Bobby_2021

Absolute consciousness, doesn't discriminate. It sees being tortured in a prision in Madagascar exactly as same as being born in a rich family in finland. That's how God sees it. There is nothing to choose when you have the power to choose. All is love. So the only thing that is left to do in merely exploring all possibilities, forgetting and remembering, over and over again and again forever. There is no choosing something because you don't like it. Just sit and look at something. Look at a wall or cat or a screen or whatever in front of you. Now realise that this is what you are going to do for freking eternity. Like literally with no breaks for eternity over and over again. And again. Then you do it again. Some of those dreams could be nightmares and others could be pleasent. But I can't stop minding. I guess I should live this life to the max before I imagine some shithole nightmare for 80 years.

https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2023/sep/23/firms-pull-ads-from-rumble-platform-over-russell-brand-videos Rumble didn't demonitize Brand and all brands are pulling off of Rumble. Exact same thing could have happened to YT.

By work, I mean all the work you did to raise your consciousness to this level. By the way, when you are a dog, you simply won't have access to any of the fruits of the work you are doing now. You will be back to square 1. And basically repeat this for infinity. You can claim to be more conscious in your upcoming imaginative journey, but consciousness can choose not to do that. It can simply forget alll of this and go back to square 1. You might re imagine yourself as some crack head in LA. It's totally possible. How can you guarantee that your consciousness will only go upwards? If you can't address this now, please address this in your future videos. It's something that troubles me a lot. It would be nice if consciousness only moves forward. But there is no direction and we are imagining stuff for freakin INFINITY. Literally forever and ever and ever. No end to this eternal drama. WTF.

Are you scared of losing your work? Consciousness has an a mechanical forgetting and remembering function. What if you simply forget all this shit and imagine yourself to be a dog in a kennel in some secluded home in siberia?

I am comprehension is too powerful. It's abstraction because it can hide a lot of details. For example you can simply ask me to buy 100 fruits instead of asking me to buy 5 Oranges, 25 apples, 60 mangoes etc... "Fruit" is the comprehension that abstracts away the underlying details about the specific fruits. Likewise, Love is the underlying abstraction of the universe. In that sense absolute comprehension is possible at all levels for consciousness. If you can comprehend love, you comprehend the universe and everything and anything possible. With that said, True comprehension should also encompasses more underlying abstractions like, Truth, Honesty, Understanding etc. All of them are fundamentally Love or Truth. Just saying....

@Leo Gura Is absolute comprehension possible even at second highest levels of consciousness? By second highest level of consciousness, I mean a there is a level above your current level consciousness, that you have never ever tapped into. Not even once.

You also said that you have not yet reached a final state. But you also have absolute comprehension. How does that work? Is the final state, one that of absolute comprehension in it's entirety?

It's quite hard to accept that even living a noble life is also Maya, perhaps not so different than a hedonistic life. Life the noble life for the sake of it. Not only will you not get rewards, it is not so different from a hedonistic life. Quite profound.

There is an even more sinister side to this. Almost everyone at the top of the macro dominance hierarchy is guilty of some crime and the evidence exists. Either it could be sexual crimes or murder or bribes or something of that sort. The enemies use these as leverage points to strangle them as and when required. There is no one whose name is clean. Poltics is not a black and white game of bad vs good, and courts being there to deliver justice who have been hurt. Russel changing his position to being against the mainstream could be a factor in what bought these crimes to light. Two things can be true at the same time. Do not go against the narrative if you have a shady past. If you have a shady past, do not be too loud and go against the narrative.

To be fair it is a legitimate question. Justice delayed is justice denied. Why wouldn't you want your own justice delayed? Was she traumatized by the rape and it destroyed her life that it took so long for her to report it? Was she denied justice when she did raise a voice? Was she blackmailed by the defendant? Did she blackmail him for using this as a weapon? Generally, the longer it takes the harder it is to prove the crime, which is already hard enough to prove, and it is only giving him more wiggle room to get out of it. So all these are very relevant questions. The fact that it took so long to report the case is a relevant fact of the case that requires investigation. It's a fact nevertheless. And it's not being presented as a case to deny the allegations. It's totally possible to have raped someone a long ago.

