Bobby_2021

He is in the process of making rules for everyone else and feels like doing things of "substance". China does more things of substance that them.

Make sure to thank him extra hard when he slaps you with carbon credit tax and flood your neighborhood with illegal migrants.

If it's successful. I am still on it. Polymaths always amazed me from childhood. Kinda not on point if there is no results. Let me try it first. I am not a ploymath by any means.

@Leo Gura What is Rock solid about this? 1. The lawsuit against Big oil. What exactly do you expect to see the changes that are happening? Big oil produces lots of oil for your car and the common man's car so that they can get to work. Yeah they lied about some numbers. So what? What is fundamentally of substance that changed? Nothing. "Oh they stopped us from years of taking action" What action were you going to take? Carbon taxes on the common man or increased fuel prices. Waging war against the big oil is stupid. We should find real source of real energy. Nuclear energy would be a good start. Big oil is not producing oil to burn it for fun. They are selling it to the general public and they should produce more oil as soon as possible. One thing that Auto makers should do is to bring down the size of cars and make it more efficient. They could also stop taking money from the auto makers as lobbying. All the workers rights protest is good. No doubt about it. 2. "China is the problem." Bullshit. Per capita emissions from China are tiny compared to what cars emit from the US. China has the biggest railway system in the world. US could take lessons from China. This is a bullshit attem to shift blame to other countries as if they are the problem. Also China is the manufacturing hub of the world. The products used in the entire world is manufactured in China, one of the biggest consumers being the US. So get real. China is dumping huge emissions into the atmosphere to produce products to be consumed in the US. Your iPhone for example. You cannot consume goods produced in China and blame China for emissions producing goods. God the blind side of west is appalling. The average person in China barely puts out any emissions. This becomes even more bleak once you count in cumulative emissions over a long period of time. China IS NOT THE PROBLEM. The problem is the CAR DEPENDENCY & CONSUMERISM of US citizens. Take lessons from China and build more railways lines and move away from Car dependence. 3. China can and has taken better action than US to mitigate climate change. Which is why they built 6 million new housing units to solve the housing problem by 2025. Why can't you accept that solving the housing problem requires that you build more affordable housing. Build more houses. How is this more complicated? And this blabber mouth Gavin didn't even mention anything about building new houses. Nice. Why? Because it's the wealthy liberal owners, who exchange lip service on equality, don't want to see the real estate bubble crash. That's the only reason why people cannot build more houses and families living in like $150k income living pay check to paycheck.

It is not that difficult to attain mastery over one thing. Most people can do it they put in the effort. It takes a true genius to be a master over multiple crafts. I have devised a system to do the achieve the polymathy level of mastery over multiple fields as much as possible. It is totally worth it. If you have to consider it, then you are probably not interested in it. One of the biggest factors in reaching polymathy levels of master is to deeply care about the domains of Truth. If you don't care enough, then you can simply forget about it.

When I don't update this thread, people think that all is over while nothing could be farther from reality. A lot of stuff has been happening with the Florida case which the Tates filed against one of the victim, Emma Gabby. They were suing her for defamation, which is not likely to be taken seriously due to Florida's anti SLAPP measures. They obviously filed the case to intimidate the victim. Her lawyers has raised the concerned and demanded the jury to reference her with alias only and not her actual name. So Tate and his lawyers are not allowed to speak publicly of the victim which they did countless times online, especially during the fresh and fit podcast appearance of their lawyer. --- In my opinion, He should take the plea deal which is offered to most criminals. If you admit guilty, then you get sentenced to 1/3rd of the prison time, according to the law. There is no guarantee that it will be offered, but if it is he should take it. 3-4 years in prison is hell a lot better than 13 years.

Update: Today there was a hearing on Tates Judicial control. Tates Judicial control review is postponed to sept 28. Basically this is when the judge evaluate their behaviour for the past 60 days and see if they were behaving well so that he doesn't get stringent measurement. If he attempts something sneaky, he will put back to house arrest or jail. The prosecution is arguing for stringent measures probably. Here you can see them coming out of the court after the hearing. They don't look well. Usually they have a ton of stuff to speak on camera. Now they are walking with their heads down. You can see his lawyer besides him. Reality is catching up to them and they are realising it slowly.

