Bobby_2021

I don't see any solution to this. Israel played the game well and mastered it from the bottom up. They might even issue a public apology that they were in the wrong after they made gaza inhabitable and the world would move on after 2 weeks. Revolutions are a thing of the past. That would do more harm than good. You need power. There is no solution to not having power. That's what get stuff done. Not revolution by the masses. One powerful man can easily clamp down a revolution, in practice. In theory revolutions should work since the masses are bigger in number.

You seriously believed all this crap? In the western world there is group of people knows as the globalists who are incredibly wealthy and powerful, promote stuff like LGBTQ in the name of liberation from oppression. Everyone who doesn't agree with them is a fascist /Nazi/ Antisemite/ racist. I am not even joking. They will throw hundreds of millions dollars in propaganda to spread this narrative and average people who don't have two brain cells gobble this up. They have plans, playbooks and even research institutes to study and orchestrate methods to destabilize governments, and spread chaos and division in the public. They don't not live by anything they preach. In fact they get to rape, kill and bomb people as they like. No one should question them, since others are too broke anyway. Epstein was only a slice of the pie that was forever sealed from the general public.

Biden is a pushover and is too old to dictate terms to anyone. He will bend over backwards to anyone who has strong enough power and money. But Trump is unpredictable. So it might, just might, have a possibility with Trump to get Israel back on its knees. Again, Trump is broke at the moment so you know what would happen. He will gladly take bribes from the, you know who. But you can't say that there isn't possibility Trump would do something other than what Biden is doing right now. He might take the right decisions for all the wrong reasons.

It's so heart touching when you put it in context of all they went through. What a time and what an experience it was to be a Soviet soldier in the 20th century. I wouldn't mess with them.

Taxes do not fund anything. The American people are not directly responsible for paying to develop weapons in the military. It's the people in power and a facade of democracy that's the problem. Democratic government are not there to enact the will of the people. There is still a oligarch style rule going on. Money rules whoever or whichever party comes to power. And Israel lobby has USA by the balls. They own the richest corporations in the US and throw money at US politicians who will send money to Netanyahu. They are incredibly biased and powerful. You can say whatever but average Americans are not funding a genocide. It's just that the governments are disconnected from the will of the people.

@Husseinisdoingfine Thanks. I see you can relate to it nicely. `

I hope they don't starve those people to death.

Thanks for the quick response and action. 🤝🏻

@OBEler @Sincerity I think this topic is more appropriate in the society/politics section. Would you be willing to move it over there?

I live under one, although a much more watered down version of it. I know it's shit. I am seeing the same patterns over and over again and they are slowly collapsing just like every other socialist government did. The world has accepted that fact long time ago and moved on. Communism effectively died by 1991. We are merely seeing all the good that came out of it inspite of all the tragedies it caused. Of course the tragedy part is well emphasized. You can see how Russian art is drenched in nihilism & depression. Even their architecture reflects that. That's what communism implies. To give up the individual for the sake of the community. It drains the souls of the individuals. But it was not for nothing.

Yup. My mother tells me that the newspapers and magazines that were in circulation in the 70s & 80s while she was in school was mostly soviet inspired magazines. Hell even there is a communist party that is ruling the state I am in. All of them drew heavy inspiration from USSR, and some of then even expect them to come back to their former glory. For real though, Britan & US really thought that India would end up like some shithole like banana republics in South America. They tried to pull of their destabilization schemes in India although none of them quite worked. They still fund Pakistan to this day for some reason to keep India in check. In all those testing times for India, we had to need USSR to come to our support. That sense of unity was quite necessary at the time, while the leaders of the "free world" tried to undermine our country. I don't know about others nations, but Soviet Union was a strong emotion in India throughout the late 20th century. Westerners are usually in a bubble of their own so I get why they wouldn't know about these things. Also it's not merely about cultural values per say, the US straight up bullies into submission anyone who goes against their agenda in the name of democracy and human rights. So people understood that deal with the US is as good as a deal written on water. They will turn against us in a moment's notice, while USSR had our backs and maintained relationships all along for a long time.

That would mean that others can see what we think too. Scary.

Russia has paraded a 3,000-tonne nuclear submarine "K3 Leninisky" nicknamed The Whale through the streets of Russia. This gigantic submarine, measures about 352ft - roughly the length of a football pitch - made its way through Kronstadt, close to St Petersburg, yesterday. This will be turned into a relic and kept in a museum. And i have a strong belief that this is the same submarine that Russia deployed in the Indian Ocean during 1971 war. U.S supported Pakistan by sending an aircraft carrier in the Indian Ocean to intimidate India. Russian nuclear submarine showed up in the Indian Ocean to support India. A simple story of "showing up for a friend”. https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1682167/putin-news-russia-nuclear-submarine-K-3-Leninsky-Komsomol-ussr

Making these models play chess is a good way to see how good they are in solving a general task. Which they fail miserably at. Simply because there are too many variables to consider to make a decision. Models specifically made to play chess can do that, but they can't be good at other tasks. As far as the models are concerned claude 3 opus is by far the best. Beats gpt4 by a long shot. Gpt4 is a sad case of the corporate bending down to the whims of the normies. You can use perplexity AI for 20/mo and use gpt4 and claude 3 and some other models for the same fee. perplexity.ai

I highly doubt this. Injecting AI into the decision making will not be beneficial. It mostly won't.

I see where you are coming from. Once you have a baby, you will probably lose all the fine preference you have to the gender of your baby.

Both are awesome. But boys are more mischievous to raise than girls. I always that it would be nice to have a girl first and then a boy. But I underestimated how hard it is to raise one. They are a freking drain on your time, especially for the mother.

Check the comments 💔

I had enough. Let's end it. All this digging has intrigued me out of my mind to what enigmatic mother Russia was and is. Each of those deaths are not merely numbers but a story of a lifetime of sorrow and untold sufferings & unbearable grief.

Doesn't have to be. Liberal policies led to the death of 8 million people from artificial famines alone. Stalin did enact liberal and leftists policies. These policies killed more people that Hiter did. I am blaming the leftist policies. Not Stalin.

AI simply said, do not make comparisons over different time frames, in elaborate language. Which is why I don't fundamentally respect AI. It's says the same things you give as input back in elaborate flowery language. When you dig deep, there is nothing out of the world hiding in the answers. If AI gave a rebuttal that liberalism didn't make the Soviet Russia better even though it was more liberal, like @Karmadhi did, I would have been impressed. But it didn't.

@Danioover9000 Thanks. Couldn't have explained it better. Slavery was ubiquitous in the world at the time. Slavery was a massive improvement over the tribal rituals and all the associated bullshit. Then Capitalism was a massive improvement over the slavery. 100 years from now, working at a job will be seen as slave labour by the liberal intellectuals of 2124. Which it honestly is. They aren't wrong.