Bobby_2021

Fr. NATO exists to provide military security to the European countries, in return for American getting to dictate their foreign policy. Europe doesn't have an independent foreign policy. If there were something like that we would be talking about it. All we hear is American foreign policy because that is the only relevant things here. If Europe had a military alliance on it's own independent of the US then things would have been a lot different. But they don't. Instead they took the deal with the devil.

Today is April 22. Putin said that he is open to negotiations from the West and Ukraine till May 21. May 21st is when Zelensky's term will end as president of the Ukraine. Russia will not recognise Zelensky after exactly one month from now. So his life is in real danger after May 21st. There is still one month remaining. Zelensky != Ukraine. He is delusional from all the promises they gave him back in feb 2022. Reality is going to hit him hard. Negotiations now. If you have any consideration for the lives of Ukrainian men.

I know what they are doing. But the west should stop using Ukrainian lives for their own interests. It's sadistic at this point. They really want every last Ukranian dead and Ukraine turning into a shithole rump state. Enough of this blood thirsty war. Russian military is stronger than ever. The sanctions has gotten Russia and China closer. America and it's love for wars. Smh.

lmao... Will they include any politically incorrect stuff? Like legitimate masculinity will be a little toxic, confrontational, competitive and direct. Will they teach that? Because that will not be egalitarian. Academia can only teach politically correct stuff. Survival has many politically incorrect stuff. Also the first question I will ask my teacher would be "What is a woman?" The answer would be enough to end the course.

Society hates masculine men who are unapologetically masculine. The only masculine figures left in the world are these sex traffickers and rapists. And no, not there aren't others who qualify as masculine, enough, at least in the public influenzer realm. So people like Trump and Tate provide an outlet for the pent up masculine energy. That is what enables there people to have a huge following on social media. It is not an accident. To put it simply, they are not masculine enough to inspire young men.

This point is often woefully missed even though they preach sensitivity and understanding themselves.

Still better than many out there. Twitter & Reddit have becomes a cesspool of hot shit lately. This forum is far better than all of that. And you need to keep your expectations low. This is as better as it can get. Average folks do not care about "the real shit". They just come here to argue and get a distraction from their lives or hang out for fun. Nothing wrong in that, but that also means Truth may not be the priority. yup.

Do not discuss this with your parents since they do not know what you are talking about and even you do not know the full extend to what all those means. Do not jump to conclusions. You are also learning like your parents. Do not argue with them and just live your life without causing much issues.

Funny how they went back the full circle to separating the boys and girls like they do in traditional catholic schools. And despite all this women still seek traditional career choices and have less women in stem than in the middle east or India. The more they try to suppress the traditional roles, the more you see them acting traditionally in the real world. This is why schools should give exposure to real world right in the schools itself, but in a controlled way. Kids will learn on their own with minimal help form adults. They just need to get out of their way.

Another aid package passed. They admit that this is not winning the war, but winning more time. The average age in the Ukraine army is 43. No man wants to be send to the border to fight. The morale is down. They are even surrendering in mass numbers. It is always people who do not want to fight that wants to drag on the war that you are going to lose anyway. I do not get the point. Do they want to spill more Ukrainian blood and give away even more negotiating power to Putin? Do they really want to give away even more land to Putin? What are they accomplishing with this?

Do you have any source that sheds light on how this takes place in practice? How does those boys even know what it means to be more sensitive? I heard they even make boys pee while sitting down and more buffoonery of the same sort. You do not become stronger because your teacher told you so lmao..

Then do not teach them. OR find those mature adults and then talk about this idealism. I am talking about practicality. In practice, it ends up being indoctrination. There is no point arguing in idealism. The Truth is that masculinity will arise organically as long as you do not suppress it. Let kids play out in the open. Let them be competitive and explore it for themselves. Schools should be giving them avenues for exploration & action. The schools are anti masculine the moment you cram boys into a class room and lecture them about cultural bullshit.