If I am running a competitor to YouTube I will brand it as "hey this is a safe platform for your kids. We don't allow rapists to make content in this platform" That's one way competitors can market their platform and it's pretty persuasive. And might end ip eating into their market share. You might say that is not logical or the possibility is minimal, but they have entire departments set up to deal with these kind of stuff. They are not logical. They make knee jerk reaction to weed out the possibility of losing the Market shares.

They become "massive" because of their public reputation in the first place. They are very sensitive to how they are perceived by the public. And they go to extreme lengths to do bullshit even if it has a minor chance of tarnishing their brand. But right now they can brag being on the side of the oppressed victim women and stand in solidarity with them. They might not lose in money from a single dude but there is a larger picture to it. And no one is going to use this level of logic in reality although that is their intention. Feel free to call me out. This is the only solution. We shouldn't have to Trust these corporations to do anyway. For them we are just a penny. An expense or a child that they should pacify. They will fire or hire creator who toiled for years on their platform. Also what should the government do and what they can do? Tough moral and ethical question. You can never piss off the blue hair ladies who will now show up to government when they try to regulate big tech. ? Their reputation will be further tarnished, had they not took any action at all in the first place. --- Even BBC has removed his shows from their streaming platform.

I will tell you a short story. A friend of mine got a job in a top tech company. He later posted in twitter that women are hired in tech companies due to diversity quotas, or something like that. A bunch of his classmates reported his posts to the company and they dropped his offer. He is barely 22 years of age. You can make a case for Truth that companies should not dictate what happens in real life. But corporations do not want to be associated with stuff like these. Bad reputation can come back to bite them in their ass. And we cannot dictate what they want to be associated with. Their revenue is associated with their reputation. Clients go for the companies with good reputation. You cannot blame them for their own internal decisions. They do as they are told by their shareholders; aka follow the money. They would not want to engage in a stupid risk. ------------- What Brand should do is to not give a fuck. Normalize being called a rapist that it does not become a bad mark on his name. If people buy into that and see that as normal, then they may not demonetize him. Governments should clear up some protocol. But even if they need to come in power, they need to appease all these people. Any party that says the accused rapists should be treated as innocent and normal citizens would be shamed for "supporting the rapists" party as the opposition. This reputation thing goes deep.

Mere association with one is enough to lose money. If you an actor who signed a deal for a movie which expects a few millions in revenue, then you are putting yourself in a position where you could lose that revenue. He is not convicted a rapist yet, but there is a 50% chance that he might be. Do you accept a 50% chance of losing maybe half of your revenue? It is a huge risk from the side of the person signing the deal. Which is why they stepped back from the deal. Brand is revenue. Tarnishing your brand is tarnishing revenue. ( I can't stop using this pun ) Corporations exists only to maximize their shareholder value. They are not interested in Truth. He is still allowed to be a youtuber. Just that you cannot make money off of his content. And you cannot dictate the TOS of a private company. Unless you are a shareholder of course. All shareholders will say is to keep making more money. All social media company has the same TOS. We can ban or demonetize anyone, anytime we want as we will not give reasoning whatsoever. That is their TOS. And you agree by signing up for it. I do agree with you. But YT is not willing to bet on him not being a rapist. It is a risky bet.

If advertisers do not want to associated with rapists, then YT would remove them for obvious reasons. He is most likely guilty. Just my first impressions here. I wish I am wrong. ------ YT is just trying to save it's ass. There is a money issue and nothing more. They want to make it advertiser friendly and no one is cancelled. And he is not short on money anyway. If YT had principles, which is too much to ask for a corporation, then they would wait until he was convicted. If they don't do anything, then they could get too much flack. I agree with Leo that the government should come up with some protocol on how organizations should treat the accused until they are proven guilty. There are far too many situations like this happening and it is putting everyone involved in a dilemma.

YT has low Brand awareness.

Just think about this for a moment. What do you mean by falsifiable? "Give me the Truth" Here is the Truth. "But but, it's not falsifiable. It's too True" Wut? How can Truth be falsifiable? Can't you see the contradiction? You should be happy if you found something that is not falsifiable. It's obviously means it's, well, True.

As a man you should be comfortable being lonely. "If you miserable when you are alone, you are in bad company." Obviously I don't mean zero social interaction because people always like to take it to the extremes.

