Bobby_2021

That's understandable. It's quite bold of you to explain that video. But please don't hold off any other radical observations from the insights you may have. Is deconstructing the idea of others the Highest awakening has got you? Because I always kind of knew this to be honest. I don't even find it too surprising in theory, although in practice it's different. Anymore higher insights than this? PM if you have anything of higher order.???

So is Sadhguru wrong in saying Enlightenment breaks the cycle of life and death? Because that goes against the infinite imagination of reality?

Breaking the cycle means you stop imagining the cycle of life and death. Consciousness keeps on imagining forms one after the other. It imagines duck, monkey etc. Enlightenment puts a stop to that and you become absolute infinity. But you were already absolute infinity before you imagined to be a human. So even after you are enlightened, you can go back to being a human, I guess.

Yes, you were awoke, before you went to sleep (by imagining finite forms). So why can't it happen again? You awaken and again go back to the business of creating finite forms. You imagine up a form. And then you do spiritual practices to attain enlightenment to realise that your were constructing all these forms all along. So technically Sadhguru says you can break the cycle of creating forms and destroying them. (Imagining forms and their death) You could never break the cycle I guess. Is it the case that once you attain enlightenment, you are always awoke forever? Sadhguru says you can break the cycle, which means you will be in infinite bliss forever without being attached to a form. But if reality is infinite imagination there is no reason why you shouldn't be imagining more forms. (Even after you have awoken) In summary: According to Sadhguru: Enlightenment totally breaks life and death cycle and you never go back to imagining forms again. You are awoke forever. But then before you imagined your birth, you were awoke. You decided to take up a human form. (Awoke-> sleep) What I am asking is that why can't the same process repeat again, once you attain enlightenment? Why can't you go back to sleep. So is Sg wrong, because it defeats the purpose of enlightenment? Else reality isn't infinite imagination. Because awoke forever, means you can no longer imagine finite forms(ie never sleep again).

I am going through the same problem. My fathers behaviour drives me nuts. I end all my frustrations in the gym. Strategically plan to move out.

Do NOT watch porn. It will change the structure of your Brain in negative ways. Just watch naked women at best. Do NOT watch other men fuck women. Watch any other sexual Material. Use your own creativity & imagination. Humanity jerked off to his imaginations for millions of years. Continue it.

Strongly agree.

This is a good idea. I don't even have your patron. But it's fair.

Why is it that all of us not get to watch the video only because of a few people misunderstanding it? It will be a long time before I get access to psychedelics, because of the circumstances I am in. Till then, your videos were my only source to higher teachings I can trust.? I will highly appreciate it, if you could let atleast a few people have a limited access. No more solipsism. I understand the pressure you have to teach this. But please do share your deep awakenings on other aspects. Plus: Are you sure that even I can experience the same insights as you do if I do 200 trips on psychedelics?

I don't claim to be spiritually gifted or something...but it did make a lot of sense even as I never used psychedelics to be honest. The idea that other people exist is literally something you borrowed from society. Simple not give into it, and what remains is you. It was not so simple. But I needed so much contemplation and the analogy of dreams to make sense of it. In dreams I can imagine multiple beings none of which actually exist. It's just one person dreaming up everything. But in future I will try psychedelics to cement this experience.

I like how you give zero fucks to the people struggling to understand this.?

"Do other people exist?" It's just like when I am dreaming being chased by a lion, I am the person running and I am the lion being imagined chasing me. I think this is the only reasonable way of thinking that could satisfy an intellectual mind.

?

There are many of my Indian friends who say that you can practice semen retention or no fap only when combined with the apt spiritual practices. Else all your energy is exhausted on controlling your hand from not touching dick. So do sadhanas or whatever if you are doing no fap. Else jerk off.

?

Why do game works even when she knows you are using it on her?

Not bad for DONALD TRUMP. But that's not a license to force people to take the jab and silence those discussions. Censorship isn't bad. But the wokes are taking it too far. Vaccine also has a individual/personal side to it which is ignored. Not all individuals like to inject their bodies. You have to respect that. Else face the backlash. Freedom is very personal to people.

Agree. It's borderline darkweb, but filled with teenagers.

Why so much difference in reply for the same thing with different genders. These things work both ways. P.S I would state these things prior to the relationship. She is free to refuse. My first gf(ex now) said she would completely agree to my terms to not have too much time spending with dudes who may want to fuck her if they had the chance. She is a fine woman. I don't want to have women that would give me headache. I would find such girls who are fine with my terms. Ok..? This is nothing to get triggered about.

I just can't accept my gf ever going out with male friends. Big no. So I look for introverted shy feminine girls in the first place. Accept that your feelings are legitimate and talk to him about it. Afterall everything is an arbitrary boundary. Everyone must discuss together what boundaries are acceptable. There are people who are even ok with sexual relations with other people outside of a relationship. It's a reality that you can't accept it. Better not do patchwork and later regret about it. And again depending on how old you are, I don't think you can outgrow, and simply accept him. This is not within the reach of most people. It's easy to convince yourself that you can while you really can't. Get Reality to change for you, instead of halfheartedly accepting it. Or visualise him going out and chatting (as friends) with the hottest girls and try to see if you can accept it.

? Do not participate in a stage green debate. Just watch. People discrediting others based on skin colour, instead of listening what they have to say... Everything is contextual... How to fix the context is itself is contextual...No one wins..and everyone is a victim/oppressor or can't speak. I have already secured the video. I don't want to lose it.?

Can confirm. Spend the last two years in isolation, never felt lonely. Only better, since I can do enlightened work much more effectively.

@mememe I don't think I can change it.?

Infact people who are logical and analytical need to put a lot of work into offloading those capabilities to your instincts and feelings. The greatest masters never logical think their next move. They often feel.

My explanation: Feminine is collective oriented. The purpose of a collective itself is to distort reality. If you lived as an individual, reality can easily crush your fantasies, versus being in a group. The ultimate truth, non-duality cannot be realised while you are part of a group. On the other hand non duality is in sync perfectly with individual frame. Because you certainly exists. Individualism need not acknowledge other individuals. But collective certainty need to acknowledge other individuals. "Others" is a self-delusion. Feminine is physically/intellectually/emotionally weaker and gentler than the masculine. The top 1% is almost all human endeavors business, science, sports etc are all dominated by males including intellectual sports like chess or shogi. Because men,*on average* value truth and are willing to work towards it. [ The people who value truth are going to be men. Not that the average dude on the internet is truthful. ] So the masculine is more in tune with the relativistic truths associated with life which are harsh and painstaking. Weaker beings need protection from reality & truth. Women obsessively indulge in makeup to distort the reality around them. Men won't allow such behaviour, atleast among other men. Men confront other men directly. Self censoring to protect 1% of people wouldn't really be in line with truthful behaviour. Instead the 1% should just be more strong in accepting reality. A huge backlash is inevitable if you artificially manipulate the flow of information. (Misinformation and ad hominems must be censored, but censoring scientific findings is stupid.) Reaching truth needs direct confrontation. Raw reality is utter chaos. And it favours the masculine which can induce order into it. ( You need order to survive in chaos.) And within the protection of the masculine, the feminine gentleness grows. Finally, the feminine values being while the masculine values doing. Men feel the need to go somewhere else, while the woman is comfortable being where she already is. This could be a boon or bane. While being is more inline with truth, you need to do certain things to be in your true being state. Because the default position that human find themselves in isn't truth. So you really need to actively do something to reach truth, which men are better at doing, on average. These are my interpretations, and I am not up for a debate. I want to read other well explained interpretations as well.