Teaching = indoctrination. Whether be it masculinity or femininity or non-binary. Kids are not mature enough to understand any of this. A 90 minute football match out in the sun will teach kids more about masculinity than cramming them up in a classroom and pumping this bullshit into their heads.

@Mesopotamian You need to have an agenda and also let life unfold. That is why you should have a flexible agenda that has enough room for life to unfold. These things are not mutually exclusive. Taking courses is kind of overrated though. The main characters are driven internally. They do not offload their thinking to courses or gurus. But you can take courses, without offloading your thinking to guru as well. But I get the point. Begin internally driven is necessary.

Man it's unreal that there are 1000+ lurkers on this site anytime. Leo is killing the SEO game fr fr.

Characters in novels do have agendas though.

Most people wouldn't even be arguing in the first place face to face. But for real though, I am a million times more articulate and clear in my thoughts after arguing with strangers here. It's a good stress test to refine your world view. This forum does a great job in filtering all the low quality stuff and keeping it organic so that conversation on this fourm are as close you can get to an informed real life discussion. But what's the chance that you will find such great minds in real life and also have their time and also not piss them off ? Atleast for now, you can refine your thought process if you are using it well.

But things will get better. They are imagining it in their mind that their life is shit and it becomes a self fulfilling prophesy. The idea that things will keep getting worse is an emotional decision, one that even the most intelligent people fall prey to. But that doesn't make it rational. That woman had a great life that many millions of people dream of having. She doesn't value it enough and her "psychiatrist" is too ignorant to treat her well. You think you are helping it, but you are legitimising taking life since you are depressed. Do you know how many people across the world are going to take their life due to depression, when they realize that depression is a legitimate reason to take their life. That's all what this is doing. Listen, I am a great proponent of euthanasia for people who are actually suffering. But this is not actual suffering. This is self inflicted suffering. Which a lot of people do and is not a legitimate reason to take your life.

Sex is a classification among organisms the came through evolution as a means to reproduce. Gender is the sex that pertains to an organisms of interest. Instead of calling " a male human" we call it "man". Man is the gender that pertains to the males of Homo sapiens. Women is the female of homo sapiens. Sex = { (male, female) } Gender = { (Man, Woman), (Cow , Bull), (stud, bitch), .......etc so on...... } Bitch is the female of dog species. Stud is what you call the male of dog species. Not that complicated. ------------- The pertinent question is, are dudes supposed to look a certain way? If a dude looks like a woman, that is a dude that looks like a woman. Still it's a dude. If a dude wears a skirt, that's a dude wearing a skirt. I don't understand the logical leap to "transwoman". If a dude wearing a skirt is supposed to be a woman, then you are making the flawed assumption that woman are supposed to look a certain way. Then you have to define a woman. It all boils down to: What is a woman? And by extension: What is a transwoman? This is the fundamental question that needs the answer. Don't give circular answers like "whoever identifies as a woman is a woman". The question is what is that person identifying as. Since the person is definitely identifying as something. What is the object of identification?

😂

Euthanasia for the sake of depression is crapshit. What a waste of life.

That doesn't invalidate the claim that NATO expansion was the reason for the invasion. Sure there could be irrelevant reason like "denazifying Ukraine" like Putin said. But countries don't go to war for the sake of denazifying. You need one good direct reason for wars. The rest is fluff. You don't even need 20 reasons for launching a full scale war.

What's so complicated about it? That gender and sex is the same? And that they are social constructions?

Taxes don't directly fund anything directly, but it does so in an indirect sense if you have a powerful autonomous Sovereign economy that can print it's own currency. The exact explanation is rather complicated which is why politicians gloss over this point.

@BlueOak Let's not pretend like I didn't prove with all the relevant sources to you that Nato encroachment was indeed the reason for the invasion. With a little more digging I now have even more sources to confirm the same. There is no point in discussion if you can't agree to this simple fact. It's so dead obvious.