Bobby_2021

You go queen. 💅👑 😍

How are you feeling today? What's up?

You are giving up control to the men who you don't have much information about. By that I mean you don't have enough information to make correct decisions. You get information from taking action. And being active isn't about chasing men. You can choose to be active in developing yourself which you be reluctant to do if you brainwashes yourself to think that you are the prize. I am not saying you should chase men. But still be active. Being active is not going to kill any feminine values. You can maintain both in yourself.

He explained spiral dynamics to you 10 years ago? Like I did. Impossible. Ewww enough of equating me to this dude. And his sexual philosophy 🤮 There is literally no dude who could possibly have the depth like I do. He probably said some crap that has nothing to do with what I have said.

Thanks for equating everything I said to some random guy you met have said. And also for assuming that I am wrong since he did wrong things and that all circles back the philosophy which I hardly even explained which I so happen to share with him. Are you even aware of making these wild accusations? I just want to know how disconnected women are from basic logic. Thanks in advance.

That's seems like using the innocent civilians in gaza as if they were hostage to negotiate with hamas. Some food trucks are passing through, but that's not nearly enough. Dropping food packets are too expensive and it might even kill people depending on how it lands. Exactly what I was thinking.

That's all there is to it. Feeding these knowledge into a human mind and letting it make decisions would be really impressive. I am not impressed by AI, but it's sort of good. And AGI will not be there in the next 50 years. Don't fool yourself.

Death can change your genetics.

Then learn to communicate without nagging. No man who loves her would hesitate to listen. If a man loves her, and she nags him, it will piss him off for no reason. Don't piss off the man who loves you. All I am saying is to avoid this crap. Add peace to his life. Be less of an insufferable women. Make it easier for him to stay with you longer. This is her strategy. Men's strategy is being appealing to the women enough to get laid. Her strategy is being appealing enough for him to stay with her for long. I will say to not nag. She should learn to communicate properly like adults. There is not a huge thing to ask. Else don't be surprised when people don't listen. Eww. I wouldn't subject myself to this humiliation. I would rather struggle and fight to get the things I want rather than sit there like an object. You do realize that objectifying women is a male fantasy that has roots from the old traditions where men would fight publically and the winner would get the woman. This is being the "prize". I would rather be the person fighting all day anyday. Why would I give away all this growth and development of character for the sake of being an object?

I am all in for Israel, but them not letting in the food trucks is irking me so much. I don't get what they get from making them starve as if bombing their homes is not enough.

Yup. Capitalists could have done it better in many ways. But have you seen the sheer magnitude of the stuff that China built? Only a pre planned communist government could do that. Many places in China are vastly superior in living standards that most Americans couldn't even comprehend. They are absolute building machines. Because they got zero red tape. So they could plan out into the future much more effectively than democratic governments which is locked into 5 years plans and wasting money over elections in which different dudes will make the same type of decisions anyway. They build houses that far outnumber the he demand. Housing crisis would be gone in no time if it was a communist style government. The only problem with the communists is that their military will be a joke due to rampant corruption. So they will not be able to boss other countries around like US does. But war and military is a waste anyway. You are not supposed to use your military. So that's fine.

Most of us has spend plenty to time slandering communism and crusading against it. But at the end of day, communism has elevated millions of people from poverty, provided a hedge for countries who were bullied by the western governments, developed nuclear weapons and never used them, literally won the space race, made immense personal sacrifice for others, and they went through suffering, pain and tragedy that a human mind can hardly tolerate. Their art had so much depth since engrained in their in souls were desperately longing for expression and love they deserved but couldn't get due to their circumstances. They are people too who were stuck with the decisions made by a few assholes and that doesn't make them our enemy. Here you can post anything you find intriguing or positive about the great powers of the East and the radical transformation they have made.

At the end of the day, nothing works better than brute force to keep men interested in a woman, both covert and overt. That has some validity to it. Genuine question. Isn't this disrespectful to women? Making her the prize is too passive and objectifying as if women have no dynamic roles other than existing. Like an object. The intersting action is happening around her on the periphery while she is watching. Everything is done by the man. I am not saying this is a bad thing. I would love to be take the hunter role. But I don't get why women would willingly take such a passive role. Just look at any sports game, the attention and glory is all on the players and the teams. Not the prize. The prize is just an object sitting there and watching everything.

Strategies are there to not piss off those who like you.

I can accept that she is the prize. But you wouldn't struggle hard to pursue a prize for no reward. A prize is a prize only because attaining it is a rewarding experience. Getting the prize usually gets you more honours, money, acceptance and generally a more prosperous life. People don't pursue a prize that would make their life worse. Being the prize is ironically a bigger responsibility than getting the prize, since you are expecting some sort of unearned recognition. There is no struggle in being the prize. There is plenty of struggle in getting the prize. You wanting to have no struggle in maintaining the relationship is a bad expectation to set. I personally never want to be the prize. I will rather tread hell and heaven to get the prize, never be one. I don't see how much of rewarding experience is being the prize as opposed to growing yourself and struggling in the process of getting the prize. Being a prize is self objectifying. This is my point too. This is the maintainece work that woman should do. If you simply sit and expect a man to love you ever more, with nothing in return, then he is bound to be dissatisfied which will sabotage the relationship.

