Zedman

Thanks guys, NOW I WANT IT EVEN HARDER Can you release it somewhere safe where muggles cant reach?

Where would Abbie Richards place ''Reality is imagined'' on this list if she knew about actualized.org?

Will I relive this life EXACTLY the same way at some point? Theoretical knowledge is have so far tells me god wouldn't do that. But if this is true it has some scary implications. I also have a feeling this question itself is flawed because answer cant be communicated and must be experienced in godhead mode.

@Terell Kirby @TheAvatarState @Gianna That is what I have suspected. However, will god be interested in reliving the same life just to have waffles instead of a yogurt for breakfast on day x without changing anything else? @Nahm @LastThursday When you get deeper into this topic it does really seem strange to even ask such questions. Will becoming godhead (which I am always delaying) help to understand this?

There must be sub-categories of corruption. Quantitatively 2nd and 3rd world countries would take the lead but in terms of quality I strongly believe US is number 1.

@Danioover9000 I think it does and it doesn't take much. Descending from spiritual path and returning to degeneracy is like a rolling snowball on the roof. Its a self sustaining process and high toxicity boosts it greatly. I wouldn't worry about it on a global level. Spirituality will not go extinct It is also demoralizing to know you cant afford to detox or do anything about it and then it turns into self limiting belief. Here is one more:

Wanted to start my own thread on this issue but I guess here is fine. How to deal with self fulfilling prophecy paranoia while overcoming your fears? When I am facing my fears and accepting and loving the 'worst' outcome it feels in that moment as if I am letting it happen. As if I am asking for trouble. Level 1 example would be my fear of flying. When I am trying to accept the possibility of a crash and just be ok with it. More advanced example is when during psychodelic meditation. In the moment of complete peace a sneaky though comes in that someone might break into my house and that I should be alert. Instead of trying to ignore this thought I am inviting it and trying to accept it and face this fear but then self fulfilling prophecy paranoia comes in. So there are 2 possible solutions. Either I am not facing my fears in a proper way or I dont really understand how self fulfilling prophecy works. This really halts my progress every time. Can I safely Imagine worst outcomes in vivid fashion without wishing for them?

It is clear OP is just looking for reasons to bite. Context matters. This particular instance wasn't racist.

From my experience its an endless cycle. You develop a technique to start doing stuff but then you dont feel like doing the technique. So now to start doing stuff you need a technique to start using the first technique. The ego is truly amazing.

May be. My take is that if you get punched in the head you get less conscious because your brain sustains damage. Same way it sustains damage from toxicity. While discussing this we are fully immersed in the human experience where we imagine brain as ''real''. Metaphysical stuff here will be of little help i think.

Trans fats. Regulators around the world are limiting its use but it also not going anywhere anytime soon: Even Alex Jones gay frog theory has a merit. Well researched. Also exposes how institutions will suppress any bad press:

Phthalates (plastic) and its effects:

In regards to vaccination how am I supposed to trust very same institutions that put 4 mercury power plants in my mouth? And it doesn't end with heavy metals. Phthalate contamination is also a massive issue, impacting your body development since inception, try to detox from this one. But you see we can explain it away with ''groupthink''. Except when you doubt vaccine safety, thats a ''conspiracy theory''. I understand that heavy metal toxicity is swept under the rug due to tricky variables like reliable testing methods, natural resistance rates, invisible buildup, lack of immediate symptoms and so on. But doesn't it apply t a recently invented genetic technology? There must be a million times more variables.

From what I gathered peoples dreams are wildly different. Some have realistic some have vague dreams. Some have simple linear dreams, I have rich dreams with overarching plotlines and characters have complex emotions. Some people claim they are aware that they are in the dream every time. So its hard to pinpoint the differences. Only you can do that from your own experience. If you are referring to ''life is a dream'' Truth then from what I understand you need godhead experience to get it.

@BlackMaze @BlackPhil Pathetic level of reasoning and emotional mastery. Namecalling, open ended arguments, dismissiveness and ridicule. Are you trying to figure things out or shut down the discussion? Although people on the other side are no better. Fully consumed by their position (as in the video). Is there no compromise? Is there no interest in coming together and addressing each others concerns?

