Bobby_2021

Imagine if Britan or US referred to itself as a white nation and the land of whites, and viewed white settlements as a national value. It's literally etched in the constitution. That's what the jews do in Israel. It's not a legitimate perspective. Even I knew all this after the was started on oct 7. The media played a huge role in masking the true nature of Israel. They have the most propaganda and lies than that of any one else.

From the perspective of a 170 IQ person, society feels like a cage that meant to stifle the genius out of them. This is why they are prone to drug abuse or lash out at society as serial killers. Sort of like how hamas lashes out at Israel. I suppose this is plausible, but the interface for them to interact with human problems has to be set up. There are many barriers which prevent them from empathising with human problems. But of course it's possible. They need lots of additional help in facilitating that.

The ICJ played it safe. It's didn't explicitly support either side. But at the same time, it gave an impression that genocide may happen. Which is what the media reported. Normally, a court ruling should be clear that you should need to explain it later. Courts should give out clear rulings. What does: "right to be protected from genocide" even mean? It doesn't mean anything more than what it says. Is it similar to "genocide couldn't be ruled out" ? I don't like Judges coming on TV to explain their decisions. They should explain it clearly at the time or ruling. Else people will misinterpret everything.

Of course it would happen. Society is not made for people with such high IQs. He needs special care and attention. Only then can his genius thrive. Sometimes it's a curse to see more things that what you are supposed to.

This makes a lot of sense. Reminds me of how a physics prodigy, Jacob Barnett ( probably 160 IQ) told how he can do complex mathematics and think in higher dimension with a few circles and lines. I tried to think about mathematics in shapes, it's not that hard as you think. It's makes mathematics ridiculously simple. If a few lines can explain whole of mathematics, then imagine what a hyper mind can do.

During the cuban missile crisis of the 60s the entire world knew that we were in the brink of a nuclear war. So both sides US and USSR acknowledged the serious to the matter, sat down and talked it out. Right now we are again close to a similar situation but our leaders are delusional and not even willing to sit down for talks, and even worse keep blocking peace deals. If they recognised the problem, then they could rectify it. That's what makes it so dangerous in my opinion, is that not enough people know how bad it is. The leaders right now are among the most idiotic and arrogant. They don't even acknowledge a problem. They still think Ukraine is still winning since they haven't gotten over the propaganda fed to them from early 2022.

@Leo Gura The world was far more peaceful during 2009-19 than during the last 4 years. Africa is in a crisis. There are missiles facing Europe and Russia. China might invade Taiwan, Iran might block the shipping in red sea. Defence spending is on rise all across the world. I bet they are not buying weapons en mass for "peaceful purposes". It's usually calm before a storm.

The world isn't coming to an end. But people live as if they have no freking clue of how bad things are. We are closer to a nuclear war than we have ever been. It makes me depressed how bad things are. So it makes sense how most people don't care to enlighten themselves on what's going on. The problem we face now is of our own ignorance and arrogance, and not the one from a formidable enemy. The delusional attitude of western leaders is beyond insanity. There is no way out for the moment.

People act like Putin doesn't know what he is doing. This is far from true. He went into the special military operation with specific targets. 1. Denazify Ukraine. 2. Demiltarize Ukraine. 3. Prevent NATO expansion into Ukraine. He has or is exceedingly close to meeting all these objectives. How many wars that US fought has met all the objectives they outlined? They even got their ass handed to them by the taliban, making them stronger than they were. These western leaders think they are more powerful than they are and that they can win a war with Putin. Putin himself has never expressed any intention for war, but God forbid if they are poking him, he will have no option but to retaliate. May God be kind enough to bring them back to their senses.

Piers want that professor to join him in his immature name calling exercise so that he can affirm his cartoonish worldview that Putin is an evil fascist dictator. That's what piers is expecting from him and he didn't submit to this childishness. Because why would you do peace deals with an unreasonable dictator. Westers leaders want to keep up this uninformed narrative so that they can block peace deals, like they did many times and use the people of Ukraine can fodder for Putin's meat grinder machine. This is sadistic and purposeless. This is the same vibes as "I don't negotiate with terrorists" because they are terrorists, because I branded them terrorists. What matters now is to get Ukraine and the NATO into a collective settlement as soon as possible. The more you wait the more power goes to Putin.

Free College would be a start.

Words you are not supposed to use as a NYT journalist. https://theintercept.com/2024/04/15/nyt-israel-gaza-genocide-palestine-coverage/ Most news media are propaganda sources to feed you with the information they want you to think.