As long as they do not use the platform to promote "rapey" stuff, they should be allowed to publish videos. It is not like they will publish a lot of videos from prison anyway.

The judge is reviewing the evidence. This is called the preliminary chamber. ?? The trial will begin once the both sides have their document reviewed to make sure all was obtained legally. Mind you, all the evidence obtained spanned around 70,000 pages. Of course not all of them will make it into the court. No human judge can review all these documents in a span of weeks. That's why it's taking so long. This is the due process of law. The trial will start take place early 2024.

A nightmare is also perfection. You would not be able to know that at the moment you are in it.

Absolute consciousness, doesn't discriminate. It sees being tortured in a prision in Madagascar exactly as same as being born in a rich family in finland. That's how God sees it. There is nothing to choose when you have the power to choose. All is love. So the only thing that is left to do in merely exploring all possibilities, forgetting and remembering, over and over again and again forever. There is no choosing something because you don't like it. Just sit and look at something. Look at a wall or cat or a screen or whatever in front of you. Now realise that this is what you are going to do for freking eternity. Like literally with no breaks for eternity over and over again. And again. Then you do it again. Some of those dreams could be nightmares and others could be pleasent. But I can't stop minding. I guess I should live this life to the max before I imagine some shithole nightmare for 80 years.

https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2023/sep/23/firms-pull-ads-from-rumble-platform-over-russell-brand-videos Rumble didn't demonitize Brand and all brands are pulling off of Rumble. Exact same thing could have happened to YT.

By work, I mean all the work you did to raise your consciousness to this level. By the way, when you are a dog, you simply won't have access to any of the fruits of the work you are doing now. You will be back to square 1. And basically repeat this for infinity. You can claim to be more conscious in your upcoming imaginative journey, but consciousness can choose not to do that. It can simply forget alll of this and go back to square 1. You might re imagine yourself as some crack head in LA. It's totally possible. How can you guarantee that your consciousness will only go upwards? If you can't address this now, please address this in your future videos. It's something that troubles me a lot. It would be nice if consciousness only moves forward. But there is no direction and we are imagining stuff for freakin INFINITY. Literally forever and ever and ever. No end to this eternal drama. WTF.

Are you scared of losing your work? Consciousness has an a mechanical forgetting and remembering function. What if you simply forget all this shit and imagine yourself to be a dog in a kennel in some secluded home in siberia?

I am comprehension is too powerful. It's abstraction because it can hide a lot of details. For example you can simply ask me to buy 100 fruits instead of asking me to buy 5 Oranges, 25 apples, 60 mangoes etc... "Fruit" is the comprehension that abstracts away the underlying details about the specific fruits. Likewise, Love is the underlying abstraction of the universe. In that sense absolute comprehension is possible at all levels for consciousness. If you can comprehend love, you comprehend the universe and everything and anything possible. With that said, True comprehension should also encompasses more underlying abstractions like, Truth, Honesty, Understanding etc. All of them are fundamentally Love or Truth. Just saying....

@Leo Gura Is absolute comprehension possible even at second highest levels of consciousness? By second highest level of consciousness, I mean a there is a level above your current level consciousness, that you have never ever tapped into. Not even once.

You also said that you have not yet reached a final state. But you also have absolute comprehension. How does that work? Is the final state, one that of absolute comprehension in it's entirety?

It's quite hard to accept that even living a noble life is also Maya, perhaps not so different than a hedonistic life. Life the noble life for the sake of it. Not only will you not get rewards, it is not so different from a hedonistic life. Quite profound.

There is an even more sinister side to this. Almost everyone at the top of the macro dominance hierarchy is guilty of some crime and the evidence exists. Either it could be sexual crimes or murder or bribes or something of that sort. The enemies use these as leverage points to strangle them as and when required. There is no one whose name is clean. Poltics is not a black and white game of bad vs good, and courts being there to deliver justice who have been hurt. Russel changing his position to being against the mainstream could be a factor in what bought these crimes to light. Two things can be true at the same time. Do not go against the narrative if you have a shady past. If you have a shady past, do not be too loud and go against the narrative.

