuff in it. --- A few notes: 1. Him being a sex trafficker doesn't invalidate his value or the Truth he speaks. Even if Jeffery Epstein says 2+2=4, that would still be Truth. 2. I don't understand why guys go around making threads speaking of how much andrew has helped them as if someone else is also supposed to find him appealing. If you found him helpful, then you should be happy and not feel the need to shove him down the throats others. 3. What Tate says counts as value depends on you. He can give you value only when he offers you something that you fall short of. I became even more disciplined and increased my ruthlessness. There are deeper reasons of why Tate is appealing that which I am unable to put to words and I don't bother to. I benefited from his content and I am happy. If you benefit from watching his content, you are free to do it. If you don't find it valueable, then don't watch it.

Watch that BBC documentary. Leo linked it in this thread. Basically all that Tate is doing is channeling you into a funnel that ends in his cult which is the war room. Tik Tok and other social Meida -> The Real World(formerly Hustlers University) -> War Room. War Room is the ultimate Cult that is run by Iggy, also a fan of Osho. He is using Tate's charisma to make his own cult where women are sexual slaves who do sex work and give all the money to their man and cook for them. This is their fantasy. The more you look into the war room, the darker it gets. A former member of the war room says it's a cult. There was a time when it's was acceptable to be ignorant about the Tate case because many people knew nothing about it. But the house of cards is crumbling fast.

Tate has a lot of good qualities and I have benefited from him a lot. But that doesn't mean those who criticize him for dark shit that you can't even fathom are wrong. Also, if Tate has benefited you, why do you feel a need to say that to everyone else. If he benefitted you, then go enjoy those benefits. You don't have to convince and persuade everyone else to find the same. He is being investigated for trafficking of minors at this point. Basically he is discount Epstein.

Is it consisting of imagination+ memory+ images? Understanding is all about relationships between objects. Once you don't have language to map the objects, you only have the images of the objects in your memory to aid in their understanding. This sort of understanding is instantaneous. You don't need to think in steps to comprehend anything. You instantly recognise it. Thoughts?

Understanding is a form of extremely condensed and dense imagination that clearly has a meaning. Meaning means a connection. You are imagining several things which are highly interconnected with each other and you are imagining those connections simultaneously.

Let me introduce you "Alien Torture".

It's truly hard to know for sure. But you should pursue that passion regardless, if that's a real strength of yours. You can use AI to outsource your work. Ultimately it's not people vs AI, it people who use AI vs people who don't.

I really want this to be true, but it's simply not. It would make everything so much more simple if there was just pure perception. But perception is created with some understanding baked into it. I think Perceptions and understanding are both fundamental in a twisted and intricate way. I am still thinking through this.

Women have a lower bar to be accepted into social situations. This is like women needing a lesser score to pass the exam. So obviously more women would pass the "social" exam. Even the most social women have terrible charisma and sense of humour and will still gets accepted to social circles due to obvious reasons.

What will the understanding of reality of a higher life form would look like? Will such life forms experience less suffering than humans on a day to day basis? Will their baseline level of consciousness be higher and will their understanding accompany their higher understanding?

I can't comment further on this post now since my thoughts on this are still evolving. 1. Can you improve your understanding with imagination? 2. Can understanding relieve you of suffering? 3. Why does understanding bring immediate joy to you? 4. Why does understanding enrich perception, although the perception itself is not changing. What exactly is changing? These are the questions I am contemplating on. Feel free to chime in and answer.

