TreyMoney
Member-
Content count
99 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by TreyMoney
-
Why are we even here? We are here to experience. Everything is an experience. Some experiences are pleasant, some are unpleasant, some of neutral. Everyone is playing their parts, acting in accordance with their characters, wearing their personas, believing they actually are who they are pretending to be. Its cute really. But i understand sometimes it can be nauseating to be the only one on stage who knows its make believe.
-
Be Your Own Therapist, Teacher, Guru, Priest, Shaman, Parent. You are all you truly need.
-
Should you judge people on appearance? Yes, relative to the situation. If some goes to a job interview dressed for a football game, or wears a tuxedo to the gym, judge them. They are not playing by the social rules for the persona interactions. Fat people are not fat. Fat people have excess body fat. People are not drug addicts. People have drug addictions. This difference between "people are" vs "people have" is massively important.
-
Lol never introduce a woman to someone more alpha than you unless you want her to branch swing up to him.
-
Ive listened to the Ultimate Guide to Happiness episode now 3 times. It is honestly my favorite video in years. I don't know why it never occurred to me before to simply write down the things that make me happy, unhappy, or what i think will make me happy but doesn't. Very happy this episode was released. Im gonna write that down.
-
Looking for good quality red pill podcasts / youtube channels? Thanks
-
This is why forums are so annoying.
-
TreyMoney replied to Thought Art's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Spiritual Autolysis in action! @Thought Art Keep going until you find satisfactory answers to all your questions. Peel that onion layer by layer. You know youre done searching when you have no more questions. -
TreyMoney replied to Loveeee's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Nilsi meant on YouTube. I like UG Krishnamurti. Ramana Maharahi is my guy. -
TreyMoney replied to Loveeee's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Great thread, i too sometimes find myself looking for other speakers, but i find myself just re-listening to Actualized. Seriously no one is on Leo's level when it comes to quality of material, quantity of material, directness of method, or ability to deconstruct and explain -
Recommended asking yourself what ego is.
-
TreyMoney replied to TreyMoney's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
This is God That is God I am God You are God He is God She is God We are God God is God -
The AEIOU is God The Absolute The Eternal The Infinite The One-True The Universal See the 99 Names of God episode for more on this topic.
-
TreyMoney replied to DavyTee's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Thats it right there. Being happy vs not being happy is a duality. The lower self "you" aka can never be truly happy, unconditionally happy, because its happiness in conditional on having its needs, wants, desires fulfilled. When the lower self "you" tames the fire breathing dragon of desire, want and need, the lower self is transcended. Then conditional happiness is seen for the illusion/duality it is, and what remains is unconditional Happiness w capital H or Peace w capital P, or Acceptance, or Love of What Is. -
TreyMoney replied to DavyTee's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Nonduality is not about happiness or peace. Nonduality is about Truth. The truth shall set you free, but it wont make you happy. Happiness and peace are emotions experienced by the self. self, happiness and peace only exist within duality. After happiness comes sadness, then happiness comes again. After peace comes war, then peace comes again. The best thing to do is to minimize your suffering, such that any future disturbances to your inner peace are mere scuffles, rather than full blown wars. I recommend studying the 4 nobles truths, eightfold path, and the 3 characteristics of Buddhism in addition to Non-Dualism to help bridge the gap. -
There is only one true lasting cure for porn addiction or any other form of sexual compulsive behaviour: committed persistence. You must commit to changing your relationship with sexual actvities and then persist until you are in control of your sexual energy rather than your sexual energy being in control of you. I have struggled/suffered / still am struggling/suffering from this, and all I can say is dont give up. BYOT - Be your own therapist. No one will care about your recovery more than you. I did therapy for 4 years and it helped, but "it" didnt "cure" me, because I was not ready / mature enough to be cured. Only you can cure yourself when you are ready to quit / had enough suffering. Read, read, read BOOKS (not articles or forums) about addiction, recovery, sexual trauma, sexual compulsion, etc. I have personally drawn strength from Buddhism. Create a sexual recovery plan listing which behaviours are acceptable for you to engage in, and which behaviours you deem unacceptable for you to engage in. Keep a CBT journal using the ABC method (Activator/Trigger, Behaviour, Consequences) whenever you experience urges to engage in or actually engage in detrimental sexual behaviour. Be mindful of when you slip into "lower self" behaviours and try to shift your consciousness back to "higher self" awareness. Improve other areas of your life (nutrition, exercise, sleep, environment, work, stress, etc) Remember that "you" are infinitely greater than your sexual behaviours, your sexual thoughts, or your mind.