To be fair it is a legitimate question. Justice delayed is justice denied. Why wouldn't you want your own justice delayed? Was she traumatized by the rape and it destroyed her life that it took so long for her to report it? Was she denied justice when she did raise a voice? Was she blackmailed by the defendant? Did she blackmail him for using this as a weapon? Generally, the longer it takes the harder it is to prove the crime, which is already hard enough to prove, and it is only giving him more wiggle room to get out of it. So all these are very relevant questions. The fact that it took so long to report the case is a relevant fact of the case that requires investigation. It's a fact nevertheless. And it's not being presented as a case to deny the allegations. It's totally possible to have raped someone a long ago.

If I am running a competitor to YouTube I will brand it as "hey this is a safe platform for your kids. We don't allow rapists to make content in this platform" That's one way competitors can market their platform and it's pretty persuasive. And might end ip eating into their market share. You might say that is not logical or the possibility is minimal, but they have entire departments set up to deal with these kind of stuff. They are not logical. They make knee jerk reaction to weed out the possibility of losing the Market shares.

They become "massive" because of their public reputation in the first place. They are very sensitive to how they are perceived by the public. And they go to extreme lengths to do bullshit even if it has a minor chance of tarnishing their brand. But right now they can brag being on the side of the oppressed victim women and stand in solidarity with them. They might not lose in money from a single dude but there is a larger picture to it. And no one is going to use this level of logic in reality although that is their intention. Feel free to call me out. This is the only solution. We shouldn't have to Trust these corporations to do anyway. For them we are just a penny. An expense or a child that they should pacify. They will fire or hire creator who toiled for years on their platform. Also what should the government do and what they can do? Tough moral and ethical question. You can never piss off the blue hair ladies who will now show up to government when they try to regulate big tech. ? Their reputation will be further tarnished, had they not took any action at all in the first place. --- Even BBC has removed his shows from their streaming platform.

I will tell you a short story. A friend of mine got a job in a top tech company. He later posted in twitter that women are hired in tech companies due to diversity quotas, or something like that. A bunch of his classmates reported his posts to the company and they dropped his offer. He is barely 22 years of age. You can make a case for Truth that companies should not dictate what happens in real life. But corporations do not want to be associated with stuff like these. Bad reputation can come back to bite them in their ass. And we cannot dictate what they want to be associated with. Their revenue is associated with their reputation. Clients go for the companies with good reputation. You cannot blame them for their own internal decisions. They do as they are told by their shareholders; aka follow the money. They would not want to engage in a stupid risk. ------------- What Brand should do is to not give a fuck. Normalize being called a rapist that it does not become a bad mark on his name. If people buy into that and see that as normal, then they may not demonetize him. Governments should clear up some protocol. But even if they need to come in power, they need to appease all these people. Any party that says the accused rapists should be treated as innocent and normal citizens would be shamed for "supporting the rapists" party as the opposition. This reputation thing goes deep.

Mere association with one is enough to lose money. If you an actor who signed a deal for a movie which expects a few millions in revenue, then you are putting yourself in a position where you could lose that revenue. He is not convicted a rapist yet, but there is a 50% chance that he might be. Do you accept a 50% chance of losing maybe half of your revenue? It is a huge risk from the side of the person signing the deal. Which is why they stepped back from the deal. Brand is revenue. Tarnishing your brand is tarnishing revenue. ( I can't stop using this pun ) Corporations exists only to maximize their shareholder value. They are not interested in Truth. He is still allowed to be a youtuber. Just that you cannot make money off of his content. And you cannot dictate the TOS of a private company. Unless you are a shareholder of course. All shareholders will say is to keep making more money. All social media company has the same TOS. We can ban or demonetize anyone, anytime we want as we will not give reasoning whatsoever. That is their TOS. And you agree by signing up for it. I do agree with you. But YT is not willing to bet on him not being a rapist. It is a risky bet.

If advertisers do not want to associated with rapists, then YT would remove them for obvious reasons. He is most likely guilty. Just my first impressions here. I wish I am wrong. ------ YT is just trying to save it's ass. There is a money issue and nothing more. They want to make it advertiser friendly and no one is cancelled. And he is not short on money anyway. If YT had principles, which is too much to ask for a corporation, then they would wait until he was convicted. If they don't do anything, then they could get too much flack. I agree with Leo that the government should come up with some protocol on how organizations should treat the accused until they are proven guilty. There are far too many situations like this happening and it is putting everyone involved in a dilemma.