I appreciate that? Nah men and women usually, in a society, share the same or slightly unequal amount of suffering. It's impossible to gauge who has it worse. Especially in complex scenarios of western world. Do you think a man would agree with your statement in these days? Impossible. As far as non Western world is concerned, people concentrate disproportionate attention to the issues and sufferings of women. Not that women suffer disproportionately in reality. That's simply the case. It's not about less or more people. It's about having a healthy population distribution where there are people of all kinds. Too many old people with too few young people means there will be disproportionate strain and economic burden on the young people to care for the old people, work at a job, and take care of their children as well. Even today it's gen z and millennials that contribute to social security with no hopes of getting such privileges themselves while being economically squeezed due to laws passed by boomer politicians. The real estate and housing crisis faced by the young people of today is purely artificial. Because boomers own most real estate and they are also higher in numbers so that you can't do anything to reverse the policy because there are fewer young people. It's gets really bad. Democracy favours the bigger demographic, due to how democracy works. This will only lead to young people, who are lesser in numbers further squeezed out. If you need a real world example, look at China where they took population control seriously. Now they are begging couples to have more children. They had to go 180° from the one child policy. The population problem is caused exclusively due to the birth of baby boomers. Once they get old and die, this will be a thing of the past. Also, with the exception of the current young demographic, life was substantially better for the offspring than the parents and it would only get better. These are all reasons to have more kids. And these are realistic grounded reasons. Not based in morality or feelings good. And of course you can feel good about having kids as well. This is not a virtue. Good quality of life comes with some destruction and exploitation to the environment. The poor people are not going to stay poor their whole life. Once economic development happens in these places they are going to consume a shit ton of fossil fuels. And western politicians will still blame them for their "carbon footprint", like they blame China nowadays.

The key is to get that "forgetting". That always messes things up. So I am wondering, Am I awake when I sleep ?

I think it's loosely connected with your memory capacity. This is the only way you have experience. Experience is just memory stuck up in your body.

Western world isn't a patriarchy either so you shouldn't have any problems with oppression. Listen, I don't want to rob you off your moral high ground, but there is no substance to this line of reasoning. Everywhere except India and China are sparsely populated and the countries having replacement level birth rate is Africa. If you have a sliver of realism then a population crunch is a much more realistic challenge for the western world, which could be offset only by immigration. Western world should be having more children. Realistically If you want to make any real impact you should urge poor people to not have children. They are the ones who are having disproportionate number of children and destroying the environment. (That's of course if you assume that having children is destroying the environment)

Lol why would you recommend it to your friends. I have to watch Actualized in hiding. ?

And please don't bring this oppressed female narrative into this. People and society together are doing what they need to survive. The female child may not go to school, but the male child may have to clean sewers full of human excrement in order to make a living, if you are talking about some old traditional patriarchal ways of living. Life is so harsh that most of you won't survive a month in such situations so keep your opinions of such people to yourself. Modern life is heaven compared to this and you need to make a couple of strategic decisions to have just another child, if you truly want them. If you adore comfort too much, then don't bother.

Bringing a child into the world is the most complex thing. You will only run in circles if you "think" about it. If you can give your child some basic life privileges, lifestyle and comfort, I say go for it. I don't know where any of you people are from although my initial judgement is that you are from the west from what you are saying. I don't have experience with the societal structure and I cannot think for you. It's not that I don't know about any of these. I just can't give opinions unless I know the specifics. 1. Children has to grow up with a strong bond. Incompatibility issues are non sense. No one will stay by you like your brother/sister despite compatibility issues. You have to build trust with your siblings. That has immense value but it takes work to develop it. You need to base your bond on principles and hold it strong. 2. Social circle is ephemeral. That will not give you anything long lasting. Only family is what lasts. That too if you put some work to make it last. 3. I am not saying to offload entire parental responsibilities to second child. But they could take up 10% of the duties and that means a lot. Having other people to take care of forces you to mature fast. But that won't have to rob you off your child like wonder of life. I myself have to take care of my younger cousins and I love to invest in them and watch them grow. I don't take any grudge in having such responsibilities. Maybe it's a cultural thing where we take such responsibilities because we don't have much choice anyway. At the end of the day, it's only my opinion. It's your call. I totally get why people say to not have children. But there are also reasons to have children, if you are being strategic enough.

I am the younger one. So the benefits of having an older brother was immense. He was like a third parents, but much more energetic, masculine and strong. For me personally, the best configuration of siblings is Elder sister and younger brother. Most girls love to take care of their younger sibling. I have cousins who are an only child wishing to have siblings always. It's not nice being lonely. Also such kids will have an artificial kind of maturity to them since they always deal with parents who are much older than them always. That will drain the childishness from them to some degree.