Bobby_2021

🤝🏻🤝🏻

Cruical context is missing here. OP is asking about the scenario where you have to survive like a biological organism. Not from the perspective of God. What you have described is correct from God's perspective. Everything is perfect and everything is Truth. Survival is not God's concern. But biological organisms need an ego to survive. Ego survives by bending and distorting the truth. Else it would be impossible to maintain the form of the organism. Note that none of us can retain the God consciousness for extended periods of time. We are merely surviving as biological creatures with Egos. Deep down you know that the Ego doesn't really exist. Therefore it's a falsehood, a violation of Truth. All of that is completely fine from the God's perspective and wouldn't be considered a violation. But your consciousness is not enough to be God consciousness.

This is not an issue with women at all. The problem is with the legal system and old regressive ideas. In India we can marry without communion of property. Communion of property is such a crap idea unless both parties contributed equally to it. Else give back what's contributed. It's not complicated. Anyways as a man it's foolish to get into a legal binding that takes away all that you have built. I don't think the situation is dire. You just need to be more aware of the predicament that you get yourself into. There are workarounds to the problem. But more men need to be made aware of it.

I am not talking about communication. That's an act, a verb. But making statements of reality in an attempt to make sense of it is what causes suffering. 1. I have to wake up tomorrow. 2. I need to eat and put food on my table. 3. I live on Earth. 4. I am a doctor. Making statements like that is what leads to suffering. All of those statements are tied down to your Ego indirectly or otherwise. Communication doesn't cause suffering. Communication doesn't bend truth. But you need to believe many things for you to facilitate communication. Those things cause suffering. For example you need to believe other people exist for you to communicate. That is a false statement that you have convinced yourself to be true. But it's false and it will result in suffering. You may be sensitive enough to be aware of the suffering, it exists nevertheless.

A cell is just a concept in your mind that you project onto reality. Reality definitely exists. But your ideas exists have no connection to reality. You make plenty of statement yo survive as a human. A concept consists of many such statements and definitions. You need to do it to survive. All these statements are false and that's why suffering exists. You can do some enlightenment work to dial down the suffering quite a bit. But survival demands that you keep making these statements over an over again. In other words everyone is traumatised by reality to varying degrees due to survival pressures. These survival pressures us to bend the Truth and suffer as a consequence for it. Spiral dynamics explains this. Some guy who grew up in a red culture is forever traumatised by their own survival pressures. It will be obvious once they live in a green culture for a while. Likewise a green individual is also traumatised by their own survival pressures. Everyone is traumatised by survival pressures that you could never have long lasting happiness. Psychedelics allow you to escape this for a short while.

It's clearly and absolutely a gross violation. That's why you suffer. And the suffering increases exponentially as you keep on making more such statements. Everything is pointing to everything else. It's already your bias to ignore all other pointers. And survival needs some kind of bias. Which is why you suffer. The answer to the question from OP is yes. To survive biologically is to violate Truth. It's possible to embody Truth into your life, but there is a hard limit to even that.

You can easily argue that no justification is sufficient for any wars at all. I think he is reasonable enough. I would do the same, more or less. How many sovereign states did the US invade in the last 20 years? How many of your presidents were war criminals? You guys have no moral high ground to counter Putin.

Every statement you make in language is a violation of absolute Truth.

Is he going to run for president from prison?

Yeah most Americans don't have enough IQ to understand this kind of stuff. They would rather have some liberal crap shoved down their throat. But I didn't see how this was relevant to the question. None of these things gives him the right to invade a nation. But his justifications are worth hearing. He is entitled to invade if he is threatened by it.

Why is he lecturing us on history.

To be fair the sanctions did work. US actually wanted Russian oil to stay in the market. Which is why they didn't outright ban it but merely introduced a price cap. This ultimately means that the profits will stay with India instead of Russia while not significantly increasing the demand for oil worldwide. That was a masterclass from the US. But by now, Russia should have found a way to bypass the price caps. But their economy is doomed. My point is that US/NATO are not saints that we should give them moral high ground.

I wouldn't walk on the streets if there is 50% chance of getting hit, which is the same rate at which divorces happen. The problem is with the legal system and society which exploits men for all the good they do and gets nothing in return. The problem is not with women. And marriage has no validity these days more than a legal binding which gives room for the govt to deal with your personal stuff. It's a patriarchal idea unfit for the modern world.

It's clear that US/NATO blew up the NS pipeline. But they will never admit it.

I am at unitive stage of awareness. I transcended the use of language to make sense of reality. Today I wholly accept that you can't make sense of reality using language. Language is reality and you can't use one part of reality to make sense of another part of reality. At best you can mimic one part of reality to look like the other part and that's the best you can do. Linguistic understanding is a fallacy. All statements are a fallacy. The only correct statement is the mind of God itself. If you choose to use your intellectual mind instead of the mind of God, then you will run in circles while missing what's right infront of your nose. Your intellectual mind takes 10 steps to complete what could have been done in 2 steps by the unitive mind. You will massively cut out the bullshit by thinking in reality itself without using language. Language is bloat. You don't need to use it to make sense of reality.

All sides use propaganda. So don't make it a huge deal when one side does it. One side can be more conscious. But that doesn't make the propaganda any more truthful. Only time will reveal the truth.

I still don't understand how memory and sleep works. Kinda twisted.

English is a wild language. It's ambiguity is it's beauty. You can craft poetic lines with English which might not be possible with Chinese. Not only can you use many words to describe one thing, but one word can have many meanings depending upon the context. For example the word "set" have 180 different meanings depending upon the context. So English leaves a lot to the context to decipher the meaning of it's content. I think it's thought provoking and beautiful. I also like Sanskrit and Chinese. Should learn them one day. Language by itself is a mysterious thing.

@Leo Gura Leo how often do you see ambitious people not making it in life? How are they supposed to live if none of their ambitions became fruitful? Go back to being a slave? That would be terrible. The other option is to perish trying eternally.

You are not typing on the keyboard. A human being is typing on some keyboard on a phone. It's not your phone. It's not your keyboard. There is no one perceiving phone or keyboard. It's happening. Just that there is no Ego you. You are the phone and the keyboard and everything within your perception. It's not yours. You are it.

👍👍

Being a billionaire should never be the goal. That an entire different ball game. I would be comfortable at 50-100 million dollars. That's the sweet spot. Realistically, even 10 million should be enough. But until then, your quality of life depends a lot on how much money you have. Note than poor people are even more miserable and depressed. On top of a shitty psychology they are poor, barely even being able to buy healthy food or a doctor. A lot of the problems people suffer from are due to a shitty psychology. Most of the people walking around have shitty psyches. Just because money is not a solution doesn't mean not having money would solve anything either.

I know it's a bad to move to have sex with employees as a boss. But, is the sheer extent of power enough to nullify her consent? Given that she fully gave consent at the time. It's almost as if any woman can simply change her mind later as if consent wasn't given at the time I don't know know much about this Vince case. Just asking in general. Many people say he is guilty and I think so.

Don't marry + routinely break up so that you don't come under common law marriage. Laws are so against men nowadays that it isn't even worth fighting. It's a lost cause and no change is happening anytime soon. Better protect your property on your own.

I also had enough. I am taking a break from this thread as well. Godspeed people.