You are not capable of ascertaining my philosophy on relationships. So do not bother. A lot of guys talk big stuff but act in manipulative way in real life. And women are unable to assess the depth of his "philosophy" will fall prey to them who had darker stuff to hide. If you can get him to talk with me for an hour, his entire philosophy will crumble in front of his eyes that he would not be able to bare it. We had an entire long discussion in the Politics section precisely on this. How underdeveloped people use liberalism as a mask for their controlling style personalities. He talks like yellow and acts like blue. Big deal. That most liberals in real life if you control for wealth and prosperity. To actually embody the values I speak of is not easy. You should be rightly skeptical of anyone who pretends to know these kinds of complicated stuff.

Laughed out of my ass lmao wtf

I am not an introvert, but this is big for me. I needs lots of time alone and women might perceive that as lack of interest. But that is not the case. Not having alone time will only make me more miserable over time. I just need a break, not a breakup. And that is not because of something that happened. Just some time alone for the sake of it. For me, this is how I want love. By leaving me alone for some time. That would take the excitement away. It is typically how a SD blue mind would interpret what I said. Because all they can see is duty and responsibility. That is not what I meant at all. Availability implies dynamism. There is a possibility of sex, but you do not know if it will happen. Being sexually available do not have more connotations to it. It simply means what it means. They way I suggest needs a higher order of development. It requires the man to judge if she is in the mood as well. As I said this is not your typical forcing people to get what they want. You can be sexually available without having sex, you do know that this is a possibility right? The opposite is not being sexually available. Which leads to more frustrations and breakups, cheating later on. SD Blue = Have sex every Friday because that is how the bible says so. Sex becomes a chore, which is suppressing the woman. SD Orange = Give me sex in return for flashy life, cars, money etc Everything is a transaction. SD green = open relationships with no expectation of sexual exclusivity. SD yellow = Realizing that all previous stages were looking for love and you can maintain exclusivity and love. Give what the other partner wants. That is love. Else there will be consequences that were apparent in the previous stages. I am talking about a yellow way of relationships. There will be elements of blue and orange and green in it. But that is not what I am talking about.

What do you mean lol?

I do not know if it's true, but I read a study that a medieval peasant had more leisure time than a modern day corporate slave. Also I like a lot of physical labor especially if it is adventurous. Going hunting and stuff should be cool.

If you are looking for certainty, I am afraid you won't find it. It's called game for a reason. You cannot predict the outcome. That is by design. If there was some that women could do that would definitively retain a man, then it would be called cause and effect. Not game. Even game for men doesn't imply that he will get every other woman to sleep with him. If he is an expert, then maybe 5% of the women be willing to sleep with him on a lucky day. You will retain him if you don't piss him off, given that he loves you in the first place. But even if he loves you, there is a high chance that you will lose him, if time spent with you is full of chaos & bullshit. I didn't say it will. But not being sexually available will not keep him either. Do you want to maximize your chances of retaining him or not? Yes. He should also get some back love in the form of peace and sex. We are both saying the same thing. She loves him with sex, her feminity or whatever. He loves her with attention, emotional attachment, and whatever she wants. You clearly do agree that she should love him, isn't it? What I am saying is that love isn't abstract, but it come in the form of sex. Love is physical. Not abstract. Love should materialise physically. It should find expression in the body. The best chances of retaining him is in loving him with as much sex & feminity as he wants. Or if he isn't looking for sex he must be seeking love in some other ways. Then give him that love. I don't know what kind of love he is looking for. But most men are looking for love in the form of sex. Loving him more seems to be a reasonable strategy for retaining him. I can't explain it better.

A normal heterosexual relationship implies that she is the only creature in this world he can have sex with. So if she isn't sexually available, where is he supposed to have sex? Note that love for the man comes in form of sex. He will expect to get sex just like you would expect his attention. I said "be sexually available" only if you want to retain him. She has all the freedom in the world to not be sexually available. But then, don't be surprised when he leaves you to get sex from women who are sexually available. No one will force anyone to do anything. On the same note, if the man is not giving enough attention to his woman, them even she will leave him. Two people are having sex because they both were sexually available in the first place. Available to take calls doesn't mean that you have to on phone 24/7. It just means, you are available to take calls when they occur. If you are not available, then no problem. Someone else will take the calls in your place. Don't worry I don't take anything you said personally.

What you guys don't get is that Love takes physical forms. Love takes the form of sex, food, attention, emotional attachment etc. Men want love in the form of sex whilst women may want it in the form of money or attention. For a broke women money is love for her. So it's okay for her to seek love in the form of money. Is it the husband's responsibility to provide? No, but your lady will perceive it as love, incase that's what she is looking for. Love for women comes in the form of attention, feeling of safety being etc. Does it always have to be the case for all women? No. Different people look for love in different ways. If you can seperate sex from love, then don't blame men when goes looking for sex somewhere else. He is looking for love. If he can't get it from his woman, then some other women will give it to him. In this day and age, no one is forced or should be forced to give anything. None of which I said implies anything of that sort. Anyways make up your own mind.

If a women wants to maximize the chances of retaining a man, then be less of a hassle as you can in his life. Make his life as peaceful as possible. Don't nag him or pester him. Dealing with many women has become insufferable. If that's the case, he will definitely leave even before you know it. In short reduce the hassle. Increase what he likes: Be sexually available, be feminine etc. This is the game of retention for women. But just like game for men, no game is perfect. It's just maximises your chances. This game for women is made under the assumption that you have selected the right man for you in the first place. You don't want to retain the wrong man for sure.

🔥