Sometimes I forget to comprehend how many people in the west are fooled by the cartoonish image of Putin. Seriously out of touch with reality. God save them from trouble.

Piers is a complete idiot. Look how he behaves like a child.

Harmful liberal policy: Sending hundreds billions money abroad to God knows where only to create more wars and give assistance to genocides ,while exacerbating inequality within their own borders. https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-mike-johnson-ukraine-israel-b72aed9b195818735d24363f2bc34ea4?utm_source=copy&utm_medium=share All this money could have been used for social programs closer to home, which would be a more conservative approach. Republican tried to block the aid, but couldn't succeed.

@Chadders The answer is not necessarily, but not restricted to, raising taxes. You can raise taxes. But even more creative thing would be to create a shit ton of housing complexes that the prices of those second homes start to plummet. That would be enough of a disincentive to not hold onto housing as some speculative investment. ----------- Whya reality drives up the inequality is government contracts. Just in a day nearly 100B was given in aid to Ukraine, Taiwan and Israel. It's not money send to these countries. That 100B goes to the bank accounts of executives of Lockheed Martin and other manufacturers within the US itself. They richest people got richer by 100B by adding no real value to the economy or no hope of any future returns. Americans are scammed from the inside out.

By drawing out patterns and drawing implications. You may have to wait 70 years for them to declassify the documents to get the proof.

Don't complicate it. 1. IQ is genetic 2. IQ disparities between individuals are also genetic. This is all that I need from the article. That's something the article aggrees with me because there is proof for it. The rest of my arguments logically follows from these two proven statements. I don't expect a mainstream source to ever claim it explicitly otherwise for obvious reasons. They literally contradicted themselves in that article. Both can't be true. I am not explicitly stating it since it's a taboo topic. Even after accepting your claim that the article disagreed with me, I don't care about it since it's not PROOF. There is no proof for the article claiming that racial IQ disparities was not genetics. So it's merely a claim. The authors are free to make claims. Your claim was that it disproven me. Which is clearly false. If I make a claim that vax is ineffective and a study proves it, the "experts" can still claim within the same source that the vaccine is effective as per the consensus in the scientific community. Which is what happened in the wiki article I quoted. Self contradiction. Who cares about consensus or disagreements. Just look at the part that there is proof. Rest is commentary and nonsense.

There was a cia led coup in Ukraine which ousted Viktor Yanukovych. I don't have proof for it. But it's true. It's also true, that the security of Israel was particularly low during oct 7 which is fishy. There could be claims made with this context that might be true, but there isn't enough proof to support it.

That's the problem with using the source. Just because I link a 100 page document as a source doesn't mean I agree with every minute that's said in that source. There may be mistakes in that source. Just because there is a mistake in that source doesn't also invalidate the relevant parts of that source. These are all complexities that can derail the Also there is nothing to "disprove" my claims about racial IQ disparities. It merely states the scientific consensus, which is not proof. My claim was that IQ is genetic if I remember correctly. That also follows that racial IQ disparities are also genetic. The article is contradicting itself. That's a mistake in my source. Because it's common sense that IQ disparities in individuals are genetic. When it's individuals from different ethnicities it suddenly doesn't make it not genetics. Afterall groups are merely individuals. You are right in the sense that my source is wrong, but not entirely. Use common sense when it's valid. I can defend it with common sense and reason with possibilities. But proof not existing is not proof of non existence. Which is a common fallacy among proof askers. You made that same fallacy in the picture you linked. Nothing is being disproven right there. There was a logical fallacy in my source. Something being true doesn't need proof to make it true. Incompleteness theorem literally proves this. I agree that there is some liberalism to them. But they are not true liberals.

It's really telling of the times when Hasan Piker of all is making the most sense in a talk. That woman was funny. 😂😂

I don't listen to destiny. But if he is supporting Israel, as someone said in this thread, that is enough to make him disingenuous especially since he is purporting himself to be some staunch liberal. Liberal will not support Israel. Anyone doing so isn't a liberal.

The problem with using proof is that it's a burden. One that no one wants to take. No one changes their mind over a proof. No one even takes rhe effort to go through the proof even if it's provided. Proof takes a lot of work from both sides. If you are not willing to put in that work, then don't make it all about proofs.

😂😂😂 Fr.

Nope. Everybody would have already kill themselves already. If something is good, I want it, and no one should be denied of it. But the trick is to find what is good and what is not. Giving away power over your own destiny is usually not good. Because now is the only time when you have any capacity to change things the way you want.