I remember those very well from my time with psychedelics. What I used to do is immediately use distraction. Remember its the best egos defense mechanism. Later when I was more familiar with those states I could start inviting, facing and even studying them. Theoretical foundation on spirituality helps a lot. Fear is mostly caused by things you dont understand and panic comes when you dont know whats going on.

@BadHippie Lets get less triggered. Helps nobody. If you did some self work, now is time to use it. My rebellion has caused me grave losses but its ok. I think in previous exchange we came little closer to the root issue. Its definitely not about research, data, books, numbers or facts. Its core life philosophy. And when I tried to explore arguments like ''lives are at stake'', ''survival trumps freedoms'' I understood there is no answer. When push comes to shove both sides will probably die by their interpretations. I guess in a separate thread it is worth exploring philosophy of this. What are we trying to get here 1)Toxicity issue shows serious flaws in institutions that are responsible for our health 2)Same issues apply to current vaccine research, production and aspects of distribution 3)Vaccine safety research may be less flawed due to methodology (as explained by TheAlchemist) Implications: 1)We have to put our trust in bad faith because situation is too serious and lives are at stake 2)Philosophical issues surrounding this are not brought up and addressed

@Leo Gura Absolutely agree. There are flaws in systems and individuals we cannot currently ''fix'' because of that our trust comes with a grain of salt and usually we can choose not to trust and call for investigation. Or flat out reject a certain institution and it loses power like church. When we relate this wisdom to heath mandates it still doesnt blend in my mind. There must be an informed choice. For example I wish I was informed on mercury in my fillings and given a choice. Now I am in a spot where I cant afford to remove them. I feel vax mandates rob you of that choice and force you to trust they are right. But how do you force trust?

@TheAlchemist Thanks for kind words despite my rant. Crazy thing is that we will be forced into this before these concerns are adressed.

@TheAlchemist Thank you for showing differences in methodology. But I don't think problem with toxicity is because its hard to study. The problem is zealosly ignoring the issue. Just a couple hours ago I made an innocent inquiry to my dentist about mercury content. First I was given ''the look'' then I was firmly assured there is absolutely no adverse health effects because of the ''mixture'' with silver. If I was to argue this I am sure I would have been slapped with ''official'' safe levels and some institutionally approved study. They would dismiss this as a conspiracy. And this is exactly what I am trying to highlight. 1)Be cautious with seemingly ''easy and simple'' vaccine research. Its far from that. And there is plenty of gray area for deniability. 2)It suffers from the same groupthink and corruption problems as toxicity research even though methodology differ 3)You cannot dismiss vaccine concerns and Ivermectin research for example as illegitimate and conspiracy tier. If you do that you can as well dismiss toxicity concerns the same way. Are these not valid concerns or am I just rambling in bias?

I see politics as a game for power. Policies and reforms are only a justification for that game. Real change happens culturally. Real change happens when me and you communicate like we do right now. I would even attempt an edgy argument that Leo made more positive impact on the world than any individual politician because that is his goal. The goal of the politician on the other hand is power. And even if you get into politics with good intentions you still have to deal with the power play or you are out.

Better tell me how god doesn't end up in dead end loops thus ending absolute infinity? Say after death you decide to forget everything and relive the same life but because you forgot that you will do it again and again. In fact there is infinite such scenarios. Is it because I am thinking linearly? But if its not linear then there is something happening outside my current consciousness which contradicts the point that there cannot be anything outside consciousness.

Been there too. Keep exploring this state. In retrospect I can see that as an essential experience. Don't let it go to waste.

Nice confession. I just dont see how spirituality is being used here. You are just using emotions, same as everyone. I would even say its normal at this point. Some examples I would consider to be spiritual weapons: 1)Applying theoretical absolute perspective to win arguments and gaslight people 2)Deriving bravery or cold-heartedness from spiritual understanding 3)Gaining authority and power from teaching and showing This leads me to question is it OK to use this in order to make the world more conscious? Is it possible to get to Truth through lies?

Current virus situation is good example. harshly regulating daily lives of the entire world in order to prevent average life span from going down by 1 year. I would call regulation ''too much'' when it is disproportionate to the problem it tackles.