One salvia Trip report says a man lived as a tree for 3000 years. Another one says they lived a thousand lives interchanging them. All during a trip that lasts less than 5 min. Incredible.

What is English? Nothing but a set of lines, curves and symbols. It's basically geometry/map/graphs.

omg this gives me chills. This line was the ending scene of real-life inspired movie where a woman framed a bollywood actor in a false rape case and got him convicted. The last scene was she telling her lawyer, also a woman, that what the actor did was not rape, but something much worse than rape. She felt totally justified in her mind that justice was served. --- In this case I cannot say that he is guilty even though a violation was done. Quite Complicated. Brand is also a weird character. Cannot say anything.

This is not just a problem with psychology. Even hard science like AI/ML are full of these trash studies. We did all that to have a paper under out name. The data that used as if it was real world results was generated with a tool on the internet. Not a single peer review guy asked a question although that was not the case for some of my collogues. Sometimes your professor can be a pain in the ass. But there is zero surprise to see a lot of junk floating around. They dug this pit for themselves to be honest. Albert einstein's paper on relativity had zero references. Today you need 20 references in your paper to be published. Imagine is someone came up with a groundbreaking study and it was rejected for not having enough references. lol total clownshow.

My stance was that it was just neutral. Here are the number of people that dies each year in the United States: 2019 - 2,854,838 Then covid happened in 2020 due to which a lot of people died. 2020 - 3,378,414 By the end of 2020, they developed the vaccine and started distributing it at scale by early 2021. So you should expect the number of deaths to come down. 2021 - 3,385,364 Apparently after the vaccine, even more people died in the year. 2022 - 3,389,088 Even More people died in 2022. Let us wait for 2023 stats. If vaccine was truly effective, why has the number of deaths not gone down? I am not stating that the vaccine was bad or killed anyone. But you need to show up for the number if you take a strong stance like the vaccine was effective. My stance is that vaccine was simply not necessary and forced. It did not accomplish anything. Else the absolute number of deaths should have gone down. @Leo Gura If anyone wants the sauce: https://deadorkicking.com/death-statistics/us/2022/ I have checked other web sites for death statistics and the numbers are mostly similar with slight variations.

Not really. You simply need to train a thousand pushups and thousands of punches a day like a chimp without thinking, It's all baked into the "muscle". They are working on training the muscles in the body. They do not work their MIND. That's why it is a mindless activity. Repetitive tasks can be done without thinking. It is executing the same set of tasks over and over again until you get good at it. Notice that according to your definition, there is no such thing like a repetitive task because apparently you cannot cross the same river twice, because so many things are different the second time you do it. Yeah it is different, but all you have to focus on is to punch and dodge and to practice it a thousand times. There is nothing much to use your mind on. You do not write down the speed at which you hit your opponent. You throw a punch like a gorilla. There is some footwork and dodging, but that is pretty much it. You punch as fast as possible as much as your genetics allows you to. Do not look get lost in definitions. Look where you apply your mind. Does boxers need to use the mind as much as footballers or chess players? No. That's all that matters. It's said that boxers can go completely unconscious and still keep fighting, because they train their muscles so hard that they begin to develop a mind and memory on their own. In football, you cannot get good at it simply because you are good with the ball. Your awareness of the ground is a key skill in football. You cannot get good at football simply by kicking the ball a thousand times. That is the big difference. I did not say to ignore stimuli. I was comparing it with sports that required more stimuli. More stimuli = = More Mindfulness Less stimuli = = Mindlessness And it is not just merely perceiving stimuli. Mindfulness is about taking in stimuli, and even processing the stimuli in your mind. The stimuli has to go through your mind to be properly mindful. Flow state's can't be measured or quantified so as to compare. Not explicitly. There is question on listening to someone and doing something else. That is as good as listening to music and doing something else. I am making a case for Truth. So if my position is unfalsifiable, that does not mean there is something wrong. Truth need not be falsifiable. It is a tautology. What does it take for you to change your mind? I think I am pretty reasonable in what I stated. I am more than willing to seek out contradictions in my positions. So far I have not got any. I do not state what I say as absolute Truth. But it will remain a relative Truth until someone bring up a better reasoning.

?