-
What city doesnt let solo guys into clubs?
-
I am very much looking forward to Parts 2 and 3 of this series. In fact, I would be very interesting in paying for a full course on this material if Leo decided to produce such a course. I am also very pleased that Leo has circled back to this material and is offering a "higher self" perspective / approach to dating/pickup/approach. Other dating e-books, products, etc always seemed sleazy to me (Mystery Method, RSD's Tyler Durden for example). I really enjoyed / had success with David DeAngelo's / Dr. Paul's products, most likely again because of their intellectual, "high-level" view of the dating/mating game. Funny enough, anyone even remotely interested in this topic has heard of Neil Strauss' book The Game, but I wonder how many people have heard of or read his book The Truth about the sexual addiction issues he struggled with after he experienced success with women and dating. For all of these reasons, I am very happy that Leo is putting this material out into the universe and may it benefit all those who encounter it.
-
Thanks for the response! Greatly appreciated!
-
Hello, I have a question re the life purpose course. I was getting ready to purchase but at the very end saw "You are buying a streamed digital product. Internet connection required to watch." Does this mean we are not able to download the video/audio content to mp4 or mp3 format, and as such it is more a one-time fee subscription for access to the videos? Just want to understand before I pull trigger and buy. Thanks
-
TreyMoney replied to Terell Kirby's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Terell Kirby ignore what Leo said. Leo is not god, despite what he says, he is just a perception, like all things you perceive in your universe of consciousness. Your question is a legitimate question that is asked on the path and in life: what is the point? why am I doing this? why do anything? etc. all these questions are legit questions. I started a thread a back in May called enlightenment is pointlessness. In it I recommended that people not chase enlightenment unless they had a burning desire to find the bedrock / foundation of existence, because what you find at the end of the journey because what you discover is that "nothing" is the foundation of existence. And a point, whether a geometric point or a philosophical point/intention/purpose, is something. Spiritual enlightenment is a very specific thing: it is the realization of the true nature of self and being/existence. And the true nature of self and being/existence is Nothing. Then you realization that the true nature of all existence is Nothing. And if the true nature of everything is nothing, then true nature of everything is the same as the true nature of everything else. This realization alone, may or may not reduce suffering, may or may not make you a more compassionate person, may or may not make you a more mystical, spiritual person. It depends on what you decide to do after realization. In words attributed to the Buddha: "Truly, I have gained nothing from enlightenment." -
TreyMoney replied to RMQualtrough's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
There are actually two types of solipsism: Metaphysical Solipsism and Epistemological Solipsism. Epistemological Solipsism is a knowledge claim: only the mind can be known to exist with absolute certainty, but this position leaves open the possibly that physical reality exists, but the existence of physical reality cannot be known to exist for certain. Metaphysical Solipsism is a reality claim: the mind is in fact the only thing that actually exists, and physical reality does not, in fact, exist. Epistemological Solipsism can be proven with introspection, autolysis, axiom regression. It is not a scientific claim. It is not falsifiable. Metaphysical Solipsism, like any scientific claim, can not be proven, but it can be disproven. It is falsifiable. -
TreyMoney replied to iboughtleosbooklist's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
well done @iboughtleosbooklist -
TreyMoney replied to Adodd's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Leo's video Brains Do Not Exist is great for this. -
TreyMoney replied to Adodd's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Your question "who's sense perception" assumes that sense-perception is a subset of who. The question assumes there has to be a who that is a perceiver. But its actually the opposite. The self that is the who is itself a sense-perception. All things, including the self / the who, are sense perceptions. I am a perception, you are perception. All who's are perceptions. I am not conscious. Consciousness is conscious of me.