thisintegrated

D-Did you just call our Messiah a liar!!!

Yes, of course, but that's still not the same as omniscience. Omniscience is more than self-realization. It's knowing every single thing within the game. Every useless fact. I thought that's what he meant. But again that's not omniscience. I've had many "expanded awareness" experiences with euphoria, bliss, sudden big realizations, sudden understanding of concepts, but I never knew every fact about life, so I could never claim to have experienced omniscience. @Leo Gura is there a more accurate word, or do you really mean "knowing everything there is to know in existence, including everything outside your own direct experience / perspective"? I may not be within Leo's experience right now, but if I flew to his house tomorrow, the information about me right now would have a direct impact on Leo's experience tomorrow. Information about me right now would be processed within Leo's reality, even though I'm not real to him. If I was planning to do something bad to him, and I'm on the road travelling to his house, even though I'm not in his experience, the facts surrounding my actions are within his experience, and will have real consequences.

As Leo is busy, anyone else know what he means by omniscience?

Can you explain how omniscience works when you, seemingly, don't know everything? You don't know me, or know what I'm wearing, so how is that omniscience? I'm not saying you're wrong, I genuinely want to understand your perspective. Maybe from your perspective, only your direct experience is the whole universe? But that's still not an explanation.

Yes, but surely not everyone has equal capabilities. I may wake up, yet still lack some of the capabilities of Einstein, for example, right? He may not have been awake, but he had greater awareness in many areas. You may be awake, but you still lack omniscience, psychic powers, etc. How can this be? How can there be those who are less aware than you, yet can do things you cannot? Those who can think many times faster and process a greater bandwidth of data?

Haha, yes, but that's not who I had in mind. A question: Do you believe in aliens?

The benefits of semen retention are debatable. The people you mention are nowhere near the level of the person I have in mind. Calling him Turquoise, maybe even Coral, would be an insult.

Not at all. It's always good to have someone you can learn from / be inspired by. This is not even remotely egoistic. At these levels that's not even possible.

LOL

The content of this new course is actually the exact thing I'm working on right now. I don't want to miss out in case it's something completely new to me.

So I know @Leo Gura wants to charge ~$1000 for his new course, but will the same ideas be available/present in free videos? I understand the need to raise the barrier for entry, but there must be better ways to filter out those for whom this content will be harmful. Moreover, this disproportionately affects people who are not Americans or didn't prioritize money in their career. Many stage Orange Americans won't have a problem with the price, while many Greens/Yellows in poorer countries will struggle. I don't think this is the best approach.

Imagine if suddenly there was a competitor to Apple and Android phones, and it was better and cheaper in every way. Wouldn't matter, as there are too many apps and refinements already made to the Apple and Android ecosystems. The smarter thing for a competitor to do would be to try to become part of either one, and work to make the existing stuff better. MBTI is Apple, Socionics is Android, and Big 5 is something no one's ever heard of, and never will, no matter how much money you pumped into the Big 5. Time and effort would be better spent working for MBTI, and making the thing that everyone already uses better. It's a mistake putting resources into reinventing the wheel. Even if you learn Big 5 or something obscure at university, you'll still end up using MBTI at home, and that's what you'll end up mastering without trying. Learning Big 5 is just a pointless uphill struggle.

It's unusable in casual conversation. That's why it never took off, and never will, and is a failure. MBTI doesn't consider any types to be better than others. There are no "other theories". We've already covered basically all of them. If universities had some sort of "secret super-cognitive-models", we'd know about them. There's just MBTI, and a few others psychology nerds like to research for entertainment.

lmao, my favorite crackhead is back!

Why would you listen to this idiot?

Big 5 is decent, but flawed. I mean, no one can even decide how to actually use it in conversation. You get stuff like this?? https://imgur.com/a/dTqV0Aa Very few people are gonna casually make a list like this when introducing themselves. And I've never heard anyone say e.g. "I'm an ocean", though you do hear "I'm an ENTP" all the time. I think Big 5 would be on par with MBTI if it was more "usable". But they should both be taught in psychology classes.

Name a better alternative that they teach in psychology class.

Although controversial, CS Joseph is probably the best MBTI YouTuber. You can also learn Socionics for an alternate perspective.

What happened to the forum-boyfriend you had?

What? I was complimenting you. Jeez.

I think, therefore I am

Itachi is 100% serious.

Respect for spelling it noone. People say "iT lOoKs LiKe NoOn!!", but I think it's the future. Carry on..

I don't think anyone is denying the existence of the placebo phenomenon. He's right, Itachi.

I was in disbelief that Itachi would actually believe this stuff, but my worst fears have been confirmed. So yeah, this should be locked up. I guess we can shitpost here until Leo